10.57647/j.mjee.2025.17379

Brain Tumor Detection through Image Fusion Using Enhanced Dual Channel Pulse Coupled Neural Networks and Grey Wolf Optimizer

PDF
  • Ratna Kumari Jogi*1,
  • Usha Rani Macigi2,
  1. Sri Padmavati Mahila Vishwavidyalayam,Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
  2. Department of Computer Science, Sri Padmavati Mahila Vishwavidyalayam,Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India

Received: 2025-06-14

Revised: 2025-07-27

Accepted: 2025-08-05

Published in Issue 2025-08-25

Copyright (c) 2025 Ratna Kumari Jogi, Usha Rani Macigi (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Jogi, R. K., & Macigi, U. R. (2025). Brain Tumor Detection through Image Fusion Using Enhanced Dual Channel Pulse Coupled Neural Networks and Grey Wolf Optimizer. Majlesi Journal of Electrical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.57647/j.mjee.2025.17379
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 32

Abstract

Image fusion is particularly crucial for diagnostic imaging in medical applications such as radiation therapy and image-guided surgeries. Medical image fusion seeks to improve diagnostic accuracy by preserving important characteristics and features from the individual pictures in the combined image. This study introduces a novel fusion methodology for MRI and CT medical imaging by decomposing the source images as base and detail layers using a novel three-scale decomposition strategy that employs Gaussian and Guided filters. Gaussian curvature directs the guided filtering procedure for each source image. The base layers are fused using the Proposed Grey Wolf Optimization algorithm (PGWO), which contains an objective function designed to maximize entropy, edge strength, and standard deviation. In order to integrate the detail layers, the activity level information is simultaneously determined using the Enhanced Dual Channel PCNN. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, thirty slices of seven different types of medical images from various sources were analyzed and compared both visually and statistically with existing approaches. According to experimental data, the suggested approach performs better than traditional approaches in terms of both objective metrics and qualitative image quality. Quantitative findings show notable advancements over current techniques: Standard deviation rises from 15.5 to 32.7%, spatial frequency from 38.2 to 70.5%, mutual information from 42.8 to 62.9%, edge strength from 37.4 to 61.9%, structural similarity index from 37.8 to 43.8%, and image entropy from 12 to 18%.

Keywords

  • Image fusion,
  • Gaussian,
  • Guided Filter,
  • Grey Wolf optimization,
  • Enhanced Dual Channel Pulse Coupled Neural Networks,
  • Entropy,
  • Edge strength and pixel intensity
PDF

