10.1007/s40097-020-00363-9

Recent progress on visible active nanostructured energy materials for water split generated hydrogen

  1. Environmental Nanotechnology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, 826004, IN
  2. Department of Environmental Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, KR

Published in Issue 26-10-2020

How to Cite

Rani, A., Saravanan, P., & Jang, M. (2020). Recent progress on visible active nanostructured energy materials for water split generated hydrogen. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry, 11(1 (March 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-020-00363-9

Abstract

Abstract Solar-driven water splitting is one amongst the fastest growing areas of research for hydrogen evolution. The technology employs application of nanostructured energy materials with featured charge-separation and light absorption characteristics. The high charge-carrier recombination and wide band-gap of energy materials are major material-related bottlenecks that restricted the large-scale implementation. Besides it, the co-catalyst, electron mediator and sacrificial electron donor (SED) were the other major components for further improving the H 2 yield. A water splitting reactor with well-optimized photon and mass transfer properties is mandatory for studying hydrogen evolution at large scale. The present review compiles various strategies that were presented for reducing charge-carrier recombination and extending visible light absorption of materials, insights for loading earth-abundant co-catalysts on photocatalyst surface, recently developed reversible redox and non-noble metal-based solid-state electron mediators and advantage of applying organic contaminant and biomass-derived waste as SEDs. The discussions on several engineered reactor designs for the photocatalytic water splitting technology were also presented. A cost-effective way of designing a photocatalytic water splitting system with functionalized nanostructured energy materials, the earth-abundant co-catalysts, organic waste-based electron donors and efficient electron mediators for achieving improved hydrogen evolution rate is comprehensively discussed. Graphic abstract

Keywords

  • Nanostructure,
  • Water splitting,
  • Photocatalysis,
  • Hydrogen,
  • Co-catalyst,
  • SEDs

