10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0801.05

New Geosites Inventory for Geoconservation and Geotourism Improvement in Alagna Valsesia, Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (Italy)

PDF
  • Michele Guerini*1,
  • Arianna Negri2,
  • Alizia Mantovani3,
  • Marco Giardino2,
  1. EDYTEM, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, 5 Bd de la Mer Caspienne, 73370 Le Bourget-du-Lac, France  AND  Earth Sciences Department, University of Turin, Via Valperga Caluso, 35 10125 Torino, Italy
  2. Earth Sciences Department, University of Turin, Via Valperga Caluso, 35 10125 Torino, Italy
  3. IGG-CNR, Torino Secondary Headquarters, Via Valperga Caluso, 35 10125 Torino, Italy
New Geosites Inventory for Geoconservation and Geotourism Improvement in Alagna Valsesia, Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (Italy)
Categories

Received: 2024-09-16

Revised: 2025-02-18

Accepted: 2025-04-07

Published in Issue 2025-05-25

Copyright (c) -1 Michele Guerini, Arianna Negri, Alizia Mantovani, Marco Giardino (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Guerini, M., Negri, A., Mantovani, A., & Giardino, M. (2025). New Geosites Inventory for Geoconservation and Geotourism Improvement in Alagna Valsesia, Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (Italy). Geoconservation Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.gcr.2025.0801.05
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 143

Abstract

Geoheritage is an important resource for modern society, and the inventory of geosites is an increasingly crucial element to encourage geoconservation actions and foster the sustainable development of an area. The present paper offers an analysis aimed at assessing 25 potential geosites in Alagna Valsesia, an alpine area within the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (NW Italy), both qualitatively and quantitatively. The qualitative assessment was performed using a descriptive form created for a project to catalog the geosites of the Piemonte Region, focusing on the scientific, aesthetic, conservation, and tourism relevance of the geoheritage elements. Statistical analysis of the new inventory, using both qualitative and quantitative assessments, has enabled a more detailed classification of the geosites and an understanding of benefits and limitations of both methodologies. We find that for a comprehensive territorial strategy, the qualitative and quantitative methods are complementary. The qualitative approach aids geoconservation with detailed geosite descriptions, benefiting spatial managers and geoparks, and the quantitative method enables objective comparisons, supporting regional geotourism development.

Keywords

  • Geoheritage,
  • Italian geoparks,
  • Environmental management,
  • Geotourism,
  • Alps,
  • Mountain geodiversity,
  • Sustainable tourism
PDF

