10.57647/jntell.2025.0402.12

On the Application of Forensic Linguistics in the Iranian Context: Insights from ELT and Law Experts

PDF
  • Saeideh Mahmoodi Momen Abadi1,
  • Fazlolah Samimi*2,
  • Shahram Afraz1,
  1. Department of English Language Teaching, Qe.C., Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran
  2. Department of English Language Teaching, BA.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Received: 2025-03-30

Revised: 2025-04-25

Accepted: 2025-06-26

Published in Issue 2025-07-18

Copyright (c) 2025 Saeideh Mahmoodi Momen Abadi, Fazlolah Samimi, Shahram Afraz (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Mahmoodi Momen Abadi, S., Samimi, F., & Afraz, S. (2025). On the Application of Forensic Linguistics in the Iranian Context: Insights from ELT and Law Experts. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/jntell.2025.0402.12
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 285

Abstract

Forensic Linguistics (Henceforth, FL) recognizes the pivotal role that language plays in legal cases, particularly in the analysis of documents and similar evidence. This means that language can be applied as an investigatory tool to solve legal problems. The objective of this qualitative study was to conceptualize and construct a comprehensive model for the applications of FL in Iranian EFL context. To this end, some face to face and focus group interviews were performed. Twenty-three university professors (including 12 associate and assistant professors in the field of TEFL and 11 associate and assistant professors in the field of law) with diverse profile of experience from three distinct provinces of Iran participated in the interviews. Codifying and transcribing the data according to Corbin and Strauss’s (2014) systematic steps of open, axial and selective coding, the results demonstrated five main themes (balancing asymmetrical power, clarifying the courtroom discourse, recognizing one’s personal identity, promoting fair and just language, interpreting legal documents soundly) and twenty categories. The findings suggest we can effectively harness advantages of FL to elevate and foster justice, and to ensure linguistic precision in legal and forensic proceedings of Iranian context.

