Original Article
Karst-Based Geotourism in Eastern Carphatian Serbia: Exploration and Evaluation of Natural Stone Bridges
Authors
Abstract
The region of Carpathian Serbia is much dominated by karst terrain with numerous geological and geomorphological features, especially caves and natural stone bridges, potentially significant for geotourism development. The geotourism potential of these sites is still largely untapped. In this paper, we analyze several natural stone bridges that possess geotourism potential. These sites include Velika Vratna, Mala Vratna, Suva Vratna, Samar, Valja, Osanica and Rajska stone bridge. This study aims to identify and evaluate the current state and geotourism potential of natural stone bridges as important resources for the development of karst geotourism in Carpathian Serbia by applying the Modified Geosite Assessment Model (M-GAM). The results indicate that the Vratna River basin currently has the best-rated Main Values, but it comes short for Additional Values, especially tourism infrastructure meaning that this should be the primary focus of any future geotourism development of this site. On the other hand, Valja stone bridge has the highest Additional Values but still with plenty of room for improvement. The paper also indicates the importance of other karst features in the vicinity and their role in completing the geotourism offer of this area.
Read the full text of the articleKeywords
- Geotourism
- Karst
- Natural stone bridges
- Modified Geosite Assessment Model (M-GAM)
- Carphatians. Eastern Serbia
- Carphatians
References
- Antić A, Tomić N (2017). Geoheritage and geotourism potential of the Homolje area (eastern Serbia). Acta Geoturistica. 8(2):67-78.
- Antić A, Tomić N (2019). Assessing the speleotourism potential together with archaeological and palaeontological heritage in Risovača Cave (Central Serbia). Acta Geoturistica. 10(1):1-11.
- Antić A, Tomić N, Marković S.B (2019). Karst geoheritage and geotourism potential in the Pek River lower basin (eastern Serbia). Geographica Pannonica. 23(1):32-46.
- Boškov J, Kotrla S, Jovanović M, Tomić N, Lukić T, Rvović I (2015). Application of the preliminary geosite assessment model (GAM): the case of the Bela Crkva municipality (Vojvodina, North Serbia). Geographica Pannonica. 19(3):146-152.
- Božić S, Tomić N (2015). Canyons and gorges as potential geotourism destinations in Serbia: Comparative analysis from two perspectives - General geotourists' and pure geotourists'. Open Geosciences. 7:531-546.
Božić S, Tomić N (2016). Developing the cultural route evaluation model (CREM) and its application on the Trail of Roman Emperors, Serbia. Tourism Management Perspectives. 17:26-35.
- Božić S, Tomić N, Pavić D (2014). Canyons as potential geotourism attractions of Serbia – comparative analysis of Lazar and Uvac canyons by using M-GAM model. Acta Geoturistica. 5(2):18-30.
- Bruschi V.M, Cendrero A (2005). Geosite evaluation. Can we measure intangible values? Il Quaternario. 18:293-306.
- Cvijić J (1918). Podzemna hidrografija i morfološka evolucija karsta (Hydrographie souterraine et evolution morphologique du karst). 6(4):375-426.
- Coratza P, Giusti C (2005). Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario. 18:307-313.
- Ćalić-Ljubojević J (2000). Natural Bridges on the Vratna River (Eastern Serbia) as the Last Remnants of a Former Cave. Acta Carsologica. 29(2):241-248.
- Dong H, Song Y, Chen T, Zhao J, Yu L (2014). Geoconservation and geotourism in Luochuan loess national geopark, China. Quaternary International. 334:40-51.
- Erhartič B (2010). Geomorphosite assessment. Acta Geographica Slovenica. 50(2):295-319.
- Farsani N.T, Coelho C.O, Costa C.M, Amrikazemi A (2014). Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage. 6(3):185-192.
- Gavrilović D(1998). Prirodni kameni mostovi - fenomen fluviokrasa Istočne Srbije. Zaštita prirode. 48/49:25-32.
- Gavrilović D (2005). Prirodni kameni most Šuplja stena. Zbornik radova. 53:5-12.
- Gordon J.E (2018). Geoheritage, geotourism and the cultural landscape: Enhancing the visitor experience and promoting geoconservation. Geosciences. 8(4):136.
