10.57647/ijrowa-2026-17430

Parthenium Hysterophorus: An Invasive Weed for Nutritional Enrichment of Vermicompost

PDF
  • Arun Kumar Jha1,
  • Rajeev Padbhushan*1,
  • Achin Kumar1,
  1. Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour-813210, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
Parthenium hysterophorus: An invasive weed for nutritional enrichment of vermicompost

Received: 2024-12-17

Revised: 2025-05-05

Accepted: 2025-08-16

Published in Issue 2026-03-31

Published Online: 2025-09-03

Copyright (c) -1 Arun Kumar Jha, Rajeev Padbhushan, Achin Kumar (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Jha, A. K., Padbhushan, R., & Kumar, A. (2026). Parthenium Hysterophorus: An Invasive Weed for Nutritional Enrichment of Vermicompost. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijrowa-2026-17430
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 271

Abstract

Purpose: Parthenium hysterophorus is a problematic weed that is difficult to manage or recycle. Therefore, it is necessary to explore alternative uses, such as vermicomposting with cow dung, for large-scale weed disposal. This study investigates the utilization of Parthenium mixed with cow dung in varying ratios through vermicomposting and assesses the final product.

Method: Nine treatments replicated three times consisted of various ratios of Parthenium and cow dung: 0:1, 1:0, 5:1, 4:1, 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 2:3, 1:5* (*Sun-dried) were used for vermicomposting. A 90-day experiment evaluated the growth and breeding of Eisenia fetida and the nutritional contents of the prepared vermicompost.

Result:The body weight and population of Eisenia fetida increased significantly within 90 days of its inoculation in cow dung. Parthenium showed a deleterious effect on the biomass growth of Eisenia fetida. On the 90th day in the heap of Parthenium, the body weight of Eisenia fetida decreased significantly. However, the decrease was non-significant when Parthenium and cow dung were 2:3, i.e. 40% Parthenium in the substrates. This ratio was found to be the most suitable for vermicomposting. Besides the harmful effect of Parthenium on the growth and fecundity of Eisenia fetida, it showed various advantageous properties during vermicomposting. Substituting 40% cow dung with Parthenium in the vermicompost increased the macronutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) and micronutrients (zinc, iron, copper and manganese) concentration of the vermicompost.

Conclusion: Overall, Parthenium can serve as an enrichment material for vermicomposting and an appropriate method for large-scale utilization and eradication of this weed.

Highlights

  • Parthenium hysterophorus are abundant in macro- and micronutrients.
  • Parthenium- An enrichment material for vermicomposting.
  • Parthenium-based vermicompost supports worm activity and casting
  • Parthenium and cow dung (2:3) is an optimal substrate for vermicomposting.
  • Parthenium harms growth and fecundity of Eisenia fetida

Keywords

  • Congress grass,
  • Enrichment,
  • Eisenia fetida,
  • Vermicomposting,
  • Soil fertility
PDF

