10.57647/j.jtap.2025.1903.28

Calculate the nuclear structure for the 72,74,76 Kr isotopes by using NuShellX@MSU code

PDF
  • Sara F. Hadi*1,
  • Ali K. Hasan2,
  1. Department of Physics, Faculty of Education for Girls, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq
  2. Department of Anesthesia, College of Health and Medical Technology, University of Alkafeel, Najaf, Iraq

Received: 2025-03-21

Revised: 2025-03-28

Accepted: 2025-04-17

Published in Issue 2025-06-30

Copyright (c) 2025 Sara F. Hadi, Ali K. Hasan (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

1.
Hadi SF, Hasan AK. Calculate the nuclear structure for the 72,74,76 Kr isotopes by using NuShellX@MSU code. J Theor Appl phys. 2025 Jun. 30;19(3). Available from: https://oiccpress.com/jtap/article/view/17272
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 183

Abstract

Effective f5pvh interactions have been identified, and the NuShellX@MSU code within the fp-shell was employed to calculate the energy levels and electromagnetic transition probabilities of the 72,74,76 Kr nucleus. The use of the nuclear shell model utilising the f5pvh interaction within the fp-shell demonstrates success, as evidenced by the concordance with both experimental and theoretical data.

Keywords

  • Nuclear structure,
  • NuShellX@MSU,
  • Shell model,
  • Energy level,
  • Transition probability
PDF

References

  1. M. G. Mayer, “On closed shells in nuclei. II,” Phys. Rev., vol. 75, no. 12, p. 1969, 1949.
  2. R. Casten, Nuclear structure from a simple perspective, vol. 23. Oxford university press, 2000.
  3. D. J. Dean, T. Engeland, M. Hjorth-Jensen, M. P. Kartamyshev, and E. Osnes, “Effective interactions and the nuclear shell-model,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 419–500, 2004.
  4. A. K. Hasan and A. N. Rahim, “Study of nuclear structure of 24, 26Na isotopes by using USDB interaction,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 169, 2018.
  5. B. A. Brown et al., “Oxbash for windows PC,” MSU-NSCL Rep., vol. 1289, 2004.
  6. E. Caurier and F. Nowacki, “Present status of shell model techniques,” Acta Phys. Pol. B, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 705, 1999.
  7. “E. Caurier, F. Nowacki. Present status of shell model techniques. Acta Physica Polonica B 30(3) (1999) 705.”.
  8. B. A. Brown and W. D. M. Rae, “The shell-model code NuShellX@ MSU,” Nucl. Data Sheets, vol. 120, pp. 115–118, 2014.
  9. A. D. Salman, S. A. Al-Ramahi, and M. H. Oleiwi, “Inelastic electron-nucleus scattering form factors for 64, 66, 68Zn isotopes,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing, 2019.
  10. B. H. Wildenthal, “Empirical strengths of spin operators in nuclei,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., vol. 11, pp. 5–51, 1984.
  11. A. K. Hasan, “Shell model calculations for 18, 19, 20O isotopes by using USDA and USDB interactions,” Ukr. J. Phys., vol. 63, no. 3, p. 189, 2018.
  12. H. De Vries, C. W. De Jager, and C. De Vries, “Nuclear charge-density-distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering,” At. data Nucl. data tables, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 495–536, 1987.
  13. H. H. A. A. K. Hasan, “STUDY OF THE NUCLEAR STRUCTURE FOR THE 18O BY USING NuShellX@MSU CODE,” Nucl. Phys., vol. 24, pp. 219–224, 2023.
  14. H. H. Abed, “Study of the Nuclear Structure for Nuclei of Different States by Applying the Nuclear Shell Model Using Different Interactions,” 2024.
  15. F. A. Berezin and M. Shubin, The Schrödinger Equation, vol. 66. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  16. A. Jasielska and S. Wiktor, “Application of shell model with the modified surface delta interaction to 42 Ca and 42 Sc nuclei,” Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1975.
  17. E. Caurier, K. Langanke, G. Martinez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, and P. Vogel, “Shell model description of isotope shifts in calcium,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 522, no. 3–4, pp. 240–244, 2001.
  18. L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, and T. T. S. Kuo, “Shell-model calculations and realistic effective interactions,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 135–182, 2009.
  19. A. Gargano, L. Coraggio, A. Covello, and N. Itaco, “Realistic shell-model calculations and exotic nuclei,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2014, p. 12004.
  20. R. D. Lawson, “Theory of the nuclear shell model,” 1980.
  21. E. M. Raheem, R. O. Kadhim, and N. A. Salman, “The effects of core polarisation on some even–even sd-shell nuclei using Michigan three-range Yukawa and modified surface delta interactions,” Pramana, vol. 92, pp. 1–11, 2019.
  22. A. Bor and B. Mottelson, “Nuclear structure, vol. 1,” 1969, WA Benjamin Inc., New-York.
  23. F. Ertuğral, E. Guliyev, and A. Kuliev, “Quadrupole Moments and Deformation Parameters of the ^166-180Hf, ^180-186W and ^152-168Sm Isotopes,” Acta Phys. Pol. A, vol. 128, no. 2B, 2015.
  24. N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, and M. Płoszajczak, “Continuum coupling and single-nucleon overlap integrals,” Nucl. Phys. A, vol. 794, no. 1–2, pp. 29–46, 2007.
  25. P. J. Brussaard and P. W. M. Glauddemans, “Shell-Model Applications in Nuclear Spectroscopy North-Holland,” Amsterdam, i, vol. 977, 1977.
  26. M. O. Waheed and F. I. Sharrad, “Description of the deformation properties of even-even 102− 106Pd isotopes,” Ukr. J. Phys., vol. 62, no. 9, p. 757, 2017.
  27. T. Otsuka, T. Suzuki, R. Fujimoto, H. Grawe, and Y. Akaishi, “Evolution of nuclear shells due to the tensor force,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, no. 23, p. 232502, 2005.
  28. D. Abriola and A. A. Sonzogni, “Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 72,” Nucl. Data Sheets, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 1–140, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2009.12.001.
  29. B. Singh and A. R. Farhan, “Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 74,” Nucl. Data Sheets, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1923–2102, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2006.05.006.
  30. B. Singh, “Nuclear data sheets update for A= 76,” Nucl. Data Sheets, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 63–164, 1995.