10.1007/s40097-021-00388-8

Mechanical activation of TiO2/Fe2O3 nanocomposite for arsenic adsorption: effect of ball-to-powder ratio and milling time

Show Details XML
  • Mercyrani Babudurai1,
  • Onyekachi Nwakanma2,
  • Araceli Romero-Nuñez2,
  • Ravichandran Manisekaran3,
  • Velumani Subramaniam*4,
  • Homero Castaneda5,
  • Anish Jantrania6,
  1. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Program, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Ciudad de México, 07360, MX
  2. Department of Electrical Engineering (SEES), Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Ciudad de México, 07360, MX
  3. Laboratorio de Investigación Interdisciplinaria, Área de Nanoestructuras y Biomateriales, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, León, Guanajuato, MX
  4. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Program, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Ciudad de México, 07360, MX Department of Electrical Engineering (SEES), Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Ciudad de México, 07360, MX
  5. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, US
  6. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Agrilife Extension, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, US

Published in Issue 09-02-2021

How to Cite

Babudurai, M., Nwakanma, O., Romero-Nuñez, A., Manisekaran, R., Subramaniam, V., Castaneda, H., & Jantrania, A. (2021). Mechanical activation of TiO2/Fe2O3 nanocomposite for arsenic adsorption: effect of ball-to-powder ratio and milling time. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry, 11(4 (December 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-021-00388-8
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Abstract Arsenic contamination and its removal from the ground or natural water become an inevitable research line as it is highly carcinogenic and toxic. In the last few decades, nanotechnology has been achieved to provide accessible clean water for all living organisms. In this work, the various ratios of TiO 2 /γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanocomposite (T/M NCs) synthesized using the ball-milling route serve as nano-adsorbent for removing arsenic species. This study presents a non-toxic, low-cost, and easily accessible method for synthesizing NCs in large quantities for adsorption, offering promising results for arsenic removal from water. The ball-milling synthesis provides a comparatively, cost-effective strategy and for modulating the properties of nanostructured materials. The milling time and ball-to-powder ratio variations allow modifying the T/M NCs properties during the synthesis. The structural, morphological, and optical characterizations using X-ray diffraction, high-resolution electron microscopy, and UV–Vis analysis showed the formation of predominantly spherical-shaped anatase TiO 2 and cubic γ-Fe 2 O 3 with varying bandgap between 2.06 and 2.14 eV, which changes because of the nanomaterial phase transformation during the milling process. Elemental compositional analysis using EDS showed the uniform distribution of Ti and Fe atoms. The vibrational modes observed using Raman spectroscopy confirmed the presence of anatase TiO 2 and γ-Fe 2 O 3 within the NCs and showed the associated variations with changes in synthesis parameters. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of the synthesized ratios indicated a variation in the binding energy (ΔBE) and the evidence of charge transfer in between TiO 2 and γ-Fe 2 O 3 NCs. The adsorption studies using the various T/M NCs ratios show varying performances. The enhanced performances obtained for the NC of anatase TiO 2 and γ-Fe 2 O 3 with the most intense phase peak ratio ( I (101) / I (311) ) of 1.2 and above shows decreased adsorption efficiency with the phase changes into rutile TiO 2 , hematite, and pseudorutile phases. The elimination of As(III) and As(V) using the synthesized NCs confirms that the ball milling technique can produce nanomaterials with desirable properties for adsorption purposes. Graphic abstract The effect of BPR and milling time on TiO 2 /γ-Fe 2 O 3 nanocomposite (T/M NCs) and its impact on Arsenic adsorption.

