10.57647/jnsc.2025.1503.13

Nanostructured functionalised sewage sludge- adsorbent: optimising wastewater remediation using ANN and RSM

PDF
  • Meta Mvita1,
  • Thandiwe Sithole*1,
  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Johannesburg, South Africa
Nanostructured functionalised sewage sludge- adsorbent: optimising wastewater remediation using ANN and RSM

Received: 07-05-2025

Revised: 20-05-2025

Accepted: 01-08-2025

Published in Issue 31-08-2025

Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Mvita, Thandiwe Sithole (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Mvita, M., & Sithole, T. (2025). Nanostructured functionalised sewage sludge- adsorbent: optimising wastewater remediation using ANN and RSM. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry, 15(4 (August 2025). https://doi.org/10.57647/jnsc.2025.1503.13
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 223

Abstract

Heavy metal pollution in industrial wastewater poses serious environmental challenges. This study investigates the optimization of heavy metal adsorption using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) combined with Response Surface Methodology (RSM). It focuses on the adsorption capabilities of sewage sludge ash (SSA) for iron (Fe2+), manganese (Mn2+), chromium (Cr3+), and aluminium (Al3+). A Box-Behnken Design (BBD) with 25 experiments was created to evaluate three key parameters: temperature (25 – 45°C), solid load percentage (1 – 10%), and contact time (1 – 10 hours). The showed maximum removal efficiencies of 97% for Fe2+, 89% for Mn2+, 97% for Cr3+, and 92% for Al3+ in mono-metal solutions. The functionalised sewage sludge ash had a notable surface area of 7.79 m²/g before adsorption, thereby classifying it as a mesoporous material, which falls within the category of nanoporous material, thus reflecting on enhanced adsorption potential. The ANN-RSM model exhibited strong predictive capability, with an R² of approximately 0.95 and a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.086. Sensitivity analysis revealed temperature as the most significant factor affecting adsorption efficiency, followed by contact time and sorbent loading. This research underscores the effectiveness of combining ANN and RSM to optimize heavy metal remediation strategies in wastewater treatment.

Keywords

  • Nanoporous,
  • Adsorption,
  • Box-Behnken Design (BBD),
  • Sensitivity analysis,
  • Remediation
PDF

