10.57647/JNTELL.2025.si-01

Advancing English Language Education through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Benefits and Challenges

PDF
  • Eko Risdianto1,
  • Shaghayegh Shirzadi2,
  • Neda Fatehi Rad3,
  • Hamed Barjesteh4,
  • Hossein Isaee*5,
  1. Doctoral Program in Education, University of Bengkulu, Kota Bengkulu-38122, Indonesia
  2. Eiman Narimani Marketing Management Co. L L.C., Dubai, UAE
  3. Department of English Language, Ke.C, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
  4. Department of English Language, Am.C., Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran
  5. 5Department of English Language and Literature, Am.C., Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran

Received: 2025-08-14

Revised: 2025-09-11

Accepted: 2025-09-29

Published in Issue 2025-10-19

Copyright (c) 2025 Eko Risdianto, Shaghayegh Shirzadi, Neda Fatehi Rad, Hamed Barjesteh, Hossein Isaee (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Risdianto, E., Shirzadi, S., Fatehi Rad, N., Barjesteh, H., & Isaee, H. (2025). Advancing English Language Education through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Benefits and Challenges. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 4. https://doi.org/10.57647/JNTELL.2025.si-01
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 668

Abstract

English functions as a dominant global language in sectors such as employment, commerce, tourism, communication, and international relations. Nevertheless, learners of English frequently encounter numerous obstacles in developing their language proficiency. Previous research indicates that artificial intelligence (AI) offers several benefits for enhancing English language teaching and learning (ELT/L). This paper addresses the need to explore both the specific advantages and difficulties associated with integrating AI into ELT/L. Employing a systematic review guided by PRISMA protocols, 42 relevant studies were identified. The results outline the geographical distribution of research, learner demographics, and publication timelines. Through grounded coding, the study highlights AI's contributions to improving speaking, writing, reading, pedagogical methods, and learner self-regulation. Conversely, challenges such as technical malfunctions, AI limitations, user apprehension, and the pressure to standardize language emerged. Stakeholders, including policymakers, funding bodies, educators, and administrators, can utilize these insights to obtain a comprehensive view of AI's evolving role in ELT/L. Practical recommendations are offered to inform future implementations of AI in this field.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence,
  • AI-education,
  • English as a foreign language
PDF

