10.1007/s40204-019-0116-7

Manipulation of the degradation behavior of calcium sulfate by the addition of bioglass

HTML PDF
  • Pei-Yi Hsu1,
  • Hsiao-Chun Kuo1,
  • Wei-Hsing Tuan*1,
  • Shao-Ju Shih2,
  • Makio Naito3,
  • Po-Liang Lai4,
  1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 107, TW
  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, 107, TW
  3. Joining and Welding Research Institute, Osaka University, Ibaraki, Osaka, 567-0047, JP
  4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 333, TW
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2019-05-24

How to Cite

Hsu, P.-Y., Kuo, H.-C., Tuan, W.-H., Shih, S.-J., Naito, M., & Lai, P.-L. (2019). Manipulation of the degradation behavior of calcium sulfate by the addition of bioglass. Progress in Biomaterials, 8(2 (June 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-019-0116-7
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Abstract A bioactive calcium sulfate/glass composite was prepared using a sintering technique, and Ca–P–Si glass particles were prepared by spray pyrolysis. The glass exhibited bioactivity in terms of its ability to form apatite in a simulated body fluid. The glass was transformed into two crystallized phases, i.e., calcium phosphate and calcium silicate, respectively, during the heating stage. The presence of the crystallized phases retarded the densification of calcium sulfate. A high sintering temperature of 1200 °C was needed to prepare the composite. The increased addition of glass enhanced the strength and decreases the degradation rate of calcium sulfate. The new composite is not only degradable but also bioactive.

Keywords

  • Composite,
  • Bioceramic,
  • Calcium sulfate,
  • Bioglass,
  • Degradation
HTML PDF

References

  1. Boccaccini et al. (2007) Sintering, crystallisation and biodegradation behaviour of Bioglasss-derived glass–ceramics (pp. 27-44)
  2. Camargo et al. (2000) Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontias (pp. 581-586) https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.110035
  3. Chang et al. (2017) A feasibility study regarding the potential use of calcium sulfate anhydrite as a bone void filler (pp. 879-886) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-017-0253-1
  4. Chen et al. (2005) The fusion rate of calcium sulfate with local autograft bone compared with autologous iliac bone graft for instrumented short-segment spinal fusion (pp. 2293-2297) https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000182087.35335.05
  5. Dorozhkin (2015) Calcium orthophosphate deposits: preparation, properties and biomedical applications (pp. 272-326) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.033
  6. Hench and Wilson (1984) Surface-active biomaterials (pp. 630-636) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6093253
  7. Islam et al. (2017) Bioactive calcium phosphate-based glasses and ceramics and their biomedical applications: a review https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731417719170
  8. Koroleva et al. (2012) Biomaterial based on doped calcium carbonate-phosphate for active osteogenesis (pp. 226-237) https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2012.32028
  9. Kuo et al. (2012) Porous calcium sulfate ceramics with tunable degradation rate (pp. 2437-2443) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4704-5
  10. LeGeros et al. (1992) Formation of carbonate apatite on calcium phosphate materials: dissolution/precipitation processes (pp. 201-212) Reed Healthcare Communications
  11. Melo et al. (2005) Bone healing in surgically created defects treated with either bioactive glass particles, a calcium sulfate barrier, or a combination of both materials. A histological and histometric study in rat tibias (pp. 683-691) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01090.x
  12. Nilsson et al. (2002) Characterization of a novel calcium phosphate/sulphate bone cement (pp. 600-607) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10268
  13. Pietrzak (2008) (pp. 153-181) Humana https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-239-7_8
  14. Rahaman et al. (2011) Bioactive glass in tissue engineering (pp. 2355-2373) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016
  15. Rice (1977) Microstructure dependence of mechanical behavior of ceramics (pp. 197-381)
  16. Roger et al. (2012) (pp. 1-9) Wiley-American Ceramic Society
  17. Shuai et al. (2015) Enhanced stability of calcium sulfate scaffolds with 45S5 bioglass for bone repair (pp. 7498-7510) https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8115398
  18. Silveira et al. (2008) Bone repair process in calvarial defects using bioactive glass and calcium sulfate barrier (pp. 4-7) https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502008000400005
  19. Thomas and Puleo (2009) Calcium sulfate: properties and clinical applications (pp. 597-610) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31269
  20. Wu and Zreiqat (2007) Preparation and characteristics of strontium containing bioactive CaSiO3 ceramics (pp. 499-502) https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.330-332.499