10.57647/ijrowa.2026.18325

Yield and Profit Improvement of Maize Utilizing Optimal Planting Density and Rice-Husk Waste as Effective Silicon Fertilizer

PDF
  • Slameto Slameto1,
  • Erythrina Erythrina*2,
  • Endriani Endriani2,
  • Valeriana Darwis1,
  1. Research Center for Behavioral and Circular Economics. Governance, Economics, and Community Welfare Research Organization, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jl. Gatot Subroto 10, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia
  2. Research Center for Food Crops. Agricultural and Food Research Organization, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor KM 46, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia

Received: 2024-10-15

Revised: 2025-09-08

Accepted: 2025-12-09

Published in Issue 2026-06-30

Published Online: 2026-01-02

Copyright (c) -1 Slameto Slameto, Erythrina Erythrina, Endriani Endriani, Valeriana Darwis (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Slameto, S., Erythrina, E., Endriani, E., & Darwis, V. (2026). Yield and Profit Improvement of Maize Utilizing Optimal Planting Density and Rice-Husk Waste as Effective Silicon Fertilizer. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijrowa.2026.18325
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 74

Abstract

Purpose: Using silicon fertilizer from rice husk waste and double-narrow row (DNR) plant spacing can increase maize yield. Therefore, the study aimed to improve farmers' productivity and profitability by applying biosilica fertilizer with DNR plant spacing and closing the maize yield gap.

Method: The field experiment was set up in a completely randomized design with three replications in a 2 × 6 × 2 factorial arrangement consisting of two plant spatial arrangements:  DNR and conventional row (CR) plant spacing; six maize cultivars: Pioneer-27, Bisi-18, NK-22, JH-37, RK-457, and RK-57; and two levels of biosilica fertilizer application in the form of Si-nanoparticles: with and without biosilica fertilizer. We observed the correlation among yield and yield components, yield increase, profitability, and yield gap analysis.

Results: The number of seeds per row and the number of leaves per plant both showed the highest estimates of positive correlation and positive direct effect as the dominant characteristic that directly affected the variation of maize grain yield. Application of biosilica fertilizer with DNR plant spacing indicated a significant increase in maize productivity of 0.96 t ha–1 or 9.90% and additional net return gains of USD 183.49 ha–1 compared to CR plant spacing without application of silicon fertilizer. This represents an exploitable yield gap of 21.35%

Conclusion: The DNR planting system and the application of biosilica fertilizer from rice husks were consistently more effective than CR spacing without biosilica fertilizer, demonstrating their reliability and potential for increasing maize yields, improving net income, and narrowing the yield gap.

Highlights

·        Double-narrow-row (DNR) was compared to conventional row (CR) plant spacing

·        Maize yield was 10% higher with DNR plus biosilica fertilizer

·        Farmers get additional net return gains of USD 183 ha–1 per cycle

·        There is room for increasing maize productivity by closing exploitable yield gaps

·        DNR with biosilica fertilizer as an innovative approach to sustainable agriculture

Keywords

  • Biosilica fertilizer,
  • Double-narrow row,
  • Grain yield,
  • Net income,
  • Sustainable agriculture,
  • Yield gap
PDF