References

  1. M. Jaishankar, T. Tseten, N. Anbalagan, B. B. Mathew, and K. N. Beeregowda.: Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 7(2), (2014)
  2. S. Mitra, A. Chakraborty, A. M. Tareq, T. B. Emran, F. Nainu, A. Khusro, A. M. Idris, M. U. Khandaker, H. Osman, F. A. Alhumaydhi, and J. Simal-Gandara.: Impact of heavy metals on the environment and human health: Novel therapeutic insights to counter the toxicity. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 34(3), (2022)
  3. T. Sithole, J. Nseke, T. Mashifana, T. Falayi, E. N. Dragoi, and E. Malenga.: Neural network optimization during the purification of industrial effluents using steel slag: kinetics and mechanism. Environ. Technol. Innov. 30, (2023)
  4. P. Swaminaathan, A. Shaji, A. Saravanan, and P. R. Yaashikaa.: Innovative Approaches in Extremophile-Mediated Remediation of Toxic Pollutants: A Comprehensive Review. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng. 9, (2024)
  5. A. Suhail.: NANOSTRUCTURES. Fut. Trends Chem. Mater. Sci. Nano Technol. 3, (2024)
  6. R. S. Rajput, A. Singh, and M. K. Mishra.: A Comprehensive Review of Water Treatment Methods for Heavy Metal Ion Removal from Wastewater. J. Adv. Zool. 45(3), (2023)
  7. Q. Chen, Z. Luo, C. Hills, G. Xue, and M. Tyrer.: Precipitation of heavy metals from wastewater using simulated flue gas: Sequent additions of fly ash, lime and carbon dioxide. Water Res. 43(10), (2009)
  8. A. Q. Jasim and S. K. Ajjam.: Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater using ion exchange resin in a batch process with kinetic isotherm. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 49, (2024)
  9. S. A. Olawale.: Biosorption of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solutions: Insight and Review. Arch. Ind. Eng. 3, (2020)
  10. A. H. Birniwa, H. Shebu, A. S. Sa'ad, M. R. E. Adam, H. Abdulmalik, M. Hamza, A. B. N. Saleh, N. Azmatullah, J. A. Hussaini.: Membrane technologies for heavy metals removal from water and wastewater: A mini review. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 9, (2024)
  11. D. B. Olawade, O. Z. Wada, B. I. Egbewole, O. Fapohunda, A. O. Ige, S. O. O. Usman, S. A. Olawale.: Metal and metal oxide nanomaterials for heavy metal remediation: novel approaches for selective, regenerative, and scalable water treatment. Front. Nanotechnol. (2024)
  12. S. Rezania, P. F. Darajeh, A. Rupani, H. Mojiri, Kamyab, and M. Taghavijeloudar.: Recent advances in the adsorption of different pollutants from wastewater using carbon-based and metal-oxide nanoparticles. Appl. Sci. 14(24), (2024)
  13. V. D. Rajput, S. Kumari, T. Minkina, S. Sushkova, and S. Mandzhieva.: Nano-enhanced microbial remediation of PAHs contaminated soil. Air Soil Water Res. (2023)
  14. V. C. Deivayanai, P. R. Yaashikaa, A. Saravanan, and A. S. Vickram.: Enhanced elimination of chromium (VI) ions from wastewater with silica-mixed magnetic nanomaterial: isotherm and kinetic studies. Environ. Dev. Sustain. (2024)
  15. G. K. Sarma, S. Sen Gupta, and K. G. Bhattacharyya.: Nanomaterials as versatile adsorbents for heavy metal ions in water: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26(7), (2019)
  16. J. Labuda, J. Barek, Z. Gajdosechova, H. Goenaga-Infante, K.J. Johnston, Z. Mester, S. N. Shtykov.: Analytical chemistry of engineered nanomaterials: Part 1. Scope, regulation, legislation, and metrology (IUPAC Technical Report. Pure and Appl. Chem. 95, (133–163), (2023)
  17. J. A. Brame, & C.S. Griggs. Surface Area Analysis Using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) Method: Standard Operating Procedure Series: SOP-C. (2016). Available from: https://erdc-library.erdc.dren.mil/jspui/bitstream/11681/20339/1/ERDC-EL%20SR-16-3.pdf
  18. Jagadeesh, S. M. Rangappa, and S. Siengchin.: Advanced characterization techniques for nanostructured materials in biomedical applications. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 7(1), (122–143), (2024)
