10.57647/JNTELL.2025.si-05

Enhancing EFL Learning: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the "General English" Textbook’s Pedagogical Effectiveness and Cultural Relevance at Arak University

  1. Department of Foreign Languages, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
  2. Department of ELT, Ahv.C., Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
  3. Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Languages, Arak University, Arak, Iran

Received: 2025-09-15

Revised: 2025-09-25

Accepted: 2025-09-30

Published in Issue 2025-10-19

How to Cite

Alinouri, L., Ayatfard, F., & Badpa, H. (2025). Enhancing EFL Learning: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the "General English" Textbook’s Pedagogical Effectiveness and Cultural Relevance at Arak University. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 4. https://doi.org/10.57647/JNTELL.2025.si-05

PDF views: 154

Abstract

This study sought to assess the "General English" textbook, authored by Manouchehr Jafari Gohar, published by Payame Noor University press, and used as a reading resource and general English coursebook at Arak University in 2025 by employing a synthesized 40-item checklist adapted from the evaluation frameworks of Abdel Wahab (2013), Ansary and Babaii (2002), Rahimy (2007), and Tok (2010), integrated to assess general appearance, objectives, content, activities, and language skills, complemented by semi-structured teacher interviews for further evaluation. This book was used in some classes at Arak University as a reading book and general course text. To evaluate the "General English" textbook, a purposive sampling method was employed to select 84 first-semester undergraduate students (48 males, 36 females) from four classes at Arak University, representing English-Persian Translation , Civil Engineering, Practical Chemistry, and Mechanics , along with four teachers responsible for teaching the textbook in these classes, with data collected using a 40-item checklist for students and semi-structured interviews with teachers. The students’ checklist consisted of forty items, and the teachers’ interview contained seven questions.  After data analysis, it was shown that the teachers and students believed that the cover and appearance of the book are attractive. In addition, teachers reported that mandatory topics and practical words are addressed in the book, and the books are interesting and accessible for students. In addition, the outcomes reported that the content of the book is up-to-date and practical, and the objectives are clearly identified. It was determined that although the textbook was not very flawed. It indicated that the textbook had met students’ needs, and it could be a good book in the hands of a good teacher. Based on these considerations, researchers should consider that the textbook could be recommended in teaching and learning situations, and it could be an effective textbook in the hands of teachers who can adapt this book to the situation and culture in teaching.  