References

  1. Annamalai, N., Eltahir, M. E., Zyoud, S. H., Soundrarajan, D., Zakarneh, B., & Al Salhi, N. R. (2023). Exploring English language learning via chatbot: A case study from a self-determination theory perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100148. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j. caeai. 2023. 100148
  2. Baranwal, D. (2022). A systematic review of exploring the potential of teachable agents in English learning. Pedagogical Research, 7(1), em0117. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11553
  3. Barjesteh, H., & Isaee, H. (2024). Is technology an asset? Enhancing EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension through CALL. International Journal of Research in English Education, 9(1), 50–69. https://ijreeonline.com/browse.php?a_id=848&sid=1&slc_lang=fa
  4. Belur, J., Tompson, L., Thornton, A., & Simon, M. (2018). Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: Exploring variation in coder decision-making. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372
  5. Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Bali, M., Dron, J., Mir, K., Stewart, B., Costello, E., Mason, J., Stracke, C. M., Romero-Hall, E., Koutropoulos, A., … Jandrić, P. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53–130. https:// doi. Org /10. 5281/ zenodo. 7636568
  6. Çakmak, F. (2022). Chatbot-human interaction and its effects on EFL pupils’ L2 speaking performance and anxiety. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 16(2), 113–131.
  7. Chen, C.H., Koong, C.-S., & Liao, C. (2022). Influences of integrating dynamic assessment into a speech recognition learning design to support public English-speaking skills, learning anxiety and cognitive load. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 1–14.
  8. Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365–397. https:// doi. org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942
  9. Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education: Grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100005. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j.caeai.2020.100005
  10. Chen, Y.-L., Hsu, C.-C., Lin, C.-Y., & Hsu, H.-H. (2022). Robot-assisted language learning: Integrating artificial intelligence and virtual reality into English tour guide practice. Education Sciences, 12(7), 437. https:// doi. org/ 10.3390/educsci12070437
  11. Chon, Y. V., Shin, D., & Kim, G. E. (2021). Comparing L2 learners’ writing against parallel machine-translated texts: Raters’ assessment, linguistic complexity, and errors. System, 96, 102408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102408
  12. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2020). Mobile learning and pedagogical opportunities: A configurative systematic review of PreK–12 research using the SAMR framework. Computers & Education, 156, 103945. https:// doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103945
  13. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in K–12 education. SN Social Sciences, 2, 113. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/s43545-022-00425-5
  14. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
  15. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). The educational affordances and challenges of ChatGPT: State of the field. TechTrends, 68(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0
  16. Crompton, H., Jones, M. V., & Burke, D. (2022). Affordances and challenges of artificial intelligence in K–12 education: A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(2), 164–185. https:// doi. org/ 10.1080/15391523.2022.2121344
  17. Cumming, A., Yang, L., Qiu, C., Zhang, L., Ji, X., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Zhan, J., Zhang, F., Xu, C., Cao, R., Yu, L., Chu, M., Liu, M., Cao, M., & Lai, C. (2018). Pupils’ practices and abilities for writing from sources in English at universities in China. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 1–15. https:// doi. org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.001
  18. Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. (2021). Examining the impact of Grammarly on the quality of mobile L2 writing. JALT CALL Journal, 17(2), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n2.336
  19. Dizon, G., & Tang, D. (2020). Intelligent personal assistants for autonomous second language learning: An investigation of Alexa. JALT CALL Journal, 16(2), 107–120. https:// doi. org/10.29140/jaltcall.v16n2.273
  20. Ericsson, E., Hashemi, S. S., & Lundin, J. (2023). Fun and frustrating: Pupils’ perspectives on practising speaking English with virtual humans. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2170088. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2170088
  21. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Sage.
  22. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833743
  23. He, Y. (2021). Challenges and countermeasures of translation teaching in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1881(2), 022086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1881/2/022086
  24. Hew, K. F., Huang, W., Du, J., & Jia, C. (2023). Using chatbots to support pupil goal setting and social presence in fully online activities: Learner engagement and perceptions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35, 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09338-x
  25. International Society for Technology in Education. (2018). Artificial intelligence explorations and their practical use in schools. https://www.iste.org/professional-development/iste-u/artificial-intelligence
  26. Isaee, H., & Barjesteh, H. (2023). EFL teachers’ professional development needs: A comparative phenomenological analysis for face-to-face and online instruction. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 12(2), 45–56. https:// www. researchgate. net/publication/373757956
  27. Isaee, H., & Barjesteh, H. (2025). Screening EFL teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of emergency remote teaching during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 568–599. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00353-7
  28. Isaee, H., Barjesteh, H., & Rad, N. F. (2024). Integrating brain-based learning activities into online TESOL courses: Exploring different learning styles. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning, 3. http:// oiccpress. com/ jntell/ article/view/8355
  29. Kannan, J., & Munday, P. (2018). New trends in second language learning and teaching through the lens of ICT, networked learning, and artificial intelligence. Circle of Linguistics Applied to Communication, 76, 13–30. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5209/CLAC.62495
  30. Kazu, I. Y., & Kuvvetli, M. (2023). The influence of pronunciation education via artificial intelligence technology on vocabulary acquisition in learning English. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(2), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.2.1044
  31. Kim, N.-Y. (2019). A study on the use of artificial intelligence chatbots for improving English grammar skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.8.037
  32. Kim, N.-Y. (2022). AI-integrated mobile-assisted language learning: Is it an effective way of preparing for the TOEIC test in classroom environments? English Teaching, 77(3), 79–102.https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.77.3.202209.79
  33. Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Pupil engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
  34. Lan, P.-S., Liu, M.-C., & Baranwal, D. (2020). Applying contracts and online communities to promote pupil self-regulation in English learning at the primary-school level. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789674
