10.1007/s40097-022-00506-0

Advanced microplastic monitoring using Raman spectroscopy with a combination of nanostructure-based substrates

  1. Department of Chemistry, Gachon University, Seongnam, 13120, KR
  2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, KR
  3. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seokyeong University, Seoul, 02713, KR
  4. Department of Chemistry, Soongsil University, Seoul, 06978, KR

Published in Issue 18-06-2022

How to Cite

Ly, N. H., Kim, M.-K., Lee, H., Lee, C., Son, S. J., Zoh, K.-D., Vasseghian, Y., & Joo, S.-W. (2022). Advanced microplastic monitoring using Raman spectroscopy with a combination of nanostructure-based substrates. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry, 12(5 (October 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-022-00506-0

Abstract

Abstract Micro(nano)plastic (MNP) pollutants have not only impacted human health directly, but are also associated with numerous chemical contaminants that increase toxicity in the natural environment. Most recent research about increasing plastic pollutants in natural environments have focused on the toxic effects of MNPs in water, the atmosphere, and soil. The methodologies of MNP identification have been extensively developed for actual applications, but they still require further study, including on-site detection. This review article provides a comprehensive update on the facile detection of MNPs by Raman spectroscopy, which aims at early diagnosis of potential risks and human health impacts. In particular, Raman imaging and nanostructure-enhanced Raman scattering have emerged as effective analytical technologies for identifying MNPs in an environment. Here, the authors give an update on the latest advances in plasmonic nanostructured materials-assisted SERS substrates utilized for the detection of MNP particles present in environmental samples. Moreover, this work describes different plasmonic materials—including pure noble metal nanostructured materials and hybrid nanomaterials—that have been used to fabricate and develop SERS platforms to obtain the identifying MNP particles at low concentrations. Plasmonic nanostructure-enhanced materials consisting of pure noble metals and hybrid nanomaterials can significantly enhance the surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectra signals of pollutant analytes due to their localized hot spots. This concise topical review also provides updates on recent developments and trends in MNP detection by means of SERS using a variety of unique materials, along with three-dimensional (3D) SERS substrates, nanopipettes, and microfluidic chips. A novel material-assisted spectral Raman technique and its effective application are also introduced for selective monitoring and trace detection of MNPs in indoor and outdoor environments. Graphical abstract

Keywords

  • Micro(nano)plastics,
  • Raman spectroscopy,
  • Metal nanomaterials,
  • Surface-enhanced Raman scattering,
  • Pollutant monitoring

References

  1. Maafa (2021) Pyrolysis of polystyrene waste: a review https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020225
  2. Zettler et al. (2013) Life in the "plastisphere": microbial communities on plastic marine debris (pp. 7137-7146) https://doi.org/10.1021/es401288x
  3. Okunola et al. (2019) Public and environmental health effects of plastic wastes disposal: a review https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4061.1510021
  4. Sobhani et al. (2020) Microplastics generated when opening plastic packaging https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61146-4
  5. Allouzi et al. (2021) Micro (nano) plastic pollution: the ecological influence on soil-plant system and human health https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147815
  6. Amelia et al. (2021) Marine microplastics as vectors of major ocean pollutants and its hazards to the marine ecosystem and humans https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00405-4
  7. Patrício Silva et al. (2022) Implications of COVID-19 pandemic on environmental compartments: is plastic pollution a major issue? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2021.100041
  8. Chen et al. (2021) Used disposable face masks are significant sources of microplastics to environment https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117485
  9. Shi et al. (2021) Insight into chain scission and release profiles from photodegradation of polycarbonate microplastics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.116980
  10. Facciola et al. (2021) Newly emerging airborne pollutants: current knowledge of health impact of micro and nanoplastics https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062997
  11. Iizuka et al. (2020) Emission fluxes of styrene monomers and other chemicals for products containing expanded polystyrene beads https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239458
  12. Hernandez et al. (2017) Are there nanoplastics in your personal care products? (pp. 280-285) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00187
  13. Hwang et al. (2020) Potential toxicity of polystyrene microplastic particles https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64464-9
  14. Chang et al. (2020) Potential health impact of environmental micro- and nanoplastics pollution 40(1) (pp. 4-15) https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3915
  15. Jaafar et al. (2021) Occurrence, distribution and characteristics of microplastics in gastrointestinal tract and gills of commercial marine fish from Malaysia https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149457
  16. Agathokleous et al. (2021) Micro/nanoplastics effects on organisms: a review focusing on 'dose' https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126084
  17. Bhagat et al. (2020) Zebrafish: an emerging model to study microplastic and nanoplastic toxicity https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138707
  18. Li et al. (2020) Impacts of nanoplastics on bivalve: fluorescence tracing of organ accumulation, oxidative stress and damage https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122418
  19. Batel et al. (2018) Microplastic accumulation patterns and transfer of benzo[a]pyrene to adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) gills and zebrafish embryos (pp. 918-930) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.028
  20. Davranche et al. (2019) Are nanoplastics able to bind significant amount of metals? The lead example (pp. 940-948) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.087
  21. Bhagat et al. (2021) Toxicological interactions of microplastics/nanoplastics and environmental contaminants: Current knowledge and future perspectives https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123913
  22. Duan et al. (2021) Weathering of microplastics and interaction with other coexisting constituents in terrestrial and aquatic environments https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117011
  23. Canesi et al. (2016) Interactions of cationic polystyrene nanoparticles with marine bivalve hemocytes in a physiological environment: role of soluble hemolymph proteins (pp. 73-81) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.05.045
  24. Gasperi et al. (2018) Microplastics in air: are we breathing it in? (pp. 1-5) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.002
  25. Ding et al. (2020) Toxicological effects of nano- and micro-polystyrene plastics on red tilapia: are larger plastic particles more harmless? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122693
  26. Luo et al. (2019) Maternal exposure to different sizes of polystyrene microplastics during gestation causes metabolic disorders in their offspring https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113122
  27. Deng et al. (2021) Enhanced reproductive toxicities induced by phthalates contaminated microplastics in male mice (Mus musculus) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124644
  28. Butryn et al. (2020) Retention of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and hydroxylated metabolites in paired human serum and milk in relation to CYP2B6 genotype https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121904
  29. Heinlaan et al. (2020) Hazard evaluation of polystyrene nanoplastic with nine bioassays did not show particle-specific acute toxicity https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136073
  30. Velusamy et al. (2022) Functionalization of MXene-based nanomaterials for the treatment of micropollutants in aquatic system: a review https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119034
  31. Priya et al. (2022) Microplastics in the environment: recent developments in characteristic, occurrence, identification and ecological risk https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134161
  32. Hojjati-Najafabadi et al. (2022) A review on magnetic sensors for monitoring of hazardous pollutants in water resources https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153844
  33. Li et al. (2020) Polystyrene microplastics cause cardiac fibrosis by activating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and promoting cardiomyocyte apoptosis in rats https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115025
  34. Gruner et al. (2016) An environmental route of exposure affects the formation of nanoparticle coronas in blood plasma (pp. 52-58) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2015.10.028
  35. Kik et al. (2021) Oxidative properties of polystyrene nanoparticles with different diameters in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (in vitro study) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094406
  36. Campanale et al. (2020) A detailed review study on potential effects of microplastics and additives of concern on human health https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041212
  37. Banerjee and Shelver (2021) Micro- and nanoplastic induced cellular toxicity in mammals: a review 755(Pt 2) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142518
  38. Goodman et al. (2021) Exposure of human lung cells to polystyrene microplastics significantly retards cell proliferation and triggers morphological changes 34(4) (pp. 1069-1081) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00486
  39. He et al. (2020) Cytotoxic effects of polystyrene nanoplastics with different surface functionalization on human HepG2 cells https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138180
  40. Choi et al. (2020) In vitro chemical and physical toxicities of polystyrene microfragments in human-derived cells https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123308
  41. Florance et al. (2021) Polystyrene nanoplastics dysregulate lipid metabolism in murine macrophages in vitro https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2021.152850
  42. Forte et al. (2016) Polystyrene nanoparticles internalization in human gastric adenocarcinoma cells (pp. 126-136) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2015.11.006
  43. Li et al. (2021) Polystyrene microplastics trigger hepatocyte apoptosis and abnormal glycolytic flux via ROS-driven calcium overload https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126025
  44. Liang et al. (2021) Underestimated health risks: polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics jointly induce intestinal barrier dysfunction by ROS-mediated epithelial cell apoptosis https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-021-00414-1
  45. Colomer et al. (2019) Mediated food and hydrodynamics on the ingestion of microplastics by Daphnia magna (pp. 434-441) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.034
  46. Elizalde-Velazquez et al. (2020) In vivo effects on the immune function of fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) following ingestion and intraperitoneal injection of polystyrene nanoplastics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139461
  47. Xu et al. (2021) Assessment of plastic pollution in the Bohai Sea: abundance, distribution, morphological characteristics and chemical components https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116874
  48. Ziajahromi and Leusch (2022) Systematic assessment of data quality and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) of current research on microplastics in biosolids and agricultural soils https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118629
  49. Shi et al. (2021) Toxicity in vitro reveals potential impacts of microplastics and nanoplastics on human health: a review (pp. 1-33)
  50. Xu et al. (2019) Microplastics in the soil environment: occurrence, risks, interactions and fate—a review (pp. 2175-2222) https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1694822
  51. Rist et al. (2021) How fast, how far: diversification and adoption of novel methods in aquatic microplastic monitoring https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118174
  52. Fu et al. (2020) Microplastic pollution research methodologies, abundance, characteristics and risk assessments for aquatic biota in China https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115098
  53. Balestra and Bellopede (2022) Microplastic pollution in show cave sediments: first evidence and detection technique https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118261
  54. Abel et al. (2021) Systematic identification of microplastics in abyssal and hadal sediments of the Kuril Kamchatka trench https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116095
  55. Kumar et al. (2021) Evidence of microplastics in wetlands: extraction and quantification in Freshwater and coastal ecosystems https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101966
  56. Kutralam-Muniasamy et al. (2020) Review of current trends, advances and analytical challenges for microplastics contamination in Latin America https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115463
  57. Cai et al. (2021) Analysis of environmental nanoplastics: progress and challenges https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128208
  58. Dey et al. (2021) Detection and removal of microplastics in wastewater: evolution and impact (pp. 16925-16947) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12943-5
  59. Zhang et al. (2021) The microplastic pollution in beaches that served as historical nesting grounds for green turtles on Hainan Island, China https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113069
  60. Monteleone et al. (2021) Label-free identification and differentiation of different microplastics using phasor analysis of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)-generated data https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109466
  61. Maes et al. (2017) A rapid-screening approach to detect and quantify microplastics based on fluorescent tagging with Nile Red https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44501
  62. Annenkov et al. (2021) Submicro- and nanoplastics: how much can be expected in water bodies? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116910
  63. Colson and Michel (2021) Flow-through quantification of microplastics using impedance spectroscopy (pp. 238-244) https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c02223
  64. VishnuRadhan et al. (2022) A microwave-based technique as a feasible method to detect plastic pollutants in experimental samples https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128224
  65. Zhu et al. (2020) Characterization of microplastics on filter substrates based on hyperspectral imaging: Laboratory assessments https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114296
  66. Nigamatzyanova and Fakhrullin (2021) Dark-field hyperspectral microscopy for label-free microplastics and nanoplastics detection and identification in vivo: a Caenorhabditis elegans study https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116337
  67. Boni et al. (2021) Inter-storm variation in microplastic concentration and polymer type at stormwater outfalls and a bioretention basin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151104
  68. Veerasingam et al. (2020) Contributions of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in microplastic pollution research: a review (pp. 2681-2743) https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1807450
  69. Vidal and Pasquini (2021) A comprehensive and fast microplastics identification based on near-infrared hyperspectral imaging (HSI-NIR) and chemometrics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117251
  70. Horton et al. (2021) Semi-automated analysis of microplastics in complex wastewater samples https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115841
  71. Lin et al. (2021) A novel thermoanalytical method for quantifying microplastics in marine sediments https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144316
  72. Ivleva (2021) Chemical analysis of microplastics and nanoplastics: challenges, advanced methods, and perspectives (pp. 11886-11936) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00178
  73. Valsesia et al. (2021) Detection, counting and characterization of nanoplastics in marine bioindicators: a proof of principle study https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-021-00005-z
  74. Fang et al. (2021) Capture and characterisation of microplastics printed on paper via laser printer's toners https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130864
  75. Brandt et al. (2021) Deep learning for reconstructing low-quality FTIR and Raman spectra horizontal line a case study in microplastic analyses (pp. 16360-16368) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02618
  76. Luo et al. (2022) Raman imaging and MALDI-MS towards identification of microplastics generated when using stationery markers https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127478
  77. Liu et al. (2021) Separation and identification of microplastics in marine organisms by TGA-FTIR-GC/MS: a case study of mussels from coastal China https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115946
  78. Karaman (2021) Orange peel derived-nitrogen and sulfur Co-doped carbon dots: a nano-booster for enhancing ORR electrocatalytic performance of 3D graphene networks (pp. 1356-1369) https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.202100018
  79. Buledi et al. (2022) Electrochemical quantification of mancozeb through tungsten oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite: a potential method for environmental remediation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.112843
  80. Akça et al. (2021) Mechanistic insights into catalytic reduction of N2O by CO over Cu-embedded graphene: a density functional theory perspective https://doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/abf481
  81. Karaman et al. (2022) Congo red dye removal from aqueous environment by cationic surfactant modified-biomass derived carbon: equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic modeling, and forecasting via artificial neural network approach https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133346
  82. Karimi-Maleh et al. (2022) A green and sensitive guanine-based DNA biosensor for idarubicin anticancer monitoring in biological samples: a simple and fast strategy for control of health quality in chemotherapy procedure confirmed by docking investigation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132928
  83. Karimi-Maleh et al. (2022) Cyanazine herbicide monitoring as a hazardous substance by a DNA nanostructure biosensor https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127058
  84. Cheraghi et al. (2022) Novel enzymatic graphene oxide based biosensor for the detection of glutathione in biological body fluids https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132187
  85. Lakhdari et al. (2021) A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on NiFe (NPs)–polyaniline hybrid materials https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112099
  86. Mehmandoust et al. (2021) Three-dimensional porous reduced graphene oxide decorated with carbon quantum dots and platinum nanoparticles for highly selective determination of azo dye compound tartrazine https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112698
  87. Ghalkhani et al. (2022) Recent advances in Ponceau dyes monitoring as food colorant substances by electrochemical sensors and developed procedures for their removal from real samples https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.112830
  88. Sarfo et al. (2019) Fabrication of nanostructured SERS substrates on conductive solid platforms for environmental application (pp. 1294-1329) https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1576468
  89. Terry et al. (2022) Applications of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in environmental detection (pp. 113-145) https://doi.org/10.1002/ansa.202200003
  90. Yilmaz et al. (2022) Nanotechnology in food and water security: on-site detection of agricultural pollutants through surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (pp. 105-132) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-022-00376-w
  91. Dey (2022) Microplastic pollutant detection by surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS): a mini-review https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-022-00223-7
  92. Lv et al. (2020) In situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for detecting microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138449
  93. Caldwell et al. (2021) Detection of sub-micro- and nanoplastic particles on gold nanoparticle-based substrates through surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopy https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051149
  94. Zhang et al. (2021) Surface-enhanced Raman scattering labeled nanoplastic models for reliable bio-nano interaction investigations https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127959
  95. Xu et al. (2020) Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy facilitates the detection of microplastics <1 μm in the environment (pp. 15594-15603) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02317
  96. Yin et al. (2021) Sensitive and rapid detection of trace microplastics concentrated through Au-nanoparticle-decorated sponge on the basis of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100096
  97. Lê et al. (2021) Nanostructured Raman substrates for the sensitive detection of submicrometer-sized plastic pollutants in water https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123499
  98. Nie et al. (2019) Recognition of plastic nanoparticles using a single gold nanopore fabricated at the tip of a glass nanopipette (pp. 6397-6400) https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC01358J
