10.1007/s40204-021-00156-5

An efficient protocol for decellularization of the human endometrial fragments for clinical usage

  1. Anatomy Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, IR
  2. School of Biology, Damghan University, Damghan, IR
  3. Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR

Published in Issue 2021-05-21

How to Cite

Sargazi, Z., Zavareh, S., Jafarabadi, M., & Salehnia, M. (2021). An efficient protocol for decellularization of the human endometrial fragments for clinical usage. Progress in Biomaterials, 10(2 (June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-021-00156-5

Abstract

Abstract The present study was aimed to compare different decellularization protocols for human endometrial fragments. The freeze–thaw cycles in combination with treatment by Triton X-100 and four concentrations of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 1.5%) with two exposure times (24 and 72 h) were applied for tissues decellularization. After analysis the morphology and DNA content of tissues the group with better morphology and lower DNA content was selected for further assessments. The nucleus by Acridine orange and extracellular matrix (ECM) using Masson's trichrome, Alcian blue, and periodic acid–Schiff staining were studied. The amount of tissues collagen types I and IV, fibronectin, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and elastin was analyzed by Raman spectroscopy. The ultrastructure and porosity of decellularized scaffold were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The MTT assay was applied for assessments of cytotoxicity of scaffold. The treated group with 1% SDS for 72 h showed the morphology similar to native control in having the minimum level of DNA and well preserved ECM. Raman spectroscopy results demonstrated, the amount of collagen types I and IV, GAG, and fibronectin was not significantly different in decellularized scaffold compared with native group but the elastin protein level was significantly decreased ( P  < 0.001). SEM micrographs also showed a porous and fiber rich ECM in decellularized sample similar to the native control. This combined protocol for decellularization of human endometrial tissue is effective and it could be suitable for recellularization and clinical applications in the future.

Keywords

  • Decellularization,
  • Human endometrial tissue,
  • Raman spectroscopy,
  • Sodium dodecyl sulfate

