10.57647/j.ijes.2025.1702.15

Improving the stability of the theta and normalized horizontal gradient filters by using the finite-difference vertical derivative

PDF
  • Nguyen Ngoc Long1,
  • Luan Thanh Pham*2,
  1. Department of Geophysics, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam. & Geophysical Division, General Department of Geology and Minerals, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  2. Department of Geophysics, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Improving the stability of the theta and normalized horizontal gradient filters by using the finite-difference vertical derivative

Received: 2024-01-18

Revised: 2024-07-21

Accepted: 2024-12-16

Published in Issue 2025-04-10

Copyright (c) 2025 Nguyen Ngoc Long, Luan Thanh Pham (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Ngoc Long, N., & Thanh Pham, L. (2025). Improving the stability of the theta and normalized horizontal gradient filters by using the finite-difference vertical derivative. Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ijes.2025.1702.15
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 125

Abstract

Estimating the boundaries of structures is a critical task in interpreting potential field data. In general, the enhancement filters based on derivatives are used to map these boundaries. The theta and normalized horizontal gradient are two popular filters used in mapping the structural edges, which can balance the signals with different amplitudes lying at different source depths beneath the subsurface. However, the use of vertical derivatives calculated from the traditional technique in these filters often amplifies noise. In this study, the performance of these filters has been improved using stable vertical derivatives from the finite-difference approach. The algorithms are tested on synthetic and real data from the Vredefort dome (South Africa). The findings from the synthetic examples show that finite-difference approach-based filters can provide stable results compared to the traditional calculations. The findings from the real application show that the finite-difference approach can provide a clearer image of the subsurface structures present underneath the study area.

Keywords

  • Edge approximation,
  • Vertical derivative,
  • Theta,
  • Normalized horizontal gradient
PDF

