10.1007/s40097-021-00411-y

Solar-light responsive efficient H2 evolution using a novel ternary hierarchical SrTiO3/CdS/carbon nanospheres photocatalytic system

  1. Department of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, Telangana, 506004, IN Centre for Advanced Materials, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, Telangana, 506004, IN Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110016, IN Department of Chemistry, Mallareddy Engineering College (Autonomous), Secunderabad, 500100, IN
  2. Department of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, Telangana, 506004, IN Centre for Advanced Materials, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, Telangana, 506004, IN
  3. Nano Catalysis and Solar Fuels Research Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Nanotechnology, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, 516005, IN

Published in Issue 11-07-2021

How to Cite

Manchala, S., Gandamalla, A., Rao, V. N., Venkatakrishnan, S. M., & Shanker, V. (2021). Solar-light responsive efficient H2 evolution using a novel ternary hierarchical SrTiO3/CdS/carbon nanospheres photocatalytic system. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry, 12(2 (April 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-021-00411-y

Abstract

Abstract Carbon nanospheres (CNS) have tremendous potential in photocatalysis due to their unique opto-electronic properties that facilitated effective electron transfer and high visible-light harvesting nature. The present work deals with the design and synthesis of novel ternary hierarchical SrTiO 3 /CdS/carbon nanospheres photocatalytic system and evaluated its photocatalytic performance for H 2 production under sunlight illumination. The ternary photocatalytic system formation is explained using surface imaging (FE-SEM and TEM) and surface chemical analysis (XPS). At optimized conditions, the ternary SrTiO 3 /CdS/carbon nanospheres’ photocatalytic system has exhibited excellent H 2 production of 3085 μmol h −1  g cat −1 when compared to single and binary photocatalytic systems. The incorporation of carbon nanospheres takes part as an electron nabber and carrier to improve the electron transfer of the SrTiO 3 /CdS photocatalytic system in the hierarchical ternary photocatalytic system. The high H 2 production of the ternary SrTiO 3 /CdS/carbon nanospheres’ photocatalytic system is demonstrated by photocurrent and lifetime PL studies. Furthermore, a suitable mechanism is also proposed.

Keywords

  • Carbon nanospheres,
  • SrTiO3,
  • CdS,
  • Ternary hierarchical photocatalytic system,
  • Hybrid nano-composite

References

  1. Ahmad et al. (2015) Hydrogen from photo-catalytic water splitting process: a review (pp. 599-610) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.101
  2. Corbo et al. (2011) Springer London https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-136-3
  3. Mccay (1988) Springer
  4. Rahman and Andrews (2006) Special issue on the hydrogen economy (pp. 1781-1784) https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2006.883713
  5. Manchala et al. (2019) Solar-light harvesting bimetallic Ag/Au decorated graphene plasmonic system with efficient photoelectrochemical performance for the enhanced water reduction process (pp. 4782-4792) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b00684
  6. Kalamaras and Efstathiou (2013) Hydrogen production technologies: current state and future developments (pp. 1-9) https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/690627
  7. Manchala et al. (2018) Facile synthesis of noble-metal free polygonal Zn2TiO4 nanostructures for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under solar light irradiation (pp. 13145-13157) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.035
  8. Unknown (1972) © 1972 Nature Publishing Group (pp. 37-38)
  9. Tan et al. (2019) Heterogeneous photocatalysts: an overview of classic and modern approaches for optical, electronic, and charge dynamics evaluation (pp. 1255-1271) https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00882E
  10. Ge et al. (2016) One-dimensional TiO2 nanotube photocatalysts for solar water splitting https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600152
  11. Yuan et al. (2018) Cadmium sulfide-based nanomaterials for photocatalytic hydrogen production (pp. 11606-11630) https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA00671G
  12. Tso et al. (2018) Enhanced H2 production in water splitting with CdS–ZnO core-shell nanowires (pp. 270-277) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.048
  13. Kumar et al. (2014) Synthesis of novel and stable g-C3N4/N-doped SrTiO3 hybrid nanocomposites with improved photocurrent and photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation (pp. 16105-16114) https://doi.org/10.1039/C4DT01076K
  14. Kanhere and Chen (2014) A review on visible light active perovskite-based photocatalysts (pp. 19995-20022) https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191219995
  15. Jiao et al. (2014) TiO2 nanotube arrays modified with Cr-doped SrTiO3 nanocubes for highly efficient hydrogen evolution under visible light (pp. 2654-2662) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201304135
  16. Karimi and Zohoori (2013) Superior photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solutions using TiO2/SrTiO3 nanocomposite https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-8865-3-32
  17. Kanagaraj and Thiripuranthagan (2017) Photocatalytic activities of novel SrTiO3–BiOBr heterojunction catalysts towards the degradation of reactive dyes (pp. 218-232) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.084
  18. Su et al. (2017) Design of a solar light-responsive metal oxide/CdS/SrTiO3 catalyst with enhanced charge separation for hydrogen evolution (pp. 240-247) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.037
  19. Zhang et al. (2017) Zinc-blende CdS nanocubes with coordinated facets for photocatalytic water splitting (pp. 1470-1477) https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b03212
  20. Zhai et al. (2018) Polyoxometalate-Decorated g-C3N4-wrapping snowflake-like CdS nanocrystal for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 15930-15936) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201803621
  21. Lu et al. (2020) Light-induced formation of MoOxSy clusters on CdS nanorods as cocatalyst for enhanced hydrogen evolution (pp. 8324-8332) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b21810
  22. Zhao et al. (2019) Encapsulated cadmium sulfide in silicon dioxide porous shells for enhanced photocatalytic sustainability and commendable protection of organic carriers https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201801933
  23. Yun et al. (2011) A combination of two visible-light responsive photocatalysts for achieving the Z-scheme in the solid state (pp. 4084-4090) https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2006738
  24. Sun et al. (2020) CdS/ZnS/ZnO ternary heterostructure nanofibers fabricated by electrospinning for excellent photocatalytic hydrogen evolution without co-catalyst (pp. 1421-1429) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63576-8
  25. Zou et al. (2018) WS2/graphitic carbon nitride heterojunction nanosheets decorated with CdS quantum dots for photocatalytic hydrogen production (pp. 1187-1197) https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201800053
  26. Shi et al. (2018) Rational construction of multiple interfaces in ternary heterostructure for efficