10.57647/jntell.2026.0502.08

Critical Discourse Analysis of Iranian Media Framing of the COVID-19 Pandemic through Fairclough’s Three-Dimensional Model

PDF
  • Sara Shafiei Berenjkani*1,
  • Bahram Hadian1,
  • Ahmadreza Lotfi1,
  1. Department of English Language, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Received: 2025-12-25

Revised: 2025-01-06

Accepted: 2025-01-26

Published Online: 2026-02-05

Copyright (c) 2026 Sara Shafiei Berenjkani, Bahram Hadian, Ahmadreza Lotfi (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Shafiei Berenjkani, S., Hadian, B., & Lotfi, A. (2025). Critical Discourse Analysis of Iranian Media Framing of the COVID-19 Pandemic through Fairclough’s Three-Dimensional Model. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 5. https://doi.org/10.57647/jntell.2026.0502.08
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 254

Abstract

This mixed-methods study investigates how Iranian news media discursively framed the COVID-19 pandemic between 2019 and 2021, with the aim of uncovering the interplay between linguistic representation, discursive practice, and ideological reproduction. Grounded in Norman Fairclough’s three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and augmented by Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), the research analyzes a corpus of 100 news reports, headlines, and editorials from six major Iranian outlets: Kayhan, IRNA, Tasnim, Shargh, Etemad, and ISNA. The study adopts a sequential explanatory design: first, a qualitative inductive analysis identifies dominant discursive strategies (e.g., war/religious metaphors, passive constructions, intertextual appeals to authority); second, a quantitative coding scheme operationalizes these strategies to test three hypotheses regarding ideological convergence across outlet types. Results indicate statistically significant alignment in the use of unifying national-religious framing—particularly in modality distribution, metaphor frequency, and agency suppression—even across reformist and conservative platforms. The findings suggest that pandemic discourse in Iran functioned less as an arena of contestation and more as a coordinated apparatus of national meaning-making, legitimizing state authority through the naturalization of collective resilience. This study contributes to CDA literature by demonstrating how crisis discourse in ideologically saturated contexts can achieve discursive hegemony not through overt censorship, but through shared linguistic repertoires and recontextualized historical–religious narratives.

Keywords

  • Critical Discourse Analysis; Fairclough; Systemic Functional Linguistics; media framing
PDF

References

  1. Aghaie, R., & Rahimi, A. (2022). Discursive saturation in Persian Twitter during the pandemic: A critical discourse analysis of #IranCorona. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijal.2022.341278.674921
  2. Aghagolzadeh, F. (2015). Critical discourse analysis (3rd ed.). Scientific and Cultural Publications.
  3. Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797127
  4. Al-Ghamdi, A. (2021). Representing fear and hope: An ideological analysis of Saudi online newspapers’ coverage of COVID-19. Discourse & Communication, 15(5), 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211003921
  5. Al-Hassan, M. (2022). The pandemic as divine trial: Shi’a theological discourse in post-2003 Iraq. Journal of Shi‘a Islamic Studies, 15(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1353/isl.2022.0018
  6. Al-Rawi, A. (2022). Religious and scientific authority in pandemic news: A comparative study of Saudi and UAE media. Journal of Middle East Media, 18(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19357421.2022.2048461
  7. Al-Sayed, K. (2023). Epistemic balancing in Gulf media: How Arab news outlets negotiate science and faith during health crises. Media, Culture & Society, 45(1), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221119204
  8. Andersen, G., & Machin, D. (2021). Critical discourse analysis and multimodality. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 331–346). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679782-24
  9. Angouri, J. (2023). Discursive agency in institutional talk: Resistance, accommodation, and voice. Journal of Pragmatics, 199, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.11.003
  10. Angouri, J., & Greco, G. (2021). Agency in institutional discourse: A critical perspective. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(5), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1754251
  11. Bandurski, D. (2023). The zero-COVID narrative in Chinese state media: Techno-nationalism and discursive closure. China Quarterly, 253, 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741022001043
  12. Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2023). Corpus approaches to critical discourse studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003335282
  13. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2021). Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108922600
  14. Bashir, H., & Sabouri, K. (2021). The discourse of Shiite scholars in Iran regarding the issue of COVID-19. Iranian Journal of Social Studies, 15(2), 89–112.
  15. Bednarek, M. (2020). Language and evaluation in media discourse: Appraisal, stance, and affect. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350086338
  16. Blommaert, J. (2021). Discourse: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943061
  17. Blommaert, J. (2023). Discursive inequality and sociolinguistic exclusion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847480.001.0001
  18. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
  19. Charteris-Black, J. (2021). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76258-6
  20. Charteris-Black, J. (2023). Metaphors of pandemic: War, journey, and divine trial across global media. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00067.cha
  21. Chen, L., Ashraf, S., & Abdullah, I. (2020). Ideological construction in pandemic times: A critical discourse analysis of COVID-19 headlines in Pakistani newspapers. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(6), 897–919. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20008.che
  22. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771566
  23. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  24. De Cock, B., & Tallroth, A. (2023). Illiberal resilience: Crisis discourse in Iran, Russia, and Hungary during the pandemic. Discourse & Society, 34(6), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231172841
  25. Dovchin, S. (2023). Translingual agency and resistance in digital spaces: A critical sociolinguistic perspective. Language in Society, 52(3), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404522000217
  26. Doğan, E. (2022). Pandemic discourse in Turkish media: Neo-Ottomanism and Islamic solidarity in AKP-aligned outlets. Middle East Critique, 31(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2022.2055281
  27. Dutta, M. J., Pal, M., & Mahendru, A. (2021). Neoliberal authoritarianism and pandemic communication in India. Communication and the Public, 6(3–4), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473211062951
  28. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  29. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
  30. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Longman.
  31. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
  32. Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
  33. Fairclough, N., & Fairclough, I. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203126528
  34. Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2018). War metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1407688
  35. Ghasemi, M. (2021). Discursive continuity in Iranian economic journalism: Sanctions narratives from 2012–2020. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 14(2), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.31126/9781803270307.05
  36. Ghasemi, M., & Tajzadeh, M. (2022). Environmental crisis and revolutionary discourse: A CDA of Iranian media coverage of water scarcity. Discourse & Communication, 16(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211067424
  37. Haugh, M., & Weinglass, L. (2022). Epistemic stance and (im)politeness in political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 188, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.007
  38. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson.
  39. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
  40. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783774
  41. Hart, P. S., Chinn, S., & Soroka, S. (2020). Politicization and polarization in COVID-19 news coverage. Science Communication, 42(5), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020950031