References

  1. Ai H., Deniz Toktay H., Alvandi A., Pasteka R., Su K., Liu Q. (2024a) Advancing potential field data analysis: the Modified Horizontal Gradient Amplitude method (MHGA). Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 54(2):119-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/congeo.2024.54.2.1
  2. Ai H., Ekinci Y. L., Alvandi A., Deniz Toktay H., Balkaya Ç., Roy A. (2024b) Detecting edges of geologic sources from gravity or magnetic anomalies through a novel algorithm based on hyperbolic tangent function. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 33(6): 684-701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0985.1936
  3. Alvandi A., Ardestani V.E. (2023) Edge detection of potential field anomalies using the Gompertz function as a high-resolution edge enhancement filter. Bulletin of Geophysics and Oceanography 64(3):279-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4430/bgo00420
  4. Alvandi A., Su K., Ai H., Ardestani V.E., Lyu C. (2023) Enhancement of potential field source boundaries using the hyperbolic domain (Gudermannian Function). Minerals 13(10):1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min13101312
  5. Aprina P. U., Santoso D., Alawiyah S., Prasetyo N., Ibrahim K. (2024) Delineating geological structure utilizing integration of remote sensing and gravity data: a study from Halmahera, North Molucca, Indonesia. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 46(2):147–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9783/20010
  6. Beiki M. (2010) Analytic signals of gravity gradient tensor and their application to estimate source location. Journal of Applied Geophysics 46:159-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3493639
  7. Blakely R. J. (1995) Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549816
  8. Cooper G. R. J., Cowan D. R. (2006) Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase. Computers & Geosciences 32(10):1585–1591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.016
  9. Cordell L., Grauch V. J. S. (1985) Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. In The utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps. Society of Exploration Geophysicists 181-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.0931830346.ch16
  10. Dransfeld L., Dwane O., McCarney C., Kelly C. J., Danilowicz B. S., Fives J. M. (2004) Larval distribution of commercial fish species in waters around. Ireland Irish fisheries investigations 13
  11. Ekinci Y. L., Ertekin C., Yigitbas E. (2013) On the effectiveness of directional derivative based filters on gravity anomalies for source edge approximation: synthetic simulations and a case study from the Aegean graben system (western Anatolia, Turkey). Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 10:1742-2132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/10/3/035005
  12. Ekinci Y. L., Yigitbas E. (2015) Interpretation of gravity anomalies to delineate some structural features of Biga and Gelibolu peninsulas, and their surroundings (north-west Turkey). Geodinamica Acta 27(4):300-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2015.1046354
  13. Ferreira F. J., de Souza J., de B. e S. Bongiolo. A., de Castro L. G. (2013) Enhancement of the total horizontal gradient of magnetic anomalies using the tilt angle. Geophysics 78(3):J33-J41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0441.1
  14. Kamto P. G., Oksum E., Pham L. T., Kamguia J. (2023) Contribution of advanced edge detection filters for the structural mapping of the Douala Sedimentary Basin along the Gulf of Guinea. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 45(3):287–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9783/18410
  15. Lana C., Gibson R. L., Reimold W. U. (2003a) Impact tectonics in the core of the Vredefort Dome: Implications for formation of central uplift in large impact structures. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 38:1093–1107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00300.x
  16. Lana C., Gibson R. L., Kisters A., Reimold W. U. (2003b) Archean crustal structure of the Kaapvaal craton, South Africa—Evidence from the Vredefort Dome. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 206:133–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01086-5
  17. Liu J., Li S., Jiang S., Wang X., Zhang J. (2023) Tools for edge detection of gravity data: comparison and application to tectonic boundary mapping in the Molucca sea. Surveys in Geophysics 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-023-09784-x
  18. Miller H. G., Singh V. (1994) Potential Field Tilt a New Concept for Location of Potential Field Sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics 32:213-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-9851(94)90022-1
  19. Nabighian M. N., Ander M. E., Grauch V. J. S., Hansen R. O., LaFehr T. R., Li, Y., et al. (2005a) Historical development of the gravity method in exploration. Geophysics 70(6):63–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2133785
  20. Nabighian M. N., Grauch V. J. S., Hansen R. O., LaFehr T. R., Li Y., Peirce J. W., et al. (2005b) The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration. Geophysics 70(6):33–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2133784
  21. Nasuti Y., Nasuti A. (2018) NTilt as an improved enhanced tilt derivative filter for edge detection of potential field anomalies. Geophysical Journal International 214(1):36-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy117
  22. Nasuti Y., Nasuti A., Moghadas D. (2019) STDR: a novel approach for enhancing and edge detection of potential field data. Pure and Applied Geophysics 176:827-841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2016-5
  23. Tran K.V., Nguyen T. N. (2020) A novel method for computing the vertical gradients of the potential field: application to downward continuation. Geophysical Journal International 220:1316–1329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz524
  24. Jahn A., Riller U. (2009) A 3D model of first-order structural elements of the Vredefort Dome, South Africa — Importance for understanding central uplift formation of large impact structures. Tectonophysics 478:221–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.08.00
  25. Pham L. T. (2023) A novel approach for enhancing potential fields: application to aeromagnetic data of the Tuangiao, Vietnam. European Physical Journal Plus 138 (12):1134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04760-1
  26. Pham L. T. (2024a) A stable method for detecting the edges of potential field sources. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 62:5912107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3388294
  27. Pham L. T. (2024b) Mapping the structural configuration of the northern part of the Central Indian Ridge from satellite gravity data using derivatives of the horizontal gradient. Advances in Space Research 74:1648–1663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.05.054
  28. Pham L. T., Oksum E., Minh D. V., Quynh T. V., Khuong D. L. V., Eldosouky A. M. (2021) An improved approach for detecting ridge locations to interpret the potential field data for more accurate structural mapping: a case study from Vredefort dome area (South Africa). Journal of African Earth Sciences 175:104099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.104099
  29. Rao D.B., Prakash M.J., Ramesh Babu N. (1990) 3-D and 2 1/2-D modeling of gravity anomalies with variable density contrast. Geophysical Prospecting 38:411–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01854.x
  30. Roest W. R., Verhoef J., Pilkington M. (1992) Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 57(1):116-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443174
  31. Wijns C., Perez C., Kowalczyk P. (2005) Theta map: Edge detection in magnetic data. Geophysics 70(4):L39–L43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.104099