Keywords

  • Ball milling,
  • Arsenic,
  • Nano-adsorbent,
  • TiO2/γ-Fe2O3 nanocomposite

References

  1. Shaji et al. (2020) Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a global synopsis with focus on the Indian Peninsula https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.015
  2. Gomes et al. (2019) A comparative electrochemical study on arsenic removal using iron, aluminum, and copper electrodes (pp. 59-68)
  3. Saha et al. (2019) Geogenic arsenic and microbial contamination in drinking water sources: exposure risks to the coastal population in Bangladesh
  4. Sinha and Prasad (2020) Health effects inflicted by chronic low-level arsenic contamination in groundwater: a global public health challenge (pp. 87-131)
  5. Qa and Ms (2016) Effect on human health due to drinking water contaminated with heavy metals (pp. 10-11)
  6. Lata and Samadder (2016) Removal of arsenic from water using nano adsorbents and challenges: a review (pp. 387-406)
  7. Kabir and Chowdhury (2017) Arsenic removal methods for drinking water in the developing countries: technological developments and research needs (pp. 24102-24120)
  8. Çermikli et al. (2020) Performances of novel chelating ion exchange resins for boron and arsenic removal from saline geothermal water using adsorption-membrane filtration hybrid process
  9. Pessoa Lopes et al. (2020) Optimisation of arsenate removal from water by an integrated ion-exchange membrane process coupled with Fe co-precipitation
  10. Ince and Kaplan İnce (2017) An overview of adsorption technique for heavy metal removal from water/wastewater: a critical review (pp. 10-19)
  11. Siddiqui and Chaudhry (2017) Iron oxide and its modified forms as an adsorbent for arsenic removal: a comprehensive recent advancement (pp. 592-626)
  12. La et al. (2017) Graphene-supported spinel CuFe2O4 composites: novel adsorbents for arsenic removal in aqueous media (pp. 1292-1306)
  13. La et al. (2017) Fabrication of a GNP/Fe–Mg binary oxide composite for effective removal of arsenic from aqueous solution (pp. 218-226)
  14. Zhou et al. (2008) Mesoporous TiO2/α-Fe2O3: bifunctional composites for effective elimination of arsenite contamination through simultaneous photocatalytic oxidation and adsorption (pp. 19584-19589)
  15. Ceballos-Chuc et al. (2018) Influence of brookite impurities on the raman spectrum of TiO2 anatase nanocrystals (pp. 19921-19930)
  16. La et al. (2017) Effective removal of Pb(II) using a graphene@ternary oxides composite as an adsorbent in aqueous media (pp. 14627-14634)
  17. Ahamed, S., Hussam, A., Munir, A.K.M.: Groundwater arsenic removal technologies based on sorbents. In: Ahuja, S. (ed.) Handbook of Water Purity and Quality, pp. 379–417. Elsevier, USA (2009)
  18. Kelly (2010) Uranium Chemistry in Soils and Sediments. In: Developments in soil science (pp. 411-466) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(10)34014-1
  19. Miao et al. (2018) Photocatalytic degradations of three dyes with different chemical structures using ball-milled TiO2 (pp. 109-114)
  20. Han et al. (2016) Synthesis and characterisation of advanced ball-milled Al-Al2O3 nanocomposites for selective laser melting (pp. 183-192)
  21. Bui et al. (2013) Investigation of typical properties of nanocrystalline iron powders prepared by ball milling techniques (pp. 045003-045012)
  22. El-sherif et al. (2017) Fabrication and characterization of CeO2–TiO2–Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticles for rapid removal of uranium ions from industrial waste solutions (pp. 260-269)
  23. Jamkhande et al. (2019) Metal nanoparticles synthesis: an overview on methods of preparation, advantages and disadvantages, and applications
  24. Castrillón Arango et al. (2019) Mechanochemical synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline Ni1−xCoxFe2O4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) ferrites
  25. Hu et al. (2020) Effect of mechanical–chemical modification process on mercury removal of bromine modified fly ash (pp. 9829-9839)
  26. Jiang and Li (2020) Mechanically induced N-arylation of amines with diaryliodonium salts (pp. 542-548)
  27. Do and Friščić (2017) Mechanochemistry: a force of synthesis (pp. 13-19)
  28. Zhu et al. (2000) The synthesis of nanosized TiO2 powder using a sol-gel method with TiCl4 as a precursor (pp. 4049-4054)
  29. Mercyrani et al. (2018) Photocatalytic degradation of Orange G using TiO2/Fe3O4 nanocomposites (pp. 15436-15444)