  19. A. Dhillon and D. Kumar.: New generation nano-based adsorbents for water purification. Elsevier, (2019)
  20. K. A. Alrefaey, A. B. Abdel-Aziz, L. A. Said, I. S. Fahim, and A. G. Radwan.: Carbon nanomaterials and their composites as adsorbents. Springer Int. Publ., (2024)
  21. A. K. Thakur, R. Singh, R. Teja Pullela, and V. Pundir.: Green adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater: a review. Mater. Today Proc. 57, (2022)
  22. R. Selvaraj, R. V. Iyer, G. Murugesan, L. C. Goveas, T. Varadavenkatesan, A. Samanth, and R. Vinayagam.: Modeling 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid adsorption on candle bush pod-derived activated carbon: Insights from advanced statistical physics models. J. Water Process Eng. 66, (2024)
  23. P. Thamarai, V. C. Deivayanai, S. Karishma, A. Saravanan, P. R. Yaashikaa, and A. S. Vickram.: Adsorption strategies in surface modification techniques for seaweeds in wastewater treatment: Exploring environmental applications. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 262(1), (2024)
  24. L. Joseph, B.-M. Jun, J. R. V. Flora, C. M. Park, and Y. Yoon.: Removal of heavy metals from water sources in the developing world using low-cost materials: A review. Chemosphere 229, (2019)
  25. Ş. Aslan.: Adsorption of heavy metals onto wastewater treatment plant sludge. Eur. Sci. J. (ESJ) 12(10), (2016)
  26. W. Jadaa and H. Mohammed.: Toxic heavy metals elimination from contaminated effluents utilizing various adsorbents: Critical mini review. J. Biomed. Res. Environ. Sci. 4, (2023)
  27. M. N. Rashed.: Heavy metals removal from wastewater by adsorption on modified physically activated sewage sludge. Arch. Org. Inorg. Chem. Sci. 1(1), (2018)
  28. S. Ragheb.: Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using sewage sludge ash (SSA) as adsorbent. Soc. Sci. Res. Netw., (2017)
  29. D. Zhou, D. Liu, F. Gao, M. Li, and X. Luo.: Effects of biochar-derived sewage sludge on heavy metal adsorption and immobilization in soils. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14(7), (2017)
  30. Z. H. Diao, J. J. Du, D. Jiang, L. J. Kong, W. Y. Huo, C. M. Liu, Q. H. Wu, and X. R. Xu.: Insights into the simultaneous removal of Cr⁶⁺ and Pb²⁺ by a novel sewage sludge-derived biochar immobilized nanoscale zero valent iron: Coexistence effect and mechanism. Sci. Total Environ. 642, (2018)
  31. S. Iyer, S. M. Deshmukh, and R. W. Tapre.: Review on removal of heavy metals from industrial effluents by adsorption. Rev. Inorg. Chem., (2024)
  32. Z. Raji, A. Karim, A. Karam, and S. Khalloufi.: Adsorption of heavy metals: Mechanisms, kinetics, and applications of various adsorbents in wastewater remediation—A review. Waste (2023)
  33. R. M. A. S. D. Rajakaruna, B. G. N. Sewwandi, M. M. M. Najim, M. B. Baig, B. A. Alotaibi, and A. Traore.: Sustainable approaches for wastewater treatment: An analysis of sludge-based materials for heavy metal removal from wastewater by adsorption. Sustainability 15(20), (2023)
  34. K. B. Kasongo and H. M. Mwanat.: Application of Taguchi method and artificial neural network model for the prediction of reductive leaching of cobalt(III) from oxidised low-grade ores. S. Afr. J. Sci. 117(5), pp. (1–8), (2021)
  35. N. G. Zulu and M. J. Mvita.: A systematic review on applications of artificial neural networks in the extraction metallurgy industry. Metall. Res., pp. (1519–1531), (2023)
  36. E. Allahkarami, O. Salmani Nuri, A. Abdollahzadeh, B. Rezai, and B. Maghsoudi.: Improving estimation accuracy of metallurgical performance of industrial flotation process by using hybrid genetic algorithm - artificial neural network (GA-ANN). Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 53(1), pp. (366–378), (2017)
  37. V. Wagh, D. Panaskar, A. Muley, S. Mukate, and S. Gaikwad.: Neural network modelling for nitrate concentration in groundwater of Kadava River basin, Nashik, Maharashtra, India. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 7. Jul. 2017, pp. (436–445), (2018)
