10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0801.07

Geotourism Potential for Sustainable Geotourism Development at Phou Pha Marn, Khammouane Province, Laos

PDF
  • Phomsanh Chantharangsone*1,
  • Kethsa Nanthavongdouangsy2,
  • Vongphet Sihapanya2,
  • Li Bo3,
  • Khamsone Latthayot4,
  1. Kunming University of Science and Technology, China
  2. Department of Ecotourism, National University of Laos, Laos
  3. Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, China
  4. Department of Geology and Minerals, Vientiane, Laos
Geotourism Potential for Sustainable Geotourism Development at Phou Pha Marn, Khammouane Province, Laos
Categories

Received: 2024-11-25

Revised: 2025-04-18

Accepted: 2025-05-13

Published in Issue 2025-07-27

Copyright (c) -1 Phomsanh Chantharangsone, Kethsa Nanthavongdouangsy, Vongphet Sihapanya, Li Bo, Khamsone Latthayot (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Chantharangsone, P., Nanthavongdouangsy, K., Sihapanya, V., Bo, L., & Latthayot, K. (2025). Geotourism Potential for Sustainable Geotourism Development at Phou Pha Marn, Khammouane Province, Laos. Geoconservation Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0801.07
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 231

Abstract

Phou Pha Marn, located in Khammouane Province, Laos, is a karst landscape of notable geological and geomorphological interest. This study assesses its geotourism potential through the application of the Modified Geosite Assessment Model (M-GAM), integrating expert-based and visitor-oriented evaluation criteria. Five representative geosites, including Konglor Cave, Karst Tower Ridge, and the Nam Dene doline field, were assessed for their scientific, educational, aesthetic, and touristic values. The results indicate that Konglor Cave scored highest overall (0.75), with outstanding scientific and educational value, while Karst Tower Ridge demonstrated exceptional aesthetic appeal (0.90). Despite moderate infrastructure scores, the area exhibits high geoheritage potential due to its diverse karst features, cultural associations, and landscape integrity. Comparative insights from successful geotourism models in Albania, Serbia, Vietnam, and Malaysia further inform the development framework. The study concludes with strategic recommendations for sustainable geotourism planning, infrastructure enhancement, and community-based geoheritage conservation, positioning Phou Pha Marn as a strong candidate for future geotourism initiatives in Southeast Asia.

Keywords

  • Geotourism,
  • Phou Pha Marn,
  • Karst,
  • Geoheritage,
  • Sustainability
PDF

References

  1. Agastya IBO, Meiva PS, Satya Y, Rinjani P, Cahyadi P (2021, December). The Potential and Challenges of Batur UNESCO Global Geopark as a Place for Volcanic Learning and Geological History in Bali Based on SWOT Analysis. In Proceedings Joint Convention Bandung.
  2. Antić A, Tomić N(2017). Geoheritage and geotourism potential of the Homolje area (eastern Serbia). Acta Geoturistica: 8(2): 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1515/agta-2017-0007
  3. Crofts R, Gordon JE, Santucci VL (2015). Geoconservation in protected areas. In Protected area governance and management. 531-568. https://doi.org/10.22459/pagm.04.2015.18
  4. Díaz-López C, Carpio M, Martín-Morales M, Zamorano M (2021). Defining strategies to adopt Level (s) for bringing buildings into the circular economy. A case study of Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production. 287: 125048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125048
  5. Dollma M (2019). Geotourism potential of Thethi National Park (Albania). International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 7(2), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2019.05.002
  6. Ertekin C, Ulugergerli EU (2022). Geoelectrical survey over perched aquifers in the northern part of Upper Sakarya River Basin, Türkiye. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering. 10(4): 335-352.
  7. Fang W, Gou GR, Cheung LT, Fok L, Chow AS, Zhang K (2024). An Investigation of Willingness to Pay for Geopark Management and Conservation: A Case Study of Geotourists in the Greater China Region. Resources. 13(2): 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13020024
  8. Farsani NT (2012). Sustainable tourism in geoparks through geotourism and networking (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de Aveiro (Portugal)).
  9. Jones L, Hobbs P (2021). The application of terrestrial LiDAR for geohazard mapping, monitoring and modelling in the British Geological Survey. Remote Sensing: 13(3): 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030395
  10. Komoo I, Patzak M (2008). Global geoparks network: An integrated approach for heritage conservation and sustainable use. Southeast and East Asia Geoheritage Conservation, Leman, MS, Reedman, A and Chen, SP, eds. Bangi: LESTARI UKM, 1-13.
  11. Matshusa K (2020). The potential for geotourism at the Kruger National Park for social sustainability. University of Johannesburg (South Africa). Doctor of Philosophy (PHD), University of Johannesburg
  12. Miljkovic B, Bjelajac D (2023). Geoheritage promotion towards sustainable tourism:" Kučaj-Beljanica Mountains" National Park in the Homolje Area (Eastern Serbia). Tourism in Southern and Eastern Europe.... 7:283-295. https://doi.org/10.20867/tosee.07.19
  13. Schutte IC (2009). A strategic management plan for the sustainable development of geotourism in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus).
  14. Shekhar S, Kumar P, Chauhan G, Thakkar MG (2019). Conservation and sustainable development of geoheritage, geopark, and geotourism: a case study of Cenozoic successions of Western Kutch, India. Geoheritage. 11(4): 1475-1488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00362-5
  15. Tavares AO, Henriques MH, Domingos A, Bala A (2015). Community involvement in geoconservation: a conceptual approach based on the geoheritage of South Angola. Sustainability. 7(5): 4893-4918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7054893
  16. Tomić N, Marković SB, Antić A, Tešić D (2020). Exploring the potential for geotourism development in the Danube region of Serbia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 8(2): 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.05.001
  17. Tran DA, Goeppert N, Palmer AN, Goldscheider N (2022). Development and structure of karstification of the Dong Van Karst Plateau UNESCO Global Geopark, North Vietnam based on cave survey data. International Journal of Earth Sciences. 111(5): 1573-1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-022-02190-5