10.30486/gcr.2023.1982041.1127

Geoconservation and Responsible Use of the Territory: Experiences from the Lanzarote and Chinijo Islands UNESCO Global Geopark

  1. GPSVOLTER- Departamento de Geografía e Historia, Universidad de La Laguna, Facultad de Humanidades. C/Prof. José Luis Moreno Becerra, s/n, 38200, Tenerife, España
  2. Geoparque de Lanzarote y Archipiélago Chinijo. Avda. Fred Olsen, s/n, Arrecife. 35500 Lanzarote. España
  3. Geoparque de Lanzarote y Archipiélago Chinijo. Avda. Fred Olsen, s/n, Arrecife. 35500 Lanzarote. España
Cover Image
Categories

Received: 2023-05-11

Accepted: 2023-06-25

Published in Issue 2023-06-21

How to Cite

Guillén Martín, C. ., & Mateo Mederos, E. (2023). Geoconservation and Responsible Use of the Territory: Experiences from the Lanzarote and Chinijo Islands UNESCO Global Geopark. Geoconservation Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.30486/gcr.2023.1982041.1127

PDF views: 176

HTML views: 29

Abstract

The island of Lanzarote represents a fragile insular space of high environmental value, where coexistence between conservation and the controlled and responsible use of local heritage has been achieved. Since April 2015, Lanzarote and the set of islands and islets of the Chinijo Islands, have been part of the UNESCO Global Geopark Network. Among its unique features is a global geosite of international relevance, the historic basaltic eruption of Timanfaya, as well as the forms and materials derived from the interaction of volcanic and erosive-sedimentary processes over more than 15 million years. The Geopark preserves key geological heritage for the islands that has been respectfully used to contribute to sustanible socioeconomic development. The recognition of Lanzarote, the Chinijo Archipelago as a Geopark, has been a fundamental tool to strengthen local strategies and value the local geological and geomorphological heritage. In addition, it has also been key in continuing to contribute to the traditional and sustainable use of these fragile insular spaces, favoring lasting models of coexistence. Here, we explore the different lines of work that the Geopark is currently developing to achieve its objectives in terms of geoconservation, responsible use of the territory, and sustainability. The recognition of Lanzarote, the Chinijo Archipelago as a Geopark, has been a fundamental tool to strengthen local strategies and value the local geological and geomorphological heritage. In addition, it has also been key in continuing to contribute to the traditional and sustainable use of these fragile insular spaces, favoring lasting models of coexistence. This document tries to expose the different lines of work that the Geopark is currently developing to achieve its essential objectives in terms of geoconservation, responsible use of the territory and sustainability.

Keywords

  • Macaronesia,
  • Lanzarote,
  • Volcanic landscape,
  • Geodiversity,
  • Geoconservation,
  • Public engagement

