10.1007/s40097-021-00449-y

Structural design of nanosize-metal–organic framework-based sensors for detection of organophosphorus pesticides in food and water samples: current challenges and future prospects

  1. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, H. R. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Shirpur, Maharashtra, 425405, IN
  2. Department of Microbiology, R. C. Patel Arts, Science, and Commerce College, Shirpur, Maharashtra, 425405, IN
  3. Department of Pharmaceutics, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, 425405, IN

Published in Issue 13-10-2021

How to Cite

Nangare, S. N., Patil, S. R., Patil, A. G., Khan, Z. G., Deshmukh, P. K., Tade, R. S., Mahajan, M. R., Bari, S. B., & Patil, P. O. (2021). Structural design of nanosize-metal–organic framework-based sensors for detection of organophosphorus pesticides in food and water samples: current challenges and future prospects. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry, 12(5 (October 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-021-00449-y

Abstract

Abstract Organophosphorus pesticide (OPP) is regarded as an important food-chain and environmental contaminant that causes primary acute toxicity and numerous severe health issues. Therefore, the minute concentration of OPP present in food materials and environments needs to be identified before it causes any brutal harm to lives. Despite the plenty of merits of qualitative and quantitative sensing methods, the lower sensitivity, poor selectivity, detection speed, etc. towards the interest OPP are major drawbacks. Nanoparticles have attracted a lot of attention because of their unique and intriguing features, which have a variety of applications including sensor development as compared to their bulk counterparts. Recently, the structural design of nanosize-metal–organic framework (MOF) is gaining huge consideration from researchers for sensing applications owing to their versatile and tunable properties. Additionally, MOF-based sensors offer the rapid, simplistic, selective, and sensitive sensing of interest analyte. The present review provides brief information about OPPs and their toxicities. The emerging trends of structural design of nanosize-MOF including their properties have been summarized. Finally, nanosize-MOF-based fluorescent sensors, electrochemical sensors, and colorimetric sensors have been discussed with central focus on sensitivity and selectivity to OPPs. Due to the higher surface area, rich topology, ease of structural tunability and functionalization, tunable pore size, plenty of binding sites, good adsorption potential, excellent charge conductivity, and chemical stability, etc., MOF based sensors are endowed with the ability of OPPs detection upto aM. Hence, MOF as nanoporous sensors can be preferred as an excellent alternative for highly sensitive and selective recognition of OPPs in food and water samples. Graphic abstract Structural design of nanosize-MOF-based sensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of OPPs in food samples

Keywords

  • Organophosphorus pesticides,
  • Nanosize-metal–organic framework,
  • Structural design,
  • Fluorescent sensor,
  • Colorimetric sensor,
  • Electrochemical sensor

