10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0802.12

Resistance of Indigenous Peoples of "Atoni Pah Meto" to the Conversion of Mutis Nature Reserve into Mutis Timau National Park in Indonesia

  1. Ledalero Institute of Philosophy and Creative Technology, Maumere 86152, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia
  2. Department of Social Development and Welfare, University of Gadjah Mada, Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
  3. Department of Sociology, University of Botswana, Private Bag 00705, Gaborone, Botswana; Extraordinary Researcher, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Received: 2025-10-13

Revised: 2025-11-10

Accepted: 2025-12-02

Published in Issue 2025-12-28

Published Online: 2025-12-10

How to Cite

Naben, K. R. M., Krisdyatmiko, & Faimau, G. (2025). Resistance of Indigenous Peoples of "Atoni Pah Meto" to the Conversion of Mutis Nature Reserve into Mutis Timau National Park in Indonesia. Geoconservation Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0802.12

PDF views: 183

Abstract

This study focuses on the resistance of the Atoni Pah Meto indigenous community in the island of Timor in Indonesia to the proposed conversion of the Mutis Nature Reserve into a national park, noted for biodiversity and geodiversity. The findings from in-depth interviews and documentary research reveal that the Atoni Pah Meto community opposed the proposed conversion to preserve the Mutis area as the heart of their cultural identity and socio-economic livelihood. They are concerned that the conversion would primarily benefit specific individuals or groups, further marginalizing local communities. Their resistance was expressed through protests, collective action, advocacy, and cultural ceremonies, together representing a struggle to assert their rights for justice, particularly in relation to forest management and socio-economic development in their territory. Although the Government of Indonesia has officially reclassified the status of Mutis Nature Reserve to Mutis Timau National Park, we suggest that community engagement and socialization efforts remain essential. Such empowering and engagement of local communities is critical to fostering sustainable conservation of natural resources.

Keywords

  • Mutis Nature Reserve,
  • Mutis Timau National Park,
  • Atoni Pah Meto,
  • Indigenous people,
  • Environmental sustainability

