Linguistic Strategies in Post-Conflict Governance: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Iraqi Presidential Speeches

pdf
  • Inas Malik Mnaathar1,
  • Bahram Hadian1,
  • Hani Kamil Al-Ebadi2,
  • Mehdi Vaez-Dalili1,
  1. Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
  2. English Department, College of Education for Humanities, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq

Published in Issue 2024-10-31

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Malik Mnaathar, I., Hadian, B., Kamil Al-Ebadi, H., & Vaez-Dalili, M. (2024). Linguistic Strategies in Post-Conflict Governance: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Iraqi Presidential Speeches. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 2(4). https://oiccpress.com/jntell/article/view/8697

pdf views: 224

Abstract

This study examines the evolution of Iraqi presidential rhetoric in response to shifting political
landscapes, governance priorities, and societal expectations. Through a critical discourse
analysis of presidential speeches, the research highlights how Iraqi leaders have transitioned
from an exclusionary nationalist narrative to a more inclusive and pluralistic discourse,
aligning with broader global trends in post-conflict state-building. The findings indicate a
significant shift in the rhetorical strategies used to assert political legitimacy, moving from
securitization and state rebuilding to democratic consolidation, governance reform, and anticorruption discourse. Additionally, the role of religious references in presidential rhetoric has
evolved from a tool for political unification to a cultural and ethical marker, reflecting Iraq’s
efforts to balance its religious heritage with modern governance ideals. This study contributes
to the understanding of the strategic use of discourse in post-conflict governance, illustrating
the interplay between rhetoric, legitimacy, and national identity. The implications of these
findings extend to political leaders, scholars, and media practitioners, offering insights into
the role of language in shaping governance narratives. Future research should explore public
reception of presidential rhetoric and its impact on national identity formation, as well as
comparative analyses across different political institutions and regional contexts.

pdf

References

  1. Ali, A. (2022). Political discourse and national identity in post-conflict societies: The case of Iraq.
  2. Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 34(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  3. Al-Harahsheh, R. (2021). Linguistic strategies in presidential rhetoric: A comparative study of Arab
  4. leaders. Discourse & Society, 32(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  5. Al-Maamari, A. (2022). Religious framing in Middle Eastern political discourse: A historical analysis.
  6. Journal of Political Linguistics, 45(3), 244–262. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  7. Al-Mohammad, H. (2021). Critical Discourse Analysis and political narratives in the Middle East.
  8. Pragmatics and Society, 12(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  9. Al-Rawi, A. (2023). Media, discourse, and legitimacy: A study of Iraqi presidential speeches. Media &
  10. Politics, 19(2), 312–328. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  11. El-Dahshan, M. (2022). Democratic transitions and the rhetoric of national identity: The cases of Iraq,
  12. Jordan, and Lebanon. Comparative Political Studies, 55(7), 889–910. https://doi.org/xxxx
  13. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
  14. Khalil, S., & Suleiman, R. (2022). State-building and governance narratives in post-conflict Iraq. Journal
  15. of International Political Analysis, 27(4), 411–432. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  16. Qasim, M., & Hussein, T. (2023). The evolution of political rhetoric in post-conflict societies: A
  17. discourse analysis of Iraq and Jordan. Discourse Analysis & Society, 40(5), 523–540.
  18. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  19. Rahman, Y., & Saleh, K. (2021). Corruption, transparency, and political rhetoric in Iraq: A CDA
  20. approach. Middle Eastern Politics Review, 18(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  21. Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.