References

  1. Adryansyah Nazaruddin D, Ab Manaf N (2024). Assessment of geoeducation program for ndigenous students in Kenyir Geopark, Terengganu, Malaysia. Geoconservation Research. 7: 22–38. https://doi.org/10.57647/J.GCR.2024.0701.02
  2. Babist J, Handy MR, Konrad-Schmolke M, Hammerschmidt K (2006). Precollisional, multistage exhumation of subducted continental crust: The Sesia Zone, western Alps. Tectonics. 25: 6008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005TC001927
  3. Bartolini R, Biasetti E, Biasetti M (2023a). Piano Regolatore Generale Comunale. Carta Geomorfologica. Studio Geologico Epifani, Arona.
  4. Bartolini R, Biasetti E, Biasetti M (2023b). Piano Regolatore Generale Comunale. Carta Geologica. Studio Geologico Epifani, Arona.
  5. Beltramo R, Bonadonna A, Duglio S, et al. (2024a). Local food heritage in a mountain tourism destination: evidence from the Alagna Walser Green Paradise project. British Food Journal. 126: 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2022-1136
  6. Beltramo R, Duglio S, Mascadri G (2024b). Mountain tourism: Environmental management for fostering tourism destinations: From context analysis to tourism products. In: Innovation, Quality and Sustainability for a Resilient Circular Economy. Springer, Cham, pp. 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28292-8_62
  7. Beltramo R, Vesce E, Buoso G, Bonadonna A (2024c). The Alagna Walser green paradise project as a tool for enhancing the cultural heritage and creativity pillar. In: Innovation, Quality and Sustainability for a Resilient Circular Economy. Springer, Cham, pp. 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28292-8_65
  8. Berrezueta E, Sánchez-Cortez JL, Aguilar-Aguilar M (2021). Inventory and characterization of geosites in Ecuador: a review. Geoheritage. 13: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-021-00619-Y
  9. Bini A, Cita MB, Gaetani M (1978). Southern Alpine lakes — Hypothesis of an erosional origin related to the Messinian entrenchment. Marine Geology. 27: 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(78)90035-X
  10. Bollati IM, Crosa Lenz B, Zanoletti E, Pelfini M (2017). Geomorphological mapping for the valorization of the alpine environment. A methodological proposal tested in the Loana Valley (Sesia Val Grande Geopark, Western Italian Alps). Journal of Mountain Science. 14: 1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11629-017-4427-7
  11. Bollati IM, Smiraglia C, Pelfini M (2013). Assessment and selection of geomorphosites and trails in the Miage Glacier area (Western Italian Alps). Environmental Management. 51: 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00267-012-9995-2
  12. Bollati IM, Caironi V, Gallo A, et al. (2023a). How to integrate cultural and geological heritage? The case of the Comuniterrae project (Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark, northern Italy). AUC Geographica. 58: 129–145. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2023.10
  13. Bollati IM, Viani C, Masseroli A, et al. (2023b). Geodiversity of proglacial areas and implications for geosystem services: A review. Geomorphology. 421: 108517. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2022.108517
  14. Brilha J (2016). Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: A review. Geoheritage. 8: 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-014-0139-3
  15. Brilha J (2018). Geoheritage: inventories and evaluation. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management. Elsevier, pp. 69–85
  16. Brilha J, Gray M, Pereira DI, Pereira P (2018). Geodiversity: An integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature. Environmental Science & Policy. 86: 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2018.05.001
  17. Brocx M, Semeniuk V (2007). Geoheritage and geoconservation - History, definition, scope and scale. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia. 90: 53–87.
  18. Burek C V., Prosser CD (2008). The history of geoconservation: An introduction. Geological Society Special Publication. 300: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP300.1
  19. Carraro F, Giardino M (2004). Quaternary glaciations in the western Italian Alps – a review. Developments in Quaternary Science. 2: 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0866(04)80071-X
  20. Carrión-Mero P, Loor-Oporto O, Andrade-Ríos H, et al. (2020). Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the “El Sexmo” tourist gold mine (Zaruma, Ecuador) as a geosite and mining site. Resources. 9: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/RESOURCES9030028
  21. Chimento F, Tusberti F, Brandano M, et al. (2023). Is it possible to inventory geoheritage without available geological maps? The case of Lumignano and Costozza (Berici Hills, Northern Italy). Geoheritage. 15: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-023-00820-1
  22. Clark PU, Dyke AS, Shakun JD, et al. (2009). The last glacial maximum. Science. 325: 710–714. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1172873
  23. Coratza P, Bollati IM, Panizza V, et al. (2021). Advances in geoheritage mapping: Application to iconic geomorphological examples from the Italian landscape. Sustainability. 13: 11538. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU132011538
  24. Coratza P, Giusti C (2005). Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario. 18: 307–313.
  25. Coratza P, Vandelli V, Fiorentini L, et al. (2019). Bridging terrestrial and marine geoheritage: Assessing geosites in Portofino Natural Park (Italy). Water. 11: 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/W11102112
  26. de Lima FF, Brilha JB, Salamuni E (2010). Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: A methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage. 2: 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-010-0014-9
  27. Di Paola A, Vecchio S, Frosini G, et al. (2022). Architectural survey, realized with integrated methodology, of the complex of Walser houses in Alagna Valsesia, Italy. HERITAGE2022. International Conference on Vernacular Heritage: Culture, People and Sustainability. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, pp 1–8
  28. El Wartiti M, Malaki A, Zahraoui M, et al. (2008). Geosites inventory of the northwestern Tabular Middle Atlas of Morocco. Environmental Geology. 55: 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00254-007-0987-0
  29. Fancello D, Columbu S, Cruciani G, et al. (2022). Geological and archaeological heritage in the Mediterranean coasts: Proposal and quantitative assessment of new geosites in SW Sardinia (Italy). Frontiers in Earth Science. 10: 910990. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEART.2022.910990
  30. Fantoni R (2008) L’evoluzione della tipologia edilizia in una valle Alpina. Le case Valsesiane tra tardo Medioevo e nuovo millennio. In: Fantoni R, Ragozzi J (eds) Di Legno e di Pietra. La Casa nella Montagna Valsesiana. Carcoforo, pp. 79–86
  31. Fassoulas C, Mouriki D, Dimitriou-Nikolakis P, Iliopoulos G (2012) Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage. 4: 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-011-0046-9
  32. Fernández MP, Timón DL, Marín RG (2014). Geosites inventory in the geopark Villuercas-Ibores-Jara (Extremadura, Spain): A proposal for a new classification. Geoheritage. 6: 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-013-0088-2
  33. Ferrando A, Faccini F, Poggi F, Coratza P (2021). Geosites inventory in Liguria region (Northern Italy): A tool for regional geoconservation and environmental management. Sustainability 13: 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13042346
  34. Ferreira DR, Valdati J (2023). Geoparks and sustainable development: Systematic review. Geoheritage. 15: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-022-00775-9
  35. Frey ML, Martini G, Zouros N (2001). European geopark charter. European Geoparks Magazine. 28.
  36. Fuertes-Gutiérrez I, Fernández-Martínez E (2010). Geosites inventory in the Leon Province (Northwestern Spain): A tool to introduce geoheritage into regional environmental management. Geoheritage. 2: 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0012-y
  37. Ganzerli S, Ganzerli L (2012). Preservation of historical Walser houses in Alagna Valsesia, Italy. Structures Congress 2008. 314: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/41016(314)306
  38. Garcia MDGM, Lama EAD, Martins L, et al. (2019). Inventory and assessment of geosites to stimulate regional sustainable management: the northern coast of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 91: e20180514. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201920180514
  39. Gasco I, Gattiglio M, Borghi A (2013). Review of metamorphic and kinematic data from Internal Crystalline Massifs (Western Alps): PTt paths and exhumation history. Journal of Geodynamics. 63: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOG.2012.09.006
  40. Giardino M, Negri A, Storta E, et al. (2024). The role of geosciences to activate the virtuous circle: awareness of geodiversity values - enhancement of geoheritage - growth of sustainable geotourism - public engagement. Abstract book of the conference “Geology for a sustainable management of our Planet”, 2-5 September 2024. Italian Geological Society, Bari, p. 296
  41. Giovagnoli MC (2023). The Italian geosite inventory: Past, present, and future. Geoheritage. 15: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-023-00843-8
  42. Gönczy S, Fodor G, Oláh N, et al. (2020). Geoheritage values of the Northeastern Carpathians, Transcarpathia, Ukraine. Geoconservation Research. 3: 32–48. https://doi.org/10.30486/GCR.2020.1904340.1026
  43. Gorączko M (2018). Easy four-thousanders in the Alps: between alpinism and mass tourism. Geography and Tourism. 2: 119–128. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2144166
  44. Grandgirard V (1999). L’évaluation des géotopes. Geologia Insubrica. 4: 59–66.
  45. Grandgirard V (1997). Géomorphologie, protection de la nature et gestion du paysage. Université de Fribourg
  46. Gray M (2013). Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
  47. Grove JM (2019). Little ice ages: Ancient and modern, 2nd edn. The Little Ice Age. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505205
  48. Guerini M, Khoso RB, Negri A, et al. (2023). Integrating cultural sites into the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (North-West Italy): Methodologies for monitoring and enhancing cultural heritage. Heritage. 6: 6132–6152. https://doi.org/10.3390/HERITAGE6090322/S1
  49. Guerini M, Mantovani A, Khoso RB, Giardino M (2024). Exploring the correlation between geoheritage and geodiversity through comprehensive mapping: A study within the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (NW Italy). Geomorphology. 461: 109298. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2024.109298
  50. Henriques MH, Brilha J (2017). UNESCO global geoparks: A strategy towards global understanding and sustainability. Episodes. 40: 349–355. https://doi.org/10.18814/EPIIUGS/2017/V40I4/017036
  51. Henriques MH, dos Reis RP, Brilha J, Mota T (2011). Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage. 3: 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-011-0039-8
  52. Herrera-Franco G, Carrión-Mero P, Montalván-Burbano N, et al. (2022). Geoheritage and geosites: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Geosciences. 12: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/GEOSCIENCES12040169
  53. Herrera-Franco G, Montalván-Burbano N, Carrión-Mero P, et al. (2021). Worldwide research on geoparks through bibliometric analysis. Sustainability. 13: 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13031175
  54. Herrera-Franco GA, Carrión-Mero PC, Mora-Frank C V., Caicedo-Potosí JK (2020). Comparative analysis of methodologies for the evaluation of geosites in the context of the Santa Elena-Ancón geopark project. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics. 15: 183–188. https://doi.org/10.18280/IJDNE.150207
  55. Hose TA (2012). Editorial: Geotourism and geoconservation. Geoheritage. 4: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-012-0059-Z
  56. Mantovani A (2024). Definitions of geodiversity, geoheritage, geosite. Zenodo. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10663974
  57. Mantovani A, Piana F, Lombardo V (2020a). Ontology-driven compilation of geological map database. Rendiconti Online Societa Geologica Italiana. 52: 62–68. https://doi.org/10.3301/ROL.2020.20
  58. Mantovani A, Piana F, Lombardo V (2020b). Ontology-driven representation of knowledge for geological maps. Computers and Geosciences. 139, 104446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104446
  59. Mariani S (2006). La valorizzazione del patrimonio geologico Un’esperienza di ricerca sui geositi tra Emilia-Romagna e Baviera. PhD Thesis, Università di Bologna.
  60. McKeever PJ, Zouros N (2005). Geoparks: Celebrating Earth heritage, sustaining local communities. Episodes. 28: 274–278. https://doi.org/10.18814/EPIIUGS/2005/V28I4/006
  61. Migón EP, Migón P (2022). Geoheritage and cultural heritage—A review of recurrent and interlinked themes. Geosciences. 12: 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/GEOSCIENCES12020098
  62. MIUR (2005). DM 18 marzo 2005. Settori Concors. e Settori Sci.
  63. Moura P, Garcia M da GM, Brilha JB, Amaral WS (2017). Conservation of geosites as a tool to protect geoheritage: the inventory of Ceará Central Domain, Borborema Province - NE/Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 89: 2625–2645. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720170600
  64. Mucivuna VC, Motta Garcia M da G, Reynard E (2022). Comparing quantitative methods on the evaluation of scientific value in geosites: analysis from the Itatiaia National Park, Brazil. Geomorphology. 396: 107988. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2021.107988
  65. Panizza M (2001). Geomorphosites: Concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chinese Science Bulletin. 46: 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187227
  66. Pasquaré Mariotto F, Drymoni K, Bonali FL, et al. (2023). Geosite assessment and communication: A review. Resources. 12: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/RESOURCES12020029
  67. Pereira LS, Alves AF (2020). Geotouristic coastal itinerary in the south coast of Paraíba (Northeast of Brazil). Geoconservation Research. 3: 58–76. https://doi.org/10.30486/GCR.2020.1902831.1021
  68. Pereira P, Pereira D (2010). Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphologie. 16: 215–222. https://doi.org/10.4000/GEOMORPHOLOGIE.7942
  69. Pérez-Romero ME, Álvarez-García J, Flores-Romero MB, Jiménez-Islas D (2023). UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 years after their creation: Analysis of scientific production. Land. 12: 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND12030671
  70. Perotti L, Bollati IM, Viani C, et al. (2020). Fieldtrips and virtual tours as geotourism resources: Examples from the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark (NW Italy). Resources. 9: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/RESOURCES9060063
  71. Perotti L, Carraro G, Giardino M, et al. (2019). Geodiversity evaluation and water resources in the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Geopark (Italy). Water. 11: 2102. https://doi.org/10.3390/W11102102
  72. Perry RB (1914). The definition of value. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods. 11, 141–162.
  73. Piana F, Barale L, Compagnoni R, et al. (2017a). Geological map of Piemonte region at 1: 250,000 scale explanatory notes. Memorie della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino. Classe di Scienze Fisiche Matematiche e Naturali 41: 3–143.
  74. Piana F, Fioraso G, Irace A, et al. (2017b). Geology of Piemonte region (NW Italy, Alps–Apennines interference zone). Journal of Maps. 13: 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2017.1316218
  75. Pica A, Vergari F, Fredi P, Del Monte M (2016). The Aeterna Urbs geomorphological heritage (Rome, Italy). Geoheritage. 8: 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-015-0150-3
  76. Piranha JM, Aparecida Del Lama E, de La Corte Bacci D (2011). Geoparks in Brazil—strategy of geoconservation and development. Geoheritage. 3: 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-011-0043-Z
  77. Poiraud A, Chevalier M, Claeyssen B, et al. (2016). From geoheritage inventory to territorial planning tool in the Vercors massif (French Alps): Contribution of statistical and expert cross approaches. Applied Geography. 71: 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOG.2016.04.012
