Analytical Evaluating Induced Stresses in reservoir rock: Insights into the Role of Biot’s Coefficient and Flow Regime
- Department of Mining Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Received: 2024-08-29
Revised: 2024-10-19
Accepted: 2024-11-11
Published 2025-07-05
Copyright (c) -1 Amin Tohidi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
PDF views: 22
Abstract
Assessing the impacts of drilling and production activities on induced stresses in oil and gas wells is crucial for addressing various geomechanical challenges such as wellbore instability, sand production, and potential blowout incidents. Mechanical instability arises when induced stresses surpass the strength of the formation. Since reservoir rock behaves as a porous medium, accurately calculating effective stress around the wellbore, based on Biot’s theory, is essential for estimating induced stresses. Understanding Biot’s coefficient is pivotal, particularly in high-pressure and soft rock reservoirs, as it influences the effective stress derived from total stress and pore pressure. However, laboratory measurements for Biot’s coefficient are expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, this paper developed the analytical solution for induced stresses in the anisotropic stress field in both Darcy and non-Darcy flow regime and investigated the impact of variations in Biot’s coefficient on induced stresses around wellbores, focusing on radial, tangential, and vertical stresses. The study highlights the significance of Biot’s coefficient in modulating effective stresses in oil and gas wells. Additionally, it addresses the prevalence of non-Darcy flow alongside Darcy flow in scenarios involving gas reservoirs, HPHT wells, and hydraulic fractures. Thus, the effect of Biot’s coefficient on induced stresses is explored in both Darcy and non-Darcy flow regimes. Results indicate that increasing Biot's coefficient in the Darcy flow regime reduces radial, tangential, and vertical stresses around the wellbore, suggesting lower stress levels in the soft rock relative to hard rock. Conversely, in the non-Darcy flow regime, increasing Biot’s coefficient reduces radial stress while initially increasing tangential stress near the wellbore wall, followed by a decrease at farther distances. The opposite trend is observed for vertical stress, highlighting the dependence of stress patterns on the flow regime. Solving stress equations for a typical reservoir under both Darcy and non-Darcy flow regimes, it is concluded that the variation in Biot’s coefficient has a negligible effect on induced stresses under low drawdown pressure reservoirs. This research provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between Biot’s coefficient, flow regimes, and induced stresses in oil and gas wells, aiding in developing effective strategies for mitigating geomechanical risks.
Keywords
- Biot’s coefficient,
- Well-induced stresses,
- Darcy flow,
- non-Darcy flow,
- Reservoir
References
- Aadnoy, B. S., & Looyeh, R. (2011). Petroleum Rock Mechanics Drilling Operations and Well Design, Gulf Professional Pub, ISBN: 9780123855466.
- Alam, Mohammad Monzurul, Mai Kristine Borre, Ida Lykke Fabricius, Kathrine Hedegaard, Birte Røgen, Zakir Hossain, and Anette Susanne Krogsbøll. (2010). ‘Biot’s Coefficient as an Indicator of Strength and Porosity Reduction: Calcareous Sediments from Kerguelen Plateau’. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 70(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.11.021
- Al-Shaaibi, Shaima K., Adel M. Al-Ajmi, and Yahya Al-Wahaibi. (2013). ‘Three-Dimensional Modeling for Predicting Sand Production’. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 109:348–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2013.04.015
- Amao, Abiodun Matthew. (2007). ‘Mathematical Model for Darcy Forchheimer Flow with Applications to Well Performance Analysis’. Texas Tech University. http://hdl.handle.net/2346/19138
- Chen, S. L., Y. N. Abousleiman, and K. K. Muraleetharan. (2011). ‘Closed-Form Elastoplastic Solution for the Wellbore Problem in Strain Hardening/Softening Rock Formations’. International Journal of Geomechanics 12(4):494–507. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000157
- Chen, Sicong, Zhihong Zhao, Yuedu Chen, and Qiang Yang. 2020. ‘On the Effective Stress Coefficient of Saturated Fractured Rocks’. Computers and Geotechnics 123:103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103564
- Cheng, Alexander. 2016. Poroelasticity. Vol. 27. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25202-5
- Dehghan A.N., Yazdi A. (2023) A Geomechanical Investigation for Optimizing the Ultimate Slope Design of Shadan Open Pit Mine, Iran. Indian Geotechnical Journal 1-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00709-w
- Detournay, E., Cheng, A. D., Roegiers, J. C., & McLennan, J. D. (1989). Poroelasticity considerations in in situ stress determination by hydraulic fracturing. In International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics (Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 507-513). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(89)91428-9
- Dohmen, Ted, Jean-Pierre Blangy, and Jon Zhang, (2014). ‘Microseismic Depletion Delineation’. Interpretation 2(3):SG1–13. https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2013-0164.1
- Espinoza, D. N., S. H. Kim, and J. C. Santamarina, (2011). ‘CO2 Geological Storage - Geotechnical Implications’. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 15(4):707–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0011-9
- Fahool, Farzad, Reza Shirinabadi, and Parviz Moarefvand, (2023). ‘Poroelastic Analysis Employing the Finite Element Method to Assess the Effect of Changes in the Biot Coefficient on Oil Well Wall Stability’. Indian Geotechnical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00773-w
- Fan, Z., & Parashar, R. (2019). Analytical solutions for a wellbore subjected to a non-isothermal fluid flux: implications for optimizing injection rates, fracture reactivation, and EGS hydraulic stimulation. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 52(11),4715-4729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01867-9
- Fan, Zhiqiang, and Rishi Parashar, (2019). ‘Analytical Solutions for a Wellbore Subjected to a Non-Isothermal Fluid Flux: Implications for Optimizing Injection Rates, Fracture Reactivation, and EGS Hydraulic Stimulation’. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 52(11):4715–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01867-9
- Fernandes, F. B., A. M. B. Braga, A. L. S. Souza, and A. C. Soares. (2023). Geomechanical-Integro-Differential Solution for Biot’s Effective Stress-Sensitive Permeability Monitoring During the Well-Reservoir Drawdown, https://doi.org/10.56952/ARMA-2023-0019
- Fjar, Erling, Rachel M. Holt, A. M. Raaen, Rasmus Risnes, and P. Horsrud. (2008). Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics. Vol. 53. Elsevier, ISSN: 0376-7361.
- Guéguen, Yves, and Maurice Boutéca. (2004). Mechanics of Fluid-Saturated Rocks. Vol. 89. Academic Press, ISBN:0-12-305355-2.
- H.Wang. 2000. ‘Theory of Linear Poroelasicity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology’. ISBN:0-691-03746-9.
- Heidarian, Mohamad, Hossein Jalalifar, Mahin Schaffie, Saeed Jafari, and others (2014). ‘New Analytical Model for Predicting the Unstable Zone Around the Borehole’. SPE Journal 19(06):1–177, https://doi.org/10.2118/169899-PA
- Huang, Zhaoqin, Xu Zhou, Tao Huang, Jun Yao, Xiaoguang Wang, and Hervé Jourde. (2018). ‘Homogenization of a Biot-Stokes System Modeling Deformable Vuggy Porous Media’, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.04329.
- Ibrahim, Adamu, (2021). ‘A Review of Mathematical Modelling Approaches to Tackling Wellbore Instability in Shale Formations’. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 89:103870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103870
- Jin, Y., K. P. Chen, and M. Chen, (2011). ‘Development of Tensile Stress near a Wellbore in Radial Porous Media Flows of a High Pressure Gas’. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 48(8):1313–19.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.09.013
- Karimiazar J., Sharifi Teshnizi E., O'Kelly B.C., Sadeghi S., Karimizad N., Yazdi A., Arjmandzadeh R. (2023) Effect of nano-silica on engineering properties of lime-treated marl soil. Transportation Geotechnics 43, 101123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101123
- Kasani, Hossein A., and A. P. S. Selvadurai, (2023). ‘A Review of Techniques for Measuring the Biot Coefficient and Other Effective Stress Parameters for Fluid-Saturated Rocks’. Applied Mechanics Reviews 75(2):020801, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055888
- Li, D., & Engler, T. W. (2001). Literature review on correlations of the non-Darcy coefficient. In SPE Permian basin oil and gas recovery conference (pp. SPE-70015). SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/70015-MS
- Li, Xuelong, Shaojie Chen, Sheng Wang, Meng Zhao, and Hui Liu, (2021). ‘Study on in Situ Stress Distribution Law of the Deep Mine: Taking Linyi Mining Area as an Example’. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2021(1):5594181. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5594181
- Lin, Menglu, Shengnan Chen, Ernest Mbia, and Zhangxing Chen, (2018). ‘Application of Reservoir Flow Simulation Integrated with Geomechanics in Unconventional Tight Play’. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 51(1):315–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1304-1
- Ma, Qianqian, Hong Li, Kun Ji, and Fengjun Huang, (2023). ‘Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanical Coupling Simulation of CO2 Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery with Regards to Low-Rank but Relatively Shallow Coal Seams’. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042592.
- Mirabbasi, Seyed Morteza, Mohammad Javad Ameri, Farid Reza Biglari, and Ashkan Shirzadi, (2020). ‘Thermo-Poroelastic Wellbore Strengthening Modeling: An Analytical Approach Based on Fracture Mechanics’. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 195:107492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107492
- Moomivand, H., Moosazadeh, S., & Gilani, S. O. (2022). A new empirical approach to estimate the ratio of horizontal to vertical in-situ stress and evaluation of its effect on the stability analysis of underground spaces. Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik, 37(3), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2022.3.8
- Ogienagbon, A., M. Khalifeh, Y. Wu, and S. Salehi. (2022). ‘Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of the Integrity of Cement and Geopolymer Under Low and Elevated Temperature Well Conditions’. in 56th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. https://doi.org/10.56952/ARMA-2022-0233
- Ong, Seehong, Baker Atlas, Rico Ramos, Arco Exploration, Production Technology, and Ziqiong Zheng. (2000). ‘SPE 58721 Sand Production Prediction in High Rate, Perforated and Open-Hole Gas Wells’. https://doi.org/10.2118/58721-MS
- Perera, M. S. A. (2023). ‘A Review of Underground Hydrogen Storage in Depleted Gas Reservoirs: Insights into Various Rock-Fluid Interaction Mechanisms and Their Impact on the Process Integrity’. Fuel 334:126677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126677
- Pilkey, Walter D., Deborah F. Pilkey, and Zhuming Bi. (2020). Peterson’s Stress Concentration Factors, Fourth Edition, ISBN: 9781119532514.
- Potts, David M., and Lidija Zdravkovic. (2001). ‘Finite Element Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering Application’ ISBN:0 7277 2753 2.
- Qi, Gao, Han Songcai, Shi Xian, Li Yang, Cheng Yuanfang, and Yan Chuanliang. (2022). ‘Effect of Parent Well Production on Wellbore Breakout of Child Well in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs’. P. ARMA--2022 in ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. https://doi.org/10.56952/ARMA-2022-0022
- Reisabadi, Mohammadreza Zare, Manouchehr Haghighi, Mohammad Sayyafzadeh, and Abbas Khaksar. (2020). ‘Effect of Matrix Shrinkage on Wellbore Stresses in Coal Seam Gas: An Example from Bowen Basin, East Australia’. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 77:103280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103280
- Shen, Weijun, Tianran Ma, Xizhe Li, Baojiang Sun, Yong Hu, and Jianchun Xu. (2022). ‘Fully Coupled Modeling of Two-Phase Fluid Flow and Geomechanics in Ultra-Deep Natural Gas Reservoirs’. Physics of Fluids 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0084975
- Tohidi, A., A. Fahimifar, and V. Rasouli. (2017). ‘Analytical Solution to Study Depletion/Injection Rate on Induced Wellbore Stresses in an Anisotropic Stress Field’. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0429-z
- Tohidi, Amin, Ahmad Fahimifar, and Vamegh Rasouli. (2019) ‘The Effect of Non-Darcy Flow on Induced Stresses Around a Wellbore in an Anisotropic in-Situ Stress Field’,sientia iranica. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4603
- Van den Bogert, P. A. J., and RMHE van Eijs. (2020). ‘Why Mohr-Circle Analyses May Underestimate the Risk of Fault Reactivation in Depleting Reservoirs’. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 136:104502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104502
- Vilarrasa, V. (2016). ‘The Role of the Stress Regime on Microseismicity Induced by Overpressure and Cooling in Geologic Carbon Storage’. Geofluids 16(5):941–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfl.12197
- Wang, Peitao, Cao Liu, Zhenwu Qi, Zhichao Liu, and Meifeng Cai. (2022). ‘A Rough Discrete Fracture Network Model for Geometrical Modeling of Jointed Rock Masses and the Anisotropic Behaviour’. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031720
- Wenke, Cao, Liu Wei, Liu Hailong, and Lin Hai. (2022). ‘Effect of Formation Strength Anisotropy on Wellbore Shear Failure in Bedding Shale’. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering Volume 208, Part B, January 2022, 109183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109183
- Yew, C. H., and P. N. Jogi. (1978). ‘The Determination of Biot’s Parameters for Sandstones - Part 1: Static Tests Experimental Procedure for Determining Biot’s Parameters for Four Rock Specimens Is Presented and Theoretical Values of Wave Speeds Propagating through Them Are Compared with Experimental Values’. Experimental Mechanics 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02324137
- Yuan, Haifeng, Franck Agostini, Zhibo Duan, Frédéric Skoczylas, and Jean Talandier. 2017. ‘Measurement of Biot’s Coefficient for COx Argillite Using Gas Pressure Technique’. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 92:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.12.016
- Zoback, Mark D. 2010. Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press, ISBN:978-0-21-77069-9.