10.1007/s40204-015-0038-y

In vitro degradation and cell attachment studies of a new electrospun polymeric tubular graft

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, 35294, US
  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, 35294, US
  3. Vivo Biosciences Inc, Birmingham, AL, 35205, US
  4. Center for Nanoscale Materials and Biointegration (CNMB), University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, 35294, US
  5. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, 35294, US Center for Nanoscale Materials and Biointegration (CNMB), University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, 35294, US
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2015-04-09

How to Cite

Patel, H. N., Thai, K. N., Chowdhury, S., Singh, R., Vohra, Y. K., & Thomas, V. (2015). In vitro degradation and cell attachment studies of a new electrospun polymeric tubular graft. Progress in Biomaterials, 4(2-4 (December 2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-015-0038-y

Abstract

Abstract Electrospinning technique was utilized to engineer a small-diameter (id = 4 mm) tubular graft. The tubular graft was made from biocompatible and biodegradable polymers polycaprolactone (PCL) and poliglecaprone with 3:1 (PCL:PGC) ratio. Enzymatic degradation effect on the mechanical properties and fiber morphology in the presence of lipase enzyme were observed. Significant changes in tensile strength (1.86–1.49 MPa) and strain (245–205 %) were noticed after 1 month in vitro degradation. The fiber breakage was clearly evident through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after 4 weeks in vitro degradation. Then, the graft was coated with a collagenous protein matrix to impart bioactivity. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and aortic artery smooth muscle cells (AoSMCs) attachment on the coated graft were observed in static condition. Further, HUVECs were seeded on the lumen surface of the grafts and exposed to laminar shear stress for 12 h to understand the cell attachment. The coated graft was aged in PBS solution (pH 7.3) at 37 °C for 1 month to understand the coating stability. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) suggested the erosion of the protein matrix from the coated graft under in vitro condition.

Keywords

  • Poliglecaprone,
  • Lipase,
  • Electrospinning,
  • Mechanical properties,
  • Vascular graft

