10.57647/JRS.2026.1603.25

Assessment of Integrated Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Images on Identification and Resolution of the Burned Rangelands (Case Study: Semi-steppe Rangelands in Chahar-Mahal Bakhtiari, Province, Iran)

  1. Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Khorramabad, Iran
  2. Natural Resources and Earth Sciences College, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Received: 2025-03-26

Revised: 2025-11-20

Accepted: 2025-12-19

Published in Issue 2026-09-30

How to Cite

Mohammadian, A., Asadi Borojeni, E., & SiahMansour, R. (2026). Assessment of Integrated Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Images on Identification and Resolution of the Burned Rangelands (Case Study: Semi-steppe Rangelands in Chahar-Mahal Bakhtiari, Province, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.57647/JRS.2026.1603.25

PDF views: 5

Abstract

Accurate monitoring of the combined impacts of fire and grazing on plant communities in semi-steppe rangelands is challenging due to spatial and temporal variability. This study demonstrates that integrating multi-sensor remote sensing data can significantly enhance monitoring precision.The Gram-Schmidt algorithm was employed to fuse Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 imagery, improving spatial resolution from 30m to 10m while preserving spectral characteristics. In addition, pan-sharpening techniques enhanced Landsat-8 imagery to 15 m resolution. Classification of affected areas was performed using Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) with a comprehensive dataset including spectral bands, the Normalized Burn Ratio Thermal (NBRT) index, Tasseled Cap Brightness (TC-B), Digital Elevation Model (DEM), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between spatial resolution and classification accuracy. The 10m resolution imagery achieved superior performance (71% overall accuracy, Kappa = 0.66), effectively discriminated fire-affected areas across different age classes (1-3 and 3-5 years post-fire) under varying grazing intensities. The 30m resolution data showed significantly low accuracy (39% overall accuracy, Kappa = 0.34). Higher-resolution imagery substantially reduced salt-and-pepper noise and enhanced visual interpretability. This research confirmed that integrated multi-sensor data processing provides a robust approach for monitoring rangeland dynamics. The methodology offers valuable capabilities for mapping fire-affected vegetation and supports management strategies in extensive, topographically challenging environments where traditional field-based methods are impractical.

Keywords

  • Fusion,
  • Burned pasture,
  • Gram-Schmidt,
  • Grazing intensity,
  • Classification