References

  1. Siripala (2004) Hydrogen energy and photoelectrolysis of water (pp. 67-73)
  2. Staffell et al. (2019) The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system (pp. 463-491)
  3. Nicoletti et al. (2015) A technical and environmental comparison between hydrogen and some fossil fuels (pp. 205-213)
  4. Nikolaidis and Poullikkas (2017) A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes (pp. 597-611)
  5. Wang et al. (2012) Comparison of thermochemical, electrolytic, photoelectrolytic and photochemical solar-to-hydrogen production technologies (pp. 16287-16301)
  6. Valiev (2002) Materials science: nanomaterial advantage (pp. 887-889)
  7. Guo et al. (2014) Mechanical properties of nanoparticles: basics and applications
  8. Maeda and Domen (2010) Photocatalytic water splitting: recent progress and future challenges (pp. 2655-2661)
  9. Chen et al. (2010) Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation (pp. 6503-6570)
  10. Maeda (2013) Z-scheme water splitting using two different semiconductor photocatalysts (pp. 1486-1503)
  11. Li et al. (2015) State-of-the-art progress in diverse heterostructured photocatalysts toward promoting photocatalytic performance (pp. 998-1013)
  12. Li et al. (2016) Z-scheme photocatalytic systems for promoting photocatalytic performance: recent progress and future challenges
  13. Fujishima and Honda (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode (pp. 37-38)
  14. Chen et al. (2017) Particulate photocatalysts for overall water splitting
  15. Guo et al. (2019) Obstacles of solar-powered photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production: a perspective from energy flow and mass flow (pp. 1079-1086)
  16. Fajrina and Tahir (2019) A critical review in strategies to improve photocatalytic water splitting towards hydrogen production (pp. 540-577)
  17. Rani et al. (2018) A review on the progress of nanostructure materials for energy harnessing and environmental remediation (pp. 255-291)
  18. Mishra et al. (2019) Graphitic carbon nitride (g–C3N4)–based metal-free photocatalysts for water splitting: a review (pp. 693-721)
  19. Reddy et al. (2019) Polymeric graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based semiconducting nanostructured materials: synthesis methods, properties and photocatalytic applications (pp. 25-40)
  20. Zhang and Guo (2013) Metal sulphide semiconductors for photocatalytic hydrogen production (pp. 1672-1690)
  21. Yuan et al. (2018) Cadmium sulfide-based nanomaterials for photocatalytic hydrogen production (pp. 11606-11630)
  22. Ning and Lu (2020) Photocorrosion inhibition of CdS-based catalysts for photocatalytic overall water splitting (pp. 1213-1223)
  23. Jo and Selvam (2017) Z-scheme CdS/g-C3N4 composites with RGO as an electron mediator for efficient photocatalytic H2 production and pollutant degradation (pp. 913-924)
  24. Li et al. (2018) Polycyclic aromatic compounds-modified graphitic carbon nitride for efficient visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution (pp. 134-144)
  25. Bellamkonda et al. (2019) Extending the π-electron conjugation in 2D planar graphitic carbon nitride: efficient charge separation for overall water splitting (pp. 3757-3771)
  26. Li et al. (2019) Ferroelectric enhanced Z-scheme P-doped g-C3N4/PANI/BaTiO3 ternary heterojunction with boosted visible-light photocatalytic water splitting (pp. 6753-6764)
  27. Huang et al. (2017) Switching charge transfer of C3N4/W18O49 from type-II to Z-scheme by interfacial band bending for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 308-316)
  28. Yan et al. (2019) Through hydrogen spillover to fabricate novel 3DOM-HxWO3/Pt/CdS Z-scheme heterojunctions for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution
  29. Takashima et al. (2019) Visible-light-induced water splitting on a hierarchically constructed Z-scheme photocatalyst composed of zinc rhodium oxide and bismuth vanadate (pp. 10372-10378)
  30. Xing et al. (2006) Band structure-controlled solid solution of Cd1-xZnxS photocatalyst for hydrogen production by water splitting (pp. 2018-2024)
  31. Chen and Guo (2012) Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production from water using Cd0.5Zn0.5S/TNTs (titanate nanotubes) nanocomposites without noble metals (pp. 7507-7514)
  32. Preethi and Kanmani (2014) Photocatalytic hydrogen production using Fe2O3-based core shell nano particles with ZnS and CdS (pp. 1613-1622)
