10.1007/s40204-022-00182-x

A review of current challenges and prospects of magnesium and its alloy for bone implant applications

  1. School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, Leicester, LE1 9BH, GB

Published in Issue 2022-03-03

How to Cite

Nasr Azadani, M., Zahedi, A., Bowoto, O. K., & Oladapo, B. I. (2022). A review of current challenges and prospects of magnesium and its alloy for bone implant applications. Progress in Biomaterials, 11(1 (March 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-022-00182-x

Abstract

Abstract Medical application materials must meet multiple requirements, and the designed implant must mimic the bone structure in shape and support the formation of bone tissue (osteogenesis). Magnesium (Mg) alloys, as a “smart” biodegradable material and as “the green engineering material in the twenty-first century”, have become an outstanding bone implant material due to their natural degradability, smart biocompatibility, and desirable mechanical properties. Magnesium is recognised as the next generation of orthopaedic appliances and bioresorbable scaffolds. At the same time, improving the mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of magnesium alloys is an urgent challenge to promote the application of magnesium alloys. Nevertheless, the excessively quick deterioration rate generally results in premature mechanical integrity disintegration and local hydrogen build-up, resulting in restricted clinical bone restoration applicability. The condition of Mg bone implants is thoroughly examined in this study. The relevant approaches to boost the corrosion resistance, including purification, alloying treatment, surface coating, and Mg-based metal matrix composite, are comprehensively revealed. These characteristics are reviewed to assess the progress of contemporary Mg-based biocomposites and alloys for biomedical applications. The fabricating techniques for Mg bone implants also are thoroughly investigated. Notably, laser-based additive manufacturing fabricates customised forms and complicated porous structures based on its distinctive additive manufacturing conception. Because of its high laser energy density and strong controllability, it is capable of fast heating and cooling, allowing it to modify the microstructure and performance. This review paper aims to provide more insight on the present challenges and continued research on Mg bone implants, highlighting some of the most important characteristics, challenges, and strategies for improving Mg bone implants.

Keywords

  • Biomaterials,
  • Magnesium alloy,
  • Degradability,
  • Mechanical properties,
  • Biocompatibility,
  • Additive manufacturing

References

  1. Abed and Moreau (2009) Importance of melastatin-like transient receptor potential 7 and magnesium in the stimulation of osteoblast proliferation and migration by platelet-derived growth factor 297(2) (pp. C360-C368) https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00614.2008
  2. Acar et al. (2018) Isolated lateral malleolar fracture treated with a bioabsorbable magnesium compression screw https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2539
  3. Alaneme and Okotete (2017) Enhancing plastic deformability of Mg and its alloys—a review of traditional and nascent developments 5(4) (pp. 460-475) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2017.11.001
  4. Ali and Sen (2017) Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior, permeability and fluid induced wall shear stress of high porosity scaffolds with gyroid and lattice-based architectures (pp. 262-270) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.035
  5. Ali and Sen (2018) Computational fluid dynamics study of the effects of surface roughness on permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress in scaffolds 46(12) (pp. 2023-2035) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2101-z
  6. Ali et al. (2016) The influence of CaO addition on grain refinement of cast magnesium alloys (pp. 103-107) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.12.015
  7. Atkins et al. (2008) Strontium ranelate treatment of human primary osteoblasts promotes an osteocyte-like phenotype while eliciting an osteoprotegerin response 20(4) (pp. 653-664) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0728-6
  8. Atrens et al. (2013) Advances in Mg corrosion and research suggestions 1(3) (pp. 177-200) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2013.09.003
  9. Atrens et al. (2018) Viewpoint—understanding Mg corrosion in the body for biodegradable medical implants (pp. 92-100) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.021