References

  1. Amin B (2014). Mempertahankan Ruang Hidup Konservasi dan Budaya di Teluk Tomini. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya. 16(1):113–136.
  2. Angi ME (2005). Kebijakan Pemerintah Pusat di Bidang Konservasi dari Perspektif Daerah dan Masyarakat: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Kutai Barat, Kalimantan Timur. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research
  3. Bachri S, Permana AK (2015). Tektonostratigrafi Cekungan Timor di Bagian Barat Pulau Timor. Jurnal Geologi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral. 16(2): 79–91.
  4. BBKSDA NTT (2018). Laporan Evaluasi Kesesuaian Fungsi Cagar Alam Mutis Timau Kabupaten Timor Tengah Selatan dan Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Kupang: BBKSDA NTT. (A report)
  5. Berry R et al. (2024). Geology of the Mutis Complex, Miomaffo, West Timor. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences. 71(2):231–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2023.2290702
  6. Besi AA, Mahayasa, INW, Rammang N (2021) Analisis Potensi dan Strategi Pengembangan Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu (HHBK) Akar Angin (Usnea barbata) di Hutan Lindung Mutis Timau (Studi Kasus di Desa Kuan Noel dan Desa Fatumnasi, Kecamatan Fatumnasi, Kabupaten Timor Tengah Selatan) Jurnal Wana Lestari. 4(1):102–112.
  7. Dako FX, Purwanto RH, Faida LRW, Sumardi S . (2019) Identifikasi Kerusakan Antropogenik Kawasan Hutan Lindung Mutis Timau Di Pulau Timor Bagian Barat Dan Upaya Penanggulangannya. Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management. 9(2):437–455.https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.2.437-455
  8. Dako FX, Ora YANR, Ranta F, Benu Y, Paga B, Aramak FS, Pujiono E (2025). Traditional agroforestry models based on local knowledge in the Mount Mutis-Timau Highlands, Timor Island, Indonesia. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan. 15(2):192–205. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.15.2.192
  9. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (Eds.) (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  10. Devall B (1991). Deep ecology and radical environmentalism. Society and Natural Resources. 4(3): 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929109380758
  11. Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE. (2024, September 8). Deklarasikan Taman Nasional Mutis Timau, Kini Indonesia Punya 56 Taman Nasional. Retrieved December 8, 2025, from https://ksdae.kehutanan.go.id/berita/12740/Deklarasikan-Taman-Nasional-Mutis-Timau-Kini-Indonesia-Punya-56-Taman-Nasional.html
  12. Earle M (2023). Protolith origin and plate tectonic setting of metamorphic complexes in the Timor Fold and Thrust Belt, Indonesia. Earth-Science Reviews. 246:104589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104589
  13. Gerring J (2017). Case Study Research Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Krisdyatmiko (2005). Mendobrak Penindasan Atoni Pah Meto. Yogyakarta: IRE.
  15. Kurniawan M and Iswandono E (2018) Tabukah Cagar Alam Mutis Berubah Fungsi. Kupang: BBKSDA NTT.
  16. Mahmud A, Satria A, Kinseng RA (2016). Teritorialisati dan konflik nelayan di Taman Nasional Bali Barat. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan. 11(1):45-54.
  17. Marimpan LS, Purwanto RH, Sumardi S, Wardhana W (2023). Analisis Cadangan Karbon dan Faktor yang Berpengaruh pada Hutan Alam Ampupu (Eucalyptus Urophili) di Kawasan Mutis Timau Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  18. Markum, Sayuti R, Hilyana S, Anugrah G. (2022). The dynamics of spatial utilization and tenurial conflict in conservation area of Moyo Island, West Nusa Tenggara. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. 12(3):445–455. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.12.3.445-455
  19. Maulana V (2022). Dinamika Konflik pada Perubahan Fungsi Kawasan Cagar Alam Menjadi Wisata Alam di Pulau Sempu, Kabupaten Malang. Journal of Politics and Policy. 4(1):51–64. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jppol.2022.004.01.04
  20. Naess A (1973) The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry. 16(1–4):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682
  21. Naess A (2008). The Ecology of Wisdom. Writings by Arne Naess. Berkeley: Counterpoint.
  22. Neonbasu G (2011). We Seek Our Roots: Oral Tradition in Biboki, West Timor. Sank Augustin: Anthropos Institut e.V.
  23. Neonbasu G (2013). Kebudayaan: Sebuah Agenda Dalam Bingkai Pulau Timor dan Sekitarnya. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  24. Nulangi TM (2021). Kolaborasi Ansy Lema-Masyarakat Adat Sukses Batalkan Penurunan Status Cagar Alam Mutis. Available at: https://kupang.tribunnews.com/2021/03/01/kolaborasi-ansy-lema-masyarakat-adat-sukses-batalkan-penurunan-status-cagar-alam-mutis.
  25. Patabang M, Dising J, Adrin A, Almulqu AA (2020) Stem biomass equation of Eucalyptus urophylla S.T. Blake. Biogenesis: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi. 8(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.24252/bio.v8i1.10212
  26. Pujiono E et al. (2023) Factors contributing to forest degradation in the mountainous tropical forest: A case study of the Mutis-Timau Forest Complex, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 42(7):675–694.
  27. Rahmat UM (2025) SIARAN PERS Nomor: SP. 212/HUMAS/PPIP/HMS.3/9/2024: Menteri LHK Deklarasikan Taman Nasional Mutis Timau di NTT. https://ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/7856/menteri-lhk-deklarasikan-taman-nasional-mutis-timau-di-ntt, accessed on February 14, 2025.
  28. Rezende MGG, Canalez GDG and Fraxe TDJP (2017) Protected areas in the Amazon: Forest management, conflict and social participation. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences. 39(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihumansoc.v39i1.33206
  29. Saptawartono S, Widen K, Segah H, Yanarita Y (2019). Socio-eonomic condition of communities in resolving conflicts in the Bukit Tangkiling Conservation Area. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. 23(2):150-162.
  30. Scott JC (1990). Domination and the Art of Resistance: Hidden Transcript. London: Yale University Press.
  31. Scott JC (2000). Senjatanya Orang-Orang Kalah. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  32. Situmorang AW (2019). Gerakan Sosial: Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  33. Sopaheluwakan J (1991). The Mutis Metamorphic Complex of Timor: A new view on the origin and its regional consequences. Proceedings Indonesian Association of Geologists (IAGI) Twentieth Annual Convention (pp. 301–315) Jakarta: IAGI.https://www.iagi.or.id/web/digital/49/20th-(10-12-Des-1991)-20.pdf
  34. Suminar E, Pawito P, Utari P, Kartono DT (2024). “This place is the source of our identity”: The case of the indigenous people of Atoni Pah Meto with the Mutis Timau National Park in Indonesia. Journal of Social and Political Sciences. 7(4):201–222.
  35. Wahyudiono J, Safri I, Panggabean H (2016). Geokimia Batuan Gunungapi di Pulau Timor Bagian Barat dan Implikasinya Tektoniknya. Jurnal Geologi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral. 17(4):241–252.