  33. Lin et al. (2020) The evolution from a typical type-I CdS/ZnS to type-II and Z-scheme hybrid structure for efficient and stable hydrogen production under visible light (pp. 4537-4546)
  34. Pan et al. (2015) A complex perovskite-type oxynitride: the first photocatalyst for water splitting operable at up to 600 nm (pp. 2955-2959)
  35. Yu et al. (2010) Hydrogen production by photocatalytic water splitting over Pt/TiO2 nanosheets with exposed (001) facets (pp. 13118-13125)
  36. Gao et al. (2019) Construction of dual defect mediated Z-scheme photocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 399-409)
  37. Chen et al. (2020) Synthesis of 3D mesoporous g-C3N4 for efficient overall water splitting under a Z-scheme photocatalytic system
  38. Sun et al. (2015) Enhanced hydrogen evolution from water splitting using Fe-Ni codoped and Ag deposited anatase TiO2 synthesized by solvothermal method (pp. 696-705)
  39. Bellamkonda et al. (2019) Highly active and stable multi-walled carbon nanotubes-graphene-TiO2 nanohybrid: an efficient non-noble metal photocatalyst for water splitting (pp. 120-127)
  40. Li et al. (2019) Photocatalytic water splitting by N-TiO2 on MgO (111) with exceptional quantum efficiencies at elevated temperatures
  41. Reddy et al. (2020) Highly efficient solar light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production over Cu/FCNTs-titania quantum dots-based heterostructures
  42. Kumar et al. (2017) Shape dependence structural, optical and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanocrystals for enhanced hydrogen production via glycerol reforming (pp. 113-119)
  43. Zhang et al. (2019) Ferrous oxalate dehydrate over CdS as Z-scheme photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 286-294)
  44. Kai et al. (2017) One-pot synthesis of size-controllable core-shell CdS and derived CdS@ZnxCd1−xS structures for photocatalytic hydrogen production (pp. 16653-16659)
  45. Cui et al. (2018) Z-scheme based CdS/CdWO4 heterojunction visible light photocatalyst for dye degradation and hydrogen evolution (pp. 831-840)
  46. Wang et al. (2016) Probing effective photocorrosion inhibition and highly improved photocatalytic hydrogen production on monodisperse PANI@CdS core-shell nanospheres (pp. 351-359)
  47. Shi et al. (2019) In situ topotactic formation of 2D/2D direct Z-scheme Cu2S/Zn0.67Cd0.33S in-plane intergrowth nanosheet heterojunctions for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production (pp. 3327-3337)
  48. Mei et al. (2019) A: Z-scheme Bi2MoO6/CdSe-diethylenetriamine heterojunction for enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen production activity under visible light (pp. 1067-1074)
  49. Chen et al. (2015) Bifunctional modification of graphitic carbon nitride with MgFe2O4 for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen generation (pp. 18843-18848)
  50. Wang et al. (2017) Enhancing photocatalytic activity of graphitic carbon nitride by codoping with P and C for efficient hydrogen generation (pp. 21730-21737)
  51. Xia et al. (2018) Dopamine modified g-C3N4 and its enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2-production activity (pp. 8945-8953)
  52. Liu et al. (2015) Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway (pp. 970-974)
  53. Ding et al. (2017) Photoelectrocatalytic water splitting: significance of cocatalysts, electrolyte, and interfaces (pp. 675-688)
  54. Bai et al. (2016) Surface and interface design in cocatalysts for photocatalytic water splitting and CO2 reduction (pp. 57446-57463)
  55. Ma et al. (2016) Mo2N: an efficient non-noble metal cocatalyst on CdS for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light irradiation (pp. 22009-22016)
  56. Zong et al. (2008) Enhancement of photocatalytic H2 evolution on CdS by loading MoS2 as cocatalyst under visible light irradiation (pp. 7176-7177)
  57. Zhu et al. (2014) Cobalt sulfide modified graphitic carbon nitride semiconductor for solar hydrogen production (pp. 11873-11879)
  58. Xu et al. (2014) Engineering highly efficient photocatalysts for hydrogen production by simply regulating the solubility of insoluble compound cocatalysts (pp. 11486-11493)
  59. Ran et al. (2014) Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 production by ZnxCd1−xS modified with earth-abundant nickel-based cocatalysts (pp. 3426-3434)
  60. Sun et al. (2017) Phase effect of NixPy hybridized with g-C3N4 for photocatalytic hydrogen generation (pp. 30583-30590)