References

  1. AbdelWahab, M. (2013). Developing an English language textbook evaluative checklist. IOSR Journal of Research and Method in Education, 1(3), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0135570
  2. Agustin, A., & Wirza, Y. (2020). Indonesian teachers' perspective towards the use of authentic materials on students' communicative competence in the EFL classroom. In Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control (pp. 1-5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3440084.3441215.
  3. Ahmadi, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2022). EFL teachers' perceptions towards textbook evaluation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 260–267.
  4. Ahour, T., & Ahmadi, E. (2020). Textbook evaluation in EFL contexts: A comprehensive review. English Language Teaching, 13(7), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p45
  5. Ahour, T., Towhidiyan, B., & Saeidi, M. (2021). The evaluation of English textbooks in Iranian high schools: Teachers’ perspectives. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 50–158.
  6. Akbar, R. (2020). An analysis of selected eleventh-grade English textbooks. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 109–126.
  7. Amanati, L., Kuhi, D., & Saeidi, M. (2023). An investigation on EFL teachers’ defining their possible selves in the future: Teaching experience in focus. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 2(3), 36–48.
  8. Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(2), 1–8.
  9. Ariawan, D. A., Nurkamto, J., & Sumardi, S. (2022). Critical discourse analysis of cultural representations in EFL national commercial textbooks. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(3), 1112-1127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i3.24579.
  10. Atai, M. R., & Asadi, S. A. (2022). Assessing academic and professional English language needs of Iranian railway engineering students: A triangulated evaluation study. ESP across Culture, 10(1), 35–54.
  11. Awasthi, J. R. (2022). Textbook and its evaluation. Journal of Nepal English Language Teachers' Association, 11(1-2), 1–10.
  12. Ayu, M., & Indrawati, R. (2022). EFL textbook evaluation: The analysis of tasks presented in English textbook. Teknosastik, 16(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v16i1.87
  13. Azizifar, A., & Baghelani, E. (2021). Textbook evaluation from EFL teachers’ perspectives: The case of “Top-Notch” series. International SAMANM Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 22–41.
  14. Besharati, M. H., & Mazdayasna, G. (2023). Investigating Iranian EFL students’ attitudes concerning the newly developed ESP materials. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 7(5), 45–58.
  15. Cunningsworth, A. (2023). Choosing your course book. Oxford: Heinemann.
  16. Demir, Y., & Ertas, A. (2021). A suggested eclectic checklist for ELT coursebook evaluation. The Reading Matrix, 14(2), 243–252.
  17. Ebadi, S., & Naderifarjad, Z. (2021). Evaluation of EAP textbooks: A comparison between SAMT English for medical students and Oxford English for career. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(3), 133–149.
  18. Ellis, R. (2022). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36
  19. Evans, J., & John, T. (2020). Program evaluation in language teaching: A practical guide. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819878392
  20. Gabrielatos, C. (2020). The coursebook as a flexible tool: Materials evaluation and adaptation. IATEFL Teacher Trainers and Educators SIG Newsletter, 1(2), 28–31.
  21. Garinger, D. (2020). Textbook selection for the ESL classroom. Center for Applied Linguistics Digest, 2(10), 1–2.
  22. Gholami, R., Noordin, N., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2022). A thorough scrutiny of ELT textbook evaluations: A review inquiry. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(3), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.3p.82
  23. Ghorbani, M. R. (2020). Quantification and graphic representation of EFL textbook evaluation results. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.5.511-520
  24. Hargreaves, A. (2020). Curriculum and assessment reform. Toronto, Canada: OISE Press.
  25. Harmer, J. (2021). How to Teach English. London & New York: Longman Inc.
  26. Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (2021). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.4.315
  27. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (2022). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Kanina, I. R. (2021). An evaluation of reading materials in English in focus textbook for seventh grade students in Bandung. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 39–50.
  29. Kariminasab, F., Najafi Karimi, S., & Marzban, A. (2023). Investigating the Iranian practices in teaching English in secondary schools. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 1(3), 1–23.
  30. Khalili, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2023). Exploring EFL teachers’ intercultural competence and intercultural sensitivity levels: The story of teachers’ experience. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 4(1), 1–20.
  31. Khodabakhshi, M. (2023). Choose a proper EFL textbook: Evaluation of "Skyline" series. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(2), 959–967.
  32. Khodadady, E., & Attaran, A. (2023). Evaluation of “Ready for First Certificate of English”: Microstructural approach. RIMCIS. Revista Internacional y Multidisciplinar en Ciencias Sociales, 6(1), 1–22.
  33. Kiely, R. (2021). Small answers to the big question: Learning from language program evaluation. Language Teaching Research, 13(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808095520
  34. Klanawong, S. (2022). A study of reading questions in high school English textbooks and National tests. The New English Teacher, 11(1), 44–68.
  35. Lami, J. M. (2020). Making the textbook more communicative. The Internet TESL Journal, 5(1), 41–58.
  36. Litz, D. R. (2020). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. Asian EFL Journal, 48(1), 1–53.
  37. McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  38. Mohammadi, M., & Abdi, H. (2023). Textbook evaluation: A case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(2), 1148–1155.
  39. O’Neil, R. (2021). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.2.104
  40. Rahimy, R. (2007). A course book evaluation. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 2(6), 121–139.
  41. Rezaee, P., & Hashemi, A. (2022). English textbook evaluation in EFL classroom: A critical approach. 15th International TELLSI conference. Tehran: Islamic Azad University.
  42. Riazi, A. M. (2021). What textbook evaluation schemes tell us? A study of the textbook evaluation schemes of three decades. In W. A. Renanda (Ed.), Methodology and Materials Design in Language Teaching (pp. 52–68). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Center.
  43. Richards, J. C. (2022). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2022). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Sheldon, L. (2020). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
  46. Soori, A., Kafipour, R., & Soury, M. (2021). EFL textbook evaluation and graphic representation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 26(3), 481–493.
  47. SunHao. (2023). The analysis and evaluation of the new standard English student’s book one. Campus English Magazine, 3(1), 3–6.
  48. Tok, H. (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers’ perspectives. Educational Research and Review, 5(9), 508–517.
  49. Tomlinson, B. (2023). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: Continuum.
  50. Ur, P. (2023). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  51. Yousefi Azarfam, A. A., & Noordin, N. (2021). Evaluating an English textbook for application in the Iranian EFL academic context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(3), 618–623.