10.57647/ijrowa-x0nb-4695

Decomposition of composted barn bedding: comparison with cattle manure under variable conditions for biofertilizer potential

PDF
  • William Gabriel Borges1,
  • Bruna da Silva1,
  • Giovana Rech Durigon1,
  • Vicente Flores Motta Schneider1,
  • Edpool Rocha Silva2,
  • Carolina Rivieira Duarte Maluche Baretta1,
  • Renan de Souza Rezende*1,
  1. Program of Postgraduate in Environmental Science, Communitarian University of Chapecó Region, CEP: 89.809-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil
  2. Rural Family Home São Domingos from Caibi, CEP: 89.888-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Decomposition of composted barn bedding: comparison with cattle manure under variable conditions for biofertilize

Received: 2024-03-26

Revised: 2024-08-11

Accepted: 2024-12-15

Published 2024-12-20

Copyright (c) -1 William Gabriel Borges, Bruna da Silva, Giovana Rech Durigon, Vicente Flores Motta Schneider, Edpool Rocha Silva, Carolina Rivieira Duarte Maluche Baretta, Renan de Souza Rezende (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Borges, W. G., Silva, B. da, Durigon, G. R., Schneider, V. F. M., Silva, E. R., Baretta, C. R. D. M., & Rezende, R. de S. (2024). Decomposition of composted barn bedding: comparison with cattle manure under variable conditions for biofertilizer potential. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijrowa-x0nb-4695
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 56

Abstract

Purpose: This research assesses the compost barn system's effectiveness in dairy cattle production, aiming to merge high productivity and quality with animal well-being and environmental sustainability. It examines the loss of mass and basal soil respiration rates in bedding materials like sawdust and wood shavings, focusing on the impacts of various storage heights, moisture levels, and temperatures.

Method: The study was conducted via two experiments. The first measured mass loss in standard bovine waste and compost barn materials across three storage heights (2 cm, 4 cm, 8 cm), two moisture conditions (wet and dry), and two temperatures (20 °C, 30 °C). The second experiment investigated mass loss rates and basal soil respiration in entisol and oxisol soils under different moisture and temperature conditions.

Results: Findings indicate the compost barn treatment reduces bovine manure decomposition rates compared to traditional methods, with taller stacks showing lesser decomposition. Dry conditions increased decomposition rates, contrary to microbial respiration trends. Temperature significantly affected decomposition, with varying effects between experiments. Higher temperatures boosted microbial respiration. Entisol treatments had lower decomposition but higher microbial respiration than oxisol treatments.

Conclusion: The compost barn system is a sustainable, viable option for dairy cattle producers, promoting animal well-being and environmental integrity. By effectively managing these factors, producers can enhance agricultural productivity and support eco-friendly practices.

 Research Highlights

  • The Compost Barn system is a sustainable and viable alternative for dairy cattle producers, enhancing animal well-being and promoting environmental sustainability.
  • Higher stacking height is associated with reduced manure decomposition, indicating that management practices related to stacking height can significantly influence decomposition efficiency.
  • Dry manure decomposed faster than wet manure, although microbial respiration showed an opposite pattern, highlighting the complexity of decomposition processes.
  • Effective and sustainable management is essential to optimize decomposition and ensure the efficient use of Compost Barn material in agricultural production, emphasizing the importance of strategic management to maximize environmental benefits.
  • The hypothesis was partially confirmed, with the Compost Barn treatment consistently showing lower manure decomposition rates compared to the conventional treatment, underscoring the potential of the Compost Barn system for sustainable agricultural practices.

Keywords

  • Compost barn,
  • Decomposition,
  • Microbial respiration,
  • Soil,
  • Bovine manure
PDF

