10.57647/ijm2c.2026.1603.21

Smart and Sustainable Transportation Based on Artificial Intelligence in Big Cities : A case study of Isfahan, Iran

PDF
  • Hourivash Ghaderi1,
  • Ahmad Biyabani Dehkordi*2,
  1. Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Research development Unit, Hajar Hospital, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
  2. Department of Mathematics, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Received: 13-09-2025

Revised: 07-02-2026

Accepted: 12-02-2026

Published in Issue 15-02-2026

Copyright (c) 2025 Hourivash Ghaderi, Ahmad Biyabani Dehkordi (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Ghaderi, H., & Biyabani Dehkordi, A. (2026). Smart and Sustainable Transportation Based on Artificial Intelligence in Big Cities : A case study of Isfahan, Iran. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations. https://doi.org/10.57647/ijm2c.2026.1603.21
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive framework for deploying Artificial Intelligence (AI) to advance smart and sustainable urban transportation, using Isfahan, Iran, as a case study. The research designs and proposes a multi-model AI architecture, utilizing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with LSTM layers for high-accuracy (target >80%) short-term traffic prediction, Deep Reinforcement Learning for adaptive signal control that incorporates BRT priority, and XGBoost for passenger demand forecasting. A phased implementation plan is outlined, integrating these models with Isfahan's existing BRT data infrastructure through a microservices architecture. The projected environmental impact, calculated via a tailored emissions model, indicates targeted reductions of 20% in CO₂ emissions and 18% in fuel consumption. A socio-economic cost-benefit analysis forecasts a substantial benefit-cost ratio (BCR > 2.5) by optimizing travel time, safety, and operational costs. The study critically addresses implementation challenges, including data governance, computational demands, and algorithmic bias, providing a replicable blueprint for AI-driven urban mobility that balances efficiency, equity, and environmental sustainability.

Keywords

  • Smart,
  • Sustainable Transportation,
  • Artificial Intelligence in Big Cities,
  • Isfahan,
  • Iran
PDF

