10.57647/jelpp.2025.1802.16

The Impact of Dynamic Assessment on Iraqi EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Engagement: The Mediating Role of Critical Thinking Principles

PDF
  • Diwan Hussein Wadi Wadi1,
  • Marzieh Sharifi Haratmeh*2,
  • Abbas Lutfi Hussein Baqqal3,
  • Ehsan Rezvani1,
  1. Department of English, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
  2. Department of English, Mo.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
  3. Department of English, College of Arts, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq

Received: 2024-04-23

Accepted: 2025-09-21

Published in Issue 2025-12-31

Copyright (c) 2026 Diwan Hussein Wadi Wadi, Marzieh Sharifi Haratmeh, Abbas Lutfi Hussein Baqqal, Ehsan Rezvani (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Wadi, D. H. W., Sharifi Haratmeh, M., Baqqal, A. L. H., & Rezvani, E. (2025). The Impact of Dynamic Assessment on Iraqi EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Engagement: The Mediating Role of Critical Thinking Principles. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/jelpp.2025.1802.16
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 13

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of dynamic assessment (DA) on Iraqi EFL learners' reading comprehension (RC) and engagement, with a focus on critical thinking (CT). Based on sociocultural theory and Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), this mixed-methods study examines the impact of formative assessment combined with direct CT instruction on students’ academic reading performance. Ninety Iraqi EFL learners were placed in two experimental groups of DAG and CT-DAG, and a control group (CG). The quantitative data was obtained through the OQPT, CTQ, EQ, and RC tests while the qualitative data was obtained via interviews. The statistical analyses showed considerable improvement in the learners’ RC and interest in the experimental groups with CT-DAG performing better than DAG on reading comprehension.  The results support the fact that combining DA with CT benefits EFL learners by enhancing metacognitive knowledge and comprehension. The qualitative findings revealed the learners' favorable attitudes towards the blended approach, reflecting greater motivation and autonomy. These results illustrate the value of dynamic, student-centered teaching and provide replicable models for application in EFL environments challenged by disengagement and limited thinking. The study integrates DA with CT within the under-researched context of Iraqi education, making suggestions for policy makers, educators, and curriculum developers.

Keywords

  • Dynamic assessment,
  • Critical thinking,
  • Reading comprehension,
  • Zone of proximal development,
  • Sociocultural theory,
  • Educational innovation
PDF