References

  1. Alef K (1995) Enrichment, isolation and counting of soil microorganisms. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, London, pp 123–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012513840-6/50019-7
  2. Barberg AE, Endres MI, Janni KA (2007) Compost dairy barns in Minnesota: a descriptive study. Appl Eng Agric 23:231–238. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.22606
  3. Black RA, Taraba JL, Day GB, Damasceno FA, Bewley JM (2013) Compost bedded pack dairy barn management, performance, and producer satisfaction. J Dairy Sci 96:8060–8074. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6778
  4. Cavallet BV, Silva ER, Baretta CRDM, Rezende RS (2022) Effect of agriculture land use on standard cellulosic substrates breakdown and invertebrates’ community. Community Ecol 23:277–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-022-00103-9
  5. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.
  6. Damasceno FA (2012) Compost bedded pack barns system and computational simulation of airflow through naturally ventilated reduced model. Dissertation, Universidad Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
  7. Delgado-Baquerizo M, García-Palacios P, Milla R, Gallardo A, Maestre FT (2015) Soil characteristics determine soil carbon and nitrogen availability during leaf litter decomposition regardless of litter quality. Soil Biol Biochem 81:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.009
  8. Eckelkamp EA, Taraba JL, Akers KA, Harmon RJ, Bewley JM (2016) Understanding compost bedded pack barns: interactions among environmental factors, bedding characteristics, and udder health. Livest Sci 190:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.05.017
  9. Guangming L, Xuechen Z, Xiuping W, Hongbo S, Jingsong Y, Xiangping W (2017) Soil enzymes as indicators of saline soil fertility under various soil amendments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 237:274–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.004
  10. Imbeah M (1998) Composting piggery waste: A review. Bioresour Technol 63:197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00165-X
  11. Kiehl EJ (1998) Composting manual: Maturation and compost quality. Piracicaba, Brazil.
  12. Kim E, Lee DH, Won S, Ahn H (2015) Evaluation of optimum moisture content for composting of beef manure and bedding material mixtures using oxygen uptake measurement. Asian Australis J Anim Sci 29:753–758. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0875
  13. Klein C, Agne SAA (2013) Phosphorus: from nutrient to pollutant! Electron J Environ Manag Educ 8. https://doi.org/10.5902/223611706430
  14. Kögel-Knabner I (2002) The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 34:139–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00158-4
  15. Krishna MP, Mohan M (2017) Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: a review. Energy Ecol Environ 2:236–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-017-0064-9
  16. Leso L, Uberti M, Morshed W, Barbari M (2013) A survey of Italian compost dairy barns. J Agric Eng 44:120–124. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2013.e17
  17. Leso L, Barbari M, Lopes MA, Damasceno FA, Galama P, Taraba JL, Kuipers A (2020) Invited review: compost-bedded pack barns for dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 103:1072–1099. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16864
  18. Liang C, Das KC, McClendon RW (2003) The influence of temperature and moisture content regimes on the aerobic microbial activity of a biosolids composting blend. Bioresour Technol 86:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00153-0
  19. Liberalesso GH (2017) Organic compost from compost barn system in the bean culture. Dissertation, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Dois Vizinhos, Brazil.
  20. Liu WR, Zeng D, She L, Su WX, He DC, Wu GY, Ma XR, Jiang S, Jiang CH, Ying GG (2020) Comparisons of pollution characteristics, emission situations, and mass loads for heavy metals in the manures of different livestock and poultry in China. Sci Total Environ 734:139023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139023
  21. Luísa M, Nunes A (2003) Evaluation of operational procedures in swine manure composting. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
  22. Mota VC, Campos AT, Damasceno FA, Resende EA, Rezende CP, Abreu LR, Vareiro T (2017) Dairy cattle confinement: history and characteristics. Pubvet 11:433–442. https://doi.org/10.22256/pubvet.v11n5.433-442
  23. Mota VC, Andrade ET, Leite DF (2020) Use of compost bedded pack barn in maize fertilization for silage. Rev Agroneg Meio Ambient 13:1571–1588.https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2020V13N4P1571-1588
  24. Piovesan SM, Oliveira DS (2019) Factors influencing bovine health and thermal comfort in compost barn systems. Vivências 16. https://doi.org/10.31512/vivencias.v16i30.154
  25. Rezende RS, Cavallet BV, Polesso AM, Silva ER, Baretta CRDM (2023) Time effect and agriculture land use on cellulose breakdown process. Ciênc Florestal 33. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509870837
  26. Ryckeboer J, Mergaert J, Vaes K, Klammer S, Clercq DD, Coosemans J, Insam H, Swings J (2003) A survey of bacteria and fungi occurring during composting and self-heating processes. Ann Microbiol 349-410.
  27. Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JA, Araujo Filho JC, Oliveira JB, Cunha TJF (2018) Brazilian soil classification system. Embrapa, Brasília, Brazil.
  28. Schogor ALB, Danieli B, Savio RL (2018) Understanding compost barn: challenges and virtues. Rev Cient Prod Anim 20:99–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2176-4158/rcpa.v20n2p99-104
  29. Seganfredo MA (2020) Environmental risks associated with the use of animal manure as fertilizer and soil indices for its evaluation. In: Miranda CR, Monticelli CJ, Matthiensen A, Seganfredo MA (eds) Intensive animal production and environmental services: strategies and evaluation. Embrapa, Brasília, pp 113–140
  30. Sharifi P, Shorafa M, Mohammadi MH (2021) Investigating the effects of cow manure, vermicompost and Azolla fertilizers on hydraulic properties of saline-sodic soils. Int. J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 10:43–51. https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2020.1893432.1039
  31. Soil Survey Staff (2022) Keys to soil taxonomy, 13th edn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington, DC, USA.
  32. Suler DJ, Finstein MS (1977) Effect of temperature, aeration, and moisture on CO2 formation in bench-scale, continuously thermophilic composting of solid waste. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:345–350. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.33.2.345-350.1977
  33. Sun X, Liu Y, Li Y, Chai S, Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhao G, Li J, Xu T, Wei Y (2023) Environmental sustainability analysis of dairy bedding regeneration system based on emergy evaluation and life cycle assessment methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:9048–9059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23525-4
  34. Tedesco M, Volkweiss S, Bohnen H (1995) Soil, plant, and other material analysis. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.