References

  1. Basic information about pesticide ingredients. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2021.
  2. https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/basic-information-about-pesticide-ingredients
  3. .
  4. International code of conduct on the distribution and use of pesticides: guidelines for quality control of pesticides, 2021. (World Health Organization).
  5. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70574
  6. Singh (2009) Organophosphorus-degrading bacteria: ecology and industrial applications (pp. 156-164) https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2050
  7. Dey and Pal (2020) Detrimental impact of pesticides on beneficial soil dwelling fauna (pp. 22-25)
  8. Storm (2001) (pp. 1077-1234) Patty's Toxicology
  9. Pundir and Malik (2019) Bio-sensing of organophosphorus pesticides: a review https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.111348
  10. Rathnayake and Northrup (2016) Structure and mode of action of organophosphate pesticides: a computational study (pp. 9-23) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2016.04.024
  11. Vikrant et al. (2018) Potential utility of metal–organic framework-based platform for sensing pesticides (pp. 8797-8817) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b00664
  12. Ssemugabo et al. (2017) Prevalence, circumstances, and management of acute pesticide poisoning in hospitals in Kampala City, Uganda https://doi.org/10.1177/1178630217728924
  13. Gunnell et al. (2007) The global distribution of fatal pesticide self-poisoning: systematic review (pp. 1-15) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-357
  14. Eddleston et al. (2008) Management of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning (pp. 597-607) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61202-1
  15. Worek and Thiermann (2013) The value of novel oximes for treatment of poisoning by organophosphorus compounds (pp. 249-259) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.04.009
  16. Jokanović (2018) Neurotoxic effects of organophosphorus pesticides and possible association with neurodegenerative diseases in man: a review (pp. 125-131) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2018.09.009
  17. Tchounwou et al. (2015) Environmental exposure and health effects associated with Malathion toxicity (pp. 2145-2149)
  18. Lasram et al. (2009) Metabolic disorders of acute exposure to malathion in adult Wistar rats (pp. 1052-1055) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.059
  19. Mostafalou et al. (2012) Biochemical evidence on the potential role of organophosphates in hepatic glucose metabolism toward insulin resistance through inflammatory signaling and free radical pathways (pp. 840-851) https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711425073
  20. Kalender et al. (2010) Malathion-induced hepatotoxicity in rats: the effects of vitamins C and E (pp. 633-638) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.044
  21. Alp et al. (2012) Effects of sulforophane and curcumin on oxidative stress created by acute malathion toxicity in rats (pp. 144-148)
  22. Nain et al. (2011) Immunotoxicity and disease resistance in Japanese quail (Corturnix coturnix japonica) exposed to malathion (pp. 892-900) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0657-6
  23. Bonner et al. (2010) Occupational exposure to terbufos and the incidence of cancer in the agricultural health study (pp. 871-877) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9514-9
  24. Mills and Yang (2007) Agricultural exposures and gastric cancer risk in Hispanic farm workers in California (pp. 282-289) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2006.11.008
  25. Beane Freeman et al. (2005) Cancer incidence among male pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study cohort exposed to diazinon (pp. 1070-1079) https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi321
  26. Koutros et al. (2009) Heterocyclic aromatic amine pesticide use and human cancer risk: results from the US Agricultural Health Study (pp. 1206-1212) https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24020
  27. Databank (1992) National Library of Medicine
  28. Rafaela et al. (2020) Exposure to low doses of malathion during juvenile and peripubertal periods impairs testicular and sperm parameters in rats: role of oxidative stress and testosterone (pp. 17-26) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.05.013
  29. Padungtod et al. (2000) Occupational pesticide exposure and semen quality among Chinese workers (pp. 982-992) https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200010000-00004
  30. Pina-Guzman et al. (2005) Diazinon alters sperm chromatin structure in mice by phosphorylating nuclear protamines (pp. 189-198) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.06.028
  31. Yavasoglu et al. (2006) The pyrethroid cypermethrin-induced biochemical and histological alterations in rat liver (pp. 774-780) https://doi.org/10.1248/jhs.52.774
