10.57647/JNTELL.2026.0502.12

An Investigation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in English Language Teaching: Iranian EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Opportunities in Focus

PDF
  • Fatemeh Sharifzadeh1,
  • Fatemeh Behjat*2,
  • Leila Akbarpour1,
  1. Department of English, Shi. C., Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
  2. Department of English, Aba. C., Islamic Azad University, Abadeh, Iran

Received: 2026-04-23

Revised: 2026-05-01

Accepted: 2026-05-20

Published in Issue 2026-06-30

Copyright (c) 2026 Fatemeh Sharifzadeh, Fatemeh Behjat, Leila Akbarpour (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Sharifzadeh, F., Behjat, F., & Akbarpour, L. (2026). An Investigation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in English Language Teaching: Iranian EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Opportunities in Focus. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/JNTELL.2026.0502.12
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 39

Abstract

Various domains of education including English language education have been influenced in various degrees by the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Emergence of AI-driven language models such as ChatGPT, Wordvice, Quillbot, and Duolingo is considered clear evidence for this claim. This study aimed to touch Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions of the use of AI (e.g., Wordvice, Quillbot, and Duolingo) in English language teaching and explore the opportunities of using AI-powered tools (e.g., Wordvice, Quillbot, and Duolingo) in English language teaching from Iranian EFL learners’ point of view. To this end, a qualitative thematic analysis design was used. The study recruited 30 learners studying English in different settings including universities and language schools, purposively selected from learners working with AI for research and learning purposes. This study used a semi-structured individual interview and written reflective journal to collect the data. The data collected from the interviews and reflective journals was thematically analyzed using open, axial and selective coding procedures. Concerning the first research question on EFL learners’ perceptions of the use of AI (e.g., Wordvice, Quillbot, and Duolingo) in English language teaching, the following themes were extracted: Enhancement of learners’ relationship with classmates, Decreasing learners’ willingness to ask questions, Time saving, Clarification of complex concepts, Creative teaching with individualized feedback, Probability of inaccurate information, Manipulating the learning process, Reducing learner efforts, Revolutionizing assessment methods, and Emergence of new research paradigms. With regard to the second research question on the opportunities of using AI-powered tools (e.g., Wordvice, Quillbot, and Duolingo) in English language teaching from Iranian EFL learners’ point of view, the following themes were identified: Making learners and teachers familiar with technology, Learner-oriented teaching, Keeping teachers and learners up-to-date, Making learning inquiry-based, Empowering teachers, and Enactment of new institutional ‎policies and responsibilities. This study’s implications extend to top policy makers, EFL teachers and learners.

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence (AI),
  • Opportunity,
  • Perception,
  • Technology
PDF

