10.30486/ijrowa.2020.1899148.1070

Optimization of chicken manure combustion parameters in the aspect of phosphorus recovery

  1. Central Mining Institute in Katowice, Department of Risk Assessment and Industrial Safety, Katowice, Poland
  2. Central Mining Institute in Katowice, Department of Environmental Monitoring, Katowice, Poland
  3. Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Applied Geology, Gliwice, Poland

Received: 2020-05-05

Accepted: 2020-07-20

Published in Issue 2020-09-30

How to Cite

Więckol-Ryk, A., Białecka, B., Cempa, M., & Adamczyk, A. (2020). Optimization of chicken manure combustion parameters in the aspect of phosphorus recovery. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2020.1899148.1070

PDF views: 174

HTML views: 18

Abstract

PurposeThe increasing demand for phosphorous for the production of mineral fertilizers forces the continuous development of research and new technologies in the field of obtaining it from sources other than phosphate rocks. This paper presents an analysis of optimizing the combustion parameters of chicken manure in the aspect of phosphorous recovery.
Methods The combustion process was carried out in different time (3-8 hours) and temperatures (700-900oC) in laboratory of electric furnace. The content of macro and micronutrients was determined by XRF and ICP-OES analysis. To identify the mineral composition of ashes, the XRD analysis was applied. The content of total phosphorus in ash extracts was determined by photometric method.
Results Concentration of p 2O5 in ash samples detected by ICP-OES and XRF was comparable, 30.37 wt.% and 31.77 wt.% at 900oC, 26.27 wt.% and 26.71wt.% at 700oC and 25.31wt.% and 25.00 wt.% at 500oC, respectively. The mineral composition of ashes showed two phases: crystalline and amorphous. The estimated values of p 2Ocontent in crystalline phase was 14.83wt.% at 500oC, 20.96wt.% at 700oC and 23.80wt.% at 900oC. The estimated p 2O5 content in amorphous phase was 10.48wt.% at 500oC and decreased at higher temperature to 5.31wt.% at 700oC and 6.57wt.% at 900oC.
Conclusion The chemical composition of ashes from chicken manure depends on the combustion temperature. The highest concentration of phosphorous in their bioavailable forms was determined for samples burned in 500oC. The results indicate that a valuable source of phosphorous is the amorphous phase.

