Diagnosing Critical Performance Drivers in the Iranian Gas Industry under Uncertainty: A Hybrid Fuzzy DEA–EFQM Approach
Received: 20-10-2025
Revised: 21-05-2026
Accepted: 21-05-2026
Published Online: 01-06-2026
Copyright (c) 2025 Novid Varnasseri, Saber Saati, Vahid Baradaran (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The gas industry exhibits considerable sensitivity to variations in specific determinants that substantially influence organizational efficiency, commonly termed as critical factors. The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) has introduced a broadly applied framework for assessing organizational performance against nine criteria, each of which can affect efficiency if changed. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a robust nonparametric tool for evaluating Decision-Making Units (DMU) performance based on multiple inputs and outputs. However, classical DEA models usually assume precise data and deterministic conditions. In practice, especially in large-scale industries such as the gas sector, performance data are frequently ambiguous, imprecise, and uncertain, making it difficult to identify the critical factors. Previous studies have either treated inputs/outputs as certain or applied EFQM and DEA separately, leaving a notable gap in the literature regarding the integration of fuzzy environments with organizational excellence frameworks to identify critical factors.
In order to bridge this gap, we present a new hybrid approach that integrates Fuzzy DEA (FDEA) with the EFQM model. Our model is non-radial and is expressed as a deterministic linear programming (LP) problem that enables the identification of critical factors under uncertainty. Using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), we evaluated nine EFQM criteria in 15 Iranian gas companies and applied the proposed model to identify the most influential critical factors. The results show that only a limited number of companies achieved full efficiency, while the majority benefited from identifying critical factors to improve their performance. This study emphasizes the practical value of combining FDEA and EFQM for managers seeking robust tools to improve efficiency in an uncertain environment.
Keywords
- Gas industry,
- Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (FDEA),
- EFQM,
- Critical Factors,
- Fuzzy AHP
References
- Hakes C. The EFQM excellence model for assessing organizational performance: a management guide. Zaltbommel: Van Haren Publishing; 2007. p. 1-116.
- Sharma A, Talwar B. Evaluation of universal business excellence model incorporating vedic philosophy. Meas Bus Excell. 2007;11(3):4-20.
- Eskildsen JK, Kristensen K, Juhl HJ. Trends in EFQM criterion weights: the case of Denmark. Meas Bus Excell. 2002;6(2):22-28.
- Mavroidis V, Toliopoulou S, Agoritsas C. A comparative analysis and review of national quality awards in Europe: development of critical success factors. TQM Mag. 2007;19(5):454-467.
- Calvo-Mora A, Leal A, Roldán JL. Using enablers of the EFQM model to manage institutions of higher education. Qual Assur Educ. 2006;14(2):99-122.
- Zárraga-Rodríguez M, Álvarez MJ. Does the EFQM model identify and reinforce information capability? Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;109:716-721.
- Calvo-Mora A, Domínguez M, Criado F. Assessment and improvement of organisational social impact through the EFQM excellence model. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2018;29(11-12):1259-1278.
- Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2(6):429-444.
- Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1984;30(9):1078-1092.
- Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 1965;8(3):338-353.
- Ahmadvand S, Pishvaee MS. An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach. Health Care Manag Sci. 2018;21(4):587-603.
- Saati SM, Memariani A, Jahanshahloo GR. Efficiency analysis and ranking of DMUs with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak. 2002;1(3):255-267.
- Esfandiari M, Saati S. Data envelopment analysis with fuzzy complex numbers with an empirical case on power plants of Iran. RAIRO Oper Res. 2021;55(3):2013-2025.
- Hatami-Marbini A, Saati S, Tavana M. Data envelopment analysis with fuzzy parameters: an interactive approach. Int J Oper Res Inf Syst. 2011;2(3):39-53.
- Moreno P, Lozano S. Fuzzy ranking network DEA with general structure. Mathematics. 2020;8(12):2190.
- Saati S, Shadab M, Mohamadnia Ahmadi S. Exploring congestion in fuzzy DEA by solving one model; case study: hospitals in Tehran. In: Decision-Making in Healthcare Systems. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 355-372. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46735-6_15.
- Lozano S. Computing fuzzy process efficiency in parallel systems. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak. 2014;13(1):73-89.
- Sengupta JK. A fuzzy systems approach in data envelopment analysis. Comput Math Appl. 1992;24(8-9):259-266.
- Kahraman C, Tolga E. Data envelopment analysis using fuzzy concept. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL); 1998 May 20-22; Fukuoka, Japan. p. 338-343.
- Maeda Y, Entani T, Tanaka H. Fuzzy DEA with interval efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (EUFIT '98); 1998; Aachen, Germany. Vol. 2. Aachen: Verlag Mainz; 1998. p. 1067-1071.
- Kao C, Liu ST. Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2011;176(1):20-35.
- Hatami-Marbini A, Saati S, Sajadi SM. Efficiency analysis in two-stage structures using fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Cent Eur J Oper Res. 2018;26(4):909-932.
- Guo P, Tanaka H. Fuzzy DEA: a perceptual evaluation method. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2001;119(1):149-160.
- Dubois D, Prade H. Possibility theory: an approach to computerized processing of uncertainty. New York: Plenum Press; 1988.
- Lertworasirikul S. Fuzzy data envelopment analysis for supply chain modeling and analysis [dissertation]. Raleigh: North Carolina State University; 2001.
- Lertworasirikul S, Fang SC, Nuttle HL, Joines JA. Fuzzy BCC model for data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak. 2003;2(4):337-358.
- Zhu J. Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1996;90(3):451-460.
- Thrall RM. Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Ann Oper Res. 1996;66:109-138.
- Boljuncic VA. Note on robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1999;112(1):240-244.
- Daneshvar S, Jahanshahloo GR, Memariani A, Saati S. Sensitivity analysis of extreme efficient decision-making units in DEA. J Interdiscip Math. 2002;5(3):195-201.
- Chen Y, Zhu J. Measuring information technology's indirect impact on firm performance. Inf Technol Manag. 2004;5(1-2):9-22.
- Wu J, Liang L. DEA models for identifying critical input-output performance measures. J Syst Sci Complex. 2012;25(2):275-286.
- Andersen P, Petersen NC. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1993;39(10):1261-1264.
- Donnelly M. A radical scoring system for the European foundation for quality management business excellence model. Manag Audit J. 2000;15(1):8-11.
- Tomaževič N, Seljak J, Aristovnik A. TQM in public administration organisations: an application of data envelopment analysis in the police service. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2016;27(11-12):1396-1412.
- Mehrabian S, Alirezaee MR, Jahanshahloo GR. A complete efficiency ranking of decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. Comput Optim Appl. 1999;14(2):261-266.
- Saati S, Zarafat Angiz M, Memariani A, Jahanshahloo GR. A model for ranking decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. Ric Oper. 2001;31(97):47-59.
- Zimmermann HJ. Fuzzy set theory and its applications. 3rd ed. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
- Lai YJ, Hwang CL. A new approach to some possibilistic linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1992;49(2):121-133.
10.57647/ijm2c.2027.1701.07
