10.57647/jee.2026.0901.06

Context Matters: Exploring Reflective Practice among Iranian EFL Teachers across Public schools and Private Institutes

PDF
  • Tooba Mahmoodi1,
  • Esmaeil Jadidi2,
  • Leila Saberi2,
  1. English Language Teaching Department of English, Bush.C., Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
  2. Department of English, Marv.C. Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

Received: 2025-08-05

Revised: 2025-08-17

Accepted: 2025-08-18

Published in Issue 2026-06-30

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Mahmoodi, T., Jadidi, E., & Saberi, L. (2026). Context Matters: Exploring Reflective Practice among Iranian EFL Teachers across Public schools and Private Institutes. Journal of Education Experiences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/jee.2026.0901.06
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 21

Abstract

This study investigates how institutional context shapes reflective practice among Iranian EFL teachers working in public schools and private language institutes. Drawing on Dewey’s and Schön’s theoretical frameworks, and adopting a comparative, cross sectional survey design, data were collected from 57 experienced teachers (≥4 years of full time teaching) using Akbari et al.’s (2010) validated Teacher Reflective Thinking Questionnaire (TRTQ). Reliability analysis revealed strong internal consistency for the total scale (α = 0.91) and subscales (α = 0.78–0.86). Independent samples t tests showed no significant contextual differences in Cognitive and Metacognitive reflection, suggesting shared analytical and self-regulatory capacities rooted in similar pre service training. However, private institute teachers reported significantly higher Practical, Affective, and Critical reflection (p < 0.05, moderate effect sizes), likely reflecting greater curricular flexibility, institutional autonomy, and professional agency. These findings highlight the context dependent nature of reflective engagement, supporting sociocultural perspectives on teacher learning. The study concludes that professional development initiatives should be tailored to sector specific conditions, enhancing underdeveloped dimensions in public schools while sustaining broad spectrum reflection in private institutes.

Keywords

  • EFL Teacher,
  • Reflective Practice,
  • Teaching context
PDF

References

  1. Aliakbari, M., Khany, R., & Adibpour, M. (2020). EFL teachers’ reflective practice, job satisfaction, and school context variables: Exploring possible relationships. TESOL Journal, 11(1), e00461.
  2. Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192–207.
  3. Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F., & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211–227.
  4. Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Academic.
  5. Borg, S., & Sanchez, H. S. (2020). Cognition and good language teachers. Lessons from good language teachers, 16-27.
  6. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath.
  7. Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals. Routledge.
  8. Farrell, T. S. C. (2018). Reflective practice in the professional development of teachers of English language learners. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–8). Wiley.
  9. Fathi, J., Ghafari, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy and emotional regulation as predictors of teacher reflection among Iranian EFL teachers. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 35–55.
  10. La Sunra, L. S., & Sahril, S. (2020). Teachers' reflective practice and challenges in an indonesian EFL secondary school classroom. International Journal of Language Education, 4(2), 289-300.
  11. Ghanizadeh, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2015). EFL teachers’ teaching style, creativity, and burnout: A path analysis approach. Cogent Education, 2(1), Article 1015127.
  12. Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
  13. Killion, J., & Todnem, G. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 14–16.
  14. Mann, S. (2021). The research and practice of teacher reflection: A review. Language Teaching, 54(2), 95–114.
  15. Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2017). Reflective practice in English language teaching: Research-based principles and practices. Routledge.
  16. Richards, J. C. (2021). Teaching English through English: Principles and practice. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  18. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass.
  19. Setoodeh, K., Jadidi, E., & Rassaei, E. (2023). On the Relationship between Iranian EFL Teachers’ Grammar Teaching Beliefs and Their Professional Development. Biannual Journal of Education Experiences, 1(1), 93.
  20. Setoodeh, K., Jadidi, E., & Rassaei, E. (2021). A Study on the Nature of Iranian English Teachers’ Grammar Beliefs. Biannual Journal of Education Experiences, 4(2), 151-170.
  21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  22. Zohrabi, M. (2015). Mixed methods research: Instruments, validity, reliability, and reporting findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254–262.