References

  1. Aira M, Monroy F, Domínguez J, Mato S (2002) How earthworm density affects microbial biomass and activity in pig manure. Eur J Soil Biol 38(1):7-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01116-5
  2. Amouei A, Yousefi Z, Khosravi T (2017) Comparison of vermicompost characteristics produced from sewage sludge of wood and paper industry and household solid wastes. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 15:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-017-0269-z
  3. Annapurna C, Singh JS (2003) Variation of Parthenium hysterophorus in response to soil quality: Implications for invasiveness. Weed Res 43(3):190-198. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00332.x
  4. Atiyeh RM, Dominguez J, Subler V, Edward CC (2000) Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by earthworms (Eisenia Andrei Bouche) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia 44:709-724. https://doi.org/10.1078/S0031-4056(04)70084-0
  5. Batish DR, Singh HP, Kohli RK, Kaur S (2002) Phytotoxicity of a medicinal plant, Anisomeles indica, against Phalaris minor and its possible mechanism of action. Environ Exp Bot 48(2):149-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.08.015
  6. Bayon Le RC, Binet F (2006) Earthworm changes the distribution and availability of phosphorus in organic substrates. Soil Biol Biochem 38:235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.013
  7. Crawford JH (1983) Composting of agricultural wastes – A review. Process Biochem18:14-15.
  8. Dhileepan K, McFadyen RE (2012) Current status of Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) biological control in Australia. J Biol Contr 26(2):125-130.
  9. Domínguez J, Edwards CA (2004) Vermicomposting organic wastes: A review. In Shakir Hanna SH, Mikhail WZA (eds), Soil zoology for sustainable development in the 21st Century, Cairo, Egypt, pp 369-395
  10. Edwards CA, Lofty JR (1972) Biology of earthworms. Chapman and Hall, London.
  11. Elvira C, Sampedro L, Benitez E, Nogales R (1998) Vermicomposting of sludges from paper mill and dairy industries with Eisenia Andrei: a pilot scale study. Bioresour Technol 63:205-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00145-4
  12. Flack FM, Hartenstein R (1984) Growth of the earthworm Eisenia fetida on microorganisms and cellulose. Soil Biol Biochem 16:491-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(84)90057-9
  13. Garg P, Kaushik P (2005) Vermistabilization of textile mill sludge spiked with cow dung by Eisenia fetida. Bioresour Technol 96(9):1063-1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.09.003
  14. Geremu T, Hailu H, Diriba A (2020) Evaluation of nutrient content of vermicompost made from different substrates at Mechara Agricultural Research Center on station, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Ecol Evol Biol 5(4):125-130. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12
  15. Gupta R, Garg VK (2008) Stabilization of primary sewage sludge during vermicomposting. J Hazard Mater 153(3):1023-1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.055
  16. Gupta RG, Mutiyar PK, Rawat NK, Saini MS, Garg VK (2007) Development of a water hyacinth-based vermicompost using an epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida. Bioresour Technol 98:2605-2610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.007
  17. Hand P, Hayes WA, Frankland JC, Satchell JE (1988) The vermicomposting of cow slurry. Pedobiologia 31:199-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-4056(23)02261-8
  18. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi, SA (2016) Vermicomposting transforms allelopathic parthenium into a benign organic fertilizer. J Environ Manage 180:180-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.013
  19. Kanchan SD (1975) Growth inhibitors from Parthenium hysterophorus Linn Curr Sci 44:358-359.
  20. Kaur M, Aggarwal NK, Kumar V, Dhiman R (2014) Effects and management of Parthenium hysterophorus: A weed of global significance. Int Scholarly Res Notices 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/368647
  21. Kaushik P, Garg VK (2003) Vermicomposting of mixed solid textile mill sludge and cow dung with epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida. Bioresour Technol 90:311-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00146-9
  22. Khaleel AN, Al-Dobaissi IARM (2022) Trichomes morphological diversity in some species from related tribes of Asteraceae family in Iraq. Iraqi J Sci 63:2362–2372. https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2022.63.6.5
  23. Khosla SN, Sobti SN (1981) Effective control of Parthenium hysterophorus L Pesticides. 15:18-19.
  24. Motmainna M, Juraimi AS, Uddin MK, Asib NB, Islam AKMM, Hasan M (2021) Bioherbicidal properties of Parthenium hysterophorus, Cleome rutidosperma and Borreria alata extracts on selected crop and weed species. Agronomy 11: 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040643
  25. Narasimhan TR, Ananth M, Narayana SM, Rajendra BM, Mangala A, Subba Rao PY (1977) Toxicity of Parthenium hysterophorus L. Curr Sci 46:15-16.
  26. National Centre for Organic & Natural Farming (2023) Biofertilizers and organic fertilizers - the fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order 1985. Ghaziabad, pp. 1-90.
  27. Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2001) Integrating composting and vermicomposting in the treatment and bioconversion of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 76:107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-8524(00)00104-8
  28. Neuhauser EF, Hartenstein R, Kaplan DL (1980) Growth of the earthworm Eisenia fetida in relation to population density and food rationing. OIKOS 35: 93-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544730
  29. Picman J, Picman AK (1984) Autotoxicity in Parthenium hysterophorus and its possible role in control of germination. Biochem Syst Ecol 12:287-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(84)90051-6
  30. Putri WE (2022) IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ Sci 978:012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/978/1/012016
  31. Rahman M, Hajam YA (2024) Selection and evaluation of optimal medium for Eisenia fetida in sustainable waste recycling. Discov Anim 1:20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44338-024-00021-2
  32. Sáez JA, Pedraza Torres AM, Blesa Marco ZE, Andreu-Rodríguez FJ, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Martínez-Sabater E, López MJ, Suarez-Estrella F, Moral R (2022) The effects of agricultural plastic waste on the vermicompost process and health status of Eisenia fetida. Agronomy 12(10): 2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102547
  33. Shafique I Andleeb S, Aftab MS, Naeem F, Ali S, Yahya S, Ahmed F, Tabasum T, Sultan T, Shahid B, Khan AH (2021) Efficiency of cow dung based vermi-compost on seed germination and plant growth parameters of Tageteserectus (Marigold). Heliyon 7(1): e05895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05895
  34. Shaver LA (2008) Determination of phosphorus by the gravimetric quinociac technique. J Chem Educ 185(8):1097. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p1097
  35. Suthar S (2007a) Nutrient changes and biodynamics of epigeic earthworm Perionyx excavatus during recycling of some agricultural wastes. Bioresour Technol 98(8):1608-1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.001
  36. Suthar S (2007b) Vermicomposting potential of Perionyx sansibaricus (Perrier) in different waste materials. Bioresour Technol 98(6):1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.008
  37. Suthar S (2010) Pilot-scale vermireactors for sewage-sludge stabilization and metal remediation process: Comparison with small-scale vermireactors. Ecol Eng 36:703-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.12.016
  38. Suthar S, Singh S (2008) Vermicomposting of domestic waste by using two epigeic earthworms (Perionyx excavantus and Perionx sansibarkus). Int J Environ Sci Tech 5(1):99-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326002
  39. Swati A, Hait S (2018) A Comprehensive review of the fate of pathogens during vermicomposting of organic wastes. J Environ Qual 47(1):16-29. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.07.0265
  40. Towers GHN, Mitchell JC, Rodriguez E, Bennett FD, Subbarao PV (1977) Biology and chemistry of Parthenium hysterophorus L. - A problem weed in India. J Sci In dust Res 36:672-684.
  41. Tudor GD, Ford AL, Armstrong TR, Bromage EK (1982) Taints in meat from sheep grazing Parthenium hysterophorus. Australian J Exptl Agri Animal Husbandry 22:43-46. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9820043
  42. Uludag A, Uremis I, Arslan M (2018) Biological control of weed. In: Jabran K, Chauhan BS (eds) Non-chemical weed control Imprint Academic Press, Elsevier. pp 115-132
  43. Vimala H, Hans D (2024) Variations in epidermal trichomes of a mystic weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. from semi-arid regions of Barmer, Rajasthan (India). Front Plant Sci 15:1363774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1363774
  44. Winston RL, Schwarzlander M, Hinz HL, Day MD, Cock MJW, Julien MH (2014) Biological control of weeds: A world catalogue of agents and their target weeds, fifth ed. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise team, Morgantown, WV. FHTET-2014-04, pp 838.
  45. Yadav A, Garg VK (2011) Recycling of organic wastes by employing Eisenia fetida. Bioresour Technol 102(3):2874-2880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.083