Digital Coalescence and Consolidated Geoconservation Outcomes: A Case Study Using ArcGIS Mobile Applications at Tasmanian Coastal Geoconservation Sites
Authors
Abstract
Geoconservation outcomes are hindered by highly subjective and conflicting criteria, varying assessment objectives, disparities in geoconservation strategy steps and the inadequate capturing and representation of geological data in dynamically changing inventories. Review shows that geoconservation outcomes are further hindered by the exclusion of quantitative geodiversity assessment from geoconservation strategies. A geoconservation toolkit is presented using the ArcGIS mobile apps QuickCapture, Survey123 and Explorer to consolidate the steps in achieving geoconservation outcomes. The toolkit closed the theoretical gap between geodiversity assessment and geoconservation strategies and attenuated the discrepancies in geoconservation strategy protocols. Preliminary research suggests the inclusion of geodiversity in geoconservation strategies will benefit geoconservation outcomes by providing scholars with a proxy to predict inventorying and geoheritage values, conservation exigencies and site complexity. The toolkit consolidated separate geoconservation strategies by unifying individual steps into one distinctive process leading to streamlined inventorying, geodiversity and geoheritage assessment. ArcGIS QuickCapture facilitated challenges in managing dynamically changing inventories by providing a fast and streamlined approach to the capturing of geodiversity information and locations. ArcGIS Survey123 facilitated the amalgamation of steps in geodiversity and geoheritage assessment and inventorying. ArcGIS Survey123 also facilitated the introduction of a suitability analysis tool to objectively manage and select existing geoheritage and inventorying criteria. Subsequent research would augment this study and its findings by determining whether statistical correlations exist between geodiversity and associated inventory and geoheritage values. Ensuing research would then seek expert advice on the standardisation of which strategies, criteria, methodologies, and processes to include in an all-encompassing third-party mobile GIS application to complement the toolkit concept in this study.
Read the full text of the articleKeywords
Main Subjects
References
Akhmetov B and Aitimov M (2015). Data Collection and Analysis Using the Mobile Application for Environmental Monitoring. Procedia Computer Science 56(1):532-537
Arts K, van der Wal R & Adams WM (2015) Digital technology and the conservation of nature.
Ambio 44(4): 661–673. August T, Harvey M, Lightfoot P, et al. (2015) Emerging Technologies for Biological Recording. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 115(3): 731 749.
Barisic M (2011). Solutions for tourism and nature discovery. In proceeding of International Symposium on Geosite Management, Evian.
Bollati I, Fossati M, Zanoletti E, et al. (2016). A methodological proposal for the assessment of cliffs equipped for climbing as a component of geoheritage and tools for Earth Science education: the case of the Verbano-Cusio-Ossola (Western Italian Alps). Journal of the Virtual Explorer. 49: 1.
Bradbury J (1994). Penguin Megabreccia. Available at: https://www.naturalvaluesatlas.tas.gov.au/#Geo sitePage:2424 (accessed 6 May 2020). Brilha J (2005). The Geological Heritage and the Nature Conservation on its Geological feature. Viseu: Palimage Editors.
Brilha J (2015) Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: a Review. The European Association for Conservation of Geologi cal Heritage. 139.doi: 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3.
Brocx M and Semeniuk V (2009). Coastal Geoheritage: Encompassing Physical, Chemical, and Biological Processes, Shoreline Landforms and other Geological Features in the Coastal Zone. Royal Society of Western Australia 92: 243–260.
Brocx M and Semeniuk V (2010). Coastal geoheritage: a hierarchical approach to classifying coastal types as a basis for identifying geodiversity and sites of significance in Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 93: 81–113.
Bruschi V, Cendrero A and Cuesta Albertos J (2011). A statistical approach to the validation and optimisation of geoheritage assessment procedures. Geohe itage 3: 131–49.
Cayla N, Hoblea F and Guasquet D (2012). Place de la géomorphologie dans l’offre géotouristique de l’arc alpin : du réel au virtuel. In Raising the Profile of Geomorphological Heritage through Iconography, Inventory and Promotion. University Paris Sor bonne (pp. 65–71).
Cayla N, Hoblea F and Reynard E (2014). New Digital Technologies Applied to the Management of Geo heritage. Geoheritage. 6: 89–90.
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, et al. (2015). Accelerated Modern Human-Induced Species Loss es: Entering the Sixth Mass Extinction. Science Advances 1(5). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1400253
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR and Dirzo R (2017). Biological Annihilation Via the Ongoing Sixth Mass Extinction Signaled by Vertebrate Population Losses and Declines. PNAS PLUS.
