10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0802.16

Bridging Generational and Educational Divides: Cognitive Uniformity Towards Ecosystem Services in Kenyir Geopark, Terengganu, Malaysia

PDF
  • Ihsan Alwi1,
  • Jamilah Mohd Salim2,
  • Hazman Samsudin1,
  • Hayati Sa’at*1,
  1. Faculty of Business, Economic and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
  2. Faculty of Science and Marine Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
Categories

Received: 2025-12-10

Published in Issue 2026-03-19

Copyright (c) -1 Ihsan Alwi, Jamilah Mohd Salim, Hazman Samsudin, Hayati Sa’at (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Alwi, I., Salim, J. M., Samsudin, H., & Sa’at, H. (2026). Bridging Generational and Educational Divides: Cognitive Uniformity Towards Ecosystem Services in Kenyir Geopark, Terengganu, Malaysia. Geoconservation Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0802.16
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 39

Abstract

The designation of Kenyir Lake as a National Geopark necessitates a dynamic balance between rapid tourism development and natural resource conservation, for which local community support is essential. However, empirical studies on the community's engagement with ecosystem service values remain limited, often overshadowing their role in sustainable governance. This study aims to assess the community’s level of understanding regarding the sustainability of ecosystem services across three core dimensions (environmental, social, and heritage) and to analyze the influence of demographic factors on this awareness. Employing a quantitative cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 510 heads of household in ten strategically selected villages surrounding Kenyir Geopark. Our analysis reveals that the community possesses a high overall level of understanding (mean = 3.49), with the environmental ecosystem dimension scoring the highest (mean = 3.53). Chi-squared tests show no statistically significant differences in the level of understanding based on age or educational attainment (p > 0.05). This cognitive uniformity demonstrates that environmental awareness in Kenyir Geopark is not contingent upon formal education but is driven by the assimilation of traditional knowledge and experience-based learning. We conclude that a robust form of environmental citizenship exists among the local resident population, and we recommend a policy shift towards a bottom-up management approach to ensure the long-term viability of the Geopark's aspirations.

Keywords

  • Kenyir Lake,
  • National Geopark,
  • Ecosystem Services,
  • Community Perception,
  • Environmental Citizenship
PDF

References

  1. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2016). Social-ecological systems: A framework for analyzing linked social-ecological systems. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Berkes F, Folke C (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bernama. (2023, June 2). Kenyir Geopark recognised as ninth National Geopark. BERNAMA. https://www.bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2194692
  4. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R, Paruelo J, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387: 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  5. De Frias Barreto M, Massara R, Fernandes A, Paglia A (2025). The perception of cultural ecosystem services by tourists in Brazilian protected areas. Ecology and Evolution. 15: e72469. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72469.
  6. Dietz T (2017). Drivers of human stress on the environment in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 42: 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085440
  7. East Coast Economic Region Development Council. (2020). ECER Master Plan 2.0: The next leap 2018–2025 (Rev. 046, low-res PDF). East Coast Economic Region Development Council. https://www.ecerdc.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Master-Plan-2.0_BI_rev046-low-res.pdf
  8. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics. 68: 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.005
  9. Fleig R, Nascimento IB, Valdati J (2022). Geoparques: desenvolvimento sustentável e agenda 2030. Revista Do Departamento de Geografia. 42: e193925. https://doi.org/10.11606/eissn.2236-2878.rdg.2022.193925
  10. Helliwell JF, Layard R, Sachs J (2018). World happiness report 2018. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
  11. Hermawan J, Wijaya LI, Rianawati A (2025). Leveraging digitalization in geoheritage and geoparks: Analysis of advancements and trends through the ADO-TCM framework. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 13,: 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2025.05.002
  12. Hungerford HR, Volk TL (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education. 21(3): 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.9943044
  13. Juan ES, Gabriela Torchio (2019). Moving towards public policy-ready science: philosophical insights on the social-ecological systems perspective for conservation science. Ecosystems and People. 15: 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1657502
  14. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research. 8:239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  15. Majlis Daerah Hulu Terengganu. (2023, 8 Mac). Sesi penilaian Kenyir Geopark sebagai Geopark Kebangsaan. Portal Rasmi Majlis Daerah Hulu Terengganu. https://mdht.terengganu.gov.my/en/htdc/media-centre/news-events/sesi-penilaian-kenyir-geopark-sebagai-geopark-kebangsaan
  16. Mazlan N, Tan CF, Kamaruzzaman MA, Adrus M, Abdullah MT (2015). Survey of small mammals in Bukit Taat, Tasik Kenyir, Hulu Terengganu, Malaysia. Borneo Journal of Resource Science and Technology. 5(2): 79–83. https://doi.org/10.33736/bjrst.225.2015
  17. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  18. Naydenov K (2022). Geoparks as a basis for the integrated conservation of ecosystems, cultural heritage, and development of ecotourism. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM. 22(5.1): 205–211. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s20.026
  19. Naser MA, Ahmad AA (2023). Freshwater fishes (Actinopterygii) of Kenyir Reservoir, Peninsular Malaysia: Updated checklist, taxonomic concerns and alien species. Biodiversity Data Journal. 11: e100337. https://doi.org/10.3897/bdj.11.e100337
  20. Occhipinti S (2025). Beyond conservation: Geoparks as multi-faceted tools for scientific research, education, and public engagement. A holistic approach. Earth & Environmental Science Research & Reviews. 8(1): 01–08. https://doi.org/10.33140/eesrr.08.01.04.
  21. Osnin NA, Rahman NSFA (2018). Assessment and ranking of inland navigation practices in Malaysia: The case of Kenyir Lake. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 34: 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJSL.2018.12.002
  22. Ostrom E (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science. 325: 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
  23. Pour M, Barati A, Azadi H, Scheffran J, Shirkhani M (2023). Analyzing forest residents' perception and knowledge of forest ecosystem services to guide forest management and biodiversity conservation. Forest Policy and Economics. 146: 102866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102866.
  24. Rebmann K (2020). The genus Ferocactus in the Mixteca Alta Geopark, Oaxaca, Mexico. Cactus and Succulent Journal. 92: 280–291. https://doi.org/10.2985/015.092.0403
  25. Shafie NJ, Anuar H, David G, Ahmad A, Abdullah MT (2023). Bird species composition, density and feeding guilds in contrasting lowland dipterocarp forests of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Tropical Ecology. 64: 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-022-00267-5
  26. Sharina AH, Azizah NI (2017). Examining community engagement in heritage conservation through geopark experiences from the Asia Pacific region. Kajian Malaysia 35(Supp.1), 11–38. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2017.35.Supp.1.2
  27. Sterling EJ, Betley E, Sigouin A, Gomez A, Toomey A, Cullman G, Porzecanski AL (2017). Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation. 209:159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.008
  28. Ullah A, Raza K, Mehmood U (2023). The impact of economic growth, tourism, natural resources, technological innovation on carbon dioxide emission: evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 30: 78825–78838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27903-4
  29. UNESCO (2025). UNESCO Global Geoparks: Governance and community participation. UNESCO official site. https://www.unesco.org/en/iggp/geop