References

  1. Abedini, M., Shishegaran, M. and Ghale, E., 2022. Monitoring and Estimating the Fire-Affected Areas of the Zagros Mountains Using Landsat Satellite Images. Geography and Environmental Planning, 33(4), 49-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2022.131560.1470
  2. Ao, Z., Sun, Y. and Xin, Q., 2020. Constructing 10-m NDVI time series from Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 images using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 18(8), 1461-1465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2020.3003322
  3. Ariza, A., Salas Rey, J. and Merino de Miguel, S., 2019. Comparison of maximum likelihood estimators and regression models for burn severity mapping in Mediterranean forests using Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Revista cartográfica, 98, 145-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35424/rcarto.i98.145
  4. Atkinson, P.M., Jeganathan, C., Dash, J. and Atzberger, C., 2012. Inter-comparison of four models for smoothing satellite sensor time-series data to estimate vegetation phenology. Remote sensing of environment, 123, 400-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.001
  5. Baig, M.H.A., Zhang, L., Shuai, T. and Tong, Q., 2014. Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 8 at-satellite reflectance. Remote Sensing Letters, 5(5), 423-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2014.915434
  6. Baloui, F., and Kabolizadeh, M. 2024. Comparative Analysis of Different Image Fusion Methods at the Pixel and Decision Levels on the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification. Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 16(3), 1-25. (In Persian). DOI: 10.48308/gisj.2025.235304.1215
  7. Bastarrika, A., Chuvieco, E. and Martín, M.P., 2011. Mapping burned areas from Landsat TM/ETM+ data with a two-phase algorithm: Balancing omission and commission errors. Remote sensing of Environment, 115(4), 1003-1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.005
  8. Bastin, G., Ludwig, J., Eager, R., Liedloff, A., Andison, R. and Cobiac, M., 2003. Vegetation changes in a semiarid tropical savanna, northern Australia: 1973–2002. The Rangeland Journal, 25(1), 3- 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ03001
  9. Bioresita, F., Puissant, A., Stumpf, A. and Malet, J.P., 2019. Fusion of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 image time series for permanent and temporary surface water mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(23), 9026-9049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1624869
  10. Celik, D.A. and Altunel, A.O., 2025. Is dynamic world a contender in global land-cover making race? A swift field assessment from Kastamonu, Türkiye. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 28(2), 205-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2025.04.002
  11. Ehlers, M., Klonus, S., Johan Åstrand, P. and Rosso, P., 2010. Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing.
  12. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 1(1), 25-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19479830903561985
  13. Escuin, S., Navarro, R. and Fernández, P., 2008. Fire severity assessment by using NBR (Normalized Burn Ratio) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) derived from LANDSAT TM/ETM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(4), 1053-1073. DOI:
  14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701281072
  15. Fathizad, H. and Tazeh, M., 2016. Assessment of pixel-based classification (ARTMAP fuzzy Neural Networks and Decision Tree) and Object-Oriented methods for land use mapping (Case study: Meymeh, Ilam province). Journal of Arid Biome, 5(2), 69- 82. (In Persian). DOI: https://doi.org/20.1001.1.2008790.1394.5.2.6.4
  16. Fazeli, F.A., Ghazavi, R. and Farzaneh, M.R., 2015. Investigation of landuse classification algorithms using image fusion techniques (Case study: Beheshtabad Sub-basin). Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources,6 (1), 91-105. (In Persian).
  17. Filipponi F., 2018, BAIS2: Burned Area Index for Sentinel-2. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Remote Sensing; 22 March–5 April 2018; Online. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ecrs-2-05177
  18. Gao, F., Hilker, T., Zhu, X., Anderson, M., Masek, J., Wang, P. and Yang, Y., 2015. Fusing Landsat and MODIS data for vegetation monitoring. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 3(3), 47-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2015.2434351
  19. Genc, C.O. and Altunel, A.O., 2025. Monitoring the operational changes in surface reflectance after logging, based on popular indices over Sentinel-2, Landsat-8, and ASTER imageries. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-13526-w
  20. Holden, Z.A., Smith, A.M.S., Morgan, P., Rollins, M.G. and Gessler, P.E., 2005. Evaluation of novel thermally enhanced spectral indices for mapping fire perimeters and comparisons with fire atlas data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(21), 4801-4808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500239008
  21. Karimi, D., Akbarizadeh, G., Rangzan, K. and Kabolizadeh, M., 2017. Effective supervised multiple-feature learning for fused radar and optical data classification. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 11(5), 768-777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0346
  22. Kerby, J.D., Fuhlendorf, S.D. and Engle, D.M., 2007. Landscape heterogeneity and fire behavior: scale-dependent feedback between fire and grazing processes. Landscape Ecology, 22, 507-516.
  23. Kim, S. and Lee, S., 2021. Maximum likelihood estimation of probabilistic non-suppression model for OECD NPP electrical fire applying a non-negative continuous distribution. Fire Safety Journal, 122, p.103323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103323
  24. Kim, Y., Eo, Y., Kim, Y. and Kim, Y., 2011. Generalized IHS-Based Satellite Imagery Fusion Using Spectral Response Functions. Etri Journal, 33(4), 497-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.11.1610.0042