  61. Guo et al. (2018) Metallic Co2C: a promising co-catalyst to boost photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of colloidal quantum dots (pp. 5890-5895)
  62. Thaminimulla et al. (2000) Effect of chromium addition for photocatalytic overall water splitting on Ni–K2La2Ti3O10 (pp. 362-365)
  63. Ravi et al. (2018) CuOCr2O3 core-shell structured co-catalysts on TiO2 for efficient photocatalytic water splitting using direct solar light (pp. 3976-3987)
  64. Chang et al. (2014) MoS2/graphene cocatalyst for efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light irradiation (pp. 7078-7087)
  65. Jiao et al. (2019) A novel MoS2 quantum dots (QDs) decorated Z-scheme g-C3N4 nanosheet/N-doped carbon dots heterostructure photocatalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 124-132)
  66. Wang et al. (2017) Facile synthesis of MoS2/g-C3N4/GO ternary heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic activity for water splitting (pp. 7878-7886)
  67. Yue et al. (2015) MoP is a novel, noble-metal-free cocatalyst for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production from water under visible light (pp. 16941-16947)
  68. Ma et al. (2017) A novel ultraefficient non-noble metal composite cocatalyst Mo2N/Mo2C/graphene for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution (pp. 18977-18984)
  69. Chao et al. (2019) Ultrathin visible-light-driven Mo incorporating In2O3–ZnIn2Se4 Z-scheme nanosheet photocatalysts
  70. Dong et al. (2019) A new and stable Mo-Mo2C modified g-C3N4 photocatalyst for efficient visible light photocatalytic H2 production (pp. 27-35)
  71. Zou et al. (2019) Carbon nanosheet facilitated charge separation and transfer between molybdenum carbide and graphitic carbon nitride toward efficient photocatalytic H2 production (pp. 91-101)
  72. He et al. (2017) Cu2(OH)2CO3 clusters: novel noble-metal-free cocatalysts for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production from water splitting (pp. 104-111)
  73. Madhusudan et al. (2019) Nature inspired ZnO/ZnS nanobranch-like composites, decorated with Cu(OH)2 clusters for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 379-390)
  74. Wang et al. (2020) In situ loading CuO quantum dots on TiO2 nanosheets as cocatalyst for improved photocatalytic water splitting
  75. Rameshbabu et al. (2019) Cauliflower-like CuS/ZnS nanocomposites decorated g-C3N4 nanosheets as noble metal-free photocatalyst for superior photocatalytic water splitting (pp. 1277-1286)
  76. Qin et al. (2018) Novel Cu3P/g-C3N4 p-n heterojunction photocatalysts for solar hydrogen generation (pp. 861-868)
  77. He et al. (2017) Enhanced visible light photocatalytic H2 production over Z-scheme g-C3N4 nansheets/WO3 nanorods nanocomposites loaded with Ni(OH)X cocatalysts (pp. 240-252)
  78. Hu et al. (2019) Noble-metal-free Ni2P as cocatalyst decorated rapid microwave solvothermal synthesis of inorganic-organic CdS-DETA hybrids for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 1385-1393)
  79. Liu et al. (2016) Photocatalytic hydrogen production using twinned nanocrystals and an unanchored NiSX co-catalyst
  80. Zeng et al. (2017) Ni12P5 nanoparticles embedded into porous g-C3N4 nanosheets as a noble-metal-free hetero-structure photocatalyst for efficient H2 production under visible light (pp. 16171-16178)
  81. Ren et al. (2020) Strongly coupled 2D–2D nanojunctions between P-doped Ni2S (Ni2SP) cocatalysts and CdS nanosheets for efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution
  82. Tong et al. (2019) Ultrafine WC1–x nanocrystals: an efficient cocatalyst for the significant enhancement of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution on g-C3N4 (pp. 26136-26144)
  83. Ren et al. (2020) ZnSe nanoparticles with bulk WC as cocatalyst: a novel and noble-metal-free heterojunction photocatalyst for enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light irradiation
  84. Chu et al. (2016) WS2 as an effective noble-metal free cocatalyst modified TiSi2 for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light irradiation
  85. Xiang et al. (2016) Hierarchical layered WS2/graphene-modified CdS nanorods for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 996-1002)
  86. Jian et al. (2019) Photoelectron directional transfer over a g-C3N4/CdS heterojunction modulated with WP for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 4341-4352)
  87. Yu et al. (2014) Cobalt sulfide quantum dots modified TiO2 nanoparticles for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 15387-15393)