References

  1. Antunes et al. (2010) Novel poly (L-lactic acid)/hyaluronic acid macroporous hybrid scaffolds: characterization and assessment of cytotoxicity 94(3) (pp. 856-869)
  2. Bezwada et al. (1995) Monocryl® suture, a new ultra-pliable absorbable monofilament suture 16(15) (pp. 1141-1148) https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)93577-Z
  3. Bhat et al. (1998) Fibronectin and avidin–biotin as a heterogeneous ligand system for enhanced endothelial cell adhesion 41(3) (pp. 377-385) https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<377::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-9
  4. Boland et al. (2005) Electrospinning polydioxanone for biomedical applications 1(1) (pp. 115-123) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2004.09.003
  5. Cittadella et al. (2013) Seifalian am arterial tissue regeneration for pediatric applications: inspiration from up-to-date tissue-engineered vascular bypass grafts (pp. 423-434) https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12022
  6. Clowes et al. (1985) Mechanisms of arterial graft failure. 1. role of cellular proliferation in early healing of PTFE prostheses 118(1)
  7. Dahl et al. (2011) Bioengineered vascular grafts: can we make them off-the-shelf? 21(3) (pp. 83-89) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2012.03.004
  8. de Valence et al. (2012) Long term performance of polycaprolactone vascular grafts in a rat abdominal aorta replacement model 33(1) (pp. 38-47) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.024
  9. Dela Paz and D’Amore (2009) Arterial versus venous endothelial cells 335(1) (pp. 5-16) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-008-0706-5
  10. Fowkes et al. (2013) Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis 382(9901) (pp. 1329-1340) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61249-0
  11. Gan et al. (1999) Enzymatic degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone)/poly (DL-lactide) blends in phosphate buffer solution 40(10) (pp. 2859-2862) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00549-7
  12. Gigout et al. (2011) Nitrogen-rich plasma-polymerized coatings on pet and ptfe surfaces improve endothelial cell attachment and resistance to shear flow 11(8) (pp. 1110-1119) https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201000512
  13. Go et al. (2014) Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association 129(3) (pp. e28-e292) https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80
  14. Gunatillake and Adhikari (2003) Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering 5(1) (pp. 1-16)
  15. Han et al. (2010) Co-electrospun blends of PLGA, gelatin, and elastin as potential nonthrombogenic scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering 12(2) (pp. 399-408) https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101149r
  16. He et al. (2005) Fabrication of collagen-coated biodegradable polymer nanofiber mesh and its potential for endothelial cells growth 26(36) (pp. 7606-7615) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.049
  17. He et al. (2009) Tubular nanofiber scaffolds for tissue engineered small-diameter vascular grafts 90A(1) (pp. 205-216) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32081
  18. He et al. (2011) Fabrication of fibrinogen/P (LLA-CL) hybrid nanofibrous scaffold for potential soft tissue engineering applications 97(3) (pp. 339-347) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.33067
  19. Holzapfel et al. (2005) Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling 289(5) (pp. H2048-H2058) https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00934.2004
  20. Jia et al. (2013) Biocompatibility evaluation of protein-incorporated electrospun polyurethane-based scaffolds with smooth muscle cells for vascular tissue engineering (pp. 5113-5124) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7359-9
  21. Ju et al. (2010) Bilayered scaffold for engineering cellularized blood vessels 31(15) (pp. 4313-4321) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.002
  22. Kidoaki et al. (2005) Mesoscopic spatial designs of nano- and microfiber meshes for tissue-engineering matrix and scaffold based on newly devised multilayering and mixing electrospinning techniques 26(1) (pp. 37-46) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.063
  23. Lee et al. (2003) Characterization of nano-structured poly (ε-caprolactone) nonwoven mats via electrospinning 44(4) (pp. 1287-1294) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00820-0
  24. Lee et al. (2008) Development of a composite vascular scaffolding system that withstands physiological vascular conditions 29(19) (pp. 2891-2898) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.032
  25. Lee et al. (2008) The use of thermal treatments to enhance the mechanical properties of electrospun poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds 29(10) (pp. 1422-1430) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.024
  26. Liu et al. (2013) Electrospinning of nanofibers for tissue engineering applications (pp. 1-11) https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/495708
  27. Lu et al. (2008) Study on the shape memory effects of poly (l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) biodegradable polymers 19(1) (pp. 395-399) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0100-3
  28. Malek et al. (1999) Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis 282(21) (pp. 2035-2042) https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.21.2035
  29. McClure et al. (2009) Electrospinning-aligned and random polydioxanone–polycaprolactone–silk fibroin-blended scaffolds: geometry for a vascular matrix 4(5) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/4/5/055010
  30. McClure et al. (2009) Electrospun polydioxanone, elastin, and collagen vascular scaffolds: uniaxial cyclic distension (pp. 18-25)
