10.57647/j.jrs.2025.1503.21

Diet composition and forage intake of horses and cattle grazing in Puna Grasslands during the wet and dry season

PDF
  • Enrique Ricardo Flores1,
  • Erich Efrain Gonzales2,
  • Raul Enrique Tácuna*3,
  1. Rangeland Science, Utah State University, USA
  2. Zootechnics, National Agrarian University La Molina, Peru
  3. Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina, Peru

Received: 2024-03-14

Revised: 2024-05-03

Accepted: 2024-08-22

Published in Issue 2025-07-20

Copyright (c) 2025 Enrique Ricardo Flores, Erich Efrain Gonzales, Raul Enrique Tácuna (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Flores, E. R., Gonzales, E. E., & Tácuna, R. E. (2025). Diet composition and forage intake of horses and cattle grazing in Puna Grasslands during the wet and dry season. Journal of Rangeland Science, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.jrs.2025.1503.21
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 172

Abstract

Peruvian puna grasslands are extensively used by horses and cattle but the competitive relationships between both animal species are not known, so a trial was conducted to understand how the composition of the diet and forage intake varied in the dry and wet season. The grassland was of fair condition and was dominated by Festuca inarticulata and Calamagrostis vicunarum. Diet samples were collected over two seasons, wet (February and April) and dry (August and November), and analyzed for botanical composition at species and plant parts, nutritive value, dead and green proportions, diversity and dry matter intake. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with season and animal as factors. The results showed that the composition of the average diet was similar and was made up of tall grasses. The average nutritional value and forage intake were similar, improving their digestibility with the advent of the wet season. The greatest difference was obtained at the level of plant parts and functional groups and occurred in the wet season with horses consuming a greater proportion of stems and senescent material than cattle. It was concluded that although both animal species exhibit a high overlap in botanical composition of the diet, their diet composition did not differ at the level of plant parts (stems vs. leaf), quality (green vs. dead) and functional groups (grasses, grasslikes and forbs). Thus, horses could be used in complementary grazing systems to increase forage utilization efficiency.

Keywords

  • Native plants,
  • Horses,
  • Cattle,
  • Composition,
  • Diet quality,
  • Intake
PDF