Keywords

  • Amorphous phase,
  • Ash,
  • Organic wastes,
  • Phosphorous availability

References

  1. Baki Unal H, Bayraktar H, Illkay Alkan R, Cengiz Akdeniz R (2015) Evaluation possibilities of chicken manure in Turkey. Agric Eng 2 (254): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.14654/ir.2015.154.116
  2. Bergfeldt B, Morgano MT, Leibold H,Richter F, Stapf D (2018) Recovery of phosphorus and other nutrients during pyrolysis of chicken manure. Agric 8 (187): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8120187
  3. Bicudo JR, Goyal SM (2003) Pathogens and manure management systems: A review. Environ Technol 24 (1): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385542
  4. Bolan NS, Szogi AA, Chuasavathi T, Seshadri B, Rothrock JR, Panneerselvam P (2010) Uses and management of poultry litter. Worlds Poult Sci J 66 (4): 673–698. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933910000656
  5. Chen Z, Jiang X (2014) Microbiological safety of chicken litter or chicken litter-based organic fertilizers: A review. Agriculture 4: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture4010001
  6. Ciesielczuk T, Rosik Dulewska C, Kusza G (2016) Extraction of phosphorous from sewage sludge ash and sewage sludge-problem analysis. Polish J Sustain Dev 20: 21–28. https://doi.org/10.15584/pjsd.2016.20.3
  7. Correll DL (1998) Role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of receiving waters: A review. J Environ Qual 27: 261–266. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700020004x
  8. Dorozhkin SV (2017) Hydroxyapatite and other calcium orthophosphates: Nanodimensional, multiphasic and amorphous formulations. Nova Science Publishers, Moscow, Russia
  9. Elliott JC (1994) Structure and chemistry of the apatites and other calcium orthophosphates, 1st Edition Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 18: 1-404
  10. Gilbert N (2009) Environment: The disappearing nutrient. Nature 461: 716–718. https://doi.org/10.1038/461716a
  11. Havukainen J, Nguyen MT, Hermann L, Horttanainen M, Mikkilä M, Deviatkin I, Linnanen L (2016) Potential of phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge and manure ash by thermochemical treatment. Waste Manag 49: 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.020
  12. Huang Y, Dong H, Shang B, Xin H, Zhu Z (2011) Characterization of animal manure and cornstalk ashes as affected by incineration temperature. Appl Energy 88: 947–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.08.011
  13. Jasinski SM (2019) Phosphate rock. U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, 122-123
  14. Jayasumana C, Fonseka S, Fernando A, Jayalath K, Amarasinghe M, Siribaddana S, Gunatilake S, Paranagama P (2015) Phosphate fertilizer is a main source of arsenic in areas affected with chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology in Sri Lanka. Springerplus 4:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0868-z
  15. Kelleher BP, Leahy JJ, Henihan A, O’Dwyer TF, Sutton D, Leahy MJ (2002) Advances in poultry litter disposal technology - A review. Bioresour Technol 83: 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00133-X
  16. Kley G, Köcher P, Brenneis R (2003) Möglichkeiten zur Gewinnung von Phosphor-Düngemitteln aus Klärschlamm-, Tiermehl- und ähnlichen Aschen durch thermochemische Behandlung, Tagungsband zum Symposium "Rückgewinnung von Phosphor in der Landwirtschaft und aus Abwasser und Abfall", UBA Berlin und RWTH Aachen, Berlin, Germany
  17. Kucharski P, Białecka B (2019) Poultry manure as a substrate for agriculture and the chemical industry. In: 19th International multidisciplinary scientific GeoConference. Section Ecology and Environmental Protection. Bulgaria
  18. Li B, Boiarkina I, Yu W, Ming Huang H, Munir T, Qian Wang G, Young BR (2019) Phosphorous recovery through struvite crystallization: Challenges for future design. Sci Total Environ 648: 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.166
  19. Łuczkowska D, Kużdżał E, Cichy B (2016) Study on the reactivity of phosphorites. Przem Chem 95(8): 1538–1541. https://doi.org/10.15199/62.2016.8.24
  20. Lynch D, Henihan AM, Bowen B, Lynch D, McDonnell K, Kwapinski, Leahy JJ (2013) Utilisation of poultry litter as an energy feedstock. Biomass and Bioenergy 49: 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.009
  21. Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development (2008) Regulation of 18 June 2008 on the implementation of certain provisions of fertilizers and fertilization. Journal of Law 119 (765) 6515-6520 (in Polish)
  22. Myszograj S, Puchalska E (2012) Waste from rearing and slaughter of poultry – treat to the environment or feedstock for energy. Environ Med 15 (3): 106–115 (in Polish)
  23. Othake H, Tsuneda S (2019) Phosphorus recovery and recycling. Springer Nature, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8031-9
  24. Pavlostathis S, Giraldo-Gomez E (1991) Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: A critical review. Crit Rev Environ Control 21 (5-6): 411–490. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1080/1064338910938842
  25. Reinhard CT, Planavsky NJ, Gill BC, Ozaki K, Robbins KJ, Lyons TW, Fisher WW, Wang C, Cole DB, Konhauser KO (2017) Evolution of the global phosphorus cycle. Nature 541: 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20772
  26. Safi MJ, Bhagwanth Rao M, Surya Prakash Rao KS, Govil PK (2006) Chemical analysis of phosphate rock using different methods - Advantages and disadvantages. X-Ray Spectrom 35: 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.886
  27. Samreen S, Kausar S (2016) Phosphorous Fertilizer: The original and commercial sources. In: IntechOpen. 6: 81-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82240
  28. Sengul H, Ozer AK, Gulaboglu MS (2006) Beneficiation of Mardin-Mazidaǧi (Turkey) calcareous phosphate rock using dilute acetic acid solutions. Chem Eng J 122: 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.06.005
  29. Staroń P, Kowalski Z, Staroń A, Seidlerová J, Banach M (2016) Residues from the thermal conversion of waste from the meat industry as a source of valuable macro- and micronutrients. Waste Manag 49: 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.018
  30. Statistics Poland (2017) Statistic yearbook of the Republic of Poland. Central Statistical Office, Warsaw, Poland (in Polish)
  31. Steen I (1998) Phosphorus availability in the 21st century: Management of a non-renewable resource. Phosphorus and Potassium 217: 25–31
  32. Tyszkiewicz Z, Czubaszek R, Roj-Rojewski S (2019) Basic methods of laboratory soil analysis. Bialystok University of Technology. https://doi:10.24427/978-83-65596-89-5 (in Polish)
  33. Van Straaten P (2002) Rock for crops. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairoby, Kenya, 1-348
  34. Van Voorneburg F, Van Ruiten LHAM, Have PJW (1998) Phosphate recovery from animal manure the possibilities in the Netherlands. Report CEEP. Brussels, Belgium
  35. Van Vuuren DP, Bouwman AF, Beusen AHW (2010) Phosphorus demand for the 1970-2100 period: A scenario analysis of resource depletion. Glob Environ Chang 20: 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.004
  36. Vance CL (2019) LSU Digital commons using poultry litter ash as a fertilizer source for Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) Establishment and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation. LSU Doctoral Dossertations. 5099. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/5099
  37. Wu D, Li L, Zhao X, Peng Y, Yang P, Peng X (2019) Anaerobic digestion: A review on process monitoring. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 103: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.039
  38. Wzorek Z, Krupa-Żuczek K, Bajcer T (2008) Possibility of phosphorus recovery from dung from chicken-farms. Arch Waste Manag Environ Prot 7: 21–28 (in Polish)
  39. Yokota T, Ito T, Saigusa M (2003) Measurement of total phosphorus and organic phosphorus contents of animal manure composts by the dry combustion method. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49 (2): 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2003.10410006