  31. Mu et al. (2007) Temperature induced denaturation of collagen in acidic solution 86(4) (pp. 282-287) https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.20742
  32. Nagata et al. (1998) Synthesis, characterization, and enzymatic degradation studies on novel network aliphatic polyesters 31(19) (pp. 6450-6454) https://doi.org/10.1021/ma980644f
  33. Nikolic and Djonlagic (2001) Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable poly (butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate) s 74(2) (pp. 263-270) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00156-2
  34. Ozolanta et al. (1998) Changes in the mechanical properties, biochemical contents and wall structure of the human coronary arteries with age and sex 20(7) (pp. 523-533) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00050-2
  35. Pandis et al. (2010) Hyaluronan-based scaffold for in vivo regeneration of the rat vena cava: preliminary results in an animal model 93(4) (pp. 1289-1296) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32626
  36. Pankajakshan et al. (2008) Development of a fibrin composite-coated poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffold for potential vascular tissue engineering applications 87(2) (pp. 570-579) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31146
  37. Patel et al. (2015) Fibro‐porous poliglecaprone/polycaprolactone conduits: synergistic effect of composition and in vitro degradation on mechanical properties (pp. 547-555) https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4834
  38. Peña et al. (2006) Long term degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone) films in biologically related fluids 91(7) (pp. 1424-1432) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.10.016
  39. Peng et al. (2010) Controlled enzymatic degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone)-based copolymers in the presence of porcine pancreatic lipase 95(4) (pp. 643-650) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.005
  40. Rizzarelli et al. (2004) Evidence for selective hydrolysis of aliphatic copolyesters induced by lipase catalysis 5(2) (pp. 433-444) https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034230s
  41. Savoji et al. (2014) Electrospun nanofiber scaffolds and plasma polymerization: a promising combination towards complete, stable endothelial lining for vascular grafts (pp. 1084-1095) https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201300545
  42. Schindler et al. (2013) Electrospun polycaprolactone/polyglyconate blends: miscibility, mechanical behavior, and degradation 54(25) (pp. 6824-6833) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.025
  43. Seifu et al. (2013) Small-diameter vascular tissue engineering (pp. 410-421) https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2013.77
  44. Sell et al. (2009) Electrospinning of collagen/biopolymers for regenerative medicine and cardiovascular tissue engineering 61(12) (pp. 1007-1019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.012
  45. Sell et al. (2010) The use of natural polymers in tissue engineering: a focus on electrospun extracellular matrix analogues 2(4) (pp. 522-553) https://doi.org/10.3390/polym2040522
  46. Siegal GP, Singh R (2010) Biologically active native biomatrix composition. US Patent 7,727,550
  47. Song et al. (2011) Tissue engineering of small-diameter vascular grafts: a literature review 49(1) (pp. 357-374)
  48. Stegemann et al. (2007) Review: advances in vascular tissue engineering using protein-based biomaterials 13(11) (pp. 2601-2613) https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2007.0196
  49. Stitzel et al. (2001) Arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation on a novel biomimicking, biodegradable vascular graft scaffold 16(1) (pp. 22-33) https://doi.org/10.1106/U2UU-M9QH-Y0BB-5GYL
  50. Thomas et al. (2007) Functionally graded electrospun scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties for vascular tissue regeneration 2(4) (pp. 224-232) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/2/4/004
  51. Tokiwa and Suzuki (1977) Hydrolysis of polyesters by lipases 270(5632) (pp. 76-78) https://doi.org/10.1038/270076a0
  52. Traub and Berk (1998) Laminar shear stress mechanisms by which endothelial cells transduce an atheroprotective force 18(5) (pp. 677-685) https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.18.5.677
  53. Wang et al. (2007) Development of small-diameter vascular grafts 31(4) (pp. 682-689) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0731-z
  54. Wang et al. (2009) Electrospun polylactide/silk fibroin–gelatin composite tubular scaffolds for small-diameter tissue engineering blood vessels 113(4) (pp. 2675-2682) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30346
  55. Yin et al. (2013) Electrospinning collagen/chitosan/poly (L-lactic acid-co-ε-caprolactone) to form a vascular graft: mechanical and biological characterization (pp. 1292-1301) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34434
  56. Zeng et al. (2004) Enzymatic degradation of poly (L-lactide) and poly (ε-caprolactone) electrospun fibers 4(12) (pp. 1118-1125) https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200400092
  57. Zhang et al. (2005) Characterization of the surface biocompatibility of the electrospun PCL-collagen nanofibers using fibroblasts 6(5) (pp. 2583-2589) https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050314k
  58. Zhang et al. (2009) In vitro biodegradation of designed tubular scaffolds of electrospun protein/polyglyconate blend fibers 89(1) (pp. 135-147) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31196
  59. Zhang et al. (2010) An in vitro regenerated functional human endothelium on a nanofibrous electrospun scaffold 31(15) (pp. 4376-4381) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.017