  10. Bairagi and Mandal (2021) A comprehensive review on biocompatible Mg-based alloys as temporary orthopaedic implants: current status, challenges, and future prospects https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.09.005
  11. Bajger et al. (2016) Mathematical modelling of the degradation behaviour of biodegradable metals 16(1) (pp. 227-238) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-016-0812-3
  12. Bakhsheshi-Rad et al. (2015) Corrosion and mechanical performance of double-layered nano-Al/PCL coating on Mg–Ca–Bi alloy (pp. 95-98) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.04.039
  13. Bär et al. (2019) Laser additive manufacturing of biodegradable magnesium alloy WE43: a detailed microstructure analysis (pp. 36-49) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.056
  14. Ben-Hamu et al. (2008) The role of Mg2Si on the corrosion behavior of wrought Mg–Zn–Mn alloy 16(7) (pp. 860-867) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2008.03.003
  15. Boukhobza et al. (2017) Biomechanical characterization of failure the 316L stainless steel for femoral compression plates (pp. 68-74) https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/jbbbe.34.68
  16. Bowen et al. (2014) Rates of in vivo(arterial) and in vitro biocorrosion for pure magnesium 103(1) (pp. 341-349) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35179
  17. Bowen et al. (2016) Biodegradable metals for cardiovascular stents: from clinical concerns to recent Zn-Alloys 5(10) (pp. 1121-1140) https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201501019
  18. Butt et al. (2017) Mechanical and degradation properties of biodegradable Mg strengthened poly-lactic acid composite through plastic injection molding (pp. 141-147) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.051
  19. Cao et al. (2015) Influence of hot rolling on the corrosion behavior of several Mg–X alloys (pp. 176-191) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.10.012
  20. Chandra and Pandey (2020) Preparation strategies for mg-alloys for biodegradable orthopaedic implants and other biomedical applications: a review https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2020.06.003
  21. Chang et al. (2013) Formation of dicalcium phosphate dihydrate on magnesium alloy by micro-arc oxidation coupled with hydrothermal treatment (pp. 118-124) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.03.017
  22. Chaya et al. (2015) In vivo study of magnesium plate and screw degradation and bone fracture healing (pp. 262-269) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.010
  23. Chen et al. (2011) Interaction between a high purity magnesium surface and PCL and PLA coatings during dynamic degradation 6(2) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/6/2/025005
  24. Chen et al. (2015) Processing and properties of magnesium containing a dense uniform dispersion of nanoparticles 528(7583) (pp. 539-543) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16445
  25. Chen et al. (2018) Mechanical properties of magnesium alloys for medical application: a review (pp. 68-79) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.022
  26. Choi and Kim (2014) Significant effects of adding trace amounts of Ti on the microstructure and corrosion properties of Mg–6Al–1Zn magnesium alloy (pp. 49-55) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.052
  27. Chung Ng et al. (2011) Fabrication of magnesium using selective laser melting technique 17(6) (pp. 479-490) https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541111184206
  28. Cui et al. (2017) In vitro corrosion of Mg–Ca alloy—the influence of glucose content 11(3) (pp. 284-295) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-017-0391-y
  29. Cui et al. (2019) Effect of nano-HA content on the mechanical properties, degradation and biocompatible behavior of Mg–Zn/HA composite prepared by spark plasma sintering (pp. 620-631) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.03.048
  30. Dambatta et al. (2015) Review on Zn-Based alloys as potential biodegradable medical devices materials (pp. 277-281) https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.776.277
  31. de Baaij et al. (2015) Magnesium in man: Implications for health and disease 95(1) (pp. 1-46) https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00012.2014
  32. Deng et al. (2017) Mechanism for corrosion protection of β-TCP reinforced ZK60 via laser rapid solidification https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v4i1.124
