10.57647/jtap.2026.2004.02

Effect of Electrode Surface Roughness on Copper Oxide Nanoparticle Synthesis via Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma in Liquid

PDF
  • Zohreh Dehghani*1,
  1. Plasma and Nuclear Fusion Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2025-12-24

Revised: 2026-01-20

Accepted: 2026-03-19

Published Online: 2026-04-17

Copyright (c) 2025 Zohreh Dehghani (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

1.
Dehghani Z. Effect of Electrode Surface Roughness on Copper Oxide Nanoparticle Synthesis via Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma in Liquid. J Theor Appl phys. 2026 Jan. 1;. Available from: https://oiccpress.com/jtap/article/view/18811
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 18

Abstract

Atmospheric-pressure plasma–liquid interactions provide a non-equilibrium environment for surface modification and nanostructure formation under ambient conditions. In this work, the effect of copper surface roughness on copper oxide nanostructure formation is investigated using an atmospheric-pressure plasma-in-liquid configuration in a strongly alkaline electrolyte (3 M NaOH). Copper electrodes with three controlled roughness levels were exposed to stable argon microplasma under identical operating conditions. X- ray diffraction indicates the formation of crystalline copper oxide on the copper surface without the use of metal salt precursors. UV–Vis spectroscopy reveals optical features characteristic of copper oxide nanostructures. Electron microscopy shows a clear roughness-dependent morphological evolution, where coarse surfaces promote localized growth and agglomeration, while smoother surfaces lead to higher nucleation density and finer, more uniform nanostructures. Elemental analysis indicates copper and oxygen as the dominant constituents of the formed layers. The results demonstrate that surface roughness governs local electric field distribution and microdischarge interaction at the plasma–liquid interface, thereby controlling the balance between nucleation and growth. These findings highlight surface roughness as an effective parameter for tuning plasma–liquid-driven oxidation processes and contribute to a deeper understanding of plasma–liquid interaction mechanisms.

Keywords

  • Atmospheric-pressure plasma,
  • Plasma–liquid interaction,
  • Copper oxide nanostructures,
  • Surface roughness
PDF