  42. He, Y., & Zhang, W. (2021). Transitivity and agency in Chinese crisis discourse: A systemic functional approach. Functions of Language, 28(2), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.19022.he
  43. Heidari, M., Goudarzi, M., & Sajjadi, S. N. (2021). Analyzing the discourse of Iranian football coaches and players during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative approach. Sport Management and Development, 10(1), 45–62.
  44. Huang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Scientization of patriotism: Media framing of China’s zero-COVID policy. Asian Journal of Communication, 31(6), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.1978512
  45. Jäger, M., & Jäger, S. (2023). Critical discourse analysis (3rd ed.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.109
  46. Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (Eds.). (2022). The handbook of discourse analysis (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119558311
  47. Karimzad, F., & Catedral, L. (2022). Entextualization and voice in mediated discourse. Language in Society, 51(2), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404521000065
  48. Karlsen, R., & Andersen, K. (2023). Crisis, discourse, and discursive infrastructure: A framework for studying semiotic events. Discourse & Society, 34(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221127542
  49. Karlsen, R., & Andersen, K. (2024). Emotional scaffolding: Managing affect in pandemic news. Media, Culture & Society, 46(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231189211
  50. Karimi, S., Rahimi, A., & Aghaie, R. (2023). Hashtag hegemony: The semiotics of resistance on Persian Twitter during the pandemic. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(1), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac032
  51. Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2021). Techno-governance and transparency in South Korean pandemic communication. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 45(4), 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599211010324
  52. Kövecses, Z. (2020). Metaphor and pandemic discourse: Universal and culture-specific patterns. Language and Communication, 75, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.09.002
  53. Korkmaz, İ. (2023). Islamic solidarity and state legitimacy in Turkish crisis communication. Turkish Studies, 24(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2022.2051512
  54. KhosraviNik, M. (2020). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS): Theorizing the ‘digital’ turn in critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1723148
  55. KhosraviNik, M. (2022). Chronotopic legitimacy and intertextual sedimentation in populist discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 49, 100647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100647
  56. KhosraviNik, M. (2024). Crisis nationalism and authoritarian resilience: Discourse in the Global South. Journal of Language and Politics, 23(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22067.kho
  57. KhosraviNik, M., & Zia, M. (2014). CDA and new media discourse: A comparative analysis of Iranian and Western media framing of the 2009 election protests. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.836126
  58. Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader (pp. 34–61). Columbia University Press.
  59. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499417
  60. Krzyżanowski, M. (2022). Discourse, crisis, and social change: New directions in critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.2018336
  61. Krzyżanowski, M., & Forchtner, B. (2022). The Routledge handbook of language and politics (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003178545
  62. Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2021). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108925553
  63. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso.
  64. Li, G. (2021). Recontextualization and genre hybridity in Chinese health communication. Discourse & Communication, 15(6), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211012273
  65. Li, G. (2022). Biomedical nationalism in Chinese state media: The case of zero-COVID. Media International Australia, 183(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211062443
  66. Li, J., & Flowerdew, J. (2020). Corpus-based critical discourse analysis: Power, ideology and identity in academic discourse. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-3-030-47565-6
  67. Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. SAGE Publications.
  68. Maly, I. (2021). The global far right and the pandemic: A digital ethnographic perspective. Digital Journalism, 9(5), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1921591
  69. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
  70. Mautner, G. (2022). Recontextualization across time and space: A diachronic CDA of UK political discourse. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 23(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00067.mau
  71. Mirzaei, M., & Ghahraman, P. (2023). Parliamentary discourse and resistance ideology in Iran: A CDA of budget debates during the pandemic. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijal.2023.356782.674991
  72. Miskolci, R., Camargo, B., & Zanella, M. (2025). Crisis nationalism in the Global South: Authoritarian legitimacy in Brazil, Iran, and Hungary. Global Discourse, 15(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1332/204378923X16731245678901
  73. Naficy, H. (2022). War metaphors and memory in post-revolutionary Iranian discourse. Middle Eastern Studies, 58(4), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2021.1992773
  74. Nakamura, K. (2022). Wa and pandemic communication: Japanese media’s ethics of restraint. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(5), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2022.2052147
  75. Nasrallah, R. (2023). Divine trials and national endurance: Shi’a discourse in Lebanese pandemic coverage. Contemporary Islam, 17(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-022-00511-2
