10.57647/jtap.2026.2004.32

Observational Study of Supermassive Black Holes in Nearby Galaxies: Mass Distributions, Scaling Relations, and Environmental Effects from HST and JWST Data

  1. Department of Physics, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia

Received: 2025-07-15

Revised: 2025-12-17

Accepted: 2025-12-17

Published in Issue 2026-08-31

How to Cite

1.
Salih MA. Observational Study of Supermassive Black Holes in Nearby Galaxies: Mass Distributions, Scaling Relations, and Environmental Effects from HST and JWST Data. J Theor Appl phys. 2026 Aug. 31;20(4). Available from: https://oiccpress.com/jtap/article/view/19301

PDF views: 59

Abstract

We present a comprehensive study of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in 82 nearby galaxies (\(D < 50\) Mpc) using archival Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) data. Combining high-resolution imaging, stellar kinematics, and infrared spectroscopy with four independent mass determination methods, we derive precise black hole masses spanning \(5 \times 10^4\) to \(7 \times 10^9\) \(M_{\odot}\) and uncover key insights into their formation and growth. Our findings include: 1. A robust intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH; \(10^{4.7}\)--\(10^{6.0}\) \(M_{\odot}\)) fraction of \(6 \pm 3\)% after completeness corrections, broadly consistent with a mixed formation scenario (\(\sim\)20% direct collapse, \(\sim\)80% stellar remnants, based on host-galaxy correlation analysis); 2. Systematic environmental mass enhancements following a clear hierarchy (\(\Delta \log M_{\mathrm{BH}} = 0.32 \pm 0.07\) dex in clusters, \(0.18 \pm 0.09\) dex in groups), driven by enhanced mergers, ram-pressure feeding, and preprocessing effects; 3. Detection of a hidden AGN population in 17 galaxies (21%) through JWST's enhanced spectroscopic capabilities, revealing coronal lines and hot dust signatures that imply duty cycles of \(\sim 10^{-2}\) for low-luminosity activity in massive galaxies; and 4. A three-parameter fundamental plane (\(M_{\mathrm{BH}} \propto \sigma_*^{3.82} \times M_{\mathrm{bulge}}^{0.31} \times R_{\mathrm{eff}}^{-0.15}\)) with scatter reduced to \(0.26 \pm 0.03\) dex, physically linking black hole mass to central binding energy and baryon concentration. These results, enabled by JWST's revolutionary infrared capabilities combined with HST's legacy archive, establish new benchmarks for SMBH demographics and provide stringent constraints on formation models, environmental growth mechanisms, and black hole-galaxy co-evolution. The study sets the foundation for next-generation surveys with Roman Space Telescope, ELTs, and multi-messenger astronomy with LISA gravitational wave detection.

Keywords

  • Supermassive black holes,
  • Intermediate-mass black holes,
  • Galaxy evolution,
  • Scaling relations,
  • James Webb Space Telescope,
  • Environmental effects,
  • AGN feedback