  25. Liu, X., Liu, Q. and Wang, Y., 2020. Remote sensing image fusion based on two-stream fusion network. Information Fusion, 55, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.07.010
  26. Liu, X., Yang, G., Que, Q., Wang, Q., Zhang, Z. and Huang, L., 2022. How Do Landscape Heterogeneity, Community Structure, and Topographical Factors Contribute to the Plant Diversity of Urban Remnant Vegetation at Different Scales?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), p.14302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114302
  27. Mahboobi, H. and Azadbakht, M., 2020. Synergy of multi-temporal image fusion and classification methods for detecting changes in Maharlu Lake over five years (2013-2018). Environmental Sciences, 18(1), 203-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/envs.18.1.203
  28. Mohammadian, A., Asadi-Broujeni, E. and Siahmansour, R., 2024. Evaluating of multi-spectral remote sensing data in capability to distinguish burned rangelands during grazing gradient (case study: semi-arid rangelands of CHB province, Iran). Iranian Journal of Forest and Range Protection Research, 22(2), 201-221. (In Persian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/ijfrpr.2024.365082.1618
  29. Ngadze, F., Mpakairi, K.S., Kavhu, B., Ndaimani, H. and Maremba, M.S., 2020. Exploring the utility of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat 8 OLI in burned area mapping for a heterogenous savannah landscape. PLoS One, 15(5), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232962
  30. Pandit, V.R. and Bhiwani, R.J., 2015. Image fusion in remote sensing applications: A review. International Journal of Computer Applications, 120(10), 22-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5120/21263-3846
  31. Rafieyan, O., Valizadeh, K.K., Ramazan, M.E. and Moshiri, S., 2022. Comparative evaluation of Landsat8 and Sentinel2 images to prepare a fire occurrence map in Arasbaran. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30495/jrnr.2022.69827.10260
  32. Rangzan, K., Kabolizadeh, M., Karimi, D. and Zareie, S., 2019. Supervised cross-fusion method: a new triplet approach to fuse thermal, radar, and optical satellite data for land use classification. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7621-y
  33. Shahriary, E., Palmer, M.W., Tongway, D.J., Azarnivand, H., Jafari, M. and Saravi, M.M., 2012. Plant species composition and soil characteristics around Iranian piospheres. Journal of Arid Environments, 82, 106-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.02.004
  34. Stroppiana, D., Bordogna, G., Carrara, P., Boschetti, M., Boschetti, L. and Brivio, P.A., 2012. A method for extracting burned areas from Landsat TM/ETM+ images by soft aggregation of multiple Spectral Indices and a region-growing algorithm. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 69, 88-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.03.001
  35. Sun, Y., Zhi, X., Jiang, S., Fan, G., Yan, X. and Zhang, W., 2024. Image fusion for the novelty rotating synthetic aperture system based on the vision transformer. Information fusion, 104, p.102163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.102163
  36. Sv, A.K. and Srivatsa, S.K., 2018. An image fusion technique based on sparse wavelet transform and non-singleton type-2 FNN techniques. TAGA J, 14, 76-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22187055
  37. Syifa, M., Panahi, M. and Lee, C.W., 2020. Mapping of post-wildfire burned area using a hybrid algorithm and satellite data: The case of the campfire wildfire in California, USA. Remote Sensing, 12(4), p.623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040623
  38. Tarhouni, M., Salem, F.B., Belgacem, A.O. and Neffati, M., 2010. Acceptability of plant species along grazing gradients around watering points in Tunisian arid zone. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 205(7), 454-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2009.12.020
  39. Thariqa, P., Sitanggang, I.S. and Syaufina, L., 2016. Comparative analysis of spatial decision tree algorithms for burned area of peatland in rokan hilir riau. TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 14(2), 684-691. DOI: http://doi.org/10.12928/telkomnika.v14i2.3540
  40. Topaloglu, R.H., Sertel, E. and Musaoglu, N., 2016. Assessment of classification accuracies of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data for land cover/use mapping. The International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, 41, 1055-1059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-1055-2016
  41. Vafaei, S., Soosani, J., Adeli, K., Fadaei, H., Naghavi, H., Pham, T.D. and Tien Bui, D., 2018. Improving accuracy estimation of Forest Aboveground Biomass based on the incorporation of ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 and Sentinel-2A imagery and machine learning: A case study of the Hyrcanian forest area (Iran). Remote Sensing, 10(2), 172. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020172
  42. Wang, Q., Blackburn, G.A., Onojeghuo, A.O., Dash, J., Zhou, L., Zhang, Y. and Atkinson, P.M., 2017. Fusion of Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel-2 MSI data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(7), 3885-3899. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2683444
  43. Zeng, Y., Zhang, J., Van Genderen, J.L. and Zhang, Y., 2010. Image fusion for land cover change detection. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 1(2), 193-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19479831003802832
  44. Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Gao, T., Lan, S., Tong, F. and Li, M., 2023. Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 Fused Dataset for High Spatial-Temporal Resolution Monitoring of Farmland in China’s Diverse Latitudes. Remote Sensing, 15(11), p.2951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112951