  30. Deepa et al. (2015) A simple spectrophotometric method for the determination of arsenic in industrial and environmental samples using vanillin-2-amino nicotinic acid (VANA) (pp. 345-352)
  31. Naguib et al. (2020) Comparative study of eco-friendly spectrophotometric methods for accurate quantification of mebendazole and quinfamide combination; content uniformity evaluation
  32. Shahat et al. (2018) Novel nano-conjugate materials for effective arsenic(V) and phosphate capturing in aqueous media (pp. 54-63)
  33. Morán et al. (2020) Comparative study of optimised molybdenum back-contact deposition with different barriers (Ti, ZnO) on stainless steel substrate for flexible solar cell application (pp. 7524-7538)
  34. Makuła et al. (2018) How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV–Vis spectra (pp. 6814-6817)
  35. Khot et al. (2018) Bipolar resistive switching and memristive properties of hydrothermally synthesized TiO2 nanorod array: effect of growth temperature (pp. 37-47)
  36. Mariño-Salguero et al. (2017) Heat generation model in the ball-milling process of a tantalum ore (pp. 10-19)
  37. Suryanarayana et al. (1999) Phase selection in a mechanically alloyed Cu-In-Ga-Se powder mixture (pp. 377-383)
  38. Oscarson et al. (1983) Oxidation and sorption of arsenite by manganese dioxide as influenced by surface coatings of iron and aluminum oxides and calcium carbonate (pp. 233-244)
  39. Danish et al. (2013) Arsenic removal from aqueous solution using pure and metal-doped Titania nanoparticles coated on glass beads: adsorption and column studies (pp. 1-17)
  40. Mohan and Pittman (2007) Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—a critical review (pp. 1-53)
  41. Awual et al. (2012) Efficient arsenic(V) removal from water by ligand exchange fibrous adsorbent (pp. 5541-5550)
  42. Xia et al. (2013) Tuning the band gap of hematite α-Fe2O3 by sulfur doping (pp. 1943-1947)
  43. Niewiadomski et al. (2015) Raman spectroscopy, dielectric properties and phase transitions of Ag0.96Li0.04NbO3 ceramics (pp. 123-131)
  44. Stagi et al. (2015) Light induced TiO2 phase transformation: correlation with luminescent surface defects (pp. 124-129)
  45. Skvortsova et al. (2015) Studies of phase composition of contact sites of diamond crystals and the surrounding rocks (pp. 1187-1190)
  46. Rezaee et al. (2011) The role of brookite in mechanical activation of anatase-to-rutile transformation of nanocrystalline TiO2: an XRD and Raman spectroscopy investigation (pp. 5055-5061)
  47. Challagulla et al. (2017) Structure sensitive photocatalytic reduction of nitroarenes over TiO2 (pp. 1-11)
  48. Deng et al. (2016) Investigation of nanoparticle agglomerates properties using Monte Carlo simulations (pp. 1971-1979)
  49. Rahman et al. (2019) Study on the mechanical, electrical and optical properties of metal-oxide nanoparticles dispersed unsaturated polyester resin nanocomposites
  50. Li et al. (2012) Microstructure and photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (pp. 1-5)
  51. Liu et al. (2017) Facet-activity relationship of TiO2 in Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocatalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. In situ DRIFTs and DFT studies (pp. 4970-4979)
  52. Zhang et al. (2015) Visible-light photocatalytic activity of N-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays on acephate degradation (pp. 1-6)
  53. Radu et al. (2017) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles (pp. 337-343)
  54. Briggs, D.: X. In: Packham, D. E. (ed.) Handbook of Adhesion, pp. 621–622. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK (2005)
  55. Yan et al. (2015) Facile synthesis of an iron doped rutile TiO2 photocatalyst for enhanced visible-light-driven water oxidation (pp. 21434-21438)
  56. Akhavan (2010) Thickness dependent activity of nanostructured TiO2/α-Fe2O3 photocatalyst thin films (pp. 1724-1728)
  57. Nayak, M.K., Singh, J., Singh, B., Soni, S., Pandey, V.S., Tyagi, S.: Introduction to semiconductor nanomaterial and its optical and electronics properties. In: Gupta, R.K., Misra, M. (eds.) Metal Semiconductor Core-Shell Nanostructures for Energy and Environmental Applications, pp. 1–33. Elsevier (2017)
  58. Bueno-Ferrer et al. (2010) Relationship between surface area and crystal size of pure and doped cerium oxides (pp. 647-653)