10.57647/ijm2c.2026.160102

Updating Most Frequently Used Degradation Models Under the Influence of Random Shocks

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, ST.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 20-07-2025

Revised: 07-09-2025

Accepted: 20-09-2025

Published in Issue 31-03-2026

Published Online: 21-09-2025

How to Cite

Daei Jafari, F., Raissi, S., & Nojavan, M. (2026). Updating Most Frequently Used Degradation Models Under the Influence of Random Shocks. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations. https://doi.org/10.57647/ijm2c.2026.160102

Abstract

In modern maintenance planning, leveraging advanced capabilities necessitates accurate modeling of system degradation under catastrophic shocks with escalating effects. Reliable estimation of failure time is crucial for optimizing maintenance strategies. This study aims to analyze the impact of exponential and Weibull catastrophic shocks on the most common degradation models Wiener, Gamma, and Inverse Gaussian-without requiring model reconstruction. A rigorous mathematical analysis is conducted to assess the influence of these shocks on degradation patterns. The necessary conditions for applying the proposed analytical approach are outlined, ensuring its practical applicability. Furthermore, a case study is presented to validate the theoretical findings. Comparative analysis between the proposed analytical method and simulation results demonstrates no significant difference, confirming the robustness of the proposed approach. These findings contribute to enhancing predictive maintenance strategies by providing a refined understanding of catastrophic shock effects on degradation processes.

Keywords

  • Degradation Modeling,
  • Catastrophic Shocks,
  • Wiener process,
  • Gamma process,
  • Inverse Gaussian Process

References

  1. Shahraki AF, Yadav OP, Liao H. A review on degradation modelling and its engineering applications. International Journal of Performability Engineering. 2017;13(3):299-314. DOI:10.23940/ ijpe.17.03.p6.299314
  2. Lemoine AJ, Wenocur ML. On failure modeling. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. 1985;32(3):479-508. DOI:10.1002/nav.3800320312
  3. Fan M, Zeng Z, Zio E, Kang R. Modeling dependent competing failure processes with degradation-shock dependence. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2017;165:422-430. DOI:10.1016/ j.ress.2017.05.004
  4. Jiang L, Feng Q, Coit DW. Reliability and maintenance modeling for dependent competing failure processes with shifting failure thresholds. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 2012;61(4):932-948. DOI: 10.1109/ TR.2012.2221016
  5. Song S, Coit DW, Feng Q. Reliability for systems of degrading components with distinct component shock sets. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2014;132:115-124. DOI:10.1016/ j.ress. 2014.06.020
  6. Jin L, Matoba Sh. Threshold Type Maintenance Policies for Systems under Cumulative Damage from Random Shocks. IEEE Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Advanced Reliability and Maintenance Modeling (APARM). 2020;1-5. DOI: 10.1109/ APARM49247.2020.9209491
  7. Yingsai C, Dong W. Reliability analysis for multi-state systems subject to distinct random shocks. Quality Reliability Engineering International. 2021; 37(5), 2085–2097. DOI:10.1002/qre.2846
  8. Feng T, Li Sh, Guo L, Gao H, Chen T, Yu, Y. A degradation-shock dependent competing failure processes based method for remaining useful life prediction of drill bit considering time-shifting sudden failure threshold. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2023; 230, 108951, ISSN 0951-8320. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108951
  9. Qiu Q, Cui L, Shen J. Availability and maintenance modeling for systems subject to multiple failure modes. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2017; 108:192-198. DOI: 10.1016/ j.cie.2017.04.028
  10. Huang, T., Coit, D., Zhao, Y., & Tang, L. Reliability assessment and lifetime prediction of degradation processes considering recoverable shock damages. IISE Transactions.2020; 53(3), 614-628. DOI:10.1080/24725854.2020.1793036
  11. Jia W, Guanghan B, Zhigang L, & Ming J , Z. A general discrete degradation model with fatal shocks and age- and state-dependent nonfatal shocks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2020; 193(0951-8320), 106648. DOI:10.1016/ j.ress.2019.106648
  12. Wang J, Han X, Zhang Y, Bai G. Modeling the varying effects of shocks for a multi-stage degradation process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2021; 215,107903. DOI:10.1016/ j.ress.2021.107925
  13. Lina W, Wang X, Liu H. Reliability analysis for systems with interactive competing degradation processes and mixed shock effects. Stochastic Models. 2022; 217:108058. DOI: 10.1080/ 15326349.2022.2066128
  14. Muhammad I, Xue W, Li Z, Sahin O, Gonzalez EDRS, Coit DW. A random-effect Wiener process degradation model with transmuted normal distribution and ABC-Gibbs algorithm for parameter estimation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2024; 251:110289. DOI: 10.3390/ sym16101364
  15. Abdollahi Nanvapisheh A. A new five-parameter distribution: properties and applications. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations. 2019;9(3):201-212.
  16. Maleki Jebelya F, Zare K, Shokri S, Karami P. Comparison of estimators of the PDF and the CDF of the three-parameter inverse Weibull distribution. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling & Computations. 2022;12(3):201-212. DOI:10.30495/ ijm2c.2022.1934934.1223
  17. Sharifi M, Tohidi G, Daneshian B, Modarres Khiyabani F. A new stochastic model for classifying flexible measures in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operations Research Society of China. 2020; 9:1-24. DOI:10.1007/s40305-020-00318-5