  38. F. Rustam, A. Ishaq, S. T. Kokab, I. de la Torre Diez, J. L. V. Mazón, C. L. Rodríguez, and I. Ashraf.: An artificial neural network model for water quality and water consumption prediction. Water (Switz.) 14(21), (2022)
  39. H. Maleki, A. Sorooshian, G. Goudarzi, Z. Baboli, Y. T. Birgani, and M. Rahmati.: Air pollution prediction by using an artificial neural network model. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 21(6), pp. (1341–1352), (2019)
  40. K. Markov.: Multilayer perceptron with backpropagation, HDL coder, and FPGA technology: An integrated approach for efficient neural network implementation. Probl. Eng. Cybern. Robot., (2023)
  41. M. G. Simões.: Feedforward neural networks. IET Digit. Libr., pp. (117–138), (2021)
  42. J. H. Waldo.: A comparative study of back propagation and its alternatives on multilayer perceptrons. arXiv, (2022)
  43. S. Bbumba, M. Kigozi, I. Karume, C. T. Arum, M. Murungi, P. M. Babirye, and S. Kirabo.: Prediction and optimization of process parameters using artificial intelligence and machine learning models. Asian J. Appl. Chem. Res. 16(1), (11–33), (2025)
  44. R. A. Aftab, S. Zaidi, M. Danish, K. B. Ansari, and M. Danish.: Novel machine learning (ML) models for predicting the performance of multi-metal binding green adsorbent for the removal of Cd (II), Cu (II), Pb (II), and Zn (II) ions. Environ. Adv. 9, p. (100256), (2022)
  45. T. N. Minh, N. T. Truyen, and D. T. H. Loan.: Artificial neural networks for modeling pollutant removal in wastewater treatment: A review. Galore Int. J. Appl. Sci. Humanit. 8(2), pp. (88–98), (2024)
  46. M. Garsi and J. Ahmad.: Predicting the process of industrial wastewater treatment using a hybrid intelligent model based on artificial neural network and logistic regression statistical method. (2016)
  47. S. Kumari, J. Chowdhry, and M. Chandra Garg.: AI-enhanced adsorption modeling: Challenges, applications, and bibliographic analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 351, (119968), (2024)
  48. R. Kumar and M. Reji.: Response surface methodology (RSM): An overview to analyze multivariate data. Indian J. Microbiol. Res. 9(4), pp. (241–248), (2023)
  49. R. H. Myers and D. C. Montgomery.: Response surface methodology. IIE Trans. 28 (12), pp. 1031–1032 (1996)
  50. M. C. Samolada and A. A. Zabaniotou.: Comparative assessment of municipal sewage sludge incineration, gasification and pyrolysis for a sustainable sludge-to-energy management in Greece. Waste Manag. 34(2), pp. (411– 420) (2014)
  51. J. Payá, J. Monzó, M. V. Borrachero, and L. Soriano.: Sewage sludge ash. In New Trends Eco-Efficient Recycl. Concr., pp. (121–152) (2019)
  52. T. C. Mahutjane, L. N. Tchadjié, and T. N. Sithole.: The feasibility of utilizing sewage sludge as a source of aluminosilicate to synthesise geopolymer cement. J. Mater. Res. Technol. pp. (3314–3323), (2023)
  53. J. C. Schmid, Bartik, A.; Benedikt, F.; Mauerhofer, A. M.; Fuchs, J.; Schanz, E.; Reisinger, S.; Nowak, B.; Bühler, F.; Österreicher, M.; Lunzer, A.; Walcher, C.; Müller, S.; Fuchs, M.; Hofbauer, H.: Steam Gasification of Sewage Sludge for Synthesis Processes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 18, (2019)
  54. M. Samani, Y. K. Ahlawat, A. Golchin, H. A. Alikhani, A. Fathi-Gerdelidani, U. Ahlawat, A. Malik, R. Panwar, D. S. Maan, M. Ahmed, P. Thakur, and S. Mishra.: Nano Silica-Mediated Stabilization of Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils. Sci Rep, 14(1), (2024)
  55. Q. Wang, J. S. Li, and C. S. Poon.: Using Incinerated Sewage Sludge Ash as a High-Performance Adsorbent for Lead Removal from Aqueous Solutions: Performances and Mechanisms. Chemosphere, 226, pp. (587–596), (2019)
  56. Y. Zeng, Y. Lin, M. Ma, & H. Chen.: A Review on the Removal of Heavy Metals from Water by Phosphorus-Enriched Biochar. Miner., 14(1), (2024)
  57. N. Tsotetsi, P. Nomngongo, and L. Mekuto. Synthesis, Modification and Characterization of Nano-Zeolites from Coal Fly Ash for the Removal of Sulfates in Wastewater. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects, 37, (2024)