  32. Afshar et al. (2008) Histopathological changes in the liver and kidney tissues of Wistar albino rat exposed to fenitrothion (pp. 581-586) https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233708100090
  33. Schulz et al. (1990) Behavioral effects of subchronic intoxication with parathion-methyl in male Wistar rats (pp. 125-127) https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-0362(90)90123-T
  34. Steenland (1996) British Medical Journal Publishing Group https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7042.1312
  35. Kamanyire and Karalliedde (2004) Organophosphate toxicity and occupational exposure (pp. 69-75) https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqh018
  36. Bureau, Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India. (2020).
  37. https://ncrb.gov.in/en/accidental-deaths-suicides-in-india
  38. Srinivas Rao et al. (2005) Pesticide poisoning in south India: opportunities for prevention and improved medical management (pp. 581-588) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01412.x
  39. National Library of Medicine (2021).
  40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  41. Shrikrishna et al. (2021) New trends in biosensor development for pesticide detection https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66165-6_8
  42. Nangare and Patil (2020) Nanoarchitectured bioconjugates and bioreceptors mediated surface plasmon resonance biosensor for in vitro diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Development and future prospects https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2020.1864716
  43. Gong et al. (2009) Electrochemical biosensing of methyl parathion pesticide based on acetylcholinesterase immobilized onto Au–polypyrrole interlaced network-like nanocomposite (pp. 2285-2288) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2008.11.012
  44. Huang et al. (2017) Disease-related detection with electrochemical biosensors: a review https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102375
  45. Cha et al. (2020) Simple colorimetric detection of organophosphorus pesticides using naturally occurring extracellular vesicles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105130
  46. Chu et al. (2020) Graphene oxide-based colorimetric detection of organophosphorus pesticides via a multi-enzyme cascade reaction (pp. 5829-5833) https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR10862A
  47. Liu et al. (2020) Colorimetric detection of organophosphorus pesticides based on the broad-spectrum aptamer (pp. 2114-2121) https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2020.17358
  48. Qiu et al. (2019) Electrochemical detection of organophosphorus pesticides based on amino acids conjugated nanoenzyme modified electrodes (pp. 386-393) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.02.007
  49. Singha and Mahata (2015) Luminescent coordination polymer–fullerene composite as a highly sensitive and selective optical detector for 2, 4, 6-trinitrophenol (TNP) (pp. 28092-28097) https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA02833G
  50. Zhao et al. (2012) Composite QDs@ MIP nanospheres for specific recognition and direct fluorescent quantification of pesticides in aqueous media (pp. 386-395) https://doi.org/10.1021/ac202735v
  51. Zor et al. (2015) Graphene quantum dots-based photoluminescent sensor: a multifunctional composite for pesticide detection (pp. 20272-20279) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b05838
  52. Singha et al. (2018) Detection of pesticides in aqueous medium and in fruit extracts using a three-dimensional metal–organic framework: experimental and computational study (pp. 12155-12165) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01767
  53. Yan et al. (2018) MnO2 nanosheet-carbon dots sensing platform for sensitive detection of organophosphorus pesticides (pp. 2618-2624) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04193
  54. Hu et al. (2017) Facile synthesis of Fe3O4/g-C3N4/HKUST-1 composites as a novel biosensor platform for ochratoxin A (pp. 718-723) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.10.006
  55. Zhu et al. (2013) Metal–organic framework (MOF): a novel sensing platform for biomolecules (pp. 1276-1278) https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc36661d
  56. Wei et al. (2012) Sensitive fluorescence biosensor for folate receptor based on terminal protection of small-molecule-linked DNA (pp. 6184-6186) https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc31979a
  57. Li et al. (2014) Graphene/graphene-tube nanocomposites templated from cage-containing metal-organic frameworks for oxygen reduction in Li–O2 batteries (pp. 1378-1386) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304218
  58. Rassaei et al. (2011) Nanoparticles in electrochemical sensors for environmental monitoring (pp. 1704-1715) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2011.05.009
  59. Rajangam et al. (2018) Progress in enzyme inhibition based detection of pesticides (pp. 4-19) https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201700028
  60. Verma and Bhardwaj (2015) Biosensor technology for pesticides—a review (pp. 3093-3119) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-015-1489-2