References

  1. Abdulrazzak, R., & Abdellatif, M. (2023). Curriculum reform in conflict-affected areas: A case study of Iraq. International Journal of Educational Development, 94, 102676.
  2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102676
  3. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
  4. Ajideh, P., & Nourdad, N. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL reading comprehension in different proficiency levels. Language Testing in Asia, 2(4), 101–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-4-101
  5. Alderson, J. C. (2000). Reading in a foreign language. Longman.
  6. Al-Jubouri, A., & Al-Jumaili, H. (2016). EFL reading difficulties among Iraqi secondary school students. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(1), 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.4n.1p.1
  7. Alquraishy, S., Ahmed, Z., & Abbas, S. (2020). The influence of instructional strategies on EFL students’ reading engagement. English Language Teaching, 13(6), 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n6p15
  8. Al-Sallami, M. (2023). Pedagogical challenges in post-war Iraq: A qualitative study. Middle East Education Review, 7(2), 45–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/mee.2023.45.58
  9. Alzaghir, A. M. J. (2025). Impact of discourse analysis-based instruction on Iraqi EFL learners’ vocabulary learning and reading comprehension ability (Doctoral dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, International Faculty).
  10. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson.
  11. Andrade, H. L., & Heritage, M. (2017). Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627513
  12. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
  13. Bailin, S., & Battersby, M. (2016). Reason in the balance: An inquiry approach to critical thinking. Hackett Publishing.
  14. Birjandi, P., & Ebadi, S. (2012). Microgenesis in dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ writing performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 668–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.101
  15. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
  16. Bouygues, L. (2018). Teaching inference-making to improve reading comprehension in EFL learners. ELT Journal, 72(2), 170–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx049
  17. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  18. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2014). Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective. Guilford Press.
  19. Caceres, M. D., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2020). Critical thinking in ESL academic writing: The role of argumentation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100714
  20. Cotos, E. (2020). Evidence from authentic ITA discourse and TOEFL IBT Speaking responses in support of ITA assessment. ITAIS Newsletter.
  21. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  22. Davies, M. (2015). A model of critical thinking in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.001
  23. Davin, K. J., & Donato, R. (2013). Student collaboration and teacher-directed classroom dynamic assessment: A complementary pairing. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 5–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12012
  24. Davin, K. J. (2020). Implementing dynamic assessment in L2 classrooms: Teacher practices and beliefs. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 724–741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12473
  25. Danaye Tous, M., Tahriri, A., & Haghighi, S. (2015). The effect of instructing critical thinking through debate on the EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(4), 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i4.13191
  26. De La Paz, S., Ferretti, R., Wissinger, D., Yee, L., & MacArthur, C. (2012). Adolescents’ Disciplinary Use of Evidence, Argumentative Strategies, and Organizational Structure in Writing About Historical Controversies. Written Communication, 29(4), 412-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312461591 (Original work published 2012)
  27. EF Education First. (2024). EF English Proficiency Index 2024: A ranking of 116 countries and regions by English skills. https://www.ef.com/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/cefcom-epi-site/reports/2024/ef-epi-2024-english.pdf
  28. El Soufi, N., & See, B. H. (2019). Does explicit teaching of critical thinking improve critical thinking skills of English language learners in higher education? A critical review of causal evidence. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 140-162.
  29. Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois.
  30. Estaji, M., & Khosravi, F. (2015). Investigating the impact of collaborative and static assessment on the Iranian EFL students’ reading comprehension, critical thinking, and metacognitive strategies of reading. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 7(1), 17–44.
  31. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The California Academic Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED315423)
  32. Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (7th ed.). Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment. https://www.insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/ia/pdf/whatwhy.pdf
  33. Fani, T., & Rashtchi, M. (2015). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(3), 177–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.3p.177
  34. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (3rded.). London: Sage.
  35. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  36. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  37. Godwin-Jones, R. (2019) Riding the Digital Wilds: Learner Autonomy and Informal Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 23, 8-25.
  38. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150484
  39. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). Springer Science + Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_29
  40. Halpern, D. F. (2003). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  41. Halpern, D. F. (2014). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought and knowledge. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709981
  42. Hassan, I. J., & Dweik, B. S. (2021). Factors and challenges in English reading comprehension among young Arab EFL Learners. Academic Research International , 12, 18-30.
  43. Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607210
  44. Heidari, F. (2020). Exploring the synergy of dynamic assessment and critical thinking in EFL reading. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 387–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1103.03
  45. Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034
  46. Kabilan, M. K. (2013). Pedagogies for creative and critical in ELT. Kuala Lumpur: August Publishing.