References

  1. X. Liu, W. Mei, H. Du, Multi-modality medical image fusion based on image decomposition framework and nonsubsampled shearlet transform, Biomed. Signal Process. Control 40 (2018) 343–350, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2017.10.001.
  2. Z. Ding, D. Zhou, R. Nie, R. Hou, Y. Liu, Brain medical image fusion based on dualbranch CNNs in NSST domain, BioMed Res. Int. 2020 (2020) 1–15, https://doi. org/10.1155/2020/6265708.
  3. Z. Zhu, M. Zheng, G. Qi, D. Wang, Y. Xiang, A phase congruency and local laplacian energy based multi-modality medical image fusion method in NSCT domain, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 20811–20824, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2898111.
  4. S. Wang, Y. Shen, Multi-modal image fusion based on saliency guided in NSCT domain, IET Image Process. (2020), https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.1319.
  5. ] Y. Yang, A novel DWT based multi-focus image fusion method, Proc. Eng. 24 (2011) 177–181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2622.
  6. B. Yu, B. Jia, L. Ding, Z. Cai, Q. Wu, R. Law, J. Huang, L. Song, S. Fu, Hybrid dualtree complex wavelet transform and support vector machine for digital multi-focus image fusion, Neurocomputing 182 (2016) 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neucom.2015.10.084.
  7. J. Du, W. Li, B. Xiao, Q. Nawaz, Union laplacian pyramid with multiple features for medical image fusion, Neurocomputing 194 (2016) 326–339, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.02.047.
  8. J. Fu, W. Li, J. Du, B. Xiao, Multimodal medical image fusion via laplacian pyramid and convolutional neural network reconstruction with local gradient energy strategy, Comput. Biol. Med. 126 (2020) 104048, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104048.
  9. Y. Liu, X. Chen, R.K. Ward, Z.J. Wang, Image fusion with convolutional sparse representation, IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 23 (12) (2016) 1882–1886, https://doi. org/10.1109/lsp.2016.2618776.
  10. S. Li, X. Kang and J. Hu, "Image Fusion With Guided Filtering," in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 2864-2875, July 2013, doi: 10.1109/TIP.2013.2244222.
  11. Zhang, Q., Shen, X., Xu, L., Jia, J. (2014), Rolling Guidance Filter. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds) Computer Vision – ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8691. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10578-9_53.
  12. W. Tan, J. Zhang, P. Xiang, H. Zhou, W. Thitøn, Infrared and visible image fusion via NSST and PCNN in multiscale morphological gradient domain, in: P. Schelkens, T. Kozacki (Eds.), Optics, Photonics and Digital Technologies for Imaging Applications VI, SPIE, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2551830.
  13. M. Yin, X. Liu, Y. Liu and X. Chen, Medical Image Fusion With Parameter-Adaptive Pulse Coupled Neural Network in Nonsubsampled Shearlet Transform Domain, in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 49-64, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2018.2838778.
  14. Vaswani, A. (2017), Attention is all you need, In I. Guyon, U. von Luxburg, S. Bengio, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems, pp. 5998–6008, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
  15. Xie, X., Zhang, X., Ye, S., Xiong, D., Ouyang, L., Yang, B., et al. (2023), MRSCFusion: joint residual swin transformer and multiscale CNN for unsupervised multimodal medical image fusion, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, pp.1–17, 10.1109/TIM.2023.3317470.
  16. Zhao, Z., Bai, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Lin, Z., et al. (2023), CDDFuse: correlation-driven dual-branch feature decomposition for multi-modality image fusion, In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 5906–5916, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.14461
  17. Xinzheng Xu, Dong Shan, Guanying Wang, Xiangying Jiang, Multimodal medical image fusion using PCNN optimized by the QPSO algorithm, Applied Soft Computing, Volume 46, 2016, Pages 588-595, ISSN 1568-4946, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.03.028.
  18. Heba M. El-Hoseny, Wael Abd El-Rahman, El-Sayed M. El-Rabaie, Fathi E Abd El-Samie, Osama S. Faragallah,An efficient DT-CWT medical image fusion system based on modified central force optimization and histogram matching, Infrared Physics & Technology, Volume 94,2018,Pages 223-231,ISSN 1350-4495,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2018.09.003.
  19. Ebenezer Daniel, J. Anitha, K.K Kamaleshwaran, Indu Rani, Optimum spectrum mask based medical image fusion using Gray Wolf Optimization, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Volume 34, 2017, Pages 36-43, ISSN 1746-8094, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2017.01.003.
  20. C. S. Asha, S. Lal, V. P. Gurupur and P. U. P. Saxena, "Multi-Modal Medical Image Fusion With Adaptive Weighted Combination of NSST Bands Using Chaotic Grey Wolf Optimization," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 40782-40796, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2908076.