References

  1. Agus, F., Andrade, J. F., Edreira, J. I. R., Deng, N., Purwantomo, D. K., Agustiani, N., ... & Grassini, P. (2019). Yield gaps in intensive rice-maize cropping sequences in the humid tropics of Indonesia. Field Crops Research, 237, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.04.006
  2. Ahmed, S., Iqbal, M., Ahmad, Z., Iqbal, M. A., Artyszak, A., Sabagh, A. E., ... & Hossain, A. (2023). Foliar application of silicon-based nanoparticles improve the adaptability of maize (Zea mays L.) in cadmium contaminated soils. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(14), 41002-41013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25189-0
  3. Alowaiesh, B. F., Awad, N. S., Eldenary, M. E., & Moneim, D. A. E. (2024). Enhancement of drought tolerance in potato employing nanoparticles of different biostimulants. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 84(2), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392024000200246
  4. Anapalli, S. S., Pinnamaneni, S. R., Chastain, D. R., Reddy, K. N., & Simmons, C. D. (2023). Eddy covariance quantification of carbon and water dynamics in twin-row vs. single-row planted corn. Agricultural Water Management, 281, 108235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108235
  5. Barus, J., Ernawati, R. E. R., Wardani, N., Pujiharti, Y., Suretno, N. D., & Slameto, S. (2023). Improvement in soil properties and soil water content due to the application of rice husk biochar and straw compost in tropical upland. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 12(1), 85-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.57647/j.ijrowa.2024.1303.32
  6. Bernhard, B. J., & Below, F. E. (2020). Plant population and row spacing effects on corn: Plant growth, phenology, and grain yield. Agronomy Journal, 112(4), 2456-2465. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20245
  7. Dorairaj, D., Govender, N., Zakaria, S., & Wickneswari, R. (2022). Green synthesis and characterization of UKMRC-8 rice husk-derived mesoporous silica nanoparticle for agricultural application. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 20162. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24484-z
  8. El-Mahrouk, E. S. M., Atef, E. A. M., Gabr, M. K., Aly, M. A., Głowacka, A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2024). Application of ZnO NPs, SiO2 NPs and date pollen extract as partial substitutes to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers for sweet basil production. Plants, 13(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020172
  9. Fadhli, N., Farid, M., Azrai, M., Nur, A., Efendi, R., Priyanto, S. B., ... & Novianti, F. (2023). Morphological parameters, heritability, yield component correlation, and multivariate analysis to determine secondary characters in selecting hybrid maize. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 24(7). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240712
  10. Frank Stephano, M., Geng, Y., Cao, G., Wang, L., Meng, W., & Meiling, Z. (2021). Effect of silicon fertilizer and straw return on the maize yield and phosphorus efficiency in Northeast China. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 52(2), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1854284
  11. Garcia, A., Gaju, O., Bowerman, A. F., Buck, S. A., Evans, J. R., Furbank, R. T., ... & Atkin, O. K. (2023). Enhancing crop yields through improvements in the efficiency of photosynthesis and respiration. New Phytologist, 237(1), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18545
  12. Geethakarthi, A. (2021). Novel approaches towards sustainable management of an agricultural residue-The rice husk. Nature Environment & Pollution Technology, 20(1), 349-355. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2021.v20i01.040
  13. Ghosh, D., Sarkar, M. M., & Roy, S. (2023). Smart fertilizers: the prospect of slow release nanofertilizers in modern agricultural practices. In Nanofertilizers for Sustainable Agroecosystems: Recent Advances and Future Trends (pp. 343-372). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  14. Haruni, S. A., Padjung, R., Musa, Y., Farid, M., Anshori, M. F., & Fadhilah, A. N. (2024). Functional food biofortification in increasing red and black rice production through the use of nano silica organic fertilizer. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 84(3), 362-371. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392024000300362
  15. Hiranmai, R. Y., Neeraj, A., & Vats, P. (2024). Improvement of soil health and crop production through utilization of organic wastes: A sustainable approach. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 13(1), 1-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.57647/j.ijrowa.2024.1301.01
  16. Isimikalu, T. O., Olaniyan, J. O., Affinnih, K. O., Muhammed, O. A., Adede, A. C., Jibril, A. H., ... & Ezekiel, T. J. (2023). Rice husk biochar and inorganic fertilizer amendment combination improved the yield of upland rice in typical soils of Southern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 12(3), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.30486/IJROWA.2022.1951012.1409
  17. Kuyah, S., Sileshi, G. W., Nkurunziza, L., Chirinda, N., Ndayisaba, P. C., Dimobe, K., & Öborn, I. (2021). Innovative agronomic practices for sustainable intensification in sub-Saharan Africa. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00673-4
  18. Liang, S., Yoshihira, T., & Sato, C. (2020). Grain yield responses to planting density in twin and narrow row cultivation of early cultivars in maize. Grassland Science, 66(3), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12264
  19. Luo, N., Wang, X., Hou, J., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Meng, Q. (2020). Agronomic optimal plant density for yield improvement in the major maize regions of China. Crop Science, 60(3), 1580-1590. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20000
  20. Magar, B. T., Acharya, S., Gyawali, B., Timilsena, K., Upadhayaya, J., & Shrestha, J. (2021). Genetic variability and trait association in maize (Zea mays L.) varieties for growth and yield traits. Heliyon, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07939
  21. Marak, D. K., Marker, S., & Lal, K. (2023). Evaluation on genetic variation, correlation and path analysis in Zaid Maize (Zea mays L.) for quantitative characters. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(12), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123678
  22. Meira, M. J., Beruski, G. C., & Tezotto-Uliana, J. V. (2022). Maize yield cultivated under different row spacing. Brazilian Journal of Agriculture v, 97(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.37856/bja.v97i1.4296