References

  1. Álvarez A (2004). El ciclo de vida de los destinos turísticos litorales [The cycle of life and coastal tourist destinations]. Álvarez A, Hernández J & Simancas M (coords). Turismo y territorio en la ciudad globalizada, 123–155. http://aalvarez.webs.ull.es/turismoPC.pdf
  2. Carcavilla L, Belmonte A, Durán JJ & Hilario A (2011). Geoturismo: concepto y perspectivas en España [Geotourism: concept and prospects in Spain]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias de la Tierra. 19(1): 81-81. https://raco.cat/index.php/ECT/article/view/244382.
  3. Carracedo JC & Rodríguez-Badiola E (1993). Evolución geológica y magmática de la isla de Lanzarote, Islas Canarias [Geological and magmatic evolution of the Isle of Lanzarote, Canary Islands]. Revista de la Academia Canaria de Ciencias. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2902842
  4. Coello J, Cantagrel JM, Hernán F, Fúster JM, Ibarrola E, Ancochea E, Casquet C, Jamond C, Díaz de Terán JR & Cendrero A (1992). Evolution of the eastern volcanic ridge of the Canary Islands based on new K-Ar data. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 53(1-4), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(92)90085-R
  5. Corral S & Hernández J (2010). El turismo en destinos maduros archipielágicos: condicionantes y estrategias. El caso de los" tres grandes": Hawai, Canarias, Baleares [Tourism in mature archipelagic destinations: determining factors and strategies. The case of the "big three": Hawaii, Canary Islands, Balearic Islands]. In Destinos turísticos maduros ante el cambio: Reflexiones desde Canarias (pp. 233-254). Instituto de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. http://www.pasosonline.org/Publicados/pasosoedita/pasosrep4.pdf
  6. Díez-Herrero A & Vegas-Salamanca J (2011). De roca a roca. Descubre el patrimonio geológico de Segovia [From rock to rock. Discover the geological heritage of Segovia]. Concejalía de Turismo, Ayuntamiento de Segovia, Segovia, 1-96.http://www.andresdiezherrero.es/publicaciones/capitulos_de_libros/diez_et_al_2011_geoturismo.pdf
  7. Dóniz-Páez FJ, Guillén Martín C, Becerra-Ramírez R & Kereszturi G (2010). Volcanes y turismo: patrimonio, atractivo, recurso y product [Volcanoes and tourism: heritage, attraction, resource and product]. In:Turismo ( Vol 2, pp. 73-79). Escuela Universitaria de Turismo Iriarte. https://portalciencia.ull.es/documentos/5d5ba7442999520e90d11297#
  8. Dóniz-Páez FJ (2014). Reflexiones en torno al turismo volcánico. El caso de Islas Canarias, España [Reflections on volcanic tourism. The case of the Canary Islands, Spain]. PASOS Revista De Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural. 12: 467–478. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2014.12.034
  9. Galindo I, Sánchez N, Romero C, Vegas J, Mateo E & Guillén C (2015). Sol, playa y mucha geología [Sun, beach and lots of geology]. Tierra y Tecnología: Revista de Información Geológica. 46: 11. https://portalciencia.ull.es/documentos/5ea21c262999521f7d523c33
  10. Galindo i, Vegas J, Díaz, G, Romero C, Sánchez N & Mateo E (2017). Geo-utas en coche por el patrimonio geológico del Geoparque de Lanzarote y Archipiélago Chinijo [Geo-routes by car through the geological heritage of the Lanzarote Geopark and Chinijo Archipelago]. In: Patrimonio geológico, gestionando la parte abiótica del patrimonio natural. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, nº 21Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid. http://hdl.handle.net/10261/273765
  11. Guillén C, Mateo E, Hernández T,& Osorio T (2015). La Caldera Del Cuervo: gestión integral de un LIG en el Geoparque de Lanzarote y Archipiélago Chinijo [La Caldera Del Cuervo: comprehensive management of a LIG in the Geopark of Lanzarote and the Chinijo Archipelago]. In: Patrimonio geológico y Geoparques, avances de un camino para todos (pp. 519-524). Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. https://www.igme.es/publicaciones/publiFree/Patrimonio%20geol%C3%B3gico%20y%20geoparques,%20avances%20de%20un%20camino%20para%20todos.pdf
  12. Guillén C & Mateo E (2019). Introduction. Lanzarote, a Unique Geopark. In Mateo E, Martínez-Frías J, Vegas J (eds) Lanzarote and Chinijo Islands Geopark: From Earth to Space. Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13130-2_1
  13. Guimarães T, Mariano G & Sá A A (2015). Potencial geoturístico en la zona costera sur del estado de Pernambuco (NE Brasil). Patrimonio geológico y geoparques, avances de un camino para todos [Geotourism potential in the southern coastal zone of the state of Pernambuco (NE Brazil). Geological heritage and geoparks, advances in a path for all]. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, nº 18. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Artur-Sa/publication/281903522_Potencial_Geoturistico_en_la_Zona_Costera_Sur_del_Estado_de_Pernambuco_NE_Brasil/links/55fd89f008ae07629e2a8d05/Potencial-Geoturistico-en-la-Zona-Costera-Sur-del-Estado-de-Pernambuco-NE-Brasil.pdf
  14. Mateo E (2015). La gestión del Patrimonio Geológico de Lanzarote [Management of Lanzarote's geological heritage]. In: Afonso-Carrillo J (Ed.), Lanzarote: naturaleza entre volcanes (pp. 87-118). Actas X Semana Científica Telesforo Bravo. Instituto de Estudios Hispánicos de Canarias. Puerto de la Cruz. https://www.iehcan.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/3-Mateo-Mederos-2015.pdf
  15. Romero C (1991). Las manifestaciones volcánicas históricas del Archipiélago Canario [The historical volcanic manifestations of the Canary Archipelago]. S/C Tenerife, Consejería de Política Territorial. Gobierno de Canarias. Sta. Cruz de Tenerife, 1407. http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/10113
  16. Romero C (2003). El relieve de Lanzarote [The relief of Lanzarote]. Servicio de Publicaciones, Cabildo de Lanzarote. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263046020_El_relieve_de_Lanzarote#fullTextFileContent
  17. Sánchez-Guzmán J & Abad J (1986). Sondeo geotérmico Lanzarote-1. Significado geológico y geotérmico [Lanzarote-1 geothermal survey. Geological and geothermal significance]. Anales de Física. Serie B, Aplicaciones, Métodos e Instrumentos. 82: 102–109.
  18. Zouros N & McKeever P (2009). European Geoparks Network and Geotourism. In: New Challenges with Geotourism. Proceedings of the VIII European Geoparks Conference. Idanha-a-Nova.