Keywords

  • Asymmetrical power,
  • Forensic linguistics,
  • Legal texts
PDF

References

  1. Ahmed, H. R. (2020). A speech act analysis of the prime minister of Pakistan Imran Khan’s speech at UNGA with respect to Islamophobia. International Journal of Social Sciences Humanities, 5(2), 59-71.
  2. Alhumsi, M.H. (2019). Key aspects in relation to forensic linguistics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 2(5), 83-85. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3461551
  3. Ali, A., David, M. K., & Sardar Ali Shah. (2022). Investigating lawyers’ perceptions of forensic linguistics in Pakistan’s Sindh Province: A way towards collaboration. Journal of Indonesian Community for Forensic Linguistics, 1(1), 1–13. https://klfindonesia.org/ojs/index.php/jicfl/article/view/2
  4. Anesa, P. (2022). Fighting cybercrime through linguistic analysis. In V. Guillén-Nieto & D. Stein (Eds.), Language as evidence (pp. 419–438). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_12
  5. Anglesos, E. (2023). An overview of forensic linguistics and its application in real-life cases. Universitat de Barcelona.
  6. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. A. (2014). Introduction to research in education. USA: Cengage Learning
  7. Ariani, M. G., Sajedi, F., & Sajedi, M. (2014). Forensic linguistics: A brief overview of the key elements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 222-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.078
  8. Catoto, J. (2022). On courtroom questioning: A forensic linguistic analysis. Available at SSRN 4137842. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4137842
  9. Christensen, T. K., & Mortensen, S. S. (2018). Introduction to special issue on forensic linguistics: European perspectives. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 41(Special Issue 2), 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586518000112
  10. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 14). sage.
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health services research, 48(6pt2), 2134-2156.
  12. Erdian, S., Hasnidar, H., Ezir, E., & Surbakti, E. B. (2019). A need analysis of forensic linguistics teaching material development for university. Journal Polingua: Scientific Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Education, 8(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.30630/polingua.v8i1.78
  13. Fallah, H., Razmjoo, S. A., Sahragard, R., & Jafari, S. M. (2024). Factors contributing to Iranian EFL institute teachers' identity reconstruction in online classes. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2023.41886.2883
  14. Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2014). an introduction to language. Cengage
  15. Gallego Balcells, C. (2023). An Overview of Forensic Linguistics and its Application in Real-Life Cases.
  16. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data, sage.
  17. Gumono, G. (2015). Profil kemampuan membaca peserta didik sekolah dasar di Provinsi Bengkulu. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 17(2), 201-211.
  18. Gorbatenko, O. (2021). Forensic linguistic expertise for university students’ interdisciplinary training. Abstracts & Proceedings of INTCESS 2021 - 8th International Conference on Education and Education of Social Sciences, 18-19 January, 2021. https://doi.org/10.51508/intcess.2021111
  19. Haryanto, H., & Arimi, S. (2022). The implication of the meaning of utterances in defamation cases: A forensic linguistics study. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 11(1), 19-30.
  20. Harupe, M. T. (2019). A forensic linguistics study of the spoken courtroom language used in theft and burglary cases at the Windhoek Magistrate’s Court (Doctoral dissertation, Namibia University of Science and Technology (NUST)). http://ir.nust.na:8080/jspui/handle/10628/698
  21. Houtman, H., & Suryati, S. (2018). The history of forensic linguistics as an assisting tool in the analysis of legal terms. Sriwijaya Law Review, 2(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss2.135.pp215-233
  22. Irimba, F. M., Ndambuki, J., & Mwithi, F. (2021). A forensic interpretation of hateful micro-speech acts and performative modality in Facebook and Twitter during the 2017 election in Kenya. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(3), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.3.8
  23. Izadi, A. (2022). Intercultural politeness and impoliteness: A case of Iranian students with Malaysian professors. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2022.17801
  24. Izadi, A., & Jalilifar, A. R. (2022). Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness research. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2022.17798
  25. Juodkaitė-Granskienė, G., Herasimenkienė, G., Žalkauskienė, A., & Jurka, R. (2017). The problem of definition of plagiarism and features of usage of other texts identified in forensic linguistics examinations. Pedagogika, 126(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2017.29
  26. Khoyi, A. M., & Behnam, B. (2014). Legal discourse: Analysis of education and criminal convictions in Iranian courts. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 2(06).
  27. Kolb, S. M. (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of emerging trends in educational research and policy studies, 3(1), 83-86
  28. Krassa, S. I. (2020). First roundtable on practices and standards in forensic authorship analysis (overview 1). Политическая лингвистика, 6, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.26170/pl20-06-19
  29. eonard, R. A., Ford, J. E. R., & Christensen, T. K. (2017). Forensic linguistics: Applying the science of linguistics to issues of the law. Hofstra Law Review, 45(3), Article 11. https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol45/iss3/11