  58. K. Sato, M. Takahashi, Y. Onari, S. Kato, and H. Enjyoji.: A Technique for Recovering Sodium Phosphate from Incinerated Ash of Sewage Treatment Sludge by Hydrothermal Synthesis. Trans. Mater. Res. Soc. Jpn., 29, (2004)
  59. T. Wajima and K. Munakata.: Material Conversion from Paper Sludge Ash in NaOH Solution to Synthesize Adsorbent for Removal of Pb²⁺, NH₄⁺, and PO₄³⁻ from Aqueous Solution. J. Environ. Sci., 23(5), pp. (718–724), (2011)
  60. N. P. Baloyi, J. M. Nseke, and M. E. Makhatha.: Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for Simultaneous Optimization of Kinetic Parameters Affecting Gold Leaching in Thiosulfate Based Media: A Statistical Approach. J. Chem., (2022)
  61. M. J. Mvita, N. G. Zulu, B. Thethwayo.: Response Surface Methodology Optimization for Chromite Roasting to Produce Sodium Chromate. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., (2024).
  62. P. Raut and A. Dani. Correlation Between Number of Hidden Layers and Accuracy of Artificial Neural Network. In Adv. Comput. Technol. Appl., pp. (513–521), (2020)
  63. B. Mrzygłód, M. Hawryluk, M. Janik, & I. Olejarczyk-Wożeńska.: Sensitivity Analysis of the Artificial Neural Networks in a System for Durability Prediction of Forging Tools to Forgings Made of C45 Steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 109(5–6), pp. (1385–1395), (2020)
  64. M. J. Mvita, B. Mbuya, and A. F. Mulaba-Bafubiandi. Optimisation and Prediction of Co³⁺-Enhanced Dissolution in Sulfuric Acid. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., (2023)
  65. D. B. Figueiredo Filho, J. A. Silva Júnior, and E. C. Rocha.: What is R² All About? Leviathan (São Paulo), no. 3, p. (60), (2011)
  66. E. Mosca, F. Szigeti, S. Tragianni, D. Gallagher, and G. Groh., 8 SHAP-Based Explanation Methods: A Review for NLP Interpretability. In Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Linguist. COLING, 29(1), pp. (4593–4603), (2022)
  67. Y. Kwon, M. A. Rivas, and J. Zou.: Efficient Computation and Analysis of Distributional Shapley Values. In Proc. Mach. Learn. Res., 130, pp. (793–801), (2021)
  68. B. A. Militaru, R. Pode, L. Lupa, W. Schmidt, A. Tekle-Röttering, and N. Kazamer .: Using Sewage Sludge Ash as an Efficient Adsorbent for Pb²⁺ and Cu²⁺ in Single and Binary Systems. Molecules, 25(11), (2020)
  69. J. P. Gustafsson, M. Akram, and C. Tiberg.: Predicting Sulphate Adsorption/Desorption in Forest Soils: Evaluation of an Extended Freundlich Equation. Chemosphere, 119, pp. (83–89), (2015)
  70. M. Thommes, K. Kaneko, A. V. Neimark, J. P. Olivier, F. Rodriguez-Reinoso, J. Rouquerol, and K. S. W. Sing.: Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem., 87(9–10), pp. (1051–1069), (2015)
  71. J. P. Bellat, C. Paulin, M. Jeffroy, A. Boutin, J. L. Paillaud, J. Patarin, and A. Di Lella.: Unusual Hysteresis Loop in the Adsorption-Desorption of Water in NaY Zeolite at Very Low Pressure. J. Phys. Chem. C, 113(19), pp. (8287–8295), (2009)
  72. Amanda and S. S. Moersidik. Characterization of Sludge Generated from Acid Mine Drainage Treatment Plants. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 1351(1), (2019)
  73. A. Munyengabe, C. Zvinowanda, J. N. Zvimba, and J. Ramontja.: Characterization and reusability suggestions of the sludge generated from a synthetic acid mine drainage treatment using sodium ferrate (VI). Heliyon, 6, e05244 (2020)
  74. L. Nielsen, P. Zhang, and T. J. Bandosz.: Adsorption of carbamazepine on sludge/fish waste derived adsorbents: Effect of surface chemistry and texture. Chem. Eng. J., 267, (170–181), (2015)
  75. T. V. Rakotonimaro, C. M. Neculita, B. Bussière, M. Benzaazoua, and G. J. Zagury.: Recovery and reuse of sludge from active and passive treatment of mine drainage-impacted waters: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 24(1), (73–91), (2017)
  76. H. Zare, H. Heydarzade, M. Rahimnejad, A. Tardast, M. Seyfi, and S. M. Peyghambarzadeh.: Dried activated sludge as an appropriate biosorbent for removal of copper (II) ions. Arab. J. Chem., 8(6), (858–864), (2015)
