10.1007/s40204-021-00165-4

Near-field electrospinning polycaprolactone microfibers to mimic arteriole-capillary–venule structure

  1. Department of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, US

Published in Issue 2021-09-22

How to Cite

Qavi, I., & Tan, G. Z. (2021). Near-field electrospinning polycaprolactone microfibers to mimic arteriole-capillary–venule structure. Progress in Biomaterials, 10(3 (September 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-021-00165-4

Abstract

Abstract The ability to create three-dimensional (3D) cell-incorporated constructs for tissue engineering has progressed tremendously. One of the major challenges that limit the clinical applications of tissue engineering is the inability to form sufficient vascularization of capillary vessels in the 3D constructs. The lack of a functional capillary network for supplying nutrients and oxygen leads to poor cell viability. This paper presents the near-field electrospinning (ES) technique to fabricate a branched microfiber structure that mimics the morphology of capillaries. Polycaprolactone solution was electrospun onto a sloped collector that resulted in morphological and geometric variation of the fibers. With proper control over the solution viscosity and the electrospinning voltage, a single fiber was scattered into a branched fiber network and then converged back to a single fiber on the collector. The obtained fibers have a diameter of less than 100 microns at the two ends with coiled and branched fibers of less than 10 microns that mimics the arteriole-capillary-venule structure. The formation of such a structure in the near-field ES strongly depends on the solution viscosity. Low viscosity solutions form beads and discontinuous lines thus cannot be used to achieve the desired structure. The branching of PCL fiber occurs due to an electrohydrodynamic instability. The transition from the straight large fiber to smaller coiled/branched fibers is not instantaneous and stretches over a horizontal region of 1.5 cm. The current work shows the feasibility of electrospinning the stem-branch-stem fibrous structure by adopting a valley-shaped collector with potentials for tissue engineering applications.

Keywords

  • Electrospinning,
  • Microvasculature,
  • Arteriole,
  • Venule,
  • Capillary