References

  1. Diaz Schery CA, Caiado RG, Corseuil ET, Ivson P, Bueno A. A novel BIM maturity model integrating Industry 4.0 and sustainability: a design science research approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2025 Apr 22.
  2. Desa U. United nations department of economic and social affairs, population division. World population prospects: The. 2015.
  3. Creutzig F, Fernandez B, Haberl H, Khosla R, Mulugetta Y, Seto KC. Beyond technology: demand-side solutions for climate change mitigation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2016 Oct 17;41(1):173-98.
  4. Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
  5. Vlahogianni EI, Karlaftis MG, Golias JC. Short-term traffic forecasting: Where we are and where we're going. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2014;43:3-19.
  6. Li L, Su X, Wang Y, Lin Y, Li Z, Li Y. Robust causal dependence mining in big data network and its application to traffic flow predictions. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2015;58:292-307.
  7. Papageorgiou M, Diakaki C, Dinopoulou V, Kotsialos A, Wang Y. Review of road traffic control strategies. Proc IEEE. 2003;91(12):2043-67.
  8. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Geneva: World Economic Forum). ekonomika preduzeća ekonomika p ekonomika pr ekonomika pre ekonomika pred ekonomika preduz ekonomika preduze konomika preduzeća nomika preduzeća omika preduzeća mika preduzeća ika preduzeća a preduzeća.
  9. Stuartl R, Peter N. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 2021.
  10. Batty M. Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues Hum Geogr. 2013;3(3):274-9.
  11. Hashem IAT, Chang V, Anuar NB, Adewole K, Yaqoob I, Gani A, et al. The role of big data in smart city. Int J Inf Manage. 2016;36(5):748-58.
  12. Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A, Talwalkar A. Foundations of Machine Learning. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2018.
  13. Bojarski M, Del Testa D, Dworakowski D, Firner B, Flepp B, Goyal P, Jackel LD, Monfort M, Muller U, Zhang J, Zhang X. End to end learning for self-driving cars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.07316. 2016 Apr 25.
  14. Janai J, Güney F, Behl A, Geiger A. Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Art. Found Trends Comput Graph Vis. 2020;12(1–3):1–308.
  15. Lv Y, Duan Y, Kang W, Li Z, Wang FY. Traffic flow prediction with big data: a deep learning approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2015;16(2):865-73.
  16. Ma X, Tao Z, Wang Y, Yu H, Wang Y. Long short-term memory neural network for traffic speed prediction using remote microwave sensor data. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2015;54:187-97.
  17. Arel I, Liu C, Urbanik T, Kohls AG. Reinforcement learning-based multi-agent system for network traffic signal control. IET Intelligent Transport Systems. 2010 Jun 4;4(2):128-35.
  18. Genders W, Razavi S. Using a deep reinforcement learning agent for traffic signal control. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01142. 2016.
  19. Jittrapirom P, Caiati V, Feneri AM, Ebrahimigharehbaghi S, Alonso González MJ, Narayan J. Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges. Urban Plan. 2017;2(2):13–25.
  20. Kenesei Z, Kökény L, Ásványi K, Jászberényi M. The central role of trust and perceived risk in the acceptance of autonomous vehicles in an integrated UTAUT model. European Transport Research Review. 2025 Feb 12;17(1):8.
  21. Nam T, Pardo TA. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times; 2011; College Park, MD, USA. p. 282–91.
  22. Albino V, Berardi U, Dangelico RM. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J Urban Technol. 2015;22(1):3-21.
  23. Frendo O, Graf J, Gaertner N, Stuckenschmidt H. Data-driven smart charging for heterogeneous electric vehicle fleets. Energy AI. 2020;1:100007.
  24. Xydas E, Marmaras C, Cipcigan LM. A multi-agent based scheduling algorithm for adaptive electric vehicles charging. Applied energy. 2016 Sep 1;177:354-65.
  25. Batty M. Digital twins. Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci. 2018;45(5):817-20.
  26. Kaewunruen S, Rungskunroch P, Welsh J. A Digital-Twin Evaluation of Net Zero Energy Building for Existing Buildings. Sustainability. 2018;11(1):159.
  27. Gössling S. Why cities need to take road space from cars and how this could be done. J Urban Des. 2020;25(4):443-8.
  28. Zhang R, Fujimori S, Dai H, Hanaoka T. Contribution of the transport sector to climate change mitigation: Insights from a global passenger transport model coupled with a computable general equilibrium model. Appl Energy. 2018;211:76-88.
  29. Wiegand G, Eiband M, Haubelt C, Hussmann H. "I'd like an Explanation for That!" - Exploring Reactions to Unexpected Autonomous Driving. In: 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services; 2020; Oldenburg, Germany. p. 1–12.
  30. Pereira RH, Karner A. Transportation equity. Elsevier; 2021 Jan 1.
  31. Cui L, Xie G, Qu Y, Gao L, Yang Y. Security and privacy in smart cities: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE access. 2018 Jul 11;6:46134-45.
  32. Gunning D, Stefik M, Choi J, Miller T, Stumpf S, Yang GZ. XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence. Sci Robot. 2019;4(37):eaay7120.
  33. Kitchin R. The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;374(2083):20160115.