  61. Andreescu and Marty (2006) Twenty years research in cholinesterase biosensors: from basic research to practical applications (pp. 1-15) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeng.2006.01.001
  62. Chauhan and Pundir (2012) An amperometric acetylcholinesterase sensor based on Fe3O4 nanoparticle/multi-walled carbon nanotube-modified ITO-coated glass plate for the detection of pesticides (pp. 79-86) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.02.012
  63. Verma and Dhillon (2003) Biosensors for monitoring insecticides and herbicides—a survey (pp. 29-43) https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230304751
  64. Marrazza (2014) Piezoelectric biosensors for organophosphate and carbamate pesticides: a review (pp. 301-317) https://doi.org/10.3390/bios4030301
  65. Batten et al. (2013) Terminology of metal–organic frameworks and coordination polymers (IUPAC Recommendations 2013) (pp. 1715-1724) https://doi.org/10.1351/PAC-REC-12-11-20
  66. Gao et al. (2019) Recent advances about metal–organic frameworks in the removal of pollutants from wastewater (pp. 17-31) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2018.03.015
  67. Feng et al. (2021) Structural design of metal–organic frameworks with tunable colorimetric responses for visual sensing applications https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214102
  68. Yang, J.: Mixed-Linker Approach toward the structural design of metal-organic frameworks, (UC Berkeley). 1–5 (2018).
  69. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/23k4t08f
  70. Chansi et al. (2019) (pp. 75-99) Nanoscience for Sustainable Agriculture Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97852-9_4
  71. Xu et al. (2021) Metal–organic framework for the extraction and detection of pesticides from food commodities (pp. 1009-1035) https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12675
  72. Anam et al. (2021) Metal-organic frameworks for heavy metal removal https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119725282.ch9
  73. Wang et al. (2018) Recent applications of metal–organic frameworks in sample pretreatment (pp. 180-194) https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201700401
  74. Kuthuru et al. (2021) Optimizing hydrogen storage in MOFs through engineering of crystal morphology and control of crystal size (pp. 10727-10734) https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c04926
  75. Kim et al. (2017) Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight (pp. 430-434) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8743
  76. Joshua et al. (2021) Metal-organic framework nanosheets: programmable 2D materials for catalysis, sensing, electronics, and separation applications https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202103723
  77. Khan et al. (2015) Adsorption and removal of phthalic acid and diethyl phthalate from water with zeolitic imidazolate and metal–organic frameworks (pp. 194-200) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.047
  78. Van de Voorde et al. (2014) Adsorptive separation on metal–organic frameworks in the liquid phase (pp. 5766-5788) https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00006D
  79. Reed et al. (2016) Reversible CO scavenging via adsorbate-dependent spin state transitions in an iron (II)–triazolate metal–organic framework (pp. 5594-5602) https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b00248
  80. Qiu et al. (2019) Recent advances in the rational synthesis and sensing applications of metal-organic framework biocomposites (pp. 60-78) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.02.009
  81. Tahir et al. (2020) Metal-organic framework-based engineered materials- fundamentals and applications https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071598
  82. Kumar et al. (2015) Metal organic frameworks for sensing applications (pp. 39-53) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2015.04.009
  83. Hu et al. (2014) Luminescent metal–organic frameworks for chemical sensing and explosive detection (pp. 5815-5840) https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00010B
  84. Li et al. (2014) Synthesis of porphyrin@ MOFs type catalysts through “one-pot” self-assembly (pp. 166-170) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2014.05.023
  85. Qi et al. (2008) Hydrothermal synthesis of metal− organic frameworks based on aromatic polycarboxylate and flexible bis (imidazole) ligands (pp. 606-611) https://doi.org/10.1021/cg700758c
  86. Park et al. (2004) Supramolecular interactions and morphology control in microwave synthesis of nanoporous materials (pp. 91-110) https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CATS.0000026990.25778.a8
  87. Mueller et al. (2006) Metal–organic frameworks—prospective industrial applications (pp. 626-636) https://doi.org/10.1039/B511962F
  88. Fernandez-Bertran (1999) Mechanochemistry: an overview (pp. 581-586) https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199971040581
