10.30495/jntell.2023.1975405.1037

Analyzing Iranian Learners' EnglishLanguage Quality ThroughValidating the Model of Criteria

  1. Ph.D. Student in TEFL, Department of English Language, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran
  2. Assistant Professor of TEFL, Department of English Language, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran
  3. Assistant Professor of TEFL, Department of English Language, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Revised: 2022-12-18

Accepted: 2023-01-09

Published in Issue 2023-12-01

How to Cite

Gorji, F., Afraz, S., & Sammi, F. (2023). Analyzing Iranian Learners’ EnglishLanguage Quality ThroughValidating the Model of Criteria. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 2(4), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.30495/jntell.2023.1975405.1037

PDF views: 145

Abstract

The present study investigated Iranian English language quality through validating the model of criteria. More specifically, the
study analyzed the most and the least important criteria for evaluating the English language quality of EFL learners. Also, the
differences among males and females with regard to the English language quality were investigated. In doing so, a total number
of 100 English teachers of different levels of proficiency were chosen. The researchers-made questionnaire was distributed
among participants via Google. The process of analyzing the data obtained from the questionnaire was performed in two software,
SPSS 21 and pls. In the quantitative part of descriptive statistics, numbers, percentages, central indicators, and dispersion
indicators were used. In inferential statistics, a factor analysis test was done to confirm and validate the questionnaire and
structural equation model. Findings of the present study revealed the most important criteria for analyzing the EFL students'
language quality which are individual characteristics, learning strategy, and learning dynamics. The results also indicated that
educational technology and content regulation as background conditions, are effective in assessing the English language quality
of Iranian learners. Moreover, no significant difference found among Iranian males and females with regard to the English
language quality. It should be noted that the implementation of this approach requires the necessary professional potentials and
competencies.

Keywords

  • Model validation,
  • Language Quality,
  • Iranian EFL Learners

References

  1. Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A.
  2. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
  3. Erlbaum.
  4. Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., and Vigdor, J. 2007. Teacher credentials and student achievement in high
  5. school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects (National Bureau of Economic
  6. Research Working Paper 13617). Available from www.Caldercenter.
  7. Deygers, B., & Malone, M. E. (2019). Language assessment literacy in university admission policies, or
  8. the dialogue that isn’t. Language Testing, 36(3), 347–368.
  9. Dornie Z., Ryan S. (2015). The Psychology of the Second Language Learner Revisited. New York, NY:
  10. Routledge.
  11. Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly,
  12. (2), 113–132.
  13. Fulcher, G. (2015a). Assessing second language speaking. Language Teaching, 48(2), 198–216.
  14. Glaser, R. (2003). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions.
  15. American Psychologist, 18, 519–521.
  16. Gunawardena, M. (2019). PEDAGOGIES FOR SCAFFOLDING THINKING IN ESL. Thinking Skills
  17. and Creativity in Second Language Education: Case Studies from International Perspectives, 42.
  18. Analyzing Iranian Learners' English Language Quality …
  19. Herppich, S., Praetorius, A.-K., Förster, N., Glogger-Frey, I., Karst, K., Leutner, D., Klug, J. (2018).
  20. Teachers' assessment competence: Integrating knowledge-, process-, and product-oriented
  21. approaches into a competence-oriented conceptual model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76,
  22. –193.
  23. Hoy, C., Bayne-Jardine, C., & Wood, M. (2000). Improving Quality in Education. (1st ed.). London:
  24. Falmer Press.
  25. Jeong, K.-O. (2006). Promoting communicative language teaching in EFL context: An English writing
  26. course mediated through the Web. English Language Teaching, 18(3), 47-68.
  27. Kim, A. A., Chapman, M., Kondo, A., & Wilmes, C. (2020). Examining the assessment literacy required
  28. for interpreting score reports: A focus on educators of K-12 English learners. Language Testing,
  29. (1), 54–75.
  30. Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93,
  31. -782.
  32. Rachmajanti, S., Sulistyo, G. H., &Suharyadi, A. N. (2019). Developing ELT Teachers Professionally
  33. towards Capability Scaffolding Roles: Reflecting on Their Standing SWOT. ICLI 2018, 351.
  34. Raver, C. C. 2004. Placing emotional self-regulation in sociocultural and socioeconomic contexts. Child
  35. Development, 75, 346–353.
  36. Salimi, E. A., & Farsi, M. (2020). Probing into EFL teachers’ assessment literacy and teaching
  37. experience: The case of native ESL and nonnative EFL teachers. Journal of English language
  38. Teaching and Learning, 12(25), 269-288.
  39. Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge
  40. University Press.
  41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. The collected works of LS Vygotsky, 1, 39-285.
  42. Yang, Y. T., & Chan, C. Y. (2008). Comprehensive evaluation criteria for English learning websites
  43. using expert validity surveys. Computers & Education, 51(1), 403-422.
  44. Zins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2007). The scientific base linking
  45. social and emotional learning to school success. Journal of Educational and Psychological
  46. Consultation, 17(2-3), 191-210.