- Gordon J.E (2019). Geoconservation principles and protected area management. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 7(4):199-210.
- Guzmán R, Fernández G (2016). Geoconservation, geotourism and speleotourism: analysis of two cave systems in Argentina. Tourism and Karst Areas. 9(1):83-93.
- Henriques M.H, dos Reis R.P, Brilha J, Mota T (2011). Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage. 3(2):117-128.
- Hose T.A (1997). Geotourism - Selling the earth to Europe. In Engineering Geology and the Environment, pp 2955-2960. Amsterdam: Balkema.
- Hose T.A (2006). Geotourism and interpretation. In Geotourism, pp 221-241. London: Elsevier.
- Hose T.A (2012). 3G’s for Modern Geotourism. Geoheritage. 4:7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0052-y
- Jonić V (2018). Comparative analysis of Devil's town and Bryce canyon geosites by applying the modified geosite assessment model (M-GAM). Researches Review of the Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management. 47(2):113-125.
- Kubalíková L (2019). Assessing Geotourism Resources on a Local Level: A Case Study from Southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Resources. 8(3):150.
- Larwood J.G (2016). Geoconservation: an introduction to European principles and practices. In Geoheritage and geotourism. A European perspective, pp 129-153. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer Ltd.
- Lewis I.D (2019). South Australian geology and the State Heritage Register: an example of geoconservation of the Naracoorte Caves complex and karst environment. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences. 66(6):785-792.
- Lobo H.A.S, Trajano E, de Alcântara Marinho M, Bichuette M.E, Scaleante J.A.B, Scaleante O.A.F, ... & Laterza F.V (2013). Projection of tourist scenarios onto fragility maps: Framework for determination of provisional tourist carrying capacity in a Brazilian show cave. Tourism Management. 35:234-243.
- Marković S.B, Korać M, Mrđić N, Buylaert J.P, Thiel C, McLaren S.J, ... & Vasiljević Dj.A (2014). Palaeoenvironment and geoconservation of mammoths from the Nosak loess–palaeosol sequence (Drmno, northeastern Serbia): initial results and perspectives. Quaternary International. 334:30-39.
- Murphy P, Allshorn S (2018). Cave explorers and Geoconservation in the North of England–a Changing Paradigm?. Geoconservation Research. 1(1):21-23.
- Natural Arch and Bridge Society. Available online: www.naturalarches.org/archinfo/faq.htm#formed (accessed on 02 May 2020).
- Pál M, Albert G (2018). Comparison of geotourism assessment models: and experiment in Bakony–Balaton UNSECO Global Geopark, Hungary. Acta Geoturistica. 9(2):1-13.
- Piranha J.M, Del Lama E.A, Bacci D.D.L.C (2011). Geoparks in Brazil—strategy of geoconservation and development. Geoheritage. 3(4):289-298.
- Peppoloni S, Bilham N, Di Capua G (2019). Contemporary Geoethics Within the Geosciences. In Exploring Geoethics, pp. 25-70. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
- Petrović D (1969). Prilog poznavanju geneze prerasti. Globus. 1:42-46.
- Petrović D, Gavrilović D (1969). Reljef u slivu Vratne. Zbornik radova Geografskog zavoda PMF. 16:7–27.
- Petrović A.S., Carević I.Z (2015). Geological influence on the formation of Samar natural bridge and collapse valley of Ravna River from the NE Kučaj Mountains (Carpatho-Balkanides, eastern Serbia).Acta Carsologica. 44(1):37-46.
- Pralong J.P (2005). A method for assessing the tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie. Relief, processus, environnement. 3:189-196.
- Pereira P, Pereira D, Caetano Alves M.I (2007). Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geographica Helvetica. 62:159-168.
- Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007). A method for assessing „scientific” and „additional values”of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica. 62(3):148-158.
- Reynard E (2008). Scientific Research and Tourist Promotion of Geomorphological Heritage. Geografia Fisica E Dinamica Quaternaria. 31(2):225-230.
- Ruban D.A (2018). Karst as Important Resource for Geopark-Based Tourism: Current State and Biases. Resources.7(4):82.