  78. Possenelli M, Gauci R, Devoto S, et al. (2024). Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites in the southern sector of the Island of Malta. Geosciences. 14: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/GEOSCIENCES14110292
  79. Regione Piemonte (2023). L. R. Piemonte 06/10/2023, n. 23. Bollettino di Legislazione Tecnica. doi: https: //www.legislazionetecnica.it/system/files/fonti/allegati/23-10/10675545/Pm_06102023_23.pdf
  80. Reynard E (2009). Geomorphosites: Definitions and characteristics. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munchen, pp 9–20
  81. Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007). A method for assessing «scientific» and «additional values» of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica. 62: 148–158.
  82. Reynard E, Perret A, Bussard J, et al. (2016). Integrated approach for the inventory and management of geomorphological heritage at the regional scale. Geoheritage. 8: 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-015-0153-0
  83. Rizzi E, Gianoglio M (2023). I Walser e le Alpi. Ultimi Studi. Grossi, Domodossola
  84. Rolfo F, Benna P, Cadoppi P, et al. (2015). The Monviso Massif and the Cottian Alps as symbols of the alpine chain and geological heritage in Piemonte, Italy. Geoheritage. 7: 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-014-0097-9
  85. Santos DS, Mansur KL, Seoane JCS, et al. (2020). Methodological proposal for the inventory and assessment of geomorphosites: An integrated approach focused on territorial management and geoconservation. Environmental Management. 66: 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00267-020-01324-2
  86. Santos DS, Reynard E, Mansur KL, Seoane JCS (2019). The specificities of geomorphosites and their influence on assessment procedures: A methodological comparison. Geoheritage. 11: 2045–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-019-00411-Z
  87. Saurabh M, Sudhanshu S, Singh SK, Mathur SC (2021). Qualitative assessment of geoheritage for geotourism promotion: A case study from Mehrangarh Ridge in Jodhpur City, Western Rajasthan, India. Geoheritage. 13: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-021-00604-5/
  88. Serrano E, González-Trueba JJ (2005). Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie. 11: 197–208. https://doi.org/10.4000/GEOMORPHOLOGIE.364
  89. Sisto M, Di Lisio A, Russo F (2022). Geosite assessment as a tool for the promotion and conservation of Irpinia landscape geoheritage (Southern Italy). Resources. 11: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/RESOURCES11100097
  90. Smiraglia C, Diolaiuti G (2015). Il nuovo Catasto dei Ghiacciai Italiani. EvK2CNR, Bergamo.
  91. Stoffelen A (2020). Where is the community in geoparks? A systematic literature review and call for attention to the societal embedding of geoparks. Area. 52: 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/AREA.12549
  92. Štrba L, Kršák B, Sidor C (2018). Some comments to geosite assessment, visitors, and geotourism sustainability. Sustainability. 10: 2589. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082589
  93. Štrba L, Rybár P, Baláž B, et al. (2015). Geosite assessments: Comparison of methods and results. Current Issues in Tourism. 18: 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.882885
  94. Sütő L, Ésik Z, Nagy R, et al. (2020). Promoting geoheritage through a field based geo-education event, a case study of the Hungarian Geotope Day in the Bükk Region Geopark. Geoconservation Research. 3: 81–96. https://doi.org/10.30486/GCR.2020.1906171.1029
  95. Suzuki DA, Takagi H (2018). Evaluation of geosite for sustainable planning and management in geotourism. Geoheritage. 10: 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12371-017-0225-4/
  96. Tognetto F, Perotti L, Viani C, et al. (2021). Geomorphology and geosystem services of the Indren-Cimalegna area (Monte Rosa massif–Western Italian Alps). Journal of Maps. 17: 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1898484
  97. UNESCO (2024). UNESCO Global geoparks. In: International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme. https: //www.unesco.org/en/iggp/geoparks/about. Accessed 3 Jun 2024
  98. Varriale R, Genovese L, Aldighieri B (2022). “Diffused geoparks”: Territorial integration as solution for a shared sustainable growth based on geotourism in Italy, Japan and Tunisia. Heritage. 5: 2083–2105. https://doi.org/10.3390/HERITAGE5030109
  99. Viani C, Bollati IM, Perotti L, et al. (2020). Geosites and geotrails of the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Global Geopark: Inventory and potential implementations. Oxford Geoheritage Virtual Conference, 25-28 May 2020
  100. Waele J De, Di Gregorio F, Piras G (1998). Geosites inventory in the Palaeozoic karst region of Sulcis-lglesiente (South-West Sardinia, Italy). Geologica Balcanica. 28: 173–179.
  101. Wimbledon WAP (1995). National site selection, a stop on the road to a European Geosite list. Geologica Balcanica 26: 15–27.
  102. Zangmo GT, Quesada AR, Pérez DU (2020). Geomorphosites inventory in the Eboga Volcano (Cameroon): contribution for geotourism promotion. Géomorphologie. 26: 19–33. https://doi.org/10.4000/GEOMORPHOLOGIE.14006
  103. Zouros N (2016). Global Geoparks Network and the new UNESCO Global Geoparks programme. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece. 50: 284–292. https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.11729