  76. Nguyen, L., & Vongsathorn, P. (2022). Affective governance in Southeast Asia: Fear and hope in pandemic news. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 53(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463422000465
  77. Osinanov, V. (2022). Discursive representation of COVID-19 in selected newspaper editorials: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2021.1922418
  78. Park, H. (2022). Transparency as legitimacy: South Korean media coverage of COVID-19. Korea Observer, 53(2), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.29152/KO.2022.53.2.289
  79. Perera, S. (2023). Majoritarian nationalism and pandemic discourse in Sri Lanka. Asian Ethnicity, 24(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2022.2045112
  80. Rahimi, A. (2023). Inflation and discursive crisis in Iranian economic journalism (2018–2022). Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 15(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.31126/9781803270413.04
  81. Rahimi, A., & Ketabi, S. (2023). Crisis framing in Iranian EFL textbooks: A CDA of post-2010 editions. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 36(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.2023015
  82. Rahman, M. M., & Hossain, M. A. (2022). Nationalism in pandemic headlines: A CDA of Bangladeshi English-language newspapers. Discourse & Communication, 16(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211031245
  83. Reisigl, M. (2022). War metaphors in political discourse: A diachronic perspective. Metaphor and the Social World, 12(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.21022.rei
  84. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2021). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003189381
  85. Rovino, D., Afifah, F. N., & Wardani, T. A. A. K. (2021). Fear rhetoric in the online news discourse on the COVID-19 pandemic in Teun van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of English Language and Culture, 11(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.21070/jelc.v11i2.1389
  86. Saeidi, A., & Yaghoubi, S. (2022). Non-confrontational coping in Iranian public discourse: A sociolinguistic analysis of pandemic narratives. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 57(6), 1342–1358. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096211031422
  87. Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
  88. Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J. (2022). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 43(2), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab030
  89. Shakeri, B. (2021). Discursive resilience: Economic crisis framing in Iranian state media. Middle East Journal, 75(4), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/48692345
  90. Shokouhi, H., Mohammadi, A., & Karimi, M. (2022). Discourse analysis of social justice in unemployment insurance laws during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Welfare Quarterly, 22(85), 177–205.
  91. Soroka, S., Wlezien, C., & Piston, S. (2021). Media framing and polarization: Evidence from the U.S. and U.K. during the pandemic. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1851843
  92. Sun, Y., & Zhao, W. (2022). Genre hybridization in Chinese health policy discourse: A systemic functional perspective. Discourse & Society, 33(4), 456–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265211065432
  93. Tajzadeh, M., & Ghasemi, M. (2023). Velayat-e faqih and crisis discourse: Theological authority in Iranian pandemic narratives. Iranian Studies, 56(2), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2022.2141234
  94. Tampubolon, D., Siregar, I., & Hasibuan, A. (2021). Discourse analysis of Delta variant coverage on Indonesian television talk shows. Asian Journal of Communication, 31(4), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.1897152
  95. Tanaka, H. (2023). Linguistic encoding of wa in Japanese pandemic discourse. Pragmatics, 33(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21033.tan
  96. Unger, J. W. (2022). Quantitative critical discourse studies. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.100
  97. Unger, J. W. (2024). Discourse and infrastructure: Language as social glue in crisis. Critical Discourse Studies, 21(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2229201
  98. van Dijk, T. A. (2020). Society and discourse: How social contexts control text and talk (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108622516
  99. Volodina, T. (2022). Hybrid war and pandemic discourse in Russian state media. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 36(3), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254211062147
  100. Wang, L., & Zhao, S. (2023). Chronotopic legitimation in Chinese presidential speeches. Discourse, Context & Media, 52, 100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100712
  101. Wodak, R. (2020). The politics of fear: The shameless normalisation of far-right discourse (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526499967
  102. Wodak, R., & Forchtner, B. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge handbook of language and politics (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003178545
  103. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  104. Yaghoubi, S., & Saeidi, A. (2022). Cultural resonance and recontextualization in Iranian news discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.2001542
  105. Yal-Sharzeh, S., & Monsefi, M. (2020). The discursive confrontation of the Iranian Ministry of Health with the outbreak of the coronavirus: A Faircloughian discourse analysis. Journal of Language Research, 12(35), 127–150.
  106. Zappavigna, M. (2022). Searchable talk: Hashtags and social media metadiscourse. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350107892
  107. Zappavigna, M., & Dovchin, S. (2023). Discourse of Twitter and social media 2.0. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350235654
  108. Zia, M., & KhosraviNik, M. (2021). CDA and Iranian media: Resistance, nationalism, and crisis discourse. In M. KhosraviNik & M. Zia (Eds.), Critical discourse studies in context and cognition (pp. 142–160). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.93.08zia