References

  1. Ashima et al. (2021) Automation and manufacturing of smart materials in additive manufacturing technologies using internet of things towards the adoption of industry 4.0 (pp. 5081-5088) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.583
  2. Britanica. Capillary.
  3. https://www.britannica.com/science/capillary
  4. Beachley and Wen (2009) Effect of electrospinning parameters on the nanofiber diameter and length 29(3) (pp. 663-668) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2008.10.037
  5. Cengiz et al. (2010) Influence of solution properties on the roller electrospinning of poly (vinyl alcohol) 50(5) (pp. 936-943) https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.21599
  6. Chang and Niklason (2017) A short discourse on vascular tissue engineering 2(1) (pp. 1-8) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-017-0011-6
  7. Drew et al. (2003) The effect of viscosity and filler on electrospun fiber morphology 40(12) (pp. 1415-1422) https://doi.org/10.1081/MA-120025320
  8. Fatima S, Haleem A, Bahl S, Javaid M, Mahla SK, Singh S (2021) Exploring the significant applications of internet of things (IoT) with 3D printing using advanced materials in medical field. Materials Today
  9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.305
  10. Fong et al. (1999) Beaded nanofibers formed during electrospinning 40(16) (pp. 4585-4592) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00068-3
  11. Fridrikh et al. (2003) Controlling the fiber diameter during electrospinning 90(14) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.144502
  12. Graessley (1967) Viscosity of entangling polydisperse polymers 47(6) (pp. 1942-1953) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712222
  13. Haider et al. (2018) A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology 11(8) (pp. 1165-1188) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.11.015
  14. Haleem and Javaid (2019) Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and its 3D printed implants applications in medical field: an overview 7(4) (pp. 571-577) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.01.003
  15. Haleem and Javaid (2019) Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and its manufacturing of customised 3D printed dentistry parts using additive manufacturing 7(4) (pp. 654-660) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.03.001
  16. Haleem and Javaid (2020) 3D printed medical parts with different materials using additive manufacturing 8(1) (pp. 215-223) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.08.002
  17. Haleem et al. (2020) 3D printing applications in bone tissue engineering (pp. 118-124) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.12.002
  18. Haq MIU, Khuroo S, Raina A, Khajuria S, Javaid M, Haq MFU, Haleem A. (2020). 3D printing for development of medical equipment amidst coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic—review and advancements. Research on Biomedical Engineering, 1-11.
  19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-020-00098-0
  20. Huang Y, Bu N, Duan Y, Pan Y, Liu H, Yin Z, Xiong Y. (2013). Electrohydrodynamic direct-writing.
  21. Nanoscale, 5
  22. (24):12007-12017.
  23. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR04329K
  24. Javaid and Haleem (2018) Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: a literature based review 54(4) (pp. 411-422) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2017.09.003
  25. Javaid and Haleem (2018) Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: a review 9(3) (pp. 202-206) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.04.008
  26. Javaid and Haleem (2019) Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: a literature-based review 9(3) (pp. 179-185) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.004
  27. Javaid and Haleem (2020) 3D printed tissue and organ using additive manufacturing: an overview 8(2) (pp. 586-594) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.12.008
  28. Laschke and Menger (2016) Prevascularization in tissue engineering: current concepts and future directions 34(2) (pp. 112-121) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.004
  29. Levick JR. (2013). An introduction to cardiovascular physiology: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  30. Li Z, Wang C. (2013a). Effects of working parameters on electrospinning. In One-dimensional nanostructures (pp. 15–28): Springer.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36427-3_2
  32. Li and Wang (2013) One-dimensional nanostructures: electrospinning technique and unique nanofibers: Springer-Verlag https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36427-3
  33. Lovett et al. (2009) Vascularization strategies for tissue engineering 15(3) (pp. 353-370) https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0085
  34. Mandrycky et al. (2017) Tissue engineering toward organ-specific regeneration and disease modeling 7(3) https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2017.58
  35. Marga F, Jakab K, Khatiwala C, Shepherd B, Dorfman S, Hubbard B, Colbert S, Forgacs G. (2012). Toward engineering functional organ modules by additive manufacturing. Biofabrication, 4(2):022001.
  36. Nayak et al. (2013) Effect of viscosity and electrical conductivity on the morphology and fiber diameter in melt electrospinning of polypropylene 83(6) (pp. 606-617) https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517512458347
  37. Neumann et al. (2003) Tissue engineering of perfused microvessels 66(1) (pp. 59-67) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2862(03)00040-2
  38. Nezarati et al. (2013) Effects of humidity and solution viscosity on electrospun fiber morphology 19(10) (pp. 810-819) https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2012.0671
  39. NIH. Dichloromethane (2021)
  40. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/123061/AQG2ndEd_5_7Dichloromethane.pdf
  41. Paula et al. (2010) Microstructure and network organization of the microvasculature in the human macula 51(12) (pp. 6735-6743) https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5415
  42. Rustad et al. (2010) Strategies for organ level tissue engineering 6(3) (pp. 151-157) https://doi.org/10.4161/org.6.3.12139
  43. Sharma et al. (2019) Upgrading prevascularization in tissue engineering: a review of strategies for promoting highly organized microvascular network formation (pp. 112-130) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.016
  44. Shieh and Vacanti (2005) State-of-the-art tissue engineering: from tissue engineering to organ building 137(1) (pp. 1-7) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2004.04.002
  45. Shin et al. (2001) Experimental characterization of electrospinning: the electrically forced jet and instabilities 42(25) (pp. 09955-09967) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00540-7
  46. Šimko and Lukáš (2016) Mathematical modeling of a whipping instability of an electrically charged liquid jet 40(21–22) (pp. 9565-9583) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.06.018
  47. Sukmana (2012) Microvascular guidance: a challenge to support the development of vascularised tissue engineering construct https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/201352
  48. Taylor and Moore (1999) Capillary fluid exchange 277(6) https://doi.org/10.1152/advances.1999.277.6.S203
  49. Teo and Ramakrishna (2006) A review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies 17(14) https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/17/14/R01
  50. Tien (2011) Tissue engineering of the microvasculature 9(3) (pp. 1155-1212) https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c180037
  51. Tuma RF, Durán WN, Ley K. (2011). Microcirculation (Vol. 4): Academic Press.
  52. Vajda et al. (2021) Microvascular tissue engineering—a review 9(6) https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9060589
  53. Vyas et al. (2017) Engineering the vasculature with additive manufacturing (pp. 1-13) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.008
  54. Wu and Ringeisen (2010) Development of human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) and human umbilical vein smooth muscle cell (HUVSMC) branch/stem structures on hydrogel layers via biological laser printing (BioLP) 2(1) https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/014111
  55. Yarin et al. (2005) Branching in electrospinning of nanofibers 98(6) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2060928
  56. Zadpoor AA, Malda J. (2017). Additive manufacturing of biomaterials, tissues, and organs.Ann Biomed Eng volume 45:1–11 (2017).
  57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1719-y