  21. E. Daniel, "Optimum Wavelet-Based Homomorphic Medical Image Fusion Using Hybrid Genetic–Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm," in IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 6804-6811, 15 Aug.15, 2018, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2822712.
  22. Parvathy, Velmurugan Subbiah, and Sivakumar Pothiraj. "Multi-modality medical image fusion using hybridization of binary crow search optimization." Health care management science 23 (2020): 661-669, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-019-09492-2
  23. K. Padmavathi, C.S. Asha, V. Karki Maya,A novel medical image fusion by combining TV-L1 decomposed textures based on adaptive weighting scheme, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, Volume 23, Issue 1,2020,Pages 225-239,ISSN 2215-0986,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.03.008.
  24. Tannaz, Akbarpour, et al. "Fusion of multimodal medical images using nonsubsampled shearlet transform and particle swarm optimization" Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing 31 (2020): 269-287, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-019-00662-7
  25. Lina Xu, Yujuan Si, Saibiao Jiang, Ying Sun, Homayoun Ebrahimian,Medical image fusion using a modified shark smell optimization algorithm and hybrid wavelet-homomorphic filter,Biomedical Signal Processing and Control,Volume 59,2020,101885,ISSN 1746-8094,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101885.
  26. Liu, Y., Chen, X., Ward, R.K. and Wang, Z.J. (2016), Image Fusion with Convolutional Sparse Representation. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 23, 1882-1886.
  27. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2016.2618776.
  28. Liu, Y., Chen, X., Ward, R.K. and Wang, Z.J., 2019, Medical image fusion via convolutional sparsity based morphological component analysis, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 26(3), pp.485-489, 10.1109/LSP.2019.2895749
  29. Jiao Du, Meie Fang, Yufeng Yu, Gang Lu,An adaptive two-scale biomedical image fusion method with statistical comparisons,Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine,Volume 196,2020,105603,ISSN 0169-2607,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105603.
  30. Sarmad Maqsood, Umer Javed,Multi-modal Medical Image Fusion based on Two-scale Image Decomposition and Sparse Representation, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control,Volume 57,2020,101810,ISSN 1746-8094,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101810.
  31. C. Pei, K. Fan and W. Wang, "Two-Scale Multimodal Medical Image Fusion Based on Guided Filtering and Sparse Representation," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 140216-140233, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013027.
  32. Amini, N., Fatemizadeh, E., & Behnam, H. (2014), MRI-PET image fusion based on NSCT transform using local energy and local variance fusion rules, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 38(4), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2014.904014.
  33. M. Sumathi and R.Barani, “Qualitative Evaluation of Pixel-level Image Fusion Algorithms”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Informatics and Medical Engineering , IEEE PRIME 2012, 10.1109/ICPRIME.2012.6208364
  34. M. Yin, X. Liu, Y. Liu and X. Chen, "Medical Image Fusion With Parameter-Adaptive Pulse Coupled Neural Network in Nonsubsampled Shearlet Transform Domain," in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 49-64, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2018.2838778.
  35. S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Grey wolf optimizer,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 69, pp. 46–61, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007.
  36. Yin M, Liu X, Liu Y, Chen X (2018), Medical image fusion with parameter adaptive pulse coupled neural network in nonsubsampled shearlet transform domain, IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 99:1–16, 10.1109/TIM.2018.2838778
  37. Liu S,Wang J, Lu Y, Li H, Zhao J, Zhu Z (2019), Multi-focus image fusion based on adaptive dual-channel spiking cortical model in non-subsampled shearlet domain, IEEE access 7:56367–56388, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900376
  38. Wang Z, Wang S, Guo L (2018), Novel multi-focus image fusion based on PCNN and random walks, Neural Comput Appl 29:1101–1114, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2633-9
  39. He K, Zhou D, Zhang X, Nie R (2018), Multi-focus: focused region finding and multi-scale transform for image fusion, Neuro computing 320:157–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.018
  40. K. A. Johnson and J. Alex Becker, The whole brain atlas,” [Online]. Available: https://www.med.harvard.edu/aanlib/
  41. M.Venkata Srikanth, A.Suneel Kumar, B.Nagasirisha, and T.V. Lakshmi, “Brain MRI and CT Image Fusion Using Multiscale Local Extrema and Image Statistics”, ECTI-EEC, vol. 22, no. 1, Feb. 2024, https://doi.org/10.37936/ecti-eec.2024221.249146.