  77. H. Lu, Q. Zhang, Y. Dong, J. Li, and X. Zhang.: The adsorption capacity, pore structure, and thermal behavior of the modified clay containing SSA. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., (9894657), (2016)
  78. M. Pérez-Carrión, F. Baeza-Brotons, J. Payá, J. M. Saval, E. Zornoza, M. V. Borrachero, and P. Garcés.: Potential Use of Sewage Sludge Ash (SSA) as a Cement Replacement in Precast Concrete Blocks. Mater. Construcc., 64(313) (2014)
  79. J. De Oliveira Silva, G. R. Filho, C. Da Silva Meireles, S. D. Ribeiro, J. G. Vieira, C. V. Da Silva, and D. A. Cerqueira.: Thermal Analysis and FTIR Studies of Sewage Sludge Produced in Treatment Plants: The Case of Sludge in the City of Uberlândia-MG, Brazil. Thermochim. Acta, 528, (72–75) (2012)
  80. Lecture 7: Hypothesis Testing and ANOVA, (2018). Available: http://www.gs.washington.edu/academics/courses/akey/56008/lecture/lecture7.pdf.
  81. B. Mbuya and A. F. M. Bafubiandi.: Predicting Optimized Dissolution of Selected African Copperbelt Copper–Cobalt–Bearing Ores by Means of Neural Network Prediction and Response Surface Methodology Modeling. Process Integr. Optim. Sustain., 7, (583–597), (2023)
  82. K. A. F. Copeland.: Response Surface Methodology. J. Qual. Technol., 28(2), (262–262), (2011)
  83. E. B. Erhardt.: In-class Examples with R Code Response Surface Analysis (RSM) Stat 579 University of New Mexico, (2014)
  84. S. Hojati and A. Landi.: Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Lead Adsorption from Aqueous Solutions Onto Iranian Sepiolite and Zeolite Characterization of Iranian Sepiolite: Physical and Environmental Applications. Int. J. Environ. Res., (2015)
  85. N. T. Sithole, F. Ntuli, and F. Okonta.: Synthesis and evaluation of basic oxygen furnace slag based geopolymers for removal of metals and sulphates from acidic industrial effluent-column study. J. Water Process Eng., 37, 101518 (2020)
  86. R. Amdoun, L. Khelifi, M. Khelifi-Slaoui, S. Amroune, M. Asch, C. Assaf-Ducrocq, and E. Gontier.: The Desirability Optimization Methodology: A Tool to Predict Two Antagonist Responses in Biotechnological Systems: Case of Biomass Growth and Hyoscyamine Content in Elicited Datura Starmonium Hairy Roots. Iran. J. Biotechnol., 16(1), (11–19), (2018)
  87. S. V. Dimitrova.: Use of granular slag columns for lead removal. Water Res., 36(16), 4001–4008 (2002)
  88. V. Javanbakht and S. M. Ghoreishi. Application of response surface methodology for optimization of lead removal from an aqueous solution by a novel superparamagnetic nanocomposite. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 35(1–2), 241–260 (2017)
  89. H. Diao, J. J. Du, D. Jiang, L. J. Kong, W. Y. Huo, C. M. Liu, Q. H. Wu, and X. R. Xu.: Insights into the simultaneous removal of Cr6+ and Pb2+ by a novel sewage sludge-derived biochar immobilized nanoscale zero valent iron: Coexistence effect and mechanism. Sci. Total Environ., 642, (505–515) (2018)
  90. X. Da-Yong, H. Ya-Jun, Y. Qiao-Feng, C. Pei-Pei, Z. Ling-Ling, and Z. Ming.: Optimizing Heavy Metals Removal of Excess Sludge by Biodegradable Chelants GLDA Using a Response Surface Methodological Approach. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 27(4), 1841–1850 (2018)
  91. J. Ayach, W. El Malti, L. Duma, J. Lalevée, M. Al Ajami, H. Hamad, and A. Hijazi.:Comparing Conventional and Advanced Approaches for Heavy Metal Removal in Wastewater Treatment: An In-Depth Review Emphasizing Filter-Based Strategies. Polymers, (2024)
  92. K. Nwosu-Obieogu, G. Dzarma, P. Ehimogue, C. B. Ugwuodo, and L. I. Chiemenem.: Textile wastewater heavy metal removal using Luffa cylindrica activated carbon: an ANN and ANFIS predictive model evaluation. Appl. Water Sci., 12(3), 1–11 (2022)
  93. S. Abisha and T. Jayasree.: Application of Image Processing Techniques and Artificial Neural Network for Detection of Diseases on Brinjal Leaf IETE J. Res., 68(3), 2246–2258 (2019).