  33. Dezfuli et al. (2017) Fabrication of novel magnesium-matrix composites and their mechanical properties prior to and during in vitro degradation (pp. 74-86) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.10.010
  34. Drozdenko et al. (2016) Investigating a twinning–detwinning process in wrought Mg alloys by the acoustic emission technique (pp. 103-113) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.013
  35. Drozdenko et al. (2019) Optimization of mechanical properties of dilute Mg–Zn–Y alloys prepared by rapid solidification https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107984
  36. Duan et al. (2012) Corrosion behavior of As-Cast Pb–Mg–Al alloys in 3.5% NaCl solution 68(9) (pp. 822-826) https://doi.org/10.5006/0570
  37. Dutta et al. (2018) Mechanical and in vitro degradation behavior of magnesium-bioactive glass composites prepared by SPS for biomedical applications 107(2) (pp. 352-365) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34127
  38. Ezechieli et al. (2014) Biomechanical characteristics of bioabsorbable magnesium-based (MgYREZr-alloy) interference screws with different threads 24(12) (pp. 3976-3981) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3325-6
  39. Farag and Yun (2014) Effect of gelatin addition on fabrication of magnesium phosphate-based scaffolds prepared by additive manufacturing system (pp. 111-115) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.055
  40. Festas et al. (2019) Medical devices biomaterials—a review 234(1) (pp. 218-228) https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420719882458
  41. Filippi et al. (2020) Natural polymeric scaffolds in bone regeneration https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00474
  42. Gao et al. (2019) Highly biodegradable and bioactive Fe–Pd-bredigite biocomposites prepared by selective laser melting (pp. 91-104) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.06.001
  43. Gao et al. (2019) Nano-SiC reinforced Zn biocomposites prepared via laser melting: microstructure, mechanical properties and biodegradability 35(11) (pp. 2608-2617) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.06.010
  44. Gao et al. (2019) Selective laser melting (SLM) of in-situ beta phase reinforced Ti/Zr-based bulk metallic glass matrix composite (pp. 21-25) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.06.007
  45. Gil-Santos et al. (2017) Microstructure and degradation performance of biodegradable Mg–Si–Sr implant alloys (pp. 25-34) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.056
  46. Grogan et al. (2014) A physical corrosion model for bioabsorbable metal stents 10(5) (pp. 2313-2322) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.059
  47. Gu et al. (2012) In vitro and in vivo studies on a Mg–Sr binary alloy system developed as a new kind of biodegradable metal 8(6) (pp. 2360-2374) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.02.018
  48. Guo et al. (2019) Microstructure and mechanical properties of wire arc additively manufactured AZ80M magnesium alloy (pp. 4-6) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.03.063
  49. Gupta et al. (2016) Biomimetic, osteoconductive non-mulberry silk fiber reinforced tricomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering 8(45) (pp. 30797-30810) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b11366
  50. Han et al. (2015) In vitro and in vivo studies on the degradation of high-purity Mg (99.99wt%) screw with femoral intracondylar fractured rabbit model (pp. 57-69) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.06.031
  51. Hao et al. (2017) The scaffold microenvironment for stem cell based bone tissue engineering 5(8) (pp. 1382-1392) https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00146k
  52. Heiden and Walker (2015) Magnesium, iron and zinc alloys, the trifecta of bioresorbable orthopaedic and vascular implantation—a review https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-952x.1000178
  53. Hiromoto et al. (2015) In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility and corrosion behaviour of a bioabsorbable magnesium alloy coated with octacalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite (pp. 520-530) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.026
  54. Huan et al. (2011) In vitro degradation behavior and bioactivity of magnesium-Bioglass® composites for orthopedic applications 100B(2) (pp. 437-446) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31968