  88. Yue et al. (2017) Cobalt phosphide modified titanium oxide nanophotocatalysts with significantly enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water splitting
  89. Wang et al. (2018) In-situ synthesis of well dispersed CoP nanoparticles modified CdS nanorods composite with boosted performance for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 14934-14943)
  90. Iwase et al. (2011) Reduced graphene oxide as a solid-state electron mediator in Z-scheme photocatalytic water splitting under visible light (pp. 11054-11057)
  91. Low et al. (2017) A review of direct Z-scheme photocatalysts
  92. Sayama et al. (1997) Photocatalytic decomposition of water into H2 and O2 by a two-step photoexcitation reaction using a WO3 suspension catalyst and an Fe3+/Fe2+ redox system (pp. 387-391)
  93. Tomita et al. (2017) Improved photocatalytic water oxidation with Fe3+/Fe2+ redox on rectangular-shaped WO3 particles with specifically exposed crystal faces via hydrothermal synthesis (pp. 221-224)
  94. Sasaki et al. (2008) The effect of co-catalyst for Z-scheme photocatalysis systems with an Fe3+/Fe2+ electron mediator on overall water splitting under visible light irradiation (pp. 133-137)
  95. Abe et al. (2001) A new type of water splitting system composed of two different TiO2 photocatalysts (anatase, rutile) and a IO3−/I− shuttle redox mediator (pp. 339-344)
  96. Sayama et al. (2001) Stoichiometric water splitting into H2 and O2 using a mixture of two different photocatalysts and an IO3−/I− shuttle redox mediator under visible light irradiation (pp. 2416-2417)
  97. Higashi et al. (2008) Two step water splitting into H2 and O2 under visible light by ATaO2N (A= Ca, Sr, Ba) and WO3 with IO3-/I- shuttle redox mediator (pp. 120-123)
  98. Miseki et al. (2013) Photocatalytic water splitting under visible light utilizing I3−/I− and IO3−/I− redox mediators by Z-scheme system using surface treated PtOx/WO3 as O2 evolution photocatalyst (pp. 1750-1756)
  99. Sasaki et al. (2013) [Co(bpy)3]3+/2+ and [Co(phen)3]3+/2+ electron mediators for overall water splitting under sunlight irradiation using Z-scheme photocatalyst system (pp. 5441-5449)
  100. Miseki et al. (2017) Photocatalytic Z-scheme water splitting for independent H2/O2 production via a stepwise operation employing a vanadate redox mediator under visible light (pp. 9691-9697)
  101. Tsuji et al. (2016) Manganese-substituted polyoxometalate as an effective shuttle redox mediator in Z-scheme water splitting under visible light (pp. 2201-2208)
  102. Iwase et al. (2018) Molybdenum-substituted polyoxometalate as stable shuttle redox mediator for visible light driven Z-scheme water splitting system (pp. 347-354)
  103. Zhao et al. (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of all-solid-state g-C3N4/Au/P25 Z-scheme system for visible-light-driven H2 evolution (pp. 6277-6287)
  104. Lu et al. (2018) In situ synthesis of all-solid-state Z-scheme BiOBr0.3I0.7/Ag/AgI photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation
  105. Ng et al. (2017) All-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalyst with carbon nanotubes as an electron mediator for hydrogen evolution under simulated solar light (pp. 41-49)
  106. Shezad et al. (2019) Carbon nanotubes incorporated Z-scheme assembly of AgBr/TiO2 for photocatalytic hydrogen production under visible light irradiations
  107. Yu et al. (2016) Smart utilization of carbon dots in semiconductor photocatalysis (pp. 9454-9477)
  108. Guo and Li (2019) MoS2 quantum dots: synthesis, properties and biological applications
  109. Chen et al. (2020) Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by all-solid-state Z-scheme CdS/QDs/ZnIn2S4 architectures with MoS2 quantum dots as solid-state electron mediator
  110. Liu et al. (2019) Carbon quantum dots bridged TiO2 and Cd0.5Zn0.5S film as solid-state Z-scheme photocatalyst with enhanced H2 evolution activity (pp. 316-325)
  111. Wu et al. (2017) Carbon dots as solid-state electron mediator for BiVO4/CDs/CdS Z-scheme photocatalyst working under visible light (pp. 501-509)
  112. Liu et al. (2019) All-solid-state Z-scheme system of NiO/CDs/BiVO4 for visible light-driven efficient overall water splitting (pp. 134-142)
  113. Pellegrin and Odobel (2017) Sacrificial electron donor reagents for solar fuel production (pp. 283-295)
  114. Kim and Choi (2010) Hydrogen producing water treatment through solar photocatalysis (pp. 1042-1045)
  115. Huang et al. (2020) Hydrogen production from natural organic matter via cascading oxic-anoxic photocatalytic processes: an energy recovering water purification technology