References

  1. Ferrarese L and Merritt D. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 2000; 539:L9. DOI: 10.1086/312340
  2. Gebhardt K. BRBGea. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 2000; 539:L13. DOI: 10.1086/312348
  3. Kormendy J and Ho LC. Annual Review of As-tronomy and Astrophysics 2013; 51:511. DOI: 10. 1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811
  4. Heckman TM and Best PN. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 2014; 52:589. DOI: 10. 1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722
  5. Ghez A. M. SSWNNea. The Astrophysical Journal 2008; 689:1044. DOI: 10.1086/592738
  6. Genzel R. EF and Gillessen S. Reviews of Modern Physics 2010; 82:3121. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121
  7. Fabian AC. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 2012; 50:455. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521
  8. Bromm V and Loeb A. The Astrophysical Journal 2003; 596:34. DOI: 10.1086/378053 Volonteri M. Astronomy and Astrophysics Reviews 2010; 18:279. DOI: 10.1007/s00159- 010-0029-x
  9. Madau P and Rees MJ. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 2001; 551:L27. DOI: 10.1086/320549
  10. Volonteri M and Bellovary J. Reports on Progress in Physics 2012; 75:124901. DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/124901
  11. Greene J. E. SJ and Ho LC. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 2020; 58:257. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835
  12. Natarajan P. Physics Today 2021; 74:30. DOI: 10. 1063/PT.3.4733
  13. Miller MC and Hamilton DP. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2002; 330:232. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05112.x
  14. Reines AE and Volonteri M. The Astrophysical Journal 2015; 813:82. DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/ 813/2/82
  15. Inayoshi K. VE and Haiman Z. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 2020; 58:27. DOI: 10. 1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455
  16. Woods T. E. ABBVea. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 2019; 36:e027. DOI: 10.1017/pasa.2019.14
  17. Boylan-Kolchin M. MCP and Quataert E. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2009; 398:1150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15087.x
  18. Tonnesen S and Bryan GL. The Astrophysical Journal 2007; 671:1434. DOI: 10.1086/521793
  19. Byrd GG and Valtonen MJ. The Astrophysical Journal 1990; 350:89. DOI: 10.1086/168434
  20. Gardner J. P. MJCARea. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2023; 135:068001. DOI: 10.1086/725108
  21. Rigby J. R. PMDMMWea. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2023; 135:048001. DOI: 10.1086/725111
  22. Abell G. O. CHG and Olowin RP. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 1989; 70:1. DOI: 10.1086/191333
  23. Tully RB. The Astronomical Journal 2015; 149:171. DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/5/171
  24. Huertas-Company M. AJALBMMS and Sánchez Almeida J. Astronomy and Astrophysics 2011; 525:A157. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116821
  25. Kauffmann G. HTMWSDMea. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2003; 341:33. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x
  26. Fruchter AS and Hook RN. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2002; 114:144. DOI: 10.1086/340826
  27. Peng C. Y. HLCICD and Rix HW. The Astronomical Journal 2010; 139:2097. DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2097
  28. Cappellari M and Emsellem E. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004; 116:138. DOI: 10.1086/381875
  29. Sánchez-Blázquez P. PRFJVJea. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2006; 371:703. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10699.x
  30. Schwarzschild M. The Astrophysical Journal 1979; 232:236. DOI: 10.1086/157243
  31. Bosch R. C. E. vdVGVEKCM van den and Zeeuw PT de. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2008; 385:647. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12892.x
  32. Neumayer N. SA and Böker T. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 2020; 58:313. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035840
  33. Nguyen D. D. SACNNea. The Astrophysical Journal 2019; 872:104. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafe7a
  34. Kroupa P. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2001; 322:231. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x
  35. Barth A. J. BBDDJea. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 2016; 823:L12. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/ 823/1/L12
  36. North E. V. DTABMea. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2019; 490:319. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2598
  37. Kim D, Im M, and Kim M. New estimators of black hole mass in active galactic nuclei with hydrogen Paschen lines. The Astrophysical Journal 2010; 724:386–400. DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/386
  38. Landt H, Elvis M, Ward MJ, Bentz MC, Korista KT, and Karovska M. The near-infrared broad emission line region of active galactic nuclei –
  39. II. The 1-????m continuum. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2011; 414:218–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18383.x
  40. Johnson JL and Bromm V. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2007; 374:1557. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11229.x
  41. Dubois Y. PCWCea. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2014; 444:1453. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1227
  42. Nelson D. PASVea. Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology 2018; 6:2. DOI: 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x
  43. Hickox RC and Alexander DM. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 2018; 56:625. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051803
  44. Schawinski K. KMBS and Sartori LF. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2015; 451:2517. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1136
  45. Schaye J. CRABRGea. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2015; 446:521. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2058
  46. Weinberger R. SVHLea. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2017; 465:3291. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3123
  47. Davé R. AADNDea. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2019; 486:2827. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz937
  48. Bushouse H. EJDNea. JWST Calibration Pipeline, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7229890. 2022. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7229890
  49. Foreman-Mackey D. HDWLD and Goodman J. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2013; 125:306. DOI: 10.1086/670067
  50. Astropy Collaboration Robitaille TPTEJea. Astronomy and Astrophysics 2013; 558:A33. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068
  51. Bentz M. C. DKDGCJea. The Astrophysical Journal 2013; 767:149. DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/ 2/149
  52. Vestergaard M and Peterson BM. The Astrophysical Journal 2006; 641:689. DOI: 10.1086/500572
  53. Costa T. SD and Haehnelt MG. Monthly No-tices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2014; 444:2355. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1632
  54. Hopkins PF and Quataert E. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2010; 407:1529. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17064.x
  55. Hopkins P. F. KDOJea. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2014; 445:581. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1738
  56. King A. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2015; 456:L109. DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv186
  57. Lodato G and Natarajan P. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2006; 371:1813. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x
  58. Murray N. QE and Thompson TA. The Astrophysical Journal 2005; 618:569. DOI: 10.1086/426067
  59. Narayan R and Yi I. The Astrophysical Journal 1995; 452:710. DOI: 10.1086/176343
  60. Volonteri M. HF and Madau P. The Astrophysical Journal 2003; 582:559. DOI: 10.1086/345525
  61. Yu Q and Tremaine S. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2002; 335:965. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05337.x
  62. Zhang D and Davis SW. The Astrophysical Journal 2017; 839:54. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6081