  34. Strubell E, Ganesh A, McCallum A. Energy and policy considerations for modern deep learning research. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence 2020 Apr 3, 34(09), 13693-13696.
  35. Gärling T, Steg L, editors. Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life: problems, causes and solutions. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2007 Apr 12.
  36. Goodwin, P. B. (1996). Empirical evidence on induced traffic. Transportation, 23(1), 35-54.
  37. Downs, A. (1962). The law of peak-hour expressway congestion. Traffic Quarterly, 16(3), 393-409.
  38. Thomson, J. M. (1977). Great Cities and Their Traffic. Gollancz.
  39. Vickrey, W. S. (1969). Congestion theory and transport investment. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 251-260.
  40. Goh, M. (2002). Congestion management and electronic road pricing in Singapore. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(1), 29-38.
  41. Santos, G., & Shaffer, B. (2004). Preliminary results of the London congestion charging scheme. Public Works Management & Policy, 9(2), 164-181.
  42. Eliasson, J. (2014). The role of attitude structures, direct experience, and framing for successful congestion pricing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, 81-95.
  43. Herring R, Hofleitner A, Abbeel P, Bayen A. Estimating arterial traffic conditions using sparse probe data. In13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2010 Sep 19 (pp. 929-936). IEEE.
  44. Pelletier MP, Trépanier M, Morency C. Smart card data use in public transit: A literature review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2011 Aug 1;19(4):557-68.
  45. Jacobson LN, Nihan NL, Bender JD. Detecting erroneous loop detector data in a freeway traffic management system. 1990.
  46. Calabrese F, Di Lorenzo G, Liu L, Ratti C. Estimating Origin-Destination flows using opportunistically collected mobile phone location data from one million users in Boston Metropolitan Area.
  47. Zheng Y, Capra L, Wolfson O, Yang H. Urban computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST). 2014 Sep 18;5(3):1-55.
  48. Zaharia M, Xin RS, Wendell P, Das T, Armbrust M, Dave A, Meng X, Rosen J, Venkataraman S, Franklin MJ, Ghodsi A. Apache spark: a unified engine for big data processing. Communications of the ACM. 2016 Oct 28;59(11):56-65.
  49. Saghrje ON, Karan O, Kurnaz S, Turkben AK. Support Vector Machines (SVM) in Traffic Prediction for Intelligent Transportation Systems-A comprehension Review. In2025 7th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (ICHORA) 2025 May 23 (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
  50. Dabiri S, Heaslip K. Inferring transportation modes from GPS trajectories using a convolutional neural network. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies. 2018 Jan 1;86:360-71.
  51. Zhao Z, Chen W, Wu X, Chen PC, Liu J. LSTM network: a deep learning approach for short‐term traffic forecast. IET intelligent transport systems. 2017 Mar;11(2):68-75.
  52. Fu R, Zhang Z, Li L. Using LSTM and GRU neural network methods for traffic flow prediction. In2016 31st Youth academic annual conference of Chinese association of automation (YAC) 2016 Nov 11 (pp. 324-328). IEEE.
  53. Jiang W, Luo J. Graph neural network for traffic forecasting: A survey. Expert systems with applications. 2022 Nov 30;207:117921.
  54. Yu B, Yin H, Zhu Z. Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks: A deep learning framework for traffic forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.04875. 2017 Sep 14.
  55. Aslani M, Mesgari MS, Wiering M. Adaptive traffic signal control with actor-critic methods in a real-world traffic network with different traffic disruption events. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2017 Dec 1;85:732-52.
  56. Genders W, Razavi S. Evaluating reinforcement learning state representations for adaptive traffic signal control. Procedia computer science. 2018 Jan 1;130:26-33.
  57. Liang X, Du X, Wang G, Han Z. A deep reinforcement learning network for traffic light cycle control. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 2019 Jan 3;68(2):1243-53.
  58. Wu C, Kreidieh AR, Parvate K, Vinitsky E, Bayen AM. Flow: A modular learning framework for mixed autonomy traffic. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 2021 Jul 16;38(2):1270-86.
  59. Li M, Zou M, Li H. Urban travel behavior study based on data fusion model. InData-driven solutions to transportation problems 2019 Jan 1 (pp. 111-135). Elsevier.
  60. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association LISA. Geographical analysis. 1995 Apr;27(2):93-115.
  61. Ibarra-Rojas OJ, Delgado F, Giesen R, Muñoz JC. Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2015 Jul 1;77:38-75.
  62. Ma TY, Fang Y. Survey of charging management and infrastructure planning for electrified demand-responsive transport systems: Methodologies and recent developments. European Transport Research Review. 2022 Dec;14(1):36.
  63. Irnich S, Toth P, Vigo D. Chapter 1: The family of vehicle routing problems. InVehicle Routing: Problems, Methods, and Applications, Second Edition 2014 Nov 24 (pp. 1-33). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  64. Eckhardt J, Aapaoja A, Nykänen L, Sochor J. Mobility as a Service business and operator models. In12th European congress on intelligent transportation systems, Strasbourg 2017 Jun (pp. 19-22).