- Sánchez-Botello C.R, Jiménez-Velandia G, Ríos-Reyes C.A (2018). Geological occurrence of the ecce homo hills cave, chimichagua (cesar), Colombia: an alternative for socio-economic development based on geotourism. International Journal of Hydrology. 2(5):618-628.
- Serrano E, González-Trueba J.J (2005). Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie. Formes, processus, environnement. 3:197-208.
- Solarska A, Hose T.A, Vasiljević Dj. A, Mroczek P, Jary Z, Marković S.B, Widawski K (2013). Geodiversity of the loess regions in Poland: Inventory, geoconservation issues, and geotourism potential. Quaternary International. 296:68-81.
- Stephens M, Hodge S, Paquette J (2013). Geoconservation of Volivoli cave, Fiji: a prehistoric heritage site of national significance. Geoheritage. 5(2):123-136.
- Tičar J, Tomić N, Breg Valjavec M, Zorn M, Marković S.B, Gavrilov M.B (2018). Speleotourism in Slovenia: balancing between mass tourism and geoheritage protection. Open Geosciences. 10(1):344-357.
- Tomić N (2011). The potential of Lazar Canyon (Serbia) as a geotourism destination: inventory and evaluation. Geographica Pannonica. 15:103-112.
- Tomić N, Božić S (2014). A modified geosite assessment model (M-GAM) and its application on the Lazar Canyon area (Serbia). International Journal of Environmental Research. 8(4):1041-1052.
- Tomić N, Marković S.B, Korać M, Mrđić N, Hose T.A, Vasiljević Dj.A, Jovičić M, Gavrilov, M.B (2015). Exposing mammoths: from loess research discovery to public palaeontological park. Quaternary International. 372:142-150.
- Tomić N (2016). Geoheritage of the Middle and Lower Danube in Serbia: Inventory, Geoconservation and Geotourism. PhD thesis. Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad.
- Tomić N, Antić A, Marković S.B, Đorđević T, Zorn M, Breg Valjavec M (2019). Exploring the potential for speleotourism development in eastern Serbia. Geoheritage. 11(2):359-369.
- Tomić N, Košić K (2020). Developing the Spa Assessement Model (SAM) and its application on the Kopaonik-Jastrebac spa zone (Serbia). Tourism Management Perspectives. 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100753
- Tomić N, Marković S.B, Antić A, Tešić D (2020). Exploring the potential for geotourism development in the Danube Region of Serbia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks.8(2):123-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.05.001
- Vasiljević Dj.A, Marković S.B, Hose T.A, Smalley I, Basarin B, Lazić L, Jović G (2011). The Introduction to Geoconservation of loess-palaeosol sequences in the Vojvodina region: Significant geoheritage of Serbia. Quaternary International. 240(1-2):108-116.
- Vasiljević Dj.A, Marković S.B, Hose T.A, Ding Z, Guo Z, Liu X, ... & Vujičić M.D (2014). Loess–palaeosol sequences in China and Europe: common values and geoconservation issues. Catena. 117:108-118.
- Vujičić M.D, Vasiljević D.A, Marković S.B, Hose T.A, Lukić T, &HadžićO. (2011). Preliminary Geosite Assessment Model (GAM) and its application on Fruška Gora Mountain, potential geotourism destination of Serbia. Acta GeographicaSlovenica. 51: 361–377.
- Vukoičić D, Milosavljević S, Valjarević A, Nikolić M, Srećković-Batoćanin D (2018). The evaluation of geosites in the territory of National park ‘Kopaonik’ (Serbia). Open Geosciences. 10(1): 618-633.
- Vuković S, Antić A (2019). Speleological approach for geotourism development in Zlatibor county (west Serbia). Turizam. 23(1):53-68.
- Williams P (2008). World heritage caves and karst. Gland: IUCN.
- Zouros N.C (2007). Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece Case study of the Lesvos island – coastal geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica. 62(3): 169-180.
- Zafra-Otero D, Gélvez-Chaparro J.E, Barajas-Rangel D.S (2019). Geoconservation of underground ecosystems in Santander (Colombia) from geotourism and geoeducation strategies. International Journal of Hydrology. 3(4):317-320.
Additional Information
Geoconservation Research (Geoconserv. Res.)
Volume 3 (2020)
Issue 2, November 2020
Page Numbers: 62-80
Article views: 19
Share: