10.1007/s40097-015-0152-3

Removal of ethyl acetylene toxic gas from environmental systems using AlN nanotube

  1. Department of Chemistry, College of Chemical Engineering, Mahshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahshahr, IR
  2. Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IR
  3. Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Gachsaran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gachsaran, IR
Cover Image

Published in Issue 20-03-2015

How to Cite

Noei, M., Ebrahimikia, M., Saghapour, Y., Khodaverdi, M., Salari, A. A., & Ahmadaghaei, N. (2015). Removal of ethyl acetylene toxic gas from environmental systems using AlN nanotube. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry, 5(2 (June 2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-015-0152-3

HTML views: 25

PDF views: 89

Abstract

Abstract The adsorption behavior of ethyl acetylene (C 4 H 6 ) molecule with external surface of (5, 0), zigzag aluminum nitride nanotube (AlNNT) was studied using density functional calculation, and it was found that the adsorption energy ( E ad ) of ethyl acetylene on the surface of pristine nanotubes is about −10.85 kcal/mol. However, when nanotubes have been doped with a P atom, the adsorption energy of ethyl acetylene molecule was decreased. Calculation showed when the nanotube is doped by P atom, the adsorption energy range is about −8.05 to −10.64 kcal/mol, and the amount of HOMO/LUMO energy gap ( E g ) will reduce significantly. Pristine AlNNT is a suitable adsorbent for ethyl acetylene and can be used in separation processes or adsorption of ethyl acetylene toxic gas from environmental systems. Also the AlNNT doped by P in the presence of ethyl acetylene, an electrical signal is generated directly and therefore can potentially be used for ethyl acetylene toxic gas sensors for detection in environmental systems.

Keywords

  • Sensor,
  • Aluminum nitride nanotube,
  • DFT,
  • Ethyl acetylene

References

  1. Iijima (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon (pp. 56-58) https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a0
  2. Hummer (2007) Water, proton, and ion transport: from nanotubes to proteins (pp. 201-207) https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970601140784
  3. Zhu et al. (2011) Melting behavior of gold nanowires in carbon (pp. 527-533) https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2010.533708
  4. Hung et al. (2004) Freezing/melting behavior within carbon nanotubes https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970410001670090
  5. Fam, D.W.H., Palaniappan, A., Tok, A.I.Y., Liedberg, B., Moochhala, S.M.: A review on technological aspects influencing commercialization of carbon nanotube sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem.
  6. 157
  7. (1), 1–7 (2011)
  8. Cabria et al. (2006) Density functional calculations of hydrogen adsorption on boron nanotubes and boron sheets (pp. 238-242) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.10.008
  9. Tondare et al. (2002) Field emission from open ended aluminum nitride nanotubes (pp. 4813-4815) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1482137
  10. Balasubramanian et al. (2004) Scanning tunneling microscopy observation of coiled aluminum nitride nanotubes (pp. 188-191) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2003.11.028
  11. Stan et al. (2009) Elastic moduli of faceted aluminum nitride nanotubes measured by atomic force microscopy (pp. 35706-357014) https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/3/035706
  12. Ahmadi et al. (2012) Theoretical study of aluminum nitride nanotubes for chemical sensing of formaldehyde (pp. 1025-1029) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.12.001
  13. Schmidt (1993) General atomic and molecular electronic structure system (pp. 1347-1363) https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540141112
  14. Soltani et al. (2012) Ab initio investigation of the SCN- chemisorption of single-walled boron nitride nanotubes (pp. 9536-9543) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.109
  15. Beheshtian et al. (2012) Functionalization of [60] fullerene with butadienes: a DFT study (pp. 8980-8984) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.134
  16. Eid et al. (2012) DFT calculations of the CO adsorption on Mn, Fe, Co, and Au deposited at MgO (1 0 0) and CdO (1 0 0) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.045
  17. Eid and Ammar (2011) Adsorption of SO2 on Li atoms deposited on MgO (1 0 0) surface: DFT calculations (pp. 6049-6058) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.122
  18. Eid and Ammar (2012) A density functional study of NO2 adsorption on perfect and defective MgO (1 0 0) and Li/MgO (1 0 0) surfaces (pp. 7689-7698) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.124
  19. Chattaraj et al. (2006) Electrophilicity index (pp. 2065-2091) https://doi.org/10.1021/cr040109f
  20. Hazarika et al. (2009) Molecular structure and density functional approach (pp. 1079-1085) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-009-9512-2
  21. Parr et al. (1999) Electrophilicity index (pp. 1922-1924) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja983494x
  22. Tomic et al. (2008) Low-dimensional systems and nanostructures (pp. 2125-2127) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2007.10.022
  23. Zhao et al. (2003) Stability and electronic structure of AIN nanotubes (pp. 235415-235418) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.235415
  24. Vurgaftman et al. (2001) Band parameters for III–V compound semiconductors and their alloys (pp. 5815-5875) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1368156
  25. Wilson (2003) Wiley