  30. Maley, W. (1994). Beyond the law?: The justice of deconstruction. Law and Critique, 10, 49–69.
  31. Maley, Y. (1994). The language of the law. In J. Gibbons (Ed.), Language and the law (pp. 198–211). Longman Group UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch11
  32. McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
  33. Mehrabani, J., Dehghan, M., Sabri, K., & Badakhshan, E. (2022). Representation of discourse features of lawyers on judge persuasion from forensic linguistics perspective: A case study of the discourse of criminal cases. Language Related Research, 13(2), 529–562. https://doi.org/10.52547/LRR.13.2.17
  34. Mirkovic, P. R. (2016). The legal basis of local government borrowing through the issuance of municipal bonds in the Republic of Serbia. Kultura Polisa, 13, 443.
  35. Mishra, P. (2019). Interdisciplinary approach in education. Ghaziabad, India: Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Retrieved from https://www.ipemgzb.ac.in/blog/Interdisciplinary-Approach-In-Education
  36. Momeni, N., & Azizi, S. (2015). Role of topic shift and violence of Grice principles in interrogation: Forensic linguistics. ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 7(16), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.22051/JLR.2015.2094
  37. Mortensen, S. S. (2020). A question of control?: Forms and functions of courtroom questioning in two different adversarial trial systems. Scandinavian Studies in Language, 11(1), 239–278. https://doi.org/10.7146/sss.v11i1.121370
  38. Najafi, P., & Haghbin, F. (2020). Verbal strategies in interrogation interaction (An investigation in legal discourse). Language Related Research, 11(4), 391-418.
  39. Nordin, M. Z. F. (2016). Forensic linguistics and the detecting of deviant teaching in Malaysia. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.08.39
  40. Olsson, J. (2008). Wordcrime: Solving crime through forensic linguistics. A&C Black.
  41. Onoja, G. O., & Oguche, R. F. E. (2021). A linguistic exploration of the interface between forensic discourse analysis and critical discourse analysis in the trials of brother Jero. Dutsinma. Journal of English and Literature, 4(1), 136-152.
  42. Perkins, R., & Grant, T. (2013). Forensic linguistics. In J. Siegel, P. Saukko, & M. Houck (Eds.), Encyclopedia of forensic sciences (2nd ed., pp. 174–177). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382165-2.00030-1Perkins, R. C. (2021). The application of forensic linguistics in cybercrime investigations. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pay097
  43. Rahimi, A., & Askari Bigdeli, R. (2016). Challenges of action research: Insights from language institutes. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 3-15.
  44. Ramezani, F., Sani, A. K., & Moghadam, K. (2016). Forensic linguistics in the light of crime investigation. Pertanika Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(1), 375-384.
  45. Rañosa-Madrunio, M., & Martin, I. P. (2023). Forensic linguistics in the Philippines: Origins, developments, and directions. Cambridge University Press.
  46. Rock, F. (2007). Communicating rights: The language of arrest and detention. Springer.
  47. Rose, J., & Johnson, C. W. (2020). Contextualizing reliability and validity in qualitative research: Toward more rigorous and trustworthy qualitative social science in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(4), 432–451.
  48. Sagheer, I., Fatima, S., Sarwer, S., & Rasool, S. A. (2024). A forensic linguistic analysis of crime language used in the headlines of the newspaper “The News International.” Jahan-e-Tahqeeq, 7(1), 757–766.
  49. Sakakini, A. (2020). Forensic linguistics: An applied theory. BAU Journal - Society, Culture and Human Behavior, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8296.1022
  50. Samimi, F., & Sahragard, R. (2018). On the validation of a preliminary model of reading strategy using SEM: Evidence from Iranian elt postgraduate students. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 105-126.
  51. Sanni, O. O. (2016). The role of forensic linguistics in courtroom cross examination. Ife Studies in English12 (2), 1-12.
  52. Seyari, A., & Bagheri, M. S. (2019). Perspectives of Forensic Linguistics Research in Iran. Journal of Language Horizons, 3(1), 187.
  53. Sobhani, S., Gorjian, B., Mahmoudi, K., & Veysi, E. (2023). Classification of interrogating defendants' spoken and written discourse markers in courts based on the McMenamin's forensic linguistics framework. Language Related Research, 14(4), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.22034/JCLC.2023.329574.1652
  54. olan, L. M. (2020). The forensic linguist: The expert linguist meets the adversarial system. In The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 349–363). Routledge.
  55. Sumaljag, M. V. (2018). A forensic linguistic analysis of police reports. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 23(1), 80-102.
  56. Sudjana, E. T., (2013). Kurt Cobain’s Suicide Note Case: Forensic Linguistic Profiling Analysis.
  57. Syam, S. K. M. A. (2018). Aspects of forensic linguistics in policing. Language in India, 18, 100-111.
  58. Umiyati, M. (2020). A literature review of forensic linguistics. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistic), 1(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.22225/ijfl.1.1.1625.23-29
  59. Zhu, M., Sari, A. R., & Lee, M. M. (2020). A comprehensive systematic review of MOOC research: Research techniques, topics, and trends from 2009 to 2019. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1685–1710.
  60. Yuliastuti, E., Aini, M. R., & Sukaito, Y. (2024). Forensic linguistics as a scientific study in the field of law and justice. JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research), 9(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.35457/josar.v8i1.3522