10.57647/jelpp.2025.1802.18

Comparing the Effectiveness of Online and Blended-Learning in Enhancing Reading Comprehension among EFL learners with Limited Linguistic Background

PDF
  • Sepideh Berenji*1,
  1. Department of English, Os.C., Islamic Azad University, Osku, Iran

Received: 2025-06-21

Accepted: 2025-11-02

Published in Issue 2025-12-31

Copyright (c) 2026 Sepideh Berenji (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Berenji, S. (2025). Comparing the Effectiveness of Online and Blended-Learning in Enhancing Reading Comprehension among EFL learners with Limited Linguistic Background. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/jelpp.2025.1802.18
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 83

Abstract

Language education has been greatly influenced by the advancements in technology especially for non-native learners. The present study was an attempt to investigate the effectiveness of online and blended learning methods in enhancing reading comprehension skill among EFL learners with limited linguistic background, implementing an experimental approach. To this end, 168 EFL learners were chosen as the participants of the study based on convenience sampling. The participants were assigned into three groups: two experimental and one control groups, with 50 EFL learners assigned to each. The first experimental group received blended learning, the second experimental group was taught through online method, and the control group received traditional lecture-based instruction. The statistical analysis of the pretest and posttest data revealed that among the three groups, the blended learning group demonstrated the greatest improvement, followed by the online group, while the lecture-based group showed the least progress, suggesting that the combination of in-person interaction and digital tools better supports learners with limited linguistic proficiency. This research provides pedagogical recommendations for optimizing instructional strategies in EFL contexts.

Keywords

  • Blended learning,
  • EFL learners,
  • Lecture-based method,
  • Linguistic background,
  • Online learning,
  • Reading comprehension
PDF

References

  1. Abdullah, M. (2018). Reading speed and comprehension enhancement in hybrid learning delivery mode. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(3), 25–33.
  2. Alipour, P. (2020). A comparative study of online vs. blended learning on vocabulary development among intermediate EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1857489.
  3. AlManafi, A. O. S., Elgaziry, A. M., & Abuabdou, E. (2023). The effect of blended learning on the primary stage EFL students' reading comprehension achievement in Libya. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 703-718.
  4. Bączek, M., Zagańczyk-Bączek, M., Szpringer, M., Jaroszyński, A., & Wożakowska-Kapłon, B. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine, 100(7), e24821.
  5. Bersamin, A. E., Duangchai, P., & Thanomsing, R. (2024). Blended learning and its impact on English reading comprehension among Thai vocational students. rEFLections, 31(1), 165–185.
  6. Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281–2310.
  7. Conole, G. (2014). Symposium 3: The 7Cs of Learning Design – a new approach to rethinking design practice. In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg & C. Sinclair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 502–509).
  8. Cronje, J. (2020). Towards a new definition of blended learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(2), 114–121.
  9. Day, R. R., & Yamanaka, J. (2011). Cover to cover: Reading comprehension and fluency. Oxford University Press Affiliation.
  10. Demuyakor, J. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and online learning in higher institutions of education: A survey of the perceptions of Ghanaian international students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202018.
  11. Djiwandono, P. (2018). The effect of blended learning on reading abilities, vocabulary mastery, and collaboration among university students. The New English Teacher, 12(1), 23–42.
  12. Dousti, M., & Amirian, Z. (2023). The effect of web-mediated, blended, and purely online learning on EFL learners’ writing achievement in the Iranian context: A comparative study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1675–1696.
  13. Eggers, J. H., Burmester, M., & Hoffmann, H. (2021). Self-regulation strategies in blended learning environments in higher education: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 175–192.
  14. Garone, A., Yukselturk, E., & Ozan, O. (2022). Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7599–7628.
  15. Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178.
  16. Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2021). Predicting students’ academic performance by their online learning patterns in a blended course. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 191–204.
  17. Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2020). Online language learning for Thai EFL learners: An analysis of effective alternative learning methods in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. English Language Teaching, 13(12), 15–26.
  18. Lee, H., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Visual aids to learning in a second language: Adding redundant video to an audio lecture. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 445–454.
  19. Lin, L.-F. (2015). The impact of problem-based learning on Chinese-speaking elementary school students' English vocabulary learning and use. System, 55, 30–42.
  20. Lin, L.-F. (2017). Impacts of the problem-based learning pedagogy on English learners' reading comprehension, strategy use, and active learning attitudes. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(6), 109–125.
  21. Luo, R. Z., & Zhou, Y. L. (2024). The effectiveness of self‐regulated learning strategies in higher education blended learning: A five years’ systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 3005–3029.
  22. Macaruso, P., Rodman, A., & Snyder, L. (2020). An investigation of blended learning to support reading instruction in elementary schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 2839–2852.
  23. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222.
  24. Martin, F., Ndoye, A., & Wilkins, P. (2022). Examining research on the impact of distance and online learning: A second-order meta-analysis study. Educational Research Review, 36, 100438.
  25. Menggo, S., & Darong, H. C. (2022). Blended learning in ESL/EFL class. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(1), 132–148.
  26. Moradimokhles, H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2022). The effect of online vs. blended learning in developing English language skills by nursing students: An experimental study. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1653–1662.
  27. Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S27–S31.
  28. Norouzifard, A., & Sadighi, F. (2017). A comparative study of writing quality in online and conventional writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(5), 157–169.
  29. Paris, S. G., & Hamilton, E. E. (2014). The development of children’s reading comprehension. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 56–77). Routledge.
  30. Peng, R., & Fu, R. (2021). The effect of Chinese EFL students’ learning motivation on learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 61–74.
  31. Rafiee, F., & Gilakjani, A. P. (2024). A comparative study on the impact of online and offline blended teaching on listening performance. Education, 9(4), 33-55.
  32. Sahni, J. (2019). Does blended learning enhance student engagement? Evidence from higher education. Journal of E-Learning and Higher Education, 2019, 1–14.
  33. Sari, F. M., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2019). Undergraduate students' perceptions toward blended learning through Instagram in English for business class. International Journal of Language Education, 3(1), 64–73.
  34. Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2022). Complex social ecologies and the development of academic motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2129–2165.
  35. Stentoft, D. (2017). From saying to doing interdisciplinary learning: Is problem-based learning the answer? Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 51–61.
  36. Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190.
  37. Tsegaye, D., & Belihu, G. G. (2024). The effects of blended learning on university students' reading comprehension. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 13(2), 163–173.
  38. Vakili, S., & Ebadi, S. (2019). Authenticity in online dynamic assessment: Iranian EFL learners’ perspectives. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 20(2), 38–54.
  39. Wang, P., Zhang, Y., & Xu, B. (2024). Investigating the combined effects of role assignment and discussion timing in a blended learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 60, 100932.
  40. Zubkov, A. D. (2020). Professional foreign language competence of technical students: Content, structure and formation. In Y. V. Tatarinov & A. V. Novikov (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference “Integrating Engineering Education and Humanities for Global Intercultural Perspectives” (pp. 540–549). Springer.