10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0801.06

The Crassostrea coquina bed in the Qeshm Geopark (Southern Iran): Paleontology, Paleoecology and Geotourism Potential

  1. Department of Ecology, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, End of Haftbagh Highway, Kerman, Iran
  2. Department of Geology, Isf. C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
The Crassostrea coquina bed in the Qeshm Geopark (Southern Iran): Paleontology, Paleoecology and Geotourism Potential
Categories

Received: 2025-05-08

Revised: 2025-06-15

Accepted: 2025-06-21

Published in Issue 2025-06-25

How to Cite

Hassani, M. J., & Hairapetian, V. (2025). The Crassostrea coquina bed in the Qeshm Geopark (Southern Iran): Paleontology, Paleoecology and Geotourism Potential. Geoconservation Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0801.06

PDF views: 196

Abstract

The Crassostrea coquina bed on Qeshm Island is named for its high abundance of Crassostrea virginica fossils. Field surveys and photographic documentation from two key locations show that there are three lithostratigraphic units deposited in deltaic or estuarine environments. Morphological changes in the oyster community suggest an upward increase in sediment load and depositional rate. Evidence of mechanical abrasion and erosion on disarticulated oyster shells indicates accumulation by strong storm and flood or tsunami currents. A Plio-Pleistocene age is confirmed through comparison with identified taxa (Crassostrea virginicaPecten vasseliiPecten jacobaeus?Chlamys variaPlacuna placenta, and Conus sp.) and the surrounding Aghajari Formation. The outcrops of the Crassostrea coquina bed in Qeshm Island could be considered as new geosites in the Qeshm International Geopark. Coquina beds hold significant geotourism potential due to their unique bioclastic composition, fossil-rich layers, and paleoenvironmental insights. Their aesthetic appeal and educational value attract both scientific and general visitors, offering opportunities for geoheritage interpretation. Sustainable management, including controlled access and taphonomic monitoring, is essential to preserve these fragile geological archives.

Keywords

  • Persian Gulf,
  • Bivalvia,
  • Aghajari Formation,
  • Geosite,
  • Ostrea

References

  1. Brett CE, Baird GC (1986). Comparative taphonomy: a key to paleoenvironmental interpretation based on fossil preservation. Palaios. 1(3):207-227. https://doi.org/10.2307/3514686.
  2. Cuitiño JI, Santos RV, Scasso RA (2013). Insights into the distribution of shallow-marine to estuarine early Miocene oysters from southwestern Patagonia: sedimentologic and stable isotope constraints. Palaios. 28(9):583-598. https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2012.p12-105r
  3. Galtsoff PS (1964). The American oyster, Crassostrea virginica Gmelin (Vol. 64). New York, US Government Printing Office.
  4. Gholamalian H, Hassani MJ, Keshavarz M (2022). Stratigraphy and palaeoceanography of late Pleistocene molluscs from the northern coast of the Persian Gulf. Geological Quarterly. 66:17. https://doi.org/10.7306/gq.1649
  5. Hassani MJ, Ameri H, Honarmand M, Hosseinipour F (2020). The microfacies, sequence stratigraphy and genesis of the Upper Devonian phosphorites in the north of Kerman, SE Iran. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia. 126(3):847-864. https://doi.org/10.13130/2039-4942/14468
  6. Hoffman AE (1978). The ecology of an epipelic microfloral community in a Virginia salt marsh ecosystem. Dissertation, American University.
  7. Hosseinipour F, Dastanpour M (2013). Lower Miocene oyster shells from the Southeast Zagros Basin (Zade Mahmud area, Iran) and their paleoecology. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 6(6):1977-1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-0493-2
  8. Hosseinipour F, Hassani MJ, Dastanpour M (2014) Guri Limestone (Early Miocene) Oysters in North of Bandar-e-Abbas, Zade Mahmoud Area, Southeast of Zagros Basin. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Geosciences 23: 101-110. https://doi.org/10.22071/gsj.2014.43780. (in Persian)
  9. Kirby MX (2001). Differences in growth rate and environment between Tertiary and Quaternary Crassostrea oysters. Paleobiology. 27(1):84-103. https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2001)027<0084:DIGRAE>2.0.CO;2
  10. Le Roux JP, Nielsen SN, Kemnitz H, Henriquez Á (2008). A Pliocene mega-tsunami deposit and associated features in the Ranquil Formation, southern Chile. Sedimentary Geology. 2:164-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.12.002
  11. Massari F, D'Alessandro A, Davaud E (2009). A coquinoid tsunamite from the Pliocene of Salento (SE Italy). Sedimentary Geology. 221:7-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2009.07.007.
  12. Motiee H (1990). Iran Geology-Zagros Stratigraphy. Ministry of Industries and Mines Publication, Tehran, Iran.
  13. Powell EN, Mann R, Ashton-Alcox KA, Kim Y, Bushek D (2016). The allometry of oysters: spatial and temporal variation in the length–biomass relationships for Crassostrea virginica. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 96:1127-1144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315415000703
  14. Pratt BR (1998). Molar-tooth structure in Proterozoic carbonate rocks: Origin from synsedimentary earthquakes, and implications for the nature and evolution of basins and marine sediment. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 110:1028-1045. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1998)110<1028:MTSIPC>2.3.CO;2.
  15. Razzhigaeva NG, Ganzei LA, Grebennikova TA, Ivanova ED, Kaistrenko VM (2006). Sedimentation particularities during the tsunami of December 26, 2004, in northern Indonesia: Simelue Island and the Medan coast of Sumatra Island. Oceanology. 46(6):875-890. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437006060130.
  16. Rahiminejad AH, Hassani MJ (2016). Depositional environment of the Upper Cretaceous orbitolinid-rich microfacies in the Kuh-e Mazar anticline (Kerman Province, Central Iran). Historical Biology. 28(5):597-612. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2014.998667
  17. Salaree A, Mansouri R, Okal EA (2018). The intriguing tsunami of 19 March 2017 at Bandar Dayyer, Iran: field survey and simulations. Natural Hazards. 90:1277-1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3119-5
  18. Seilacher A (1984). Constructional morphology of bivalves: evolutionary pathways in primary versus secondary soft-bottom dwellers. Palaeontology. 27(2):207-237.
  19. Seilacher A, Matyja BA, Wierzbowski A (1985). Oyster beds: morphologic response to changing substrate conditions. In Sedimentary and evolutionary cycles (pp. 421-435). Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer.
  20. Stenzel HB (1971). Oysters. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part N, Bivalvia 3, N953-N1224. The University of Kansas and the Geological Society of America, Lawrence, Kansas.
  21. Tyler N, Miall AD (1991). The three-dimensional facies architecture of terrigenous clastic sediments and its implications for hydrocarbon discovery and recovery. Society for Sedimentary Geology. 3:1-5