  116. Battula et al. (2019) Visible light-driven simultaneous H2 production by water splitting coupled with selective oxidation of HMF to DFF catalyzed by porous carbon nitride (pp. 5643-5649)
  117. Speltini et al. (2014) Sunlight-promoted photocatalytic hydrogen gas evolution from water-suspended cellulose: a systematic study (pp. 1410-1419)
  118. Zhang et al. (2016) Simultaneous cellulose conversion and hydrogen production assisted by cellulose decomposition under UV-light photocatalysis (pp. 1673-1676)
  119. Wakerley et al. (2017) Solar-driven reforming of lignocellulose to H2 with a CdS/CdOx photocatalyst
  120. Pichler et al. (2020) Photoreforming of biomass in metal salt hydrate solutions (pp. 5743-5746)
  121. Lo et al. (2010) Novel twin reactor for separate evolution of hydrogen and oxygen in photocatalytic water splitting (pp. 1523-1529)
  122. Reilly et al. (2018) Photocatalytic water splitting in a fluidized bed system: computational modeling and experimental studies (pp. 423-436)
  123. Fajrina and Tahir (2020) Monolithic Ag-Mt dispersed Z-scheme pCN-TiO2 heterojunction for dynamic photocatalytic H2 evolution using liquid and gas phase photoreactors (pp. 4355-4375)
  124. Psaltis et al. (2006) Developing optofluidic technology through the fusion of microfluidics and optics (pp. 381-386)
  125. Erickson et al. (2011) Optofluidics for energy applications (pp. 583-590)
  126. Fainman et al. (2009) McGraw-Hill Inc
  127. Ahsan et al. (2013) Redox mediated photocatalytic water-splitting in optofluidic microreactors (pp. 409-414)
  128. Li et al. (2014) High surface area optofluidic microreactor for redox mediated photocatalytic water splitting (pp. 19270-19276)
  129. Jing et al. (2009) Photocatalytic hydrogen production under direct solar light in a CPC-based solar reactor: reactor design and preliminary results (pp. 2919-2926)
  130. Yang et al. (2016) Solar concentrator with uniform irradiance for particulate photocatalytic hydrogen production system (pp. 16040-16047)
  131. Wei et al. (2017) Direct solar photocatalytic hydrogen generation with CPC photoreactors: system development (pp. 215-223)
  132. Wei et al. (2018) Experimental study on direct solar photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production using surface uniform concentrators (pp. 13745-13753)
  133. Yang et al. (2018) Optimization of the radiation absorption for a scaled-up photocatalytic hydrogen production system (pp. 168-177)
  134. Baniasadi et al. (2012) Radiative heat transfer and catalyst performance in a large-scale continuous flow photoreactor for hydrogen production (pp. 638-645)
  135. Goto et al. (2018) A particulate photocatalyst water-splitting panel for large-scale solar hydrogen generation (pp. 509-520)
  136. Cao et al. (2018) Experimental study of direct solar photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production under natural circulation conditions (pp. 13727-13737)
  137. Xu et al. (2020) S-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst (pp. 1543-1559)
  138. Kuila et al. (2017) Metal organic frameworks: a new generation coordination polymers for visible light photocatalysis (pp. 6163-6177)
  139. Reddy et al. (2020) Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)-based efficient heterogeneous photocatalysts: synthesis, properties and its applications in photocatalytic hydrogen generation, CO2 reduction and photodegradation of organic dyes (pp. 7656-7679)
  140. Xu et al. (2018) Porous organic polymers: an emerged platform for photocatalytic water splitting
  141. Liu et al. (2020) Metal sulfide/MOF-based composites as visible-light-driven photocatalysts for enhanced hydrogen production from water splitting
  142. Liu et al. (2019) Metal or metal-containing nanoparticle@MOF nanocomposites as a promising type of photocatalyst (pp. 63-78)
  143. Xiang et al. (2017) Nanoparticle/metal–organic framework composites for catalytic applications: current status and perspective
  144. Pu et al. (2015) Ultrafast exciton dynamics in InGaN/GaN and Rh/Cr2O3 nanoparticle-decorated InGaN/GaN nanowires (pp. 2649-2656)
  145. Corp and Schlenker (2017) Ultrafast spectroscopy reveals electron-transfer cascade that improves hydrogen evolution with carbon nitride photocatalysts (pp. 7904-7912)
  146. Godin et al. (2017) Time-resolved spectroscopic investigation of charge trapping in carbon nitrides photocatalysts for hydrogen generation (pp. 5216-5224)