10.57647/ijm2c.2025.150420

Design and evaluation of a new teaching method based on factors to reduce math anxiety using the combined Delphi-bwm-topsis technique

  1. Department of Mathematics, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  2. Department of Mathematics, BA.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Received: 07-06-2025

Revised: 13-07-2025

Accepted: 20-07-2025

Published in Issue 24-07-2025

How to Cite

Karamian, M. A., Barkhordari, M., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2025). Design and evaluation of a new teaching method based on factors to reduce math anxiety using the combined Delphi-bwm-topsis technique. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijm2c.2025.150420

Abstract

Mathematics anxiety is one of the most significant educational challenges and a major barrier to effective mathematics learning, significantly impacting students’ academic performance and self-confidence. This study aimed to design and evaluate an innovative teaching method focused on identifying factors that reduce mathematics anxiety and enhance learning among male and female students aged 13 to 17 in Qaleh Ganj County. The approach is grounded in three pillars: active learning, personalization, and technology integration. This mixed-methods research utilized the Delphi technique followed by the Best-Worst Method. Initially, the Delphi technique was employed to identify factors contributing to the reduction of mathematics anxiety, which were then prioritized using the Best-Worst Method. Key prioritized factors included: teaching mathematical concepts in simple language with understandable examples, employing technology, providing personalized instruction, effective teaching strategies, and fostering mathematical self-efficacy (confidence in learning abilities). A teaching method based on the top five factors was subsequently designed and implemented in four classes (two as control groups and two as experimental groups). The four research hypotheses indicated that teaching through active and technological approaches had a significant positive effect on students’ mathematical performance. The mean post-test scores of the experimental groups surpassed those of the traditional groups, and a significant interaction was observed between gender and teaching method, with the innovative approach being particularly effective for female students.

References

  1. Amiri, A, Jalali Varnamkhasti, M. (2025). Prioritization of Factors Affecting Operational Budgeting in Oil Industry Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations,15(3), 131-145, DOI: 10.71932/ijm.2025.1208486
  2. Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 243–248, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194059.
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  4. Bazyar, S., et al. (2020). Investigating the impact of active teaching methods on reducing mathematics anxiety. Innovations in Mathematics Education, 12(2), 21-38, https://www.noormags.ir/view/en/Journal/JournalIssueList/2122.
  5. Besant, J. (1995). Emotional manifestations of mathematics anxiety. Educational Review, 47(3), 227-235, https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191950470305.
  6. EdWeek Research Center. (2025). Math Anxiety Among Teachers and Students. EdWeek Reports, https://www.edweek.org/search?q=Math+Anxiety.
  7. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020.
  8. Ghorbani, M., et al. (2018). The role of family support in academic achievement and mathematics anxiety. Applied Psychology Studies, 8(1), 34-55, https://www.noormags.ir/view/en/Journal/JournalIssueList/2431.
  9. Greenwood, J. (1984). Mathematics anxiety and teaching methods. Educational Psychology, 4(3), 253-260, https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341840040307.
  10. Hajian, A., et al. (2024). Presenting the Model of Influencing Factors on Mathematical Progress-Structural Equation Model Approach. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations, 14(1), 131-145, DOI: 10.71932/ijm.2024.1185877.
  11. Hojatzadeh, B., et al. (2019). The effect of teaching style on students’ mathematics anxiety. Educational Psychology Quarterly, 14(3), 17-32, https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/Journal/JournalIssueList/2544.
  12. Hosseini Moghaddam, Z., et al. (2014). Analysis of teacher attitude and its influence on students’ mathematics anxiety. Journal of Education, 5(2), 62-77, https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/Journal/JournalIssueList/2046.
  13. Hormozgan Department of Education. (2023). Annual Report on Education in Qaleh Ganj County. Ministry of Education, Iran, http://hormozgan.medu.ir/.
  14. Karamzadeh, S., et al. (2012). The role of family and environment in students’ mathematics anxiety. Educational Psychology Journal, 7(1), 43-58, https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/544635.
  15. Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety towards mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 520–540, https://doi.org/10.2307/749772.
  16. Masoumi, N., et al. (2019). The impact of innovative educational approaches on mathematics anxiety. Iranian Educational Studies, 7(4), 100-120, www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1702561.
  17. Mirahmadi, M., et al. (2023). Application of the Best-Worst Method (BWM) in ranking educational decision–making factors. Educational Management Quarterly, 15(2), 115–132, https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/2580143.
  18. Rezaei, J. (2015). Best–Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method. Omega, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009.
  19. Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551–554, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033456 .
  20. Shabani, M., et al. (2017). Application of the Fuzzy Delphi method in educational decision-making. Strategies in Education, 9(1), 77–93, https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1198957.
  21. Shoarani, S., et al. (2016). Factors affecting mathematics anxiety in secondary school students. Mathematics Education Journal, 10(3), 55-74, https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1134303.
  22. Şimşek, E., & Yıldırım, S. (2021). Using the Fuzzy Delphi Method in educational research. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 110-123, https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2021.1.008.
  23. Spielberger, C. D. (1980). Test anxiety inventory: Test manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.
  24. Yousefzadeh, A., et al. (2022). Identifying dimensions of mathematics anxiety in high school students. Research in Education Journal, 13(2), 89-105, https://tlr.shahed.ac.ir/article_2516.html.