  55. Huang et al. (2015) Fabrication and characterization of a biodegradable Mg–2Zn–0.5Ca/1β-TCP composite (pp. 120-132) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.035
  56. Ibrahim et al. (2017) Resorbable bone fixation alloys, forming, and post-fabrication treatments (pp. 870-888) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.069
  57. Jayalakshmi et al. (2018) Structure-property correlation in magnesium nanocomposites synthesized by disintegrated melt deposition technique 5(8) (pp. 16280-16285) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.05.120
  58. Jia et al. (2015) Correlative change of corrosion behavior with the microstructure of AZ91 mg alloy modified with y additions (pp. 263-271) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.019
  59. Jung et al. (2012) In vivo corrosion mechanism by elemental interdiffusion of biodegradable Mg–Ca alloy 100B(8) (pp. 2251-2260) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32795
  60. Karasoglu et al. (2018) Mechanical properties of Mg-based materials fabricated by mechanical milling and spark plasma sintering 233(10) (pp. 1972-1984) https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420718805119
  61. Khayat (2017) Minerals in pregnancy and lactation: a review article https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2017/28485.10626
  62. Kopp et al. (2019) Influence of design and postprocessing parameters on the degradation behavior and mechanical properties of additively manufactured magnesium scaffolds (pp. 23-35) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.012
  63. Kowalski et al. (2018) Properties of ultrafine-grained Mg-based composites modified by addition of silver and hydroxyapatite 34(9) (pp. 1096-1103) https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2018.1424381
  64. Kumar et al. (2018) Investigation on the controlled degradation and in vitro mineralization of carbon nanotube reinforced AZ31 nanocomposite in simulated body fluid 25(1) (pp. 105-116) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-018-0161-0
  65. Laires (2004) Role of cellular magnesium in health and human disease 9(1–3) https://doi.org/10.2741/1223
  66. Lavery et al. (2017) Effects of hot isostatic pressing on the elastic modulus and tensile properties of 316L parts made by powder bed laser fusion (pp. 186-213) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.100
  67. Lee et al. (2016) Long-term clinical study and multiscale analysis of in vivo biodegradation mechanism of mg alloy 113(3) (pp. 716-721) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518238113
  68. Li et al. (2014) Progress of biodegradable metals 24(5) (pp. 414-422) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.08.014
  69. Li et al. (2016) Design of magnesium alloys with controllable degradation for biomedical implants: from bulk to surface (pp. 2-30) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.005
  70. Li et al. (2018) Influence of albumin on in vitro degradation behavior of biodegradable Mg-1.5Zn-0.6Zr-0.2Sc alloy (pp. 227-230) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.082
  71. Li et al. (2018) Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesium (pp. 378-392) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.008
  72. Li et al. (2020) A review on thermal conductivity of magnesium and its alloys 8(1) (pp. 78-90) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2019.08.002
  73. Liu et al. (2016) Biodegradable Mg–Cu alloys with enhanced osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and long-lasting antibacterial effects https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27374
  74. Liu et al. (2016) Effects of alloying elements (ca and sr) on microstructure, mechanical property and in vitro corrosion behavior of biodegradable Zn–1.5Mg alloy (pp. 444-452) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.116
  75. Liu et al. (2017) Effect of laser processing parameters on porosity, microstructure and mechanical properties of porous Mg–Ca alloys produced by laser additive manufacturing (pp. 359-371) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.031
  76. Liu et al. (2018) Biodegradable magnesium alloys developed as bone repair materials: A review (pp. 1-15) https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9216314
  77. Liu et al. (2018) Inflammation, mesenchymal stem cells and bone regeneration 149(4) (pp. 393-404) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-018-1643-3
  78. Lu et al. (2015) Modification of grain refinement and texture in AZ31 Mg alloy by a new plastic deformation method (pp. 130-134) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.196