  89. Stock and Biswas (2012) Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): routes to various MOF topologies, morphologies, and composites (pp. 933-969) https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200304e
  90. Gedanken (2004) Using sonochemistry for the fabrication of nanomaterials (pp. 47-55) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.01.037
  91. Mansouriieh et al. (2019) Optimization of profenofos organophosphorus pesticide degradation by zero-valent bimetallic nanoparticles using response surface methodology (pp. 2524-2532) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.04.009
  92. Li, G., Xia, L., Dong, J., Chen, Y., Li, Y.: Metal-organic frameworks. Solid-Phase Extraction (Handbooks in Separation Science). Elsevier, pp 285–309 (2020).
  93. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816906-3.00010-8
  94. Furukawa et al. (2013) The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230444
  95. Li and Shi (2019) Recent advances and applications of carbon nanotubes based composites in magnetic solid-phase extraction (pp. 652-665) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.06.039
  96. DeCoste and Peterson (2014) Metal–organic frameworks for air purification of toxic chemicals (pp. 5695-5727) https://doi.org/10.1021/cr4006473
  97. Maya et al. (2017) Magnetic solid-phase extraction using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and their derived carbons (pp. 142-152) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.03.004
  98. Ebrahimi and Mansournia (2018) Zeolitic imidazolate framework-7: Novel ammonia atmosphere-assisted synthesis, thermal and chemical durability, phase reversibility and potential as highly efficient nanophotocatalyst (pp. 33-45) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.06.003
  99. Li et al. (1999) Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework (pp. 276-279) https://doi.org/10.1038/46248
  100. Wang et al. (2020) A luminescent method for detection of parathion based on zinc incorporated metal-organic framework https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104441
  101. Yang et al. (2020) A luminescent sensor based on a new Cd-MOF for nitro explosives and organophosphorus pesticides detection https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2020.108272
  102. Wei et al. (2020) Construction of a highly stable lanthanide metal-organic framework for effective detection of aryl-organophosphorus flame retardants in simulated wastewater and fruit juices https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2020.119840
  103. He et al. (2019) A water-stable luminescent metal–organic framework for rapid and visible sensing of organophosphorus pesticides (pp. 26250-26260) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b06151
  104. Mehta et al. (2019) Organophosphate hydrolase conjugated UiO-66-NH2 MOF based highly sensitive optical detection of methyl parathion (pp. 46-53) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.018
  105. Xu et al. (2018) Sensitive detection of pesticides by a highly luminescent metal-organic framework (pp. 339-345) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.075
  106. Nagabooshanam et al. (2020) Development of field deployable sensor for detection of pesticide from food chain https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2020.3030034
  107. Ma et al. (2018) Lipase@ ZIF-8 nanoparticles-based biosensor for direct and sensitive detection of methyl parathion (pp. 509-516) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.176
  108. Bagheri et al. (2019) Sensitive biosensing of organophosphate pesticides using enzyme mimics of magnetic ZIF-8 (pp. 118-125) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2018.10.039
  109. Liu et al. (2019) Strategies to fabricate metal–organic framework (MOF)-based luminescent sensing platforms (pp. 10743-10763) https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC03208H
  110. Yu et al. (2017) A metal–organic framework as a “turn on” fluorescent sensor for aluminum ions (pp. 256-260) https://doi.org/10.1039/C6QI00362A
  111. Ovens and Leznoff (2015) Raman detected sensing of volatile organic compounds by vapochromic Cu [AuX2 (CN) 2] 2 (X= Cl, Br) coordination polymer materials (pp. 1465-1478) https://doi.org/10.1021/cm502998w
  112. Guo et al. (2014) Tuning the luminescence of metal–organic frameworks for detection of energetic heterocyclic compounds (pp. 15485-15488) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja508962m
  113. Khatua and Biswas (2020) Flexible luminescent MOF: trapping of less stable conformation of rotational isomers, in situ guest-responsive turn-off and turn-on luminescence and mechanistic study (pp. 22335-22346) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c02891
  114. Yang et al. (2021) Design and synthesis of fluorescence sensing metal-organic frameworks https://doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/abfe49
  115. Sharma and Ghosh (2018) Metal–organic framework-based selective sensing of biothiols via chemidosimetric approach in water (pp. 254-258) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01891
