10.57647/ijm2c.2026.1603.15

Designing a Cat Robot with a Defective Leg Capable of Jumping Stairs

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Na.C., Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

Received: 07-10-2025

Revised: 09-12-2025

Accepted: 15-12-2025

Published in Issue 30-09-2026

Published Online: 24-12-2025

How to Cite

NaghshNilchi, M., Saadat, M., Soleimani, A., Vahabi, M., & Salehi, M. (2026). Designing a Cat Robot with a Defective Leg Capable of Jumping Stairs. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations, 16(3), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.57647/ijm2c.2026.1603.15

Abstract

Many scientists utilize the movement behavior of animals in nature to design and simulate robots. Jumping over obstacles is one of the most crucial and challenging tasks for four-legged robots. However, errors can occur when these robots attempt to jump on stairs. If one leg of the four-legged robot is defective, appropriate adjustments can be made to enable the robot to still jump on stairs. This paper focuses on simulating the jumping motion of a four-legged robot, which is considered one of the most challenging aspects of controlling such robots. Initially, a two-dimensional model of the four-legged robot is introduced, followed by the formulation of dynamic equations that govern the robot's jumping motion. This operation is subsequently simulated using Adams software, whereby the robot's jump is modeled through torsion springs in each leg. One of the most challenging scenarios discussed in this article involves the four-legged robot jumping on stairs with a defective leg. The robot's jump on the stairs is then optimized based on various parameters, and the best case scenario of the robot jumping on stairs with a defective leg is presented. This optimized case is illustrated in diagram form within the article.