References

  1. Aamodt and Grainger (2016) Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response (pp. 68-82) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.003
  2. Abbas et al. (2020) Generation of a three-dimensional collagen scaffold-based model of the human endometrium https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2019.0079
  3. Agmon and Christman (2016) Controlling stem cell behavior with decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds (pp. 193-201) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2016.02.001
  4. Badylak (2007) The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material (pp. 3587-3593) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.043
  5. Baraga et al. (1992) In situ optical histochemistry of human artery using near infrared Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy (pp. 3473-3477) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.8.3473
  6. Campo et al. (2017) De-and recellularization of the pig uterus: a bioengineering pilot study (pp. 34-45) https://doi.org/10.1095/biolre/bio143396
  7. Campo et al. (2019) Tissue-specific decellularized endometrial substratum mimicking different physiological conditions influences in vitro embryo development in a rabbit model (pp. 126-138) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.004
  8. Crapo et al. (2011) An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes (pp. 3233-3243) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057
  9. Daryabari et al. (2019) Development of an efficient perfusion-based protocol for whole-organ decellularization of the ovine uterus as a human-sized model and in vivo application of the bioscaffolds (pp. 1211-1223) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01463-4
  10. Das and Agrawal (2011) Raman spectroscopy: recent advancements, techniques and applications (pp. 163-176) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2011.08.003
  11. Deeken et al. (2011) Method of preparing a decellularized porcine tendon using tributyl phosphate (pp. 199-206) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31753
  12. Dzobo et al. (2019) Recent trends in decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks for 3D printing: an updated review https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184628
  13. Faulk et al. (2014) The effect of detergents on the basement membrane complex of a biologic scaffold material (pp. 183-193) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.006
  14. Fayazi et al. (2017) In-vitro construction of endometrial-like epithelium using CD146+ mesenchymal cells derived from human endometrium (pp. 241-252) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.05.020
  15. Frushour and Koenig (1975) Raman scattering of collagen, gelatin, and elastin (pp. 379-391) https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1975.360140211
  16. Gilbert et al. (2006) Decellularization of tissues and organs (pp. 3675-3683) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014
  17. Gilpin et al. (2014) Perfusion decellularization of human and porcine lungs: bringing the matrix to clinical scale (pp. 298-308) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2013.10.030
  18. Gratzer et al. (2006) Matrix alteration and not residual sodium dodecyl sulfate cytotoxicity affects the cellular repopulation of a decellularized matrix (pp. 2975-2983) https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.2975
  19. Gu et al. (2020) Endometrial organoids: a new model for the research of endometrial-related diseases (pp. 918-926) https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioaa124
  20. Han and Du (2020) Advances in the application of biomimetic endometrium interfaces for uterine bioengineering in female infertility https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00153
  21. He et al. (2017) Optimization of SDS exposure on preservation of ECM characteristics in whole organ decellularization of rat kidneys (pp. 1352-1360) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33668
  22. Hellström et al. (2014) Towards the development of a bioengineered uterus: comparison of different protocols for rat uterus decellularization (pp. 5034-5042) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.018
  23. Hellström et al. (2016) Bioengineered uterine tissue supports pregnancy in a rat model (pp. 487-496) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.048
  24. Hiraoka et al. (2016) STAT3 accelerates uterine epithelial regeneration in a mouse model of decellularized uterine matrix transplantation https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.87591
  25. Jakus et al. (2017) Tissue papers” from organ-specific decellularized extracellular matrices https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201700992
  26. Keane et al. (2015) Methods of tissue decellularization used for preparation of biologic scaffolds and in vivo relevance (pp. 25-34) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.03.005
  27. Kuo et al. (2017) Bioengineering strategies to treat female infertility (pp. 294-306) https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2016.0385
  28. Lim et al. (2011) Early detection of biomolecular changes in disrupted porcine cartilage using polarized Raman spectroscopy https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3528006
  29. Liu et al. (2019) Cell and biomaterial-based approaches to uterus regeneration (pp. 141-148) https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbz021
  30. Matoba et al. (2019) Current status of uterine regenerative medicine for absolute uterine factor infertility (pp. 79-86) https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2019.1182
  31. Mendibil et al. (2020) Tissue-specific decellularization methods: rationale and strategies to achieve regenerative Compounds https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155447
  32. Miki et al. (2019) The orientation of a decellularized uterine scaffold determines the tissue topology and architecture of the regenerated uterus in rats (pp. 1215-1227) https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioz004
  33. Miyazaki and Maruyama (2014) Partial regeneration and reconstruction of the rat uterus through recellularization of a decellularized uterine matrix (pp. 8791-8800) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.052
  34. Nguyen et al. (2012) Characterization of type I and IV collagens by Raman microspectroscopy: Identification of spectral markers of the dermo-epidermal junction (pp. 421-427) https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/686183
  35. Olalekan et al. (2017) Development of a novel human recellularized endometrium that responds to a 28-day hormone treatment (pp. 971-981) https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/iox039
  36. Padma et al. (2018) Protocols for rat uterus isolation and decellularization: applications for uterus tissue engineering and 3D cell culturing (pp. 161-175) https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2017_60
  37. Porzionato et al. (2018) Tissue-engineered grafts from human decellularized extracellular matrices: a systematic review and future perspectives https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19124117
  38. Santoso et al. (2014) Application of detergents or high hydrostatic pressure as decellularization processes in uterine tissues and their subsequent effects on in vivo uterine regeneration in murine models https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103201
  39. Seddon et al. (2004) Membrane proteins, lipids and detergents: not just a soap opera (pp. 105-117) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.04.011
  40. Strehle et al. (2004) A Raman spectroscopic study of the adsorption of fibronectin and fibrinogen on titanium dioxide nanoparticles (pp. 5232-5236) https://doi.org/10.1039/B406524G
  41. Tiemann et al. (2020) Towards uterus tissue engineering: a comparative study of sheep uterus decellularisation (pp. 167-178) https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaaa009
  42. Wallis et al. (2012) Comparative assessment of detergent-based protocols for mouse lung de-cellularization and re-cellularization (pp. 420-432) https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0567
  43. White et al. (2017) The impact of detergents on the tissue decellularization process: a ToF-SIMS study (pp. 207-219) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.033
  44. Wu et al. (2015) Decellularized porcine aortic intima-media as a potential cardiovascular biomaterial (pp. 189-194) https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivv113
  45. Xiao et al. (2017) A microfluidic culture model of the human reproductive tract and 28-day menstrual cycle (pp. 1-3) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14584
  46. Xu et al. (2014) Comparison of decellularization protocols for preparing a decellularized porcine annulus fibrosus scaffold https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086723
  47. Yao et al. (2020) Exploiting crosslinked decellularized matrix to achieve uterus regeneration and construction (pp. 218-229) https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2019.1699828
  48. Youngstrom et al. (2013) Functional characterization of detergent-decellularized equine tendon extracellular matrix for tissue engineering applications https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064151