  47. Kahu, E. (2013) Framing Student Engagement in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758-773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
  48. Kazemi, A., Bagheri, M. S., & Rassaei, E. (2020). Dynamic assessment in English classrooms: Fostering learners’ reading comprehension and motivation. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1788912
  49. Kobylarek, A., Kulesza, W. M., & Woznica, J. (2017). Critical thinking questionnaire: The construction and standardization of a tool for measuring critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 137-147.
  50. Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(s1), 1–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1
  51. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Individual identity, cultural globalization and teaching English as an international language: The case for an epistemic break. In L. Alsagoff, W. Renandya, G. Hu, & S. L. Mckay (Eds.), Teaching English as an international language: Principles and practices (pp. 9-27). New York: Routledge.
  52. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
  53. Leach, S. M., Immekus, J. C., French, B. F., & Hand, B. (2020). The factorial validity of the Cornell Critical Thinking Tests: A multi-analytic approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100676
  54. Mahdi, H. S. (2020). The effect of instructional design on Iraqi EFL learners' reading. Asian EFL Journal, 27(1), 110–129.
  55. Mardani, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). Beyond reading comprehension: Dynamic assessment of EFL learners’ lexical inferencing strategies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1369–1374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.6.1369-1374
  56. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657
  57. Momeni, M., & Nushi, M. (2022). Critical thinking and reading performance in EFL learners. TESL-EJ, 26(2), n2.
  58. Muhammed, I. J. (2024). Iraqi EFL University Students’ Level in Reading Comprehension. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 31(5), 23–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.31.5.2024.24
  59. Naeini, J., & Duvall, E. (2012). Dynamic assessment and the impact on English language learners’ reading comprehension performance. Language Testing in Asia, 2(2), Article 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-2-22
  60. Naiker, M., Wakeling, L., Cook, S., Peck, B., Johnson, J. B., & Brown, S. (2022). Student engagement amongst regional Australian undergraduate students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(3), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i3.31688
  61. Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article: Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20, 535–562.
  62. Nation, I. S. P. (2017). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316839847
  63. Nguyen, P. H. (2024, September). Effects of critical thinking strategy training on reading comprehension and self-efficacy of Vietnamese EFL learners. Paper presented at The 12th European Conference on Language Learning 2024, University College London & SOAS, University of London, London, United Kingdom and Online. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2188-112X.2024.14
  64. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
  65. OECD (2019), Development Co-operation Report 2019: A Fairer, Greener, Safer Tomorrow, OECD Publishing, Paris.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9a58c83f-en
  66. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  67. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). Critical Thinking: Tools for taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
  68. Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75775-9
  69. Poehner, M. E., & Infante, P. (2017). Mediated development in the classroom: The dynamic assessment of language learners' emergent abilities. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 331–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816654273
  70. Poehner, M. E., van Compernolle, R. A., Esteve, O., & Lantolf, J. P. (2018). A Vygotskian developmental approach to second language education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 17(3), 238–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.17.3.238
  71. Poehner, M. E., & Wang, Z. (2020). Dynamic assessment and second language development. Language Teaching, 54(4), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000555
  72. Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: a learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 163-188.
  73. Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
  74. Saavedra, A., & Opfer, V. (2012). Teaching and learning 21st century skills: Lessons from the learning sciences (A Global Cities Education Network Report). Asia Society. http://asiasociety.org/files/rand-0512report.pdf
  75. Saiz, C., & Rivas, S. F. (2011). Evaluation of the Ardesos Programs: An Initiative to Improve Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 34–51. Retrieved
  76. Salim, A., & Krebt, D. (2023). Reading comprehension in Iraqi EFL learners: Gaps and growth. ELT Voices, 13(1), 89–98.
  77. Shrestha, P. N., & Coffin, C. J. (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 55–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.003
  78. Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
  79. Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.
  80. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511013370
  81. UNESCO. (2011). Education for All Global Monitoring Report: The hidden crisis: Armed conflict and education. UNESCO.
  82. Van Lier, L. (2004). Theories of language. In L. van Lier (Ed.), The ecology and semiotics of language learning (pp. 47–71). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5_2
  83. Ventura, A., Lai, M., & Diogo, A. M. (2017). Fostering critical thinking in EFL classes: A case study. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 13(2), 41–57.
  84. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  85. Yancey, K. B. (2015). Relationships between writing and critical thinking, and their significance for curriculum and pedagogy. Florida University. Vol 3. 1 – 14
  86. Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2023). Enhancing EFL learners’ reading proficiency through dynamic assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(1), 20–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.213216
  87. Yousefi, M. H., & Mohammadi, S. (2016). The impact of critical thinking instruction on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 776–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0604.20
  88. Zare, M., Ghaemi, H., & Jafari, P. (2021). Exploring the combined effects of critical thinking instruction and dynamic assessment on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language and Translation, 11(3), 45–60.