References

  1. Afshar, H. S., & Shirzadi, H. (2024). The impact of JeopardyLabs, Kahoot, and Quizizz on students' attitudes toward technology and their L2 achievement. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 25(4), 148-168.
  2. Alhalangy, A. G. I., AbdAlgane, M. (2023). Exploring the impact of AI on the EFL context: A case study of Saudi Universities. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 41-49 doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i2.125
  3. Baharloo, A., & Miyan Baghi, A. (2024). The impact of AI-assisted learning on EFL speaking skills: A mixed-methods study in the Iranian context. Technology Assisted Language Education, 2(4), 69-96. https://doi.org/10.22126/tale.2025.11299.1070
  4. Božić, V., & Poola, I. (2023). Chat GPT and education. Preprint.
  5. Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., & Sun, L. (2023). A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04226.es.
  6. Catal, C., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2019). Aligning education for the life sciences domain to support digitalization and industry 4.0. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.032
  7. Chivu, R. G., Popa, I. C., Orzan, M. C., Marinescu, C., Florescu, M. S., & Orzan, A. O. (2022). The role of blockchain technologies in the sustainable development of students’ learning process. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031406
  8. Cigdem, H., Ozturk, M., Karabacak, Y., Atik, N., Gürkan, S., & Aldemir, M. H. (2024). Unlocking student engagement and achievement: The impact of leaderboard gamification in online formative assessment for engineering education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12845-2
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design qualitative and quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
  10. Dugošija, T. (2024). Benefits and challenges of artificial intelligence in English language teaching. KNOWLEDGE – International Journal, 62(2), 275-280.
  11. Heejoo, I. (2023). A study on learners' perceptions and attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in general English classes. Culture and Convergence, 45(9), 1335-1342. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2023.09.45.09.1335
  12. Hwang, G. J., Chang, S. C., & Chen, P. Y. (2020). Effects of a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment on students’ learning performance and perceptions in English listening and reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 147, 103-110.
  13. Jahan, M., Azam, L. A., Ahmad, F., & Sadia, H. (2023). Reinforcement learning supplementing communicative language teaching: Examining the applications of ChatGPT in ELT classrooms. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 299-330.
  14. Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2023). Measuring EFL learners' use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2174524
  15. McPherson, M. S., & Bacow, L. S. (2015). Online higher education: Beyond the hype cycle. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 135–153. http://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.4.135
  16. Mehranirad, M. (2025). Exploring the impact of an AI-oriented teacher education program on efl teachers’ professional development. Technology Assisted Language Education, 3(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.22126/tale.2025.11510.1082
  17. Olivas-Padilla, B. E., Manitsaris, S., & Glushkova, A. (2024). Explainable AI in human motion: A comprehensive approach to analysis, modeling, and generation. Pattern Recognition, 110418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2023.110418
  18. Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2016). Student vulnerability, agency, and learning analytics: An exploration. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.10
  19. Rane, N. L., Choudhary, S. P., Tawde, A., & Rane, J. (2023). ChatGPT is not capable of serving as an author: ethical concerns and challenges of large language models in education. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(10), 851-874. https://doi.org/10.54926/IRJMETS23.10.851
  20. Ross, P., & Maynard, K. (2021). Towards a 4th industrial revolution. Intelligent Buildings International, 13(3), 159-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2021.1873625
  21. Rukiati, E., Wicaksono, J. A., Taufan, G. T., & Suharsono, D. D. (2023). AI on learning English: Application, benefit, and threat. Journal of Language, Communication, and Tourism, 1(2), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.25047/jlct.v1i2.3967
  22. Satar, H. M., & Akayoğlu, S. (2021). Automated feedback tools in foreign language writing: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Language Learning & Technology, 25(1), 1-22.
  23. Schukow, C., Smith, S. C., Landgrebe, E., Parasuraman, S., Folaranmi, O. O., Paner, G. P., & Amin, M. B. (2024). Application of ChatGPT in routine diagnostic pathology: Promises, pitfalls, and potential future directions. Advances in anatomic pathology, 31(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0000000000000417
  24. Schwab, K. (2018). Shaping the future of the fourth industrial revolution. Crown Currency.
  25. Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Morze, N., & Boiko, M. (2019). The impact of educational trends on the digital competence of students in Ukraine and Poland. In E.Smyrnova-Trybulska (Ed.), E-learning and STEM education, e-Learning (pp. 365-379). Studio Noa for University of Silesia.
  26. Stahl, B. C., & Eke, D. O. (2020). Artificial intelligence for learning? A systematic literature review of artificial intelligence applications in learning. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(5), 807-821. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2719
  27. Vaccino-Salvadore, S. (2023). Exploring the ethical dimensions of using ChatGPT in language learning and beyond. Languages, 8(3), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030191
  28. Vasconcelos, H., Jörke, M., Grunde-McLaughlin, M., Gerstenberg, T., Bernstein, M. S., & Krishna, R. (2023). Explanations can reduce overreliance on ai systems during decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545969
  29. Wang, T., Lund, B. D., Marengo, A., Pagano, A., Mannuru, N. R., Teel, Z. A., & Pange, J. (2023). Exploring the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on international students in higher education: Generative AI, chatbots, analytics, and international student success. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6716. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116716
  30. Wang, X., Liu, Q., Pang, H., Tan, S. C., Lei, J., Wallace, M. P., & Li, L. (2023). What matters in AI-supported learning: A study of human-AI interactions in language learning using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis. Computers & Education, 194, 104703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104703
  31. Wang, Y., Pan, Y., Yan, M., Su, Z., & Luan, T. H. (2023). A survey on ChatGPT: AI-generated contents, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2023.3300321
  32. Wazir, S., Mohani, S.S., Affandi, H., Rafique, A.A., & Soomro, M. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence and machine learning on predicting student performance and engagement. Dialogue Social Science Review, 3(1),1298-1311.
  33. Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: Impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-14.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955
  34. Wu, Y. (2023). Integrating generative AI in education: How ChatGPT brings challenges for future learning and teaching. Journal of Advanced Research in Education, 2(4), 6–10. Available online: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jare
  35. Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners' use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212
  36. Yang, M., & Mei, Q. (2019). The effects of AI-assisted language pronunciation systems on improving EFL learners’ speaking skills. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 12(1), 15-26.
  37. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  38. Zhang, Z., & Crawford, J. (2024). EFL learners’ motivation in a gamified formative assessment: The case of Quizizz. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 6217-6239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12034-7