Match and Mismatch between Learning and Teaching Style in the Agricultural Education Process

  1. Ph.D. Graduate, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
  2. Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
  3. Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
  4. Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Revised: 27-02-2019

Accepted: 09-05-2019

Published in Issue 01-09-2020

How to Cite

Khaledi , K. ., Chizari , M. ., Abbasi, E. ., & Sadighi, H. (2020). Match and Mismatch between Learning and Teaching Style in the Agricultural Education Process. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 10(4), 233-242. https://oiccpress.com/ijamad/article/view/6553

PDF views: 166

Abstract

Teaching and learning processes in universities have not achieved expected outcomes. The mismatch between learning and teaching styles is a challenge in the education process. In-structors should strive to incorporate their teaching style with students’ learning styles in order to ensure effective teaching and learning process in higher education. The present descrip-tive-survey study aimed to explain the compatibility of students’ learning styles using Witkin’s (1976) Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) and teachers’ teaching style using van Tilburg and Hamilich’s (1990) test. The target population consisted of students and faculty members at the agricultural college at Razi University, Iran. Results revealed that the majority of males were field-inde-pendent and the majority of females were field-dependent learners. Concerning four teaching styles (expert, provider, facil-itator and enabler), the instructors tended to use the enabler teaching style. Instructors should consider the characteristics and needs of both field-dependent and field-independent students and use different teaching methods. Recommendations about matching learning and teaching styles are provided based on the results.

Keywords

  • Education,
  • field-dependent,
  • learning style,
  • teaching style