  79. Manoj Kumar et al. (2016) Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite coating on Mg–3Zn alloy for orthopaedic application (pp. 82-92) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.12.086
  80. McBride (1938) Magnesium screw and nail transfixion in fractures 31(5) (pp. 508-514) https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-193805000-00010
  81. Md Saad et al. (2019) Impacts of dynamic degradation on the morphological and mechanical characterisation of porous magnesium scaffold 18(3) (pp. 797-811) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-01115-z
  82. Montazerian et al. (2017) Porous scaffold internal architecture design based on minimal surfaces: a compromise between permeability and elastic properties (pp. 98-114) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.009
  83. Narita et al. (2019) Degradation behaviors and cytocompatibility of Mg/β-tricalcium phosphate composites produced by spark plasma sintering 107(7) (pp. 2238-2253) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34316
  84. Navarro et al. (2008) Biomaterials in orthopaedics 5(27) (pp. 1137-1158) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0151
  85. Niinomi (2008) Mechanical biocompatibilities of titanium alloys for biomedical applications 1(1) (pp. 30-42) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.07.001
  86. Oladapo et al. (2019) 3D printing of bone scaffolds with hybrid biomaterials (pp. 428-436) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.065
  87. Palanivel et al. (2015) Friction stir additive manufacturing for high structural performance through microstructural control in an Mg based WE43 alloy 1980–2015(65) (pp. 934-952) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.082
  88. Park et al. (2013) Polycaprolactone coating with varying thicknesses for controlled corrosion of magnesium 10(5) (pp. 695-706) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-013-9474-6
  89. Patil et al. (2019) Bioactive coating on a new Mg–2Zn–0.5Nd alloy: modulation of degradation rate and cellular response 34(7) (pp. 394-402) https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2019.1574956
  90. Prasad et al. (2012) Production of high purity magnesium alloys by melt purification with Zr 14(7) (pp. 477-490) https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201200054
  91. Puleo (1999) Understanding and controlling the bone–implant interface 20(23–24) (pp. 2311-2321) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00160-x
  92. Qiao et al. (2012) Corrosion behaviour of a nominally high purity Mg ingot produced by permanent mould direct chill casting (pp. 185-207) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.030
  93. Qin et al. (2019) Additive manufacturing of biodegradable metals: current research status and future perspectives (pp. 3-22) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.046
  94. Radha and Sreekanth (2017) Insight of magnesium alloys and composites for orthopedic implant applications—a review 5(3) (pp. 286-312) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2017.08.003
  95. Razavi et al. (2014) Controlling the degradation rate of bioactive magnesium implants by electrophoretic deposition of akermanite coating 40(3) (pp. 3865-3872) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.027
  96. Ren et al. (2019) Evaluation of as-extruded ternary Zn–Mg–Zr alloys for biomedical implantation material: in vitro and in vivo behavior 70(6) (pp. 1056-1070) https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201810648
  97. Renkema et al. (2008) Calcium and phosphate homeostasis: Concertedinterplay of new regulators 40(2) (pp. 82-91) https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890701689645
  98. Rtimi et al. (2019) Advances in catalytic/photocatalytic bacterial inactivation by nano Ag and Cu coated surfaces and medical devices (pp. 291-318) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.025
  99. Saini (2015) Implant biomaterials: a comprehensive review 3(1) https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52
  100. Salehi et al. (2019) Additive manufacturing of magnesium–zinc–zirconium (ZK) alloys via capillary-mediated binderless three-dimensional printing https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107683
  101. Sanchez et al. (2015) Mg and mg alloys: how comparable are in vitro and in vivo corrosion rates? A review (pp. 16-31) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.048