  35. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  36. Lee, D., Kim, H.-H., & Sung, S.-H. (2023). Development research on an AI English learning support system to facilitate learner-generated-context-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 629–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10172-2
  37. Li, D., Tong, T. W., & Xiao, Y. (2021, February 18). Is China emerging as the global leader in AI? Harvard Business Review. https:// hbr. org/ 2021 /02/ is- china- emerging-as-the-global-leader-in-ai
  38. Lin, C.-J., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Learning analytics for investigating the mind map-guided AI chatbot approach in an EFL flipped speaking classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 16–35.
  39. Liu, S.-C., & Hung, P.-Y. (2016). Teaching pronunciation with computer-assisted pronunciation instruction in a technological university. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 1939–1943. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040902
  40. Lo, S. (2023). Neural machine translation in EFL classrooms: Learners’ vocabulary improvement, immediate vocabulary retention and delayed vocabulary retention. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2207603
  41. Loncar, M., Schams, W., & Liang, J.-S. (2023). Multiple technologies, multiple sources: Trends and analyses of the literature on technology-mediated feedback for L2 English writing published from 2015–2019. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 722–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1943452
  42. Luo, M., & Cheng, L. (2020). Exploration of interactive foreign language teaching mode based on artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on Computer Vision, Image and Deep Learning (pp. 285–290). IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1109/CVIDL51233.2020.00-84
  43. Ma, G. (2021). The current situations of mobile assisted language learning. In J. MacIntyre, J. Zhao, & X. Ma (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Big Data Analytics for IoT Security and Privacy (pp. 675–679). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62746-1_99
  44. Margana, M. (2016). Voices of English teachers and pupils on blended culture as a model of English language teaching and learning at vocational high schools in Yogyakarta. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n3p459
  45. Mlinarić, A., Horvat, M., & Smolčić, V. Š. (2017). Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results. Biochemia Medica, 27(3), 447–452. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.030201
  46. Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence-powered digital writing assistance in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014.https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ j.heliyon. 2021. e07014
  47. Noviyanti, S. D. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI)-based pronunciation checker: An alternative for independent learning in pandemic situation. The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 5(2), 162. https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/eltecho/article/view/7246
  48. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  49. Pokrivčáková, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025
  50. Rowe, L. W. (2022). Google Translate and biliterate composing: Second-graders’ use of digital translation tools to support bilingual writing. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 883–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3143
  51. Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
  52. Sharadgah, T. A., & Sa’di, R. A. (2022). A systematic review of research on the use of artificial intelligence in English language teaching and learning (2015–2021): What are the current effects? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 337–377. https://doi.org/10.28945/4999
  53. Shivakumar, A., Shukla, S., Vasoya, M., Kasrani, I. M., & Pei, Y. (2019). AI-enabled language speaking coaching for dual language learners. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet, 17(1), 66–78.
  54. Sindermann, C., Sha, P., Zhou, M., Wernicke, J., Schmitt, H. S., Li, M., Sariyska, R., Stavrou, M., Becker, B., & Montag, C. (2021). Assessing the attitude towards artificial intelligence: Introduction of a short measure in German, Chinese, and English language. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00689-0
  55. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1995). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Sage.
  56. Tai, T.-Y., Chen, H. H., & Todd, G. (2022). The impact of a virtual reality app on adolescent EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 892–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1752735
  57. Thompson, A., Gallacher, A., & Howarth, M. (2018). Stimulating task interest: Human partners or chatbots? In P. Taalas, J. Jalkanen, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Future-proof CALL: Language learning as exploration and encounters—Short papers from EUROCALL 2018 (pp. 302–306). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.854
  58. Tokoz-Goktepe, F. (2014). Speaking problems of 9th-grade high school Turkish learners of L2 English and possible reasons for those problems: Exploring the teachers’ and pupils’ perspectives. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1875–1879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.487
  59. Ulicheva, A., Harvey, H., Aronoff, M., & Rastle, K. (2018). Skilled readers’ sensitivity to meaningful regularities in English writing. Cognition, 195, 103810. https:// doi. org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.013
  60. Viktorivna, K. L., Oleksandrovych, V. A., Oleksandrivna, K. I., & Oleksandrivna, K. N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in language learning: What are we afraid of. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 8, 262–273. https:// doi.org/ 10.24093 /awej/call8.18
  61. Vuong, Q.-H., La, V.-P., Nguyen, M.-H., Jin, R., La, M.-K., & Le, T.-T. (2023). AI’s humanoid appearance can affect human perceptions of its emotional capability: Evidence from self-reported data in the U.S. International Journal of Social Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01036-9
  62. Wang, X., Liu, Q., Pang, H., Tan, S. C., Lei, J., Wallace, M. P., & Li, L. (2023). What matters in AI-supported learning: A study of human-AI interactions in language learning using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis. Computers & Education, 194, 104703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104703
  63. Xiaohong, W., & Yanzheng, W. (2021, February). The application of artificial intelligence in modern foreign language learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Big Data and Education (pp. 34–37). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451400.3451406
  64. Xu, Z., Wijekumar, K., Ramirez, G., Hu, X., & Irey, R. (2019). The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K–12 pupils’ reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3119–3137. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12758
  65. Yang, H., & Kyun, S. (2022). The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 180–210. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7492
  66. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  67. Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2023). A review of research on technology-enhanced peer feedback for second language writing based on the activity theory framework. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 6727–6753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11469-8
  68. Zheng, D., Bischoff, M., & Gilliland, B. (2015). Vocabulary learning in massively multiplayer online games: Context and action before words. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 771–790. https:// doi. org/ 10.1007/s11423-015-9387-4