Chelariu C and Hapciuc O-E (2017). Geodiversity assessment of Moldova catchment in the mountain area. Lucrările Seminarului Geografic” Dimitrie Cantemir” 45: 5–14.
Comfort M and Eberhard R (2011). The Tasmanian Geoconservation Database: A tool for promoting the conservation and sustainable management of geodiversity. In Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales (pp. 27–36), New South Wale: RMIT.
Davidovic N and Stoimenov L (2011). Improving quality of geo-data in electric utility companies using mobile GIS. In XLVI International Scientific Conference on Information, Communication and Energy Systems and Technologies, Nis, Serbia: ICEST.
de Lima FF, Brilha JB and Salamuni E (2010). Inventorying Geological heritage in Large Territories: A Methodological Proposal Applied to Brazil. Geo heritage. 2:91-92 Dias E, Rhin C, Haller R, et al. (2004). Adding value and improving processes using location-based ser vices in protected areas. In E-Environment: Progress and Challenge (Eds), The WebPark Experience (pp. 291–302). Mexico: Instituto Politécnico Nacional Mexico.
Díaz-Martínez E (2011) Typology of heritage: where does geoheritage fit in. In Forum GeoReg. Pro gramme and Abstracts.
dos Santos DS, Mansur KL, de Arruda ER, et al. (2019). Geodiversity Mapping and Relationship with Vegetation: A Regional-Scale Application in SE Brazil. Geoheritage. 11(2): 399–415. doi: 10.1007/s12371 018-0295-y.
dos Santos FM, Corte Bacci DC, Saad AR, et al. (2020). Geodiversity Index Weighted by Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Applied Geomatics. 12: 361–370 DPIPWE (2016). Tasmanian Geoconservation Data base. Available at: https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/con servation/geoconservation/tasmanian-geoconserva tion-database (accessed 5 September 2020).
DPIPWE (2018). Natural Values Atlas - Geodiversity. Available at: https://www.naturalvaluesatlas.tas.gov. au/#GeodiversityHomePage (accessed 25 May 2020). DPIPWE (2019). Tasmanian Geoconservation Data base. Available at: https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/con servation/geoconservation/tasmanian-geoconserva tion-database (accessed 21 February 2019). Eastoe C (1979). Geological Monuments in Tasmania. Geol. Soc. Aust. (Tasm. Div.).
Fan G, Chen F, Li Y, et al. (2019) Development and Testing of a New Ground Measurement Tool to As sist in Forest GIS Surveys. Forest 10(643).
Filocamo F, Di Paola G, Mastrobuono L, et al. (2020). MoGeo, a mobile application to promote geotourism in molise region (southern Italy). Resources 31(9): 1–20.
Fleishman E, Noss R and Noon B (2006). Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning. Ecological Indicators 6: 543–553. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.07.005.
Forte JP, Brilha J, Pereira DI, et al. (2018). Kernel Density Applied to the Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity. Geoheritage. 10(2): 205–217. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-018-0282-3.
Frey M and Hinkelmann K (2009). Application of in novative technology QR-code for popularisation of Earth heritage topics at the World heritage site Messel Pit, Germany. 6th European Congress on Regional Geoscientific Cartography and Information Systems (pp. 250–253). München: Landesamt für Vermessung und Geoinformation.
Gallerini G, Susini S, Bruciatelli L, et al. (2011). Geomatics and GeoTourism: San Bartolo Natural Park Case Study (Pesaro, Italy). GeoActa 3: 167–178.
Ghiraldi L, Coratza P, Marchetti M, et al. (2010). GIS and Geomatics for the Evaluation and Exploitation of Piemonte Geomorphosites. In Mapping Geoheritage. Lausanne: Institut de Geographie (pp. 97–113).
Gray M (2013). Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature. 2nd ed. Chichester UK: Wi ley-Blackwell. Grove J, Stout J, Rutherford I, et al. (2015). Identifying and Classifying Sites and Processes of Fluvial Geo morphic Significance in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: a Proposed Approach. 15/5, Nature Conservation Report. Hobart, Tasmania: Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment.
Henriques M, Pena dos RR, Brilha J, et al. (2011). Geo conservation as an emerging Geoscience. Geoheri tage. 3: 117–128. Houshold I and Sharples C (2008). Geodiversity in the wilderness: a brief history of geoconservation in Tasmania. Geological Society of London. 300: 257–272. ICSM (2020). ELVIS - Elevation and Depth - Foun dation Spatial Data. Available at: https://elevation. fsdf.org.au/ (accessed 5 October 2020).
Iscan F and Guler E (2021). Developing a mobile GIS application related to the collection of land data in soil mapping studies. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences. 6(1): 27–39.