  65. Polydoropoulou A, Pagoni I, Tsirimpa A, Roumboutsos A, Kamargianni M, Tsouros I. Prototype business models for Mobility-as-a-Service. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020 Jan 1;131:149-62.
  66. Dong G, Ma J, Wei R, Haycox J. Electric vehicle charging point placement optimisation by exploiting spatial statistics and maximal coverage location models. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2019 Feb 1;67:77-88.
  67. Habib S, Khan MM, Abbas F, Sang L, Shahid MU, Tang H. A comprehensive study of implemented international standards, technical challenges, impacts and prospects for electric vehicles. IEEe Access. 2018 Mar 6;6:13866-90.
  68. Arrieta AB, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Bennetot A, Tabik S, Barbado A, García S, Gil-López S, Molina D, Benjamins R, Chatila R. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information fusion. 2020 Jun 1;58:82-115.
  69. Samek W, Montavon G, Vedaldi A, Hansen LK, Müller KR, editors. Explainable AI: interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning. Springer Nature; 2019 Sep 10.
  70. Buolamwini J, Gebru T. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. InConference on fairness, accountability and transparency 2018 Jan 21 (pp. 77-91). PMLR.
  71. Green B, Chen Y. The principles and limits of algorithm-in-the-loop decision making. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction. 2019 Nov 7;3(CSCW):1-24.
  72. Zhang K, Ni J, Yang K, Liang X, Ren J, Shen XS. Security and privacy in smart city applications: Challenges and solutions. IEEE communications magazine. 2017 Jan 19;55(1):122-9.
  73. Voigt P, Von dem Bussche A. The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr). A practical guide, 1st ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2017 Aug 10;10(3152676):10-5555.
  74. Lacoste A, Luccioni A, Schmidt V, Dandres T. Quantifying the carbon emissions of machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09700. 2019 Oct 21.
  75. Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., & Etzioni, O. (2020). Green AI. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54-63.
  76. Kitchenham B, Charters S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering technical report. Software Engineering Group, EBSE Technical Report, Keele University and Department of Computer Science University of Durham. 2007 Feb;2.
  77. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Bmj. 2009 Jul 21;339.
  78. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica. 2012 Oct 15;22(3):276-82.
  79. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version. 2006 Apr 1;1(1):b92.
  80. Luo W, Phung D, Tran T, Gupta S, Rana S, Karmakar C, Shilton A, Yearwood J, Dimitrova N, Ho TB, Venkatesh S. Guidelines for developing and reporting machine learning predictive models in biomedical research: a multidisciplinary view. Journal of medical Internet research. 2016 Dec 16;18(12):e323.
  81. Moons KG, Wolff RF, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Kleijnen J, Mallett S. PROBAST: a tool to assess risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies: explanation and elaboration. Annals of internal medicine. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-33.
  82. Mousavi SA, Varnamkhasti MJ, Aghajani M. The Role of Integrated Environmental Management Systems (IEMS) in Promoting Human Resource Sustainability in the Assaluyeh Oil Field. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations. 2025 Jun 10;15(3):181-97.
  83. Mousavi SA, Varnamkhasti MJ, Aghajani M. Leveraging Educational Technologies for Human Capital Sustainability: A Case Study of the Assaluyeh Oilfield's Workforce Training Initiatives.
  84. Mousavi SA, Varnamkhasti MJ, Aghajani M. Evaluating Human Capital Sustainability in the Asaluyeh Oil Field: Strategies for Effective Policy Implementation. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations. 2025 Feb 28;15(1):29-47.
  85. Naser MM, Varnamkhasti MJ, Mohammed HJ, Aghajani M. Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst for Operational Excellence in Iraqi Industries: Implementation of a Proposed Model. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations. 2024 Jun 28;14(2).
  86. Alsaedi AG, Varnamkhasti MJ, Mohammed HJ, Aghajani M. Data Mining Classification Techniques to Improve Decision-Making Processes. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations. 2024 Dec 19;14(4):363-80.
  87. Khayamim R, Shetab-Boushehrib SN, Hosseininasab SM, Karimi H. A sustainable approach for selecting and timing the urban transportation infrastructure projects in large-scale networks: A case study of Isfahan, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020 Feb 1;53:101981.
  88. Salavati A, Haghshenas H, Ghadirifaraz B, Laghaei J, Eftekhari G. Applying AHP and clustering approaches for public transportation decisionmaking: a case study of Isfahan city. Journal of Public Transportation. 2016 Oct 1;19(4):38-55.
  89. Mansourianfar MH, Haghshenas H. Micro-scale sustainability assessment of infrastructure projects on urban transportation systems: Case study of Azadi district, Isfahan, Iran. Cities. 2018 Feb 1;72:149-59.
  90. Naghdbishi R. P30: Investigation of Sustainability in Road Transportation: A Case Study in Isfahan, Iran. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2014 Jan 1.

Most read articles by the same author(s)