References

  1. Allison, C. D. 1985. Factors affecting forage intake by range ruminants: A review. Journal of Range Management, 38(4), 305-311. Doi: 10.2307/3899409.
  2. Ammar, H., López, S., Bochi-Brum, O., García, R., Ranilla, M.J. 1999. Composition and in vitro digestibility of leaves and stems of grasses and legumes harvested from permanent mountain meadows at different stages of maturity. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 1999; 8(4):599-610. doi:10.22358/jafs/69184/1999.
  3. Association of Official Agricultural Chemistry (AOAC). 2001. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD. USA Method 976.06.
  4. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Official Method 985.35, 18th Edition, Revision # 1, 2005.
  5. Austin, D.D., Urnes, P.J., Fierro, L.C. 1983. Spring Livestock grazing affects crested wheatgrass regrowth and winter use by Mule deer, Journal of Range Management. 36:589-593. Doi: 10.2307/3898347.
  6. Bueno, L.S., Florez, A. 1986. Autoecological studies of the key grass species of the Andean grassland. Pp 1 – 13. In: Research on Pastures and forages Texas Tech University in Peru. Volumen III. Fierro LC and Farfan R. (eds.). Minor ruminants. Collaborative research support program. In collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the National Institute of Agricultural Research and Promotion (INIPA) Peru. Technical Paper T-9-468, College of Agricultural Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
  7. Castellaro, G., Tamara, R., Wackwitz, B., Raggi, A. 2004. Composición botánica de la dieta de alpacas (Lama pacos L.) y llamas (Lama glama L.) en dos estaciones del año, en praderas altiplánicas de un sector de la Provincia de Parinacota, Chile. Agricultura Técnica, 64(4), 353- 363. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0365-28072004000400004
  8. Celaya, R., Ferreira, L. M. M., García, U., Rosa García, R., Osoro, K. 2011. Diet selection and performance of cattle and horses grazing in heathlands. Animal, 5(09), 1467–1473. Doi: 10.1017/s1751731111000449.
  9. Cruz, J.A. 2008. Diet composition, forage intake and energy demand of Criollo x Brown Swiss cattle grazing high Andean elevation rangelands of Pasco Region, MS Thesis. Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Lima – Peru.
  10. Cymbaluk, N.F. 1990. Comparison of forage digestion by cattle and horses. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 70: 601-610. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas90-072.
  11. Dey, S., Barai, S., Barman, B. B. 2017. Studies on indirect evidence of the presence of wildlife from different national parks of Dooars, West Bengal, India. World Scientific News, 71: 199–219. ISSN: 0976-4968.
  12. Duncan, P., Foose, T. J., Gordon, I. J., Gakahu, C. G., Lloyd, M. 1990. Comparative nutrient extraction from forages by grazing bovids and equids: A test of the nutritional model of equid/bovid competition and coexistence. Oecologia, 84(3), 411–418. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329768.
  13. Edouard, N., Fleurance, G., Martin-Rosset, W., Duncan, P., Dulphy, J.P., Grange, S., Baumont, R., Dubroeucq, H., Pérez-Barbería, F.J., Gordon, I. J. 2008. Voluntary intake and digestibility in horses: effect of forage quality with emphasis on individual variability. Animal, 2(10). Doi:10.1017/s1751731108002760.
  14. Fleurance, G., Sallé, G., Lansade, L., Wimel, L., Dumont, B. 2022. Comparing the effects of horse grazing alone or with cattle on horse parasitism and vegetation use in a mesophile pasture. Grass Forage Sci.77:175–188. Doi: 10.1111/gfs.12564
  15. Flores, E.R., Cruz, J.A., Ñaupari, J.A. 2009. Utilización de praderas cultivadas en secano y praderas naturales para la producción lechera. Boletín técnico. INCAGRO, Perú y FDA.
  16. Goering, H.K., Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS–USDA, Washington, DC.
  17. Gutiérrez, H., De la Vara, R. 2008. Análisis y diseño de experimentos. Segunda Edición. McGraw Hill Interamericana.
  18. Gudmundsson, O., Dyrmundsson, O. R. 1994. Horse grazing under cold and wet conditions: a review. Livestock Production Science, 40(1), 57-63. Doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(94)90265-8.
  19. Harker, K.W., Torell, D.T., Van Dyne, G.M. 1964. Botanical examination of forage from esophageal fistulas in cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 23, 465–469.
  20. Harper, K., McNeill, D. 2015. The Role of iNDF in the Regulation of Feed Intake and the Importance of Its Assessment in Subtropical Ruminant Systems (the Role of iNDF in the Regulation of Forage Intake). Agriculture, 5(3), 778-790. Doi: 10.3390/agriculture5030778.
  21. Huston, J. E., Pinchack, W.E. 1991. Range Animal Nutrition. Pp 38-47. In: Grazing Management: An Ecological Perspective. Chapter 2. Heitschmidt R. K. and Stuth J.W. (eds.) Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.
  22. Janis, C. 1976. The Evolutionary Strategy of the Equidae and the Origins of Rumen and Cecal Digestion. Evolution, 30(4), 757. Doi: 10.2307/2407816.
  23. Janis, C. M., Constable, E. C., Houpt, K. A., Streich, W. J., Clauss, M. 2010. Comparative ingestive mastication in domestic horses and cattle: a pilot investigation. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 94(6), e402–e409. Doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01030.x.
  24. Josse, C., Cuesta, F., Navarro, G., Barrena, V., Cabrera, E., Chacón-Moreno, E., Ferreira, W., Peralvo, M., Saito, J., Tovar, A. 2009. Ecosistemas de los Andes del Norte y Centro. Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú y Venezuela. Secretaría General de la Comunidad Andina. https://www.natureserve.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/josseetal2009. pdf
  25. Lamoot, I., Meert, C., Hoffmann, M. 2005. Habitat use of ponies and cattle foraging together in a coastal dune area. 122(4):523–536. Doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.009
  26. Lippke, H. 2002. Estimation of forage intake by ruminants on pasture. (Forage & Grazing Lands). Crop Science, 42(3): 869-872. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.8690.
  27. López, C.L., Celaya, R., Ferreira, L.M.M., García, U., Rodrigues, M.A.M., Osoro, K. 2019. Comparative foraging behavior and performance between cattle and horses grazing in heathlands with different proportions of improved pasture area. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 47(1), 377–385. Doi:10.1080/09712119.2019.1649679.
  28. Menard, C., Duncan, P., Fleurance, G., Georges, J., Lila, M. 2002. Comparative foraging and nutrition of horses and cattle in European wetlands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39(1), 120–133. Doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00693.x.
  29. Molle A., Cannas A., Gregorini P. 2022 A review on the effects of part-time grazing herbaceous pastures on feeding behavior and intake of cattle, sheep and horses. Livestock Science 263104982. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104982
  30. Osoro, K., Ferreira, L.M.M., García, U., Martínez, A., Celaya, R. 2017. Forage intake, digestibility and performance of cattle, horses, sheep and goats grazing together on an improved heathland. Animal Production Science, 57(1), 102. Doi: 10.1071/an15153.
  31. Quispe, C.E., Ñaupari, J.A., Distel, R. A., Flores, E.R. 2021. Feeding selection of sheep and alpaca on puna tussock rangelands grazed previously by cattle. Small Ruminant Research, 197, 106349. Doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106349
  32. SAS Institute. 2004. Statistical Analysis System SAS/STAT 9.2 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  33. SENAMHI. 2015. Precipitación total anual, según departamento, 2000-2015. SENAMHI (Servicio Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología). Perú. www.senamhi.gob.pe/?p=descarga-datoshidrometeorológicos.
  34. Somasiri, S.C., Kenyon, P.R., Kemp, P.D., Morel, P.C.H., Morris, S.T. 2016. Effect of herb-clover mixes of plantain and chicory on yearling lamb production in the early spring period. Animal Production Science, 56(10), 1662–1668. Doi: 10.1071/AN14796.
  35. Tácuna, R.E., Flores, E. R., Distel, R.A. 2024. Impact of Deferment on Grassland Condition and Diet Quality of Cattle under a Short-Duration Grazing System. Journal of Rangeland Science, 14(3). Doi: 10.30495/RS.2023.1983130.1664.
  36. Tilley, J.M., Terry, R.A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society. 18: 104-111.
  37. Wilson, J.R. 1994. Cell wall characteristics in relation to forage digestion in ruminants. Journal of Agriculture Science. 122(2): 173–182.