  99. Zhang et al. (2022) Nanowell-enhanced Raman spectroscopy enables the visualization and quantification of nanoplastics in the environment (pp. 542-553) https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EN00945A
  100. Jeon et al. (2021) Detection of nanoplastics based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering with silver nanowire arrays on regenerated cellulose films https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118470
  101. Elsayed et al. (2021) A microfluidic chip enables fast analysis of water microplastics by optical spectroscopy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89960-4
  102. Lin et al. (2021) Do polystyrene nanoplastics aggravate the toxicity of single contaminants (okadaic acid)? Using AGS cells as a biological model (pp. 3186-3201) https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EN00688F
  103. Rai et al. (2021) Progress, prospects, and challenges in standardization of sampling and analysis of micro- and nano-plastics in the environment https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129321
  104. Szymańska and Obolewski (2020) Microplastics as contaminants in freshwater environments: a multidisciplinary review (pp. 333-345) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2020.05.001
  105. Shruti et al. (2020) Metro station free drinking water fountain—a potential "microplastics hotspot" for human consumption https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114227
  106. Dos Santos Galvao et al. (2022) Critical steps for microplastics characterization from the atmosphere https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127668
  107. Abbasi (2021) Microplastics washout from the atmosphere during a monsoon rain event https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2021.100035
  108. Simon-Sanchez et al. (2022) Are research methods shaping our understanding of microplastic pollution? A literature review on the seawater and sediment bodies of the Mediterranean Sea https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118275
  109. Ge et al. (2021) Review of the toxic effect of microplastics on terrestrial and aquatic plants https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148333
  110. Horton et al. (2017) Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities (pp. 127-141) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190
  111. Kim et al. (2021) Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in soils with different agricultural practices: Importance of sources with internal origin and environmental fate https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123997
  112. Chia et al. (2021) Microplastic pollution in soil and groundwater: a review (pp. 4211-4224) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01297-6
  113. Gaylarde et al. (2021) Nanoplastics in aquatic systems—are they more hazardous than microplastics? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115950
  114. Kik et al. (2020) Polystyrene nanoparticles: sources, occurrence in the environment, distribution in tissues, accumulation and toxicity to various organisms https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114297
  115. Gonzalez-Acedo et al. (2021) Evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies on the potential health repercussions of micro- and nanoplastics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130826
  116. Huang et al. (2021) Microplastic: a potential threat to human and animal health by interfering with the intestinal barrier function and changing the intestinal microenvironment https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147365
  117. Mansa and Zou (2021) Thermogravimetric analysis of microplastics: a mini review https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100117
  118. Dabrowska (2021) Raman spectroscopy of marine microplastics—a short comprehensive compendium for the environmental scientists https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2021.105313
  119. Song et al. (2021) A comparison of spectroscopic analysis methods for microplastics: manual, semi-automated, and automated Fourier transform infrared and Raman techniques https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113101
  120. Tirkey and Upadhyay (2021) Microplastics: an overview on separation, identification and characterization of microplastics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112604
  121. Shim et al. (2017) Identification methods in microplastic analysis: a review (pp. 1384-1391) https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY02558G
  122. Renner et al. (2018) Analytical methodologies for monitoring micro(nano)plastics: which are fit for purpose? (pp. 55-61) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2017.11.001
  123. Caldwell et al. (2022) The micro-, submicron-, and nanoplastic hunt: a review of detection methods for plastic particles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133514
  124. Lim et al. (2021) Inhalation toxicity of polystyrene micro(nano)plastics using modified OECD TG 412 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128330
  125. Klein and Fischer (2019) Microplastic abundance in atmospheric deposition within the Metropolitan area of Hamburg, Germany (pp. 96-103) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.405
  126. Ita-Nagy et al. (2022) Prevalence of microplastics in the ocean in Latin America and the Caribbean https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2021.100037
  127. Imhof et al. (2016) Pigments and plastic in limnetic ecosystems: a qualitative and quantitative study on microparticles of different size classes (pp. 64-74) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.015
  128. Huang et al. (2021) Microplastics and nanoplastics in the environment: macroscopic transport and effects on creatures https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124399
  129. Prust et al. (2020) The plastic brain: neurotoxicity of micro- and nanoplastics https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00358-y
  130. Singh et al. (2021) Micro (nano) plastics in wastewater: a critical review on toxicity risk assessment, behaviour, environmental impact and challenges https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133169
  131. Paul et al. (2020) Micro- and nanoplastics—current state of knowledge with the focus on oral uptake and toxicity (pp. 4350-4367) https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00539H
  132. Venancio et al. (2021) Is the toxicity of nanosized polymethylmethacrylate particles dependent on the exposure route and food items? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125443