Jolma A, Ames D, Horning N, et al. (2008). Free and Open Source Geospatial Tools for Environmental Modeling and Management. In Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment (pp. 163 180). Elsevier.
Jordan J, Moran C and Godwyll J (2019). Does Tourism Really Cause Stress? A Natural Experiment Utilizing ArcGIS Survey123. Current Issues in Tourism. 24(1): 1-15 Joyce E (2010). Australia’s geoheritage: history of study, a new inventory of geosites and applications to geotourism and geoparks. Geoheritage. 2: 39–56.
Kaskela AM and Kotilainen AT (2017). Seabed geo diversity in a glaciated shelf area, the Baltic Sea. Geomorphology. 295: 419–435. DOI: 10.1016/j. geomorph.2017.07.014.
Kiernan K (1996). The Conservation of Glacial Land forms. Forest Practices Unit. Kubalikova L (2013). Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech Journal of Tourism. 2(2): 80–104. DOI: 10.2478/cjot-2013-0005.
Leakey R and Lewin R (1996). The Sixth Extinction: Patterns of Life and the Future of Humankind. 1st ed. New York: Anchor Books. Lindsay I (2014). Tablet-Based Mobile GIS Approach es to Archaeological Data Collection in Armenia. Purdue University. Available at: https://docs.lib. purdue.edu/purduegisday/2014/Presentations/2/ (accessed 11 December 2020).
Lindsay I and Kong N (2020). Using the ArcGIS col lector mobile app for settlement survey data collection in Armenia. Advances in Archaeological Practice. 8(4): 322–336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/ aap.2020.26.
Linkov I, Varghese S, Jamil T, et al. (2004). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Framework for Structuring Remedial Decisions at Contaminated Sites. Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision on Making 38.
Manosso FC and de Nobrega MT (2016). Calculation of Geodiversity from Landscape Units of the Cadeado Range Region in Parana, Brazil. Geoheritage. 8(3): 189–199. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-015-0152-1.
Martin S, Reynard E, Pellitero Ondicol R, et al. (2014). Multi-Scale Web Mapping for Geoheritage Visualisation and Promotion. Geoheritage. 6: 141–148. Matthews T (2014). Integrating Geodiversitiy and Bio diversity Conservation: Theoretical Foundations and Conservation Recommendations in a Europe an Union Context. Geoheritage. 6: 57–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1007/s12371-013-0092-6.
Meir E, Andelman S and Possingham H (2004). Does conservation-planning matter in a dynamic and un certain world? Ecological Letters. 7: 615–622.
Moore D, Betts P and Hall M (2015). Fragmeneted Tasmania: the transition from Rodinia to Gonwana. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences. 62(1): 1–35.
Nowak MM, Dziób K, Ludwisiak Lukasz, et al. (2020). Mobile GIS applications for environmental field surveys: A state of the art. Global Ecology and Conservation. Elsevier: e01089.
Ozsahin E (2017). Geodiversity assessment in the Ganos (Isiklar) Mount (NW Turkey). Environmental Earth Sciences. 76(7): 271. DOI: 10.1007/s12665 017-6591-z.
Pál M and Albert G (2019). Digital Cartography for Geoheritage: Turning an Analogue Geotourist Map Into Digital. In: International Cartographic Association, Japan:.International Cartographic Association.
Parks K and Mulligan M (2010). On the relationship between a resource based measure of geodiversity and broad scale biodiversity patterns. Biodivers Conserv 19: 2751–2766. Pattern and Process: Towards a Regional Approach to National Estate Assessment of Geodiversity (1997). Landform Classification for Geoconservation. Technical Series 2. Australian Heritage Commission & Environment Forest Taskforce, Environment Australia, Canberra.
Payne JL, Bush AM, Heim NA, et al. (2016). Ecological Selectivity of the Emerging Mass Extinction in the Oceans. Science. 353: 1284–1286. Pellitero R, Gonzalez-Amuchastegui M, Purificacion R, et al. (2011). Geodiversity and Geomorphosite Assessment Applied to a Natural Protected Area: the Ebro and Rudron Gorges Natural Park (Spain). Geoheritage. 3: 163–174.DOI: 10.1007/s12371-010-0022-9.
Pellitero R, Manosso FC and Serrano E (2015). Mid- and Large-Scale Geodiversity Calculation in Fuentes Carrionas (NW Spain) and Serra do Cadeado (Parana, Brazil): Methodology and Application for Land Management. Geografiska Annaler Series a-Physical Geography. 97(2): 219–235. DOI: 10.1111/geoa.12057.