Keywords

  • Four-legged,
  • Robot jumping,
  • Simulation, Dynamic,
  • Fault-tolerant

References

  1. Wang TH, Lin PC. A reduced-order-model-based motion selection strategy in a leg-wheel transformable robot. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2022; 27(5): 3315–3321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2021.3126606
  2. Raibert MH. Legged robots that balance. MIT press; 1986.
  3. Berns K. The Walking Machine Catalogue. 2005.
  4. Todd DJ. Walking machines: an introduction to legged robots. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
  5. Ishino Y. Walking robot for underwater construction. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics; 1983. p. 107-114.
  6. Zykov V, Bongard J, Lipson H. Evolving dynamic gaits on a physical robot. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Late Breaking Paper, GECCO; vol. 4. 2004. p. 2004.
  7. Bruzzone L, Quaglia G. Locomotion systems for ground mobile robots in unstructured environments. Mech Sci. 2012; 3(2): 49–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-3-49-2012
  8. Rongfu L, Guo W, Li M. Novel design of legged mobile landers with decoupled landing and walking functions containing a rhombus joint. J Mech Robot. 2018; 10(6): 061017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040413
  9. Dominik B, Labecki P, Skrzypczyński P. An exploration-based approach to terrain traversability assessment for a walking robot. In: 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR); 2013. p. 1-6. IEEE.
  10. Takahide Y, Kuroda M, Ujino R, Kaneko H, Higuchi H, Iwasaki S, Kanemoto Y, Asatani M, Koshiishi T. Development of experimental legged robot for inspection and disaster response in plants. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2017. p. 4869-4876. IEEE.
  11. Luca B, Quaglia G. Locomotion systems for ground mobile robots in unstructured environments. Mech Sci. 2012; 3(2): 49–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-3-49-2012
  12. Robertas D, Maskeliūnas R, Narvydas G, Narbutaitė R, Połap D, Woźniak M. Intelligent automation of dental material analysis using robotic arm with jerk optimized trajectory. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput. 2020; 11: 6223-6234. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12652-020-02605-8
  13. WeiHai Ch, Ren G, Wang J, Liu D. An adaptive locomotion controller for a hexapod robot: CPG, kinematics and force feedback. Sci China Inf Sci. 2014; 57: 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11432-014-5148-y
  14. Weitao X, Yesilevskiy Y, Remy CD. Selecting gaits for economical locomotion of legged robots. Int J Robot Res. 2016; 35(9): 1140–1154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364915612572
  15. NaghshNilchi M, Saadat M, Soleimani A, Vahabi M, Salehi M. Modeling and simulation of a jumping four-legged robot on staircases. J Appl Dyn Syst Control. 2024; 4(4): 9.
  16. Quan N, Powell M, Katz B, Di Carlo J, Kim S. Optimized jumping on the MIT Cheetah 3 robot. In: 2019 Int Conf on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2019. p. 7448-7454. IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794449
  17. Xu B, Zhang X, Yu X, Ou Y, Zhang K, Cai H, Zhao J, Fan J. A motion planner based on Mask-D3QN of quadruped robot motion for steam generator. Biomimetics. 2024 ;9(10): 592.
  18. Ribeiro JC, Dias B, Lopes G, Flores P. Trends in the control of hexapod robots: a survey. Robotics. 2021; 10(3): 100. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/robotics10030100
  19. Ayonga H, Harib O, Hartley R, Gong Y, Grizzle J. Rapid trajectory optimization using C-FROST with illustration on a Cassie-series dynamic walking biped. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ Int Conf on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2019. p. 4722-4729. IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968056
  20. Joel Ch, Lau M, Cheung G, Kuffner J, Hodgins J, Kanade T. Footstep planning for the Honda ASIMO humanoid. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf on Robotics and Automation; 2005. p. 629-634. IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570188
  21. Powell B, Katz B, Di Carlo J, Wensing P, Kim S, Matthew J. MIT Cheetah 3: Design and control of a robust, dynamic quadruped robot. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ Int Conf on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2018: 2245-2252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8593885
  22. Tianjiao L, Ye Sh, Chen L, Sun C, Zhang A. Energy efficient swing leg trajectory planning for quadruped robots walking on rough terrain. In: 2019 IEEE Int Conf on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO); 2019. p. 2128-2133. IEEE.
  23. McGuire K, Wagter Ch, Tuyls K, Kappen H, de Croon GC. Minimal navigation solution for a swarm of tiny flying robots to explore an unknown environment. Sci Robot. 2019; 4(35): 9710. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aax9710
  24. Guoteng Zh, Rong X, Hui Ch, Li Y, Li B. Torso motion control and toe trajectory generation of a trotting quadruped robot based on virtual model control. Adv Robot. 2016; 30(4): 284–297.
  25. Linqi Y, Liu H, Wang X, Liang B, Yuan B. Multi-task control for a quadruped robot with changeable leg configuration. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ Int Conf on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2020. p. 3944-3950. IEEE.
  26. Min Sung A, Chae H, Hong DW. Stable, autonomous, unknown terrain locomotion for quadrupeds based on visual feedback and mixed-integer convex optimization. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ Int Conf on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2018. p. 3791-3798. IEEE.
  27. Liheng M, Gao F, Tian Y, Zhao Y. Novel method for preventing shin-collisions in six-legged robots by utilizing a robot–terrain interference model. Mech Mach Theory. 2020; 151: 103897. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.103897
  28. Mertyüz İ, Tanyıldızı AK, Taşar B, Tatar AB, Yakut O. FUHAR: A transformable wheel-legged hybrid mobile robot. Robot Auton Syst. 2020; 133: 103471. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2020.103471
  29. Tao L, Fan X, Liu Y, Jia X, Deng Y. Hexapod robot fault tolerant gait on slope and simulation verification. In: J Phys Conf Ser. vol. 1601. IOP Publishing; 2020. p. 062038. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1601/6/062038
  30. Debabrata S, Kumar Dubey Sh, Mahapatra A, Shekhar Roy Sh. Modeling and analysis of fault tolerant gait of a multi-legged robot moving on an inclined plane. Procedia Technol. 2014; 14: 93–99.
  31. Tatar AB. W-leg jumping robot: Mechanical design, dynamical analysis and simulation of jumping dual wheel-leg hybrid robot. Arab J Sci Eng. 2024; 49(11): 15463–15481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08882-5
  32. Han J, Wan B, Zheng Y, Song Z. An energy-efficient obstacle-crossing control framework for quadruped robots. Results Eng. 2025.
  33. Li H, Qi C, Mao L, Zhao Y, Chen X, Gao F. Staircase-climbing capability-based dimension design of a hexapod robot. Mech Mach Theory. 2021; 164: 106200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104400
  34. Li W, Wei L, Zhang X. A wheels-on-knees quadruped assistive robot to carry loads. Appl Sci. 2022; 12(18): 9386. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189386
  35. Roy F. Rigid body dynamics algorithms. Springer; 2014.
  36. Sciavicco L, Siciliano B, Sciavicco B. Modelling and Control of Robot Manipulators. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg; 2000.