10.1007/s40204-014-0023-x

Characterization of crystalline cellulose of jute reinforced poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) biocomposite film for potential biomedical applications

  1. Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, BD
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2014-04-03

How to Cite

Rahman, M. M., Afrin, S., & Haque, P. (2014). Characterization of crystalline cellulose of jute reinforced poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) biocomposite film for potential biomedical applications. Progress in Biomaterials, 3(1 (June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-014-0023-x

Abstract

Abstract Cellulose crystals (CC) were chemically derived from jute by alkali treatment, bleaching and subsequent hydrolysis with 40 % sulfuric acid. Infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) suggested sufficient removal of lignin and hemicellulose from the raw jute and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies demonstrated the preparation of microcrystalline cellulose. CC reinforced polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) composite was prepared by solution casting method under laminar flow. In order to maintain uniform dispersion of 3–15 % (w/w) of the CC in the composite N, N dimethylformamide (DMF) was used as a dispersant. FT-IR, XRD, SEM, thermogravimetric analysis (TG, DTG and DTA) and thermomechanical analyses (TMA) were used to characterize the CC and the composites. The study of tensile properties showed that tensile strength (TS) and modulus (TM) increase with increasing CC content up to 9 % and then decrease with the addition of a high content of CC (above 9 %) because of the aggregation of CCs in the composite. The highest TS (43.9 MPa) and TM (2,190 MPa) have been shown to be the composite prepared with 9 % CC and the lowest to be from pure PVA film 17.1 and 1470 MPa. In addition, the composites have showed no cytotoxicity that can also prohibit microbial growth and; hence, it can be a potential material for biomedical applications such as wound healing accelerators.

Keywords

  • Jute,
  • Crystalline cellulose,
  • Biocomposite,
  • Wound healing,
  • Reinforcing agent,
  • PVA

References

  1. Alemdar and Sain (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues—wheat straw and soy hulls 99(6) (pp. 1664-1671) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029
  2. Azizi Samir et al. (2005) Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field 6(2) (pp. 612-626) https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0493685
  3. Bledzki and Gassan (1999) Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres 24(2) (pp. 221-274) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5
  4. Cheng et al. (2007) Physical and mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol and polypropylene composite materials reinforced with fibril aggregates isolated from regenerated cellulose fibers 14(6) (pp. 593-602) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9141-0
  5. Han et al. (2009) Controlled-release fertilizer encapsulated by starch/polyvinyl alcohol coating 240(1) (pp. 21-26) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.01.047
  6. Hoenich (2007) Cellulose for medical applications: past, present, and future 1(2) (pp. 270-280)
  7. Iwatake et al. (2008) Cellulose nanofiber-reinforced polylactic acid 68(9) (pp. 2103-2106) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.006
  8. Jahan et al. (2009) Pre-extraction and its impact on the alkaline pulping of bagasse 3(4) (pp. 380-385) https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2009.1053
  9. Kobayashi et al. (2003) Preliminary study of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) artificial meniscus 24(4) (pp. 639-647) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00378-2
  10. Kotek (2008) Recent advances in polymer fibers 48(2) (pp. 221-229) https://doi.org/10.1080/15583720802020038
  11. Lee et al. (2009) Nanocellulose reinforced PVA composite films: effects of acid treatment and filler loading 10(1) (pp. 77-82) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-009-0077-x
  12. Mathew et al. (2005) Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites from poly lactic acid (PLA) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) 97(5) (pp. 2014-2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21779
  13. Mwaikambo and Ansell (2002) Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization 84(12) (pp. 2222-2234) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.10460
  14. Nakagaito and Yano (2008) The effect of fiber content on the mechanical and thermal expansion properties of biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose 15(4) (pp. 555-559) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9212-x
  15. Nakagaito and Yano (2008) Toughness enhancement of cellulose nanocomposites by alkali treatment of the reinforcing cellulose nanofibers 15(2) (pp. 323-331) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9168-2
  16. Oh et al. (2005) Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy 340(15) (pp. 2376-2391) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2005.08.007
  17. Özgür Seydibeyoğlu and Oksman (2008) Novel nanocomposites based on polyurethane and micro fibrillated cellulose 68(3) (pp. 908-914) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.008
  18. Peppas and Mongia (1997) Ultrapure poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels with mucoadhesive drug delivery characteristics 43(1) (pp. 51-58) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(96)00010-0
  19. Tan and Saltzman (2004) Biomaterials with hierarchically defined micro-and nanoscale structure 25(17) (pp. 3593-3601) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.034
  20. Zhang et al. (2009) Dehydration of water-plasticized poly (vinyl alcohol) systems: particular behavior of isothermal mass transfer 58(1) (pp. 97-104) https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.2498