  102. Sankar et al. (2017) Comparison of electrochemical behavior of hydroxyapatite coated onto WE43 Mg alloy by electrophoretic and pulsed laser deposition (pp. 840-848) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.10.077
  103. Sanz-Herrera et al. (2018) In silico design of magnesium implants: macroscopic modeling (pp. 181-188) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.016
  104. Schlüter et al. (2014) Corrosion performance and mechanical properties of sputter-deposited MgY and MgGd alloys (pp. 43-54) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.08.027
  105. Seitz et al. (2015) Recent advances in biodegradable metals for medical sutures: a critical review 4(13) (pp. 1915-1936) https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500189
  106. Selvam et al. (2016) Corrosion behavior of Mg/graphene composite in aqueous electrolyte (pp. 129-136) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.01.051
  107. Seong and Kim (2015) Development of biodegradable Mg–Ca alloy sheets with enhanced strength and corrosion properties through the refinement and uniform dispersion of the Mg2Ca phase by high-ratio differential speed rolling (pp. 531-542) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.029
  108. Sezer et al. (2018) Review of magnesium-based biomaterials and their applications 6(1) (pp. 23-43) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2018.02.003
  109. Shalbafi et al. (2017) Hot deformation of the extruded Mg–10Li–1Zn alloy: constitutive analysis and processing maps (pp. 1269-1277) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.087
  110. Shao et al. (2016) 3D printing magnesium-doped wollastonite/β-TCP bioceramics scaffolds with high strength and adjustable degradation 36(6) (pp. 1495-1503) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.01.010
  111. Shuai et al. (2017) Laser rapid solidification improves corrosion behavior of Mg–Zn–Zr alloy (pp. 961-969) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.019
  112. Shuai et al. (2018) Wrapping effect of secondary phases on the grains: increased corrosion resistance of Mg–Al alloys 13(4) (pp. 292-300) https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2018.1479969
  113. Shuai et al. (2018) Lanthanum-containing magnesium alloy with antitumor function based on increased reactive oxygen species 8(11) https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112109
  114. Shuai et al. (2018) Microstructure, biodegradation, antibacterial and mechanical properties of ZK60-Cu alloys prepared by selective laser melting technique 34(10) (pp. 1944-1952) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.02.006
  115. Shuai et al. (2018) Physical stimulations and their osteogenesis-inducing mechanisms https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v4i2.138
  116. Shuai et al. (2019) Biodegradable metallic bone implants 3(4) (pp. 544-562) https://doi.org/10.1039/c8qm00507a
  117. Shuai et al. (2019) 3D honeycomb nanostructure-encapsulated magnesium alloys with superior corrosion resistance and mechanical properties (pp. 611-620) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.031
  118. Shuai et al. (2019) Antibacterial polymer scaffold based on mesoporous bioactive glass loaded with in situ grown silver (pp. 304-315) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.273
  119. Shu-Rong et al. (1999) A long-term study of the efficacy and acceptability of a single-rod hormonal contraceptive implant (implanon®) in healthy women in China 4(2) (pp. 85-93) https://doi.org/10.3109/13625189909064009
  120. Song G, Atrens A (1999) Corrosion mechanisms of magnesium alloys. Adv Eng Mater 1(1):11–33.
  121. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1527-2648(199909)1:1
  122. Song et al. (2017) Pitting corrosion of a rare earth mg alloy GW93 33(9) (pp. 954-960) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2017.01.014
  123. Song et al. (2018) Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications (pp. 3117-3145) https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s165440
  124. Sta Agueda et al. (2021) 3D printing of biomedically relevant polymer materials and biocompatibility 11(2) (pp. 197-212) https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-021-00038-8
  125. Stevens (2008) Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering 11(5) (pp. 18-25) https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-7021(08)70086-5
  126. Sur divers altisides du nord de l’Afrique avec description de plusieursformesnouvelles (1911) Bulletin de La Société Entomologique de France. pp 9–11.