  133. Dehaut et al. (2016) Microplastics in seafood: benchmark protocol for their extraction and characterization (pp. 223-233) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.018
  134. Fueser et al. (2022) Polystyrene microbeads influence lipid storage distribution in C. elegans as revealed by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118662
  135. Tian et al. (2022) Direct identification and visualisation of real-world contaminating microplastics using Raman spectral mapping with multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126892
  136. Sobhani et al. (2020) Identification and visualisation of microplastics/nanoplastics by Raman imaging (i): down to 100 nm https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115658
  137. Takahashi et al. (2021) Selective imaging of microplastic and organic particles in flow by multimodal coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering and two-photon excited autofluorescence analysis (pp. 5234-5240) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05474
  138. Levermore et al. (2020) Detection of microplastics in ambient particulate matter using Raman spectral imaging and chemometric analysis (pp. 8732-8740) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05445
  139. Fang et al. (2022) Identification and visualisation of microplastics via PCA to decode Raman spectrum matrix towards imaging https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131736
  140. Zada et al. (2018) Fast microplastics identification with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy (pp. 1136-1144) https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.5367
  141. Liu et al. (2020) Application of confocal laser Raman spectroscopy on marine sediment microplastics (pp. 1502-1516) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-020-0129-z
  142. Laptenok et al. (2020) Stimulated Raman microspectroscopy as a new method to classify microfibers from environmental samples https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115640
  143. Wolff et al. (2019) Determination of the microplastics emission in the effluent of a municipal waste water treatment plant using Raman microspectroscopy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2018.100014
  144. Valsesia et al. (2021) Combining microcavity size selection with Raman microscopy for the characterization of nanoplastics in complex matrices https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79714-z
  145. Karimi-Maleh et al. (2022) Determination of D&C Red 33 and Patent Blue V Azo dyes using an impressive electrochemical sensor based on carbon paste electrode modified with ZIF-8/g-C3N4/Co and ionic liquid in mouthwash and toothpaste as real samples https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.112907
  146. Prata et al. (2021) Selection of microplastics by Nile Red staining increases environmental sample throughput by micro-Raman spectroscopy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146979
  147. Cho et al. (2021) Feasibility study for simple on-line Raman spectroscopic detection of microplastic particles in water using perfluorocarbon as a particle-capturing medium https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338518
  148. Liu et al. (2020) A multicolor-SERS dual-mode pH sensor based on smart nano-in-micro particles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.127889
  149. Amorim and Scott-Fordsmand (2021) Plastic pollution—a case study with Enchytraeuscrypticus—from micro-to nanoplastics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116363
  150. Ly et al. (2021) Surface-enhanced Raman sensing of semi-volatile organic compounds by plasmonic nanostructures https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102619
  151. Das et al. (2021) Science-society-policy interface for microplastic and nanoplastic: environmental and biomedical aspects https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117985
  152. Schmidt et al. (2021) Correlative SEM-Raman microscopy to reveal nanoplastics in complex environments https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2021.103034
  153. Pang et al. (2021) Transcriptome sequencing and metabolite analysis reveal the toxic effects of nanoplastics on tilapia after exposure to polystyrene https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116860
  154. Chaudhry and Sachdeva (2021) Microplastics’ origin, distribution, and rising hazard to aquatic organisms and human health: socio-economic insinuations and management solutions
  155. Pérez-Guevara et al. (2021) A central role for fecal matter in the transport of microplastics: an updated analysis of new findings and persisting questions https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2021.100021
  156. Morris et al. (2010) Applications of nanopipettes in the analytical sciences (pp. 2190-2202) https://doi.org/10.1039/c0an00156b
  157. Ho et al. (2021) Coumarin–lipoic acid conjugates on silver nanoparticle-supported nanopipettes for in situ dual-mode monitoring of intracellular Cu(II) and potential chemodynamic therapy applications https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130271
  158. Nguyen et al. (2019) Nanostars on nanopipette tips: a Raman probe for quantifying oxygen levels in hypoxic single cells and tumours (pp. 2710-2714) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201812677
  159. Schmid et al. (2021) Microplastic's story https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111820
  160. Vélez-Escamilla and Contreras-Torres (2022) Latest advances and developments to detection of micro- and nanoplastics using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.202100217
  161. Fang et al. (2021) Identification and visualisation of microplastics/nanoplastics by Raman imaging (iii): algorithm to cross-check multi-images https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.116913
  162. Gwinnett et al. (2021) The application of tape lifting for microplastic pollution monitoring https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100066
  163. Jiao et al. (2021) Analysis of composite microplastics in sediment using 3D Raman spectroscopy and imaging method https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2021.100016
  164. Luo et al. (2022) Applying Raman imaging to capture and identify microplastics and nanoplastics in the garden https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127788
  165. Luo et al. (2021) Characterising microplastics in shower wastewater with Raman imaging https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152409