  23. Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Ragadhita, R., & Istadi, I. (2020). Techno-economic analysis for the production of silica particles from agricultural wastes. Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.48317/IMIST.PRSM/morjchem-v8i4.21637
  24. Nongbet, A., Mishra, A. K., Mohanta, Y. K., Mahanta, S., Ray, M. K., Khan, M., ... & Chakrabartty, I. (2022). Nanofertilizers: a smart and sustainable attribute to modern agriculture. Plants, 11(19), 2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192587
  25. Osadebe, V. O., Ukwu, U. N., Dauda, N., Nwamba, I. M., Ede, A. E., & Onah, A. I. (2024). Utilizing rice-husk waste as an effective weed control mulch for Holy Basil (Ocimum sanctum) production in a tropical environment. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 13(3), 1-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.57647/IJROWA.2024.1303.32
  26. Paez, L. A., Garcia, J. F., Parra, J. D., & Jacome, L. L. (2022). Effect of phosphoric rock on the chemical, microbiological and enzymatic quality of poultry, equine and cattle manure compost mix. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 11(3), 385-398. https://doi.org/10.30486/IJROWA.2022.1930622.1247
  27. Parihar, D. S., Narang, M. K., Dogra, B., Prakash, A., & Mahadik, A. (2023). Rice residue burning in northern India: an assessment of environmental concerns and potential solutions–a review. Environmental Research Communications, 5(6), 062001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acb6d4
  28. Prabha, A. M., Mary, P. C. N., Pandian, P. S., Sivakumar, T., & Shanthi, M. (2022). Silicon fertilizer–An imperative source for enhancing yield and phytolith content of maize hybrid in desilicated soil (Typic Rhodustalf). Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 28(2), 879-885. http://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2022.v28i02.045
  29. Rahman, S., Ahmad, I., & Nafees, M. (2023). Mitigation of heavy metal stress in maize (Zea mays L.) through application of silicon nanoparticles. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 50, 102757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2023.10275
  30. Rajput, V. D., Minkina, T., Feizi, M., Kumari, A., Khan, M., Mandzhieva, S., ... & Choudhary, R. (2021). Effects of silicon and silicon-based nanoparticles on rhizosphere microbiome, plant stress and growth. Biology, 10(8), 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10080791
  31. Ruiz, A., Trifunovic, S., Eudy, D. M., Sciarresi, C. S., Baum, M., Danalatos, G. J., ... & Archontoulis, S. V. (2023). Harvest index has increased over the last 50 years of maize breeding. Field Crops Research, 300, 108991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108991
  32. Sadeghi, B. (2022). Chatterjee Correlation Coefficient: A robust alternative for classic correlation methods in geochemical studies-(including “TripleCpy” Python package). Ore Geology Reviews, 146, 104954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.104954
  33. Sarong, M. M., Orge, R. F., Eugenio, P. J. G., & Monserate, J. J. (2020). Utilization of rice husks into biochar and nanosilica: For clean energy, soil fertility and green nanotechnology. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 15(1), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.150113
  34. Shah, A. N., Tanveer, M., Abbas, A., Yildirim, M., Shah, A. A., Ahmad, M. I., ... & Song, Y. (2021). Combating dual challenges in maize under high planting density: Stem lodging and kernel abortion. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 699085. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.699085
  35. Silva, S. H. G., Ribeiro, B. T., Guerra, M. B. B., de Carvalho, H. W. P., Lopes, G., Carvalho, G. S., ... & Weindorf, D. C. (2021). pXRF in tropical soils: Methodology, applications, achievements and challenges. Advances in Agronomy, 167, 1-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2020.12.001
  36. Statistics Indonesia (2021). Ringkasan Eksekutif Pemutakhiran Data Usaha/Perusahaan Industri Penggilingan Padi 2020 (Executive Summary of Data Updates Rice Milling Industry Business/Company 2020). Badan Pusat Statistik-Statistics of Indonesia Jakarta. 65p.
  37. Statistics Indonesia (2023). Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik-Statistics of Indonesia Jakarta. pp 279-340
  38. Stuart, A. M., Pame, A. R. P., Silva, J. V., Dikitanan, R. C., Rutsaert, P., Malabayabas, A. J. B., ... & Singleton, G. R. (2016). Yield gaps in rice-based farming systems: Insights from local studies and prospects for future analysis. Field Crops Research, 194, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.039
  39. Sutriadi, M. T., Anwar, S., Mulyanto, B., Darmawan, Husnain, & Jaya, A. (2022). Improving upland acid soil properties and increasing maize yield by phosphate rock application with organic acids. International Journal of Agronomy, 2022(1), 9720632. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9720632
  40. Torabi, S., Alahdadi, I., Akbari, G. A., Ghorbani Javid, M., & Fotovat, R. (2023). Effects of foliar application of salicylic acid and nanosilicon on the yield and physiological traits of maize (Zea mays.) in heavy metal contaminated fields. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 54(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJFCS.2022.346622.654931
  41. Worku A, Derebe B, Bitew Y, Chakelie G, Andualem M (2020) Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to nitrogen and planting density in Jabitahinan district, Western Amhara region. Cogent Food & Agriculture 6(1):1770405. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1770405
  42. Yadav, M., George, N., & Dwibedi, V. (2023). Emergence of toxic trace elements in plant environment: Insights into potential of silica nanoparticles for mitigation of metal toxicity in plants. Environmental Pollution, 333, 122112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122112
  43. Yan, Y., Hou, P., Duan, F., Niu, L., Dai, T., Wang, K., ... & Zhou, W. (2021). Improving photosynthesis to increase grain yield potential: an analysis of maize hybrids released in different years in China. Photosynthesis Research, 150(1), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00847-x
  44. Yokamo, S. (2020). Adoption of improved agricultural technologies in developing countries: Literature review. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture, 4(2), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2020.06.010