  116. Bagheri et al. (2019) Highly sensitive chemiluminescence sensing system for organophosphates using mimic LDH supported ZIF-8 nanocomposite (pp. 220-227) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.147
  117. Wei et al. (2018) A highly hydrolytically stable lanthanide organic framework as a sensitive luminescent probe for DBP and chlorpyrifos detection (pp. 5481-5486) https://doi.org/10.1039/C8AN01606B
  118. Lu et al. (2020) Enhancing hydrogel-based long-lasting chemiluminescence by a platinum-metal organic framework and its application in array detection of pesticides and d-amino acids (pp. 4959-4967) https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR00203H
  119. Jin et al. (2020) A novel microporous metal–organic framework for highly sensitive and selective photochemical determination of chlorpyrifos https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2020.108062
  120. Yu et al. (2020) Ultrathin two-dimensional metal-organic framework nanosheets decorated with tetra-pyridyl calix [4] arene: design, synthesis and application in pesticide detection https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.127819
  121. Eskandari et al. (2020) Mesoporous MIP-capped luminescent MOF as specific and sensitive analytical probe: application for chlorpyrifos (pp. 1-10) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-020-04654-4
  122. Mahmoudi et al. (2019) High-performance electrochemical enzyme sensor for organophosphate pesticide detection using modified metal-organic framework sensing platforms https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.107348
  123. Meng et al. (2019) Facile synthesis of platinum-embedded zirconia/porous carbons tri-component nanohybrids from metal-organic framework and their application for ultra-sensitively detection of methyl parathion (pp. 424-430) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.076
  124. Karimian et al. (2019) A novel sensing layer based on metal–organic framework UiO-66 modified with TiO2–graphene oxide: application to rapid, sensitive and simultaneous determination of paraoxon and chlorpyrifos (pp. 2600-2609) https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ06208K
  125. Al’Abri et al. (2019) Highly sensitive and selective determination of malathion in vegetable extracts by an electrochemical sensor based on Cu-metal organic framework (pp. 930-941) https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2019.1652072
  126. Song et al. (2019) Metal− organic frameworks-derived MnO2/Mn3O4 microcuboids with hierarchically ordered nanosheets and Ti3C2 MXene/Au NPs composites for electrochemical pesticide detection (pp. 367-376) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.083
  127. Ma et al. (2019) Nanocomposites of Pt nanoparticles anchored on UiO66-NH2 as carriers to construct acetylcholinesterase biosensors for organophosphorus pesticide detection (pp. 525-533) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.110
  128. Nagabooshanam et al. (2019) Electrochemical micro analytical device interfaced with portable potentiostat for rapid detection of chlorpyrifos using acetylcholinesterase conjugated metal organic framework using Internet of things (pp. 1-9) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56510-y
  129. Wang et al. (2019) Direct, selective and ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensing of methyl parathion in vegetables using Burkholderia cepacia lipase@ MOF nanofibers-based biosensor (pp. 356-362) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.01.052
  130. Li et al. (2020) Degradable metal-organic framework/methylene blue composites-based homogeneous electrochemical strategy for pesticide assay https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.128701
  131. Bhardwaj et al. (2020) Layered construction of nano immuno-hybrid embedded MOF as an electrochemical sensor for rapid quantification of total pesticides load in vegetable extract https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114386
  132. Xie et al. (2019) A CuO-CeO2 composite prepared by calcination of a bimetallic metal-organic framework for use in an enzyme-free electrochemical inhibition assay for malathion (pp. 1-9) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-3684-2
  133. Deep et al. (2015) Surface assembly of nano-metal organic framework on amine functionalized indium tin oxide substrate for impedimetric sensing of parathion (pp. 226-231) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.10.045
  134. Amirzehni et al. (2020) Surface imprinted CoZn-bimetalic MOFs as selective colorimetric probe: application for detection of dimethoate https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.128768
  135. Liu et al. (2020) Magnetically controlled colorimetric aptasensor for chlorpyrifos based on copper-based metal-organic framework nanoparticles with peroxidase mimetic property (pp. 1-9) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-020-04499-x
  136. Zhu et al. (2020) Design and property modulation of metal–organic frameworks with aggregation-induced emission (pp. 77-89) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00477