Pereira D, Pereira P, Brilha J, et al. (2015). The Iberian Massif landscape and fluvial network in Portugal: a geoheritage inventory based on the scientific value. Proceed ings of the Geologists’ Association. 126: 252–265.
Perotti L, Carraro G, Giardino M, et al. (2019). Geo diversity Evaluation and Water Resources in the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Geopark (Italy). Water. 11(10): 2102.
Pettorelli N, Safi K and Turner W (2014). Satellite Re mote Sensing, Biodiversity Research and Conservation of the Future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 369: 20130190
Pica A, Reynard E, Grangier L, et al. (2018). GeoGu ides, Urban Geotourism Offer Powered by Mobile Application Technology. Geoheritage. 10: 311–326. Plomley B (1993). The Tasmanian Aborigines. Launceston, Tasmania: The Plomley Foundation. Prosser C (2013).
Our rich and varied geoconservation portfolio: The foundation for the future. In Proceed ings of the Geologists’ Association. Prosser C, Burek C, Evans D, et al. (2010). Conserving geodiversity sites in a changing climate: management challenges and responses. Geoheritage. 2: 123–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0016-7.
Quilty PG, Hill PJ, Exon NF, et al. (2014). Creta ceous-Neogene evolution of Tasmania. In Geolog ical Evolution of Tasmania (pp.409-509). Geological Society of Australia Special Publication.
Rovere A, Vacchi M, Parravicini V, et al. (2011). Brin ging Geoheritage Underwater: Definitions, Methods, and Application in Two Mediterranean Marine Areas. Environmental Earth Sciences. 64: 133–142.
Sanchez J and Brilha J (2017). Terrestrial impact struc tures as geoheritage: an assessment method of their scientific value and its application to Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 89(2): 825–834.
Santos DS, Mansur KL, Goncalves JB, et al. (2017). Quantitative assessment of geodiversity and urban growth impacts in Armacao dos Buzios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Applied Geography. 85: 184–195. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.009.
Seijmonsbergen A, De Jong Mat G and De Graaff Leo W (2009). A Method for the Identification and As sessment of Significance of Geomorphosites in Vorarlberg (Austria), supported by Geographical Information Systems. Memorie Descrittive Della Carta Geoligica d’Italia.87: 163–172.
Serrano E and Ruiz-Flano P (2007). Geodiversity. A theoretical and applied concept. Geographica Hel vetica. 62: 140–146. Serrano E, Ruiz-Flaño P and Arroyo P (2009). Geodiver sity assessment in a rural landscape: Tiermes-Cara cena area (Soria, Spain). Memorie Descrittive Della Carta Geoligica d’Italia. 87: 173–180.
Seymour DB and Vicary MJ (2010). A Review of Cambrian Megabreccias in the Penguin - Ulverstone area, Central Northern Tasmania. Mineral Resourc es Tasmania. Sharples C (1993). A Methodology for the Identification of Significant Landforms and Geological Sites for Geoconservation Purposes. Technical Report. Forestry Commission Tasmania, Hobart.
Sharples C (2003). A Review of the Geoconservation values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Department of Primary Industries Parks Water and Environment.
Soms J (2017). Assessment of Geodiversity as Tool for Environmental Management of Protected Nature areas in South-Eastern Latvia. In Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific and Practical Conference (Volume I, p. 277).
Stevanovic A (2015). Methodological guidelines for geoheritage site assessment: a proposal for Serbia. Natural History Museum in Belgrade. 76: 105–113. doi: 10.2298/GABP1576105M.
Suma A and de Cosmo P (2011). GeoDiv Interface: An Open Source Tool for Management and Promotion of the Geodiversity of Sierra de Grazalema Natural Park (Andalusia, Spain). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites. 8(2): 309–318.
White S and Wakelin-King G (2014). Earth Sciences Comparative Matrix: A Comparative Method for Geoheritage Assessment. Geographical Research. 52(2): 168–181. DOI: 10.1111/1745-5871.12062.
Williams M and McHenry M (2020). The increasing need for geographical information technology (GIT) tools in geoconservation and geotourism. Geoconservation Research. 3(1): 17–32.
Yongxin D (2007). New Trends in Digital Terrain Analysis: Landform Definition, Representation, and Classification. Progress in Physical Geography. 31(4): 405–419.
Zangmo GT, Kagou AD, Nkouathio DG, et al. (2017). The volcanic geoheritage of the Mount Bamenda calderas (Cameroon line): assessment for geotouristic and geo educational purposes. Geoheritage. 9(3): 255–278.
Zarnetske P, Read Q, Record S, et al. (2019). Towards connecting biodiversity and geodiversity across scales with satellite remote sensing. Global Ecolo gy and Biogeography. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ geb.12887