References

  1. Bruggeman, P. J., Kushner, M. J., Locke, B. R., Gardeniers, J. G. E., Graham, W. G., Graves, D. B., … Bogaerts, A. (2016). Plasma–liquid interactions: A review and roadmap. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 25(5), 053002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/25/5/053002
  2. Mariotti, D., & Sankaran, R. M. (2010). Microplasmas for nanomaterials synthesis. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 43(32), 323001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/43/32/323001
  3. Mariotti, D., Patel, J., Švrček, V., & Maguire, P. (2012). Plasma–liquid interactions at atmospheric pressure for nanomaterials synthesis and surface engineering. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 9(11–12), 1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.201200080
  4. Locke, B. R., Sato, M., Sunka, P., Hoffmann, M. R., & Chang, J.-S. (2006). Electrohydraulic discharge and nonthermal plasma for water treatment. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(3), 882–905. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050981u
  5. Rezaei, F., Vanraes, P., Nikiforov, A. Y., & Leys, C. (2019). Applications of plasma–liquid systems: A review. Materials, 12(17), 2751. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172751
  6. Saito, G., & Akiyama, T. (2015). Nanomaterial synthesis using plasma generation in liquid. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2015, 123696. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/123696
  7. Bruggeman, P., & Leys, C. (2009). Non-thermal plasmas in and in contact with liquids. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 42(5), 053001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/5/053001
  8. Shirai, N., Uchida, S., & Tochikubo, F. (2014). Chemical reactions in liquid induced by atmospheric-pressure glow discharge with liquid electrode. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 23(5), 054006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/23/5/054006
  9. Mun, M. K., Li, Y., & Sankaran, R. M. (2017). Solution plasma synthesis of nanoparticles. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 50(27), 273002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa74d8
  10. Lin, L., & Keidar, M. (2015). Microplasmas: Technology and applications. Journal of Applied Physics, 118(3), 033301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4926866
  11. Greda, K., Jamroz, P., Pohl, P., & Zyrnicki, W. (2016). Flowing liquid anode atmospheric pressure glow discharge. Analytical Chemistry, 88(15), 7476–7485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01709
  12. Jiang, B., Zheng, J., Qiu, S., Wu, M., Zhang, Q., Yan, Z., & Xue, Q. (2014). Review on electrical discharge plasma technology for wastewater remediation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 236, 348–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.090
  13. Hickling, A., & Ingram, M. D. (1964). Glow-discharge electrolysis. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 8(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(64)80012-1
  14. Gupta, S. K. (2015). Contact glow discharge electrolysis: Its origin, plasma diagnostics and non-faradaic chemical effects. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 48(42), 425201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/48/42/425201
  15. Sunka, P. (2001). Pulse electrical discharges in water and their applications. Physics of Plasmas, 8(5), 2587–2594. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1352595
  16. Dufour, T., Gherardi, N., & Boutin, B. (2015). Modeling of atmospheric pressure discharges over water. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 35, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-014-9586-7
  17. Sankaran, R. M., Holunga, D., Flagan, R. C., & Giapis, K. P. (2005). Synthesis of blue luminescent Si nanoparticles using atmospheric-pressure microdischarges. Nano Letters, 5(3), 537–541. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl050085b
  18. Saito, G., Hosokai, S., Tsubota, M., & Akiyama, T. (2011). Synthesis of copper/copper oxide nanoparticles by solution plasma. Journal of Applied Physics, 110(2), 023302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3608240
  19. Velusamy, T., La, C. H., Sankaran, R. M., & Mariotti, D. (2017). Ultra-small CuO nanoparticles synthesized by a hybrid plasma–liquid process. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 14(7), e1600224. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.201600224
  20. Du, C. M., Yan, Z. G., Ren, X. D., & Wang, Y. N. (2014). Cu₂O nanoparticles synthesized by atmospheric pressure microplasma. Scientific Reports, 4, 7339. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07339
  21. Wang, Z., & Li, Y. (2012). Cu₂O nanostructures: Synthesis and applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 22, 16102–16111. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM33055K
  22. Zhang, Q., Zhang, K., & Xu, D. (2014). CuO nanostructures: Synthesis, characterization, growth mechanisms, fundamental properties, and applications. Progress in Materials Science, 60, 208–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.003
  23. Wang, Y., Li, J., & Liu, Y. (2019). Copper oxide nanomaterials for energy and environmental applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 362, 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.037
  24. Liguori, A., Trisolini, E., Laurita, R., et al. (2018). Synthesis of copper-based nanostructures by non-equilibrium atmospheric pressure plasma jet in liquid. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 38, 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-018-9921-4
  25. Glad, X., et al. (2020). Synthesis of copper and copper oxide nanomaterials by spark discharges in liquids. Nanomaterials, 10(8), 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10081584
  26. Galif, H., et al. (2022). Copper nanoparticles synthesized via solution plasma process. ACS Omega, 7(10), 8630–8639. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c07027
  27. Lu, Q., et al. (2021). Plasma-assisted synthesis of Cu₂O nanosheets in alkaline electrolyte. Electrochimica Acta, 367, 137483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137483
  28. Kaushik, N. K., et al. (2019). Plasma and nanomaterials: Fabrication and biomedical applications. Nanomaterials, 9(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010098
  29. Brisset, J. L., & Pawlat, J. (2016). Chemical effects of air plasma species in aqueous media. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 36, 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-015-9707-6
  30. Clyne, T. W., & Troughton, S. C. (2019). A review of recent work on discharge characteristics during plasma electrolytic oxidation. Surface Engineering, 35(3), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2018.1467889
  31. Zhu, L., Liu, C., & Yang, S. (2017). Effect of surface roughness on plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology, 325, 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.06.075
  32. Dehnavi, V., Luan, B. L., Liu, X. Y., Shoesmith, D. W., & Rohani, S. (2014). Correlation between plasma discharge and coating formation. Surface and Coatings Technology, 251, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.04.036