  127. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.2956
  128. Taljanovic et al. (2003) Fracture fixation 23(6) (pp. 1569-1590) https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.236035159
  129. Tammann and Schafmeister (1924) MetallographischeMitteilungen. CXVIII. Über die verteilungeinesmetalleszwischenzweiflüssigenmetallischenphasen 138(1) (pp. 219-232) https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19241380121
  130. Tang and El-Awady (2014) Formation and slip of pyramidal dislocations in hexagonal close-packed magnesium single crystals (pp. 319-332) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.022
  131. Tappa and Jammalamadaka (2018) Novel biomaterials used in medical 3D printing techniques 9(1) https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010017
  132. Tie et al. (2013) Antibacterial biodegradable Mg–Ag alloys (pp. 284-298) https://doi.org/10.22203/ecm.v025a20
  133. Turan et al. (2017) The effect of GNPs on wear and corrosion behaviors of pure magnesium (pp. 14-23) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.022
  134. Velikokhatnyi and Kumta (2010) First-principles studies on alloying and simplified thermodynamic aqueous chemical stability of calcium-, zinc-, aluminum-, yttrium- and iron-doped magnesium alloys☆ 6(5) (pp. 1698-1704) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.016
  135. Venezuela and Dargusch (2019) The influence of alloying and fabrication techniques on the mechanical properties, biodegradability and biocompatibility of zinc: a comprehensive review (pp. 1-40) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.035
  136. Wan et al. (2016) Mechanical and biological properties of bioglass/magnesium composites prepared via microwave sintering route (pp. 521-527) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.096
  137. Wang et al. (2015) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in drug delivery and biomedical applications 11(2) (pp. 313-327) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2014.09.014
  138. Wang et al. (2016) Evaluation of metal-ceramic bond characteristics of three dental Co–Cr alloys prepared with different fabrication techniques 116(6) (pp. 916-923) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.002
  139. Wang et al. (2017) Chlorogenic acid protects against aluminium-induced cytotoxicity through chelation and antioxidant actions in primary hippocampal neuronal cells 8(8) (pp. 2924-2934) https://doi.org/10.1039/c7fo00659d
  140. Wang et al. (2018) A silk-based coating containing GREDVY peptide and heparin on Mg–Zn–Y–Nd alloy: improved corrosion resistance, hemocompatibility and endothelialization 6(6) (pp. 966-978) https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tb02784b
  141. Wang et al. (2018) What is going on in magnesium alloys? 34(2) (pp. 245-247) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.019
  142. Wang et al. (2018) Microstructures, mechanical properties, and degradation behaviors of heat-treated Mg-Sr alloys as potential biodegradable implant materials (pp. 47-57) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.028
  143. Wen et al. (2018) Laser additive manufacturing of Zn metal parts for biodegradable applications: processing, formation quality and mechanical properties (pp. 36-45) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.057
  144. Willbold et al. (2015) Effect of the addition of low rare earth elements (lanthanum, neodymium, cerium) on the biodegradation and biocompatibility of magnesium (pp. 554-562) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.041
  145. Witte (2010) The history of biodegradable magnesium implants: a review☆ 6(5) (pp. 1680-1692) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.028
  146. Witte and Eliezer (2012) Springer
  147. Witte (2015) Reprint of: the history of biodegradable magnesium implants: a review (pp. S28-S40) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.017
  148. Wolff et al. (2016) Magnesium powder injection molding (MIM) of orthopedic implants for biomedical applications 68(4) (pp. 1191-1197) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1837-x
  149. Wu and Veillette (2011) Magnesium in a signalling role 475(7357) (pp. 462-463) https://doi.org/10.1038/475462a
  150. Wu and Zhu (2017) Heterogeneous materials: a new class of materials with unprecedented mechanical properties 5(8) (pp. 527-532) https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2017.1343208
  151. Wu et al. (2014) Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (pp. 1-36) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001
  152. Wu et al. (2019) In vivo study of microarc oxidation coated Mg alloy as a substitute for bone defect repairing: degradation behavior, mechanical properties, and bone response (pp. 349-359) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.05.052
  153. Xin et al. (2011) In vitro studies of biomedical magnesium alloys in a simulated physiological environment: a review 7(4) (pp. 1452-1459) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.004
  154. Xiong et al. (2016) Characterization of biomedical hydroxyapatite/magnesium composites prepared by powder metallurgy assisted with microwave sintering 16(8) (pp. 830-836) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2016.05.004
