10.30495/jntell.2023.1984699.1058

Effect of Consciousness-raising via Vocabulary Input Flooding on Iranian Intermediate Learners’ Writing Fluency

  1. PhD Candidate, Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

Revised: 2023-04-25

Accepted: 2023-06-28

Published in Issue 2023-01-01

How to Cite

Fatahzadeh, S., Shafiee, sajad, & Rahimi Esfahani, F. (2023). Effect of Consciousness-raising via Vocabulary Input Flooding on Iranian Intermediate Learners’ Writing Fluency. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning (JNTELL), 2(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.30495/jntell.2023.1984699.1058

PDF views: 194

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the impact of consciousness-raising via vocabulary input flooding on Iranian
intermediate learners’ writing fluency. To this purpose, 80 EFL learners were selected as intermediate participants
through a language proficiency test (OPT), and randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group,
each including 40 intermediate male and female learners. The treatment for the experimental group lasted 13 twohour sessions in which the participants were exposed to consciousness-raising tasks via vocabulary input flooding.
the control group received no treatment and just followed the conventional teaching procedures. At the end of the
treatment, a writing test was administered for both groups, and the collected data was analyzed using paired-samples
t-test The results of data analysis showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group
in writing fluency. This finding might have theoretical and pedagogical implications for language teachers/learners,
curriculum designers, ELT policy-makers, and stakeholders

Keywords

  • Consciousness-raising,
  • Intermediate Learners,
  • Writing Fluency,
  • Vocabulary Input Flooding

References

  1. Ahmadi, A., Ghafarsamar, R., & Yazdanimoghaddam, M. (2011). Teaching requestive downgraders in
  2. L2: How effective are input-based and output-based tasks? IJAL, 14(2), 1-30.
  3. Alcon-Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3),
  4. -435.
  5. Alegría de la Colina, A., García Mayo, M.D. (2009). Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning: The
  6. use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47 (3–4), 325–345.
  7. Arshad, Z., Abdolrahimpour, M., Najafi, M, R., (2015). The Use of L1 as a Consciousness-raising Tool
  8. in Teaching Grammar to Beginner and Upper-intermediate EFL Students. Journal of Language
  9. Teaching and Research, 6 (3), 633-638.
  10. Barekat, B., & Mehri, M. (2013). Investigating the effect of metalinguistic feedback in L2 pragmatic
  11. instruction. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(2), 197-208.
  12. Butzkamm Behrouzi, P., Kazemirad, F. (2012). The effect of consciousness-raising tasks on Iranian
  13. elementary EFL learners' syntax acquisition. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 334-341.
  14. Fatahzadeh, Shafiee, & Rahimi Esfahani- JNTELL, Volume 2, Issue 1, Spring 2023
  15. Ellis, R. (1993). Naturally simplified input, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M.
  16. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification theory and application. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language
  17. Centre.
  18. Ellis, R. (2002). Grammar teaching–practice or consciousness-raising? In J. C. Richards, & W. A.
  19. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 167-
  20. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3),
  23. -208.
  24. Fellner, T., Apple, M. (2006). Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. The JALT
  25. CALL Journal, 2(1), 15-26.
  26. Fotos, S., Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about Grammar: a Task-based Approach. TESOL Quarterly,
  27. (4), 605 - 628.
  28. Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar
  29. consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 323-351.
  30. Gomez Martinez, S., Fuertes Olivera, P.A. (2003). A Revision of the Role L1 Plays in Second Language
  31. Learning. In P. A. García & J. R. Fernández Suárez (Eds.), Estudios de Filología Inglesa.
  32. Homenaje al Profesor José María Ruiz (pp. 193-205). Valladolid: University of Valladolid.
  33. Moradkhan, D., Sohrabian, R. (2009). Grammatical Consciousness-Raising Tasks and the Improvement
  34. of Iranian Students’ Knowledge of Grammar. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign
  35. Language and Literature, 1(4), 57-71.
  36. Nosratinia, M., Roustayi, S. (2014). The Effect of Grammar Consciousness-Raising Tasks on EFL
  37. Learners' Reading Comprehension and Writing Ability. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social
  38. Science. 19(3), 203-216.
  39. O’Brien, J. (2015). Consciousness-raising, Error Correction and Proofreading. Journal of the Scholarship
  40. of Teaching and Learning, 15 (3), 85-103.
  41. Roza, V. (2014). A Model of Grammar Teaching Through Consciousness-raising Activities.
  42. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 2(3), 1-5.
  43. Richards, J. C. (2002). Addressing the grammar gap in task work. In J. C. Richards, & W. A. Renandya
  44. (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 153-166).
  45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  46. Scott, V. M., De la Fuente, M. J. (2008). What is the problem? L2 learners’ use of the L1 during
  47. consciousness-raising form-focused tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 100-113.
  48. Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis, & D.
  49. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and Change in Language Teaching (pp. 17-30). Oxford: Heinemann.
  50. English Language Teaching, 7(2), 97-115.
  51. Skehan, P., and Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influence on foreign
  52. language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185 – 211.
  53. Smith, M.S. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2 (2),
  54. -168.
  55. Effect of Consciousness-raising via Vocabulary Input …
  56. Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback and form–meaning processing on the development
  57. of pragmatic proficiency in consciousness-raising tasks. System, 34(4), 601-614.
  58. Tajeddin, Z., Hosseinpur, R. M. (2014). The Role of Consciousness-Raising Tasks on EFL Learners'
  59. Microgenetic Development of Request Pragmatic Knowledge. Iranian Journal of Applied
  60. Linguistics, 7 (1), 147-187.
  61. Thornbury, S. (1999) How to Teach Grammar. Harlow: Longman.