  155. Yan et al. (2017) Improvement of the mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of biodegradable β-Ca3 (PO4) 2/Mg-Zn composites prepared by powder metallurgy: the adding β-Ca3 (PO4) 2, hot extrusion and aging treatment (pp. 582-596) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.132
  156. Yang et al. (2010) Effects of magnesium alloys extracts on adult human bone marrow-derived stromal cell viability and osteogenic differentiation 5(4) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/5/4/045005
  157. Yang et al. (2016) System development, formability quality and microstructure evolution of selective laser-melted magnesium 11(3) (pp. 173-181) https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1210522
  158. Yang et al. (2016) The enhancement of mg corrosion resistance by alloying mn and laser-melting 9(4) https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9040216
  159. Yang et al. (2018) Regulating degradation behavior by incorporating mesoporous silica for Mg bone implants 4(3) (pp. 1046-1054) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00020
  160. Yang et al. (2018) Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds
  161. Yang et al. (2018) A combined strategy to enhance the properties of zn by laser rapid solidification and laser alloying (pp. 51-60) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.03.018
  162. Yang et al. (2020) Metal organic frameworks as a compatible reinforcement in a biopolymer bone scaffold 4(3) (pp. 973-984) https://doi.org/10.1039/c9qm00772e
  163. Yang et al. (2020) Mg bone implant: features, developments and perspectives https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108259
  164. Yang et al. (2020) Laser additive manufacturing of Mg-based composite with improved degradation behaviour 15(3) (pp. 278-293) https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1748381
  165. Yao et al. (2018) Extrusion temperature impacts on biometallic Mg–2.0Zn–0.5Zr–3.0Gd (wt%) solid-solution alloy (pp. 468-480) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.225
  166. Yin et al. (2013) Effects of Ca on microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties and biocompatibility of Mg–Zn–Ca alloys 24(6) (pp. 1365-1373) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4856-y
  167. Yin et al. (2019) In vitro degradation behavior and cytocompatibility of ZK30/bioactive glass composites fabricated by selective laser melting for biomedical applications (pp. 38-45) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.165
  168. Yousefi et al. (2014) Current strategies in multiphasic scaffold design for osteochondral tissue engineering: a review 103(7) (pp. 2460-2481) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35356
  169. Yu et al. (2017) Improving mechanical properties of ZM61 magnesium alloy by aging before extrusion (pp. 553-560) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.128
  170. Yu et al. (2018) Long-term in vivo evolution of high-purity Mg screw degradation—local and systemic effects of Mg degradation products (pp. 215-224) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.023
  171. Yuan et al. (2018) Interfacial structure in AZ91 alloy composites reinforced by graphene nanosheets (pp. 177-186) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.090
  172. Yuan et al. (2019) Additive manufacturing technology for porous metal implant applications and triple minimal surface structures: a review (pp. 56-70) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003
  173. Zeng et al. (2006) Review of studies on corrosion of magnesium alloys (pp. s763-s771) https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(06)60297-5
  174. Zhang et al. (2010) Research on an Mg–Zn alloy as a degradable biomaterial 6(2) (pp. 626-640) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.028
  175. Zhang et al. (2011) Effects of powder characteristics on selective laser melting of 316L stainless steel powder (pp. 3664-3667) https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.189-193.3664
  176. Zhang et al. (2011) Corrosion of hot extrusion AZ91 magnesium alloy: I-relation between the microstructure and corrosion behavior 53(5) (pp. 1960-1968) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.015
  177. Zhang et al. (2016) Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of CGRP to improve bone-fracture healing in rats 22(10) (pp. 1160-1169) https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4162
  178. Zhang et al. (2017) A study of degradation resistance and cytocompatibility of super-hydrophobic coating on magnesium (pp. 405-412) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.057
  179. Zhang et al. (2018) The degradation and transport mechanism of a Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr stent in rabbit common carotid artery: a 20-month study (pp. 372-384) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.018
  180. Zhao XF, Niinomi M, Nakai M, Hieda J (2011) OS07-2-2 development of new Ti-Mo alloys with changeable Young’s modulus for spinal fixture devices. The Abstracts of ATEM: International Conference on Advanced Technology in Experimental Mechanics: Asian Conference on Experimental Mechanics, 2011.10(0), _OS07-2.
  181. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeatem.2011.10._os07-2-2
  182. Zhao et al. (2016) Vascularized bone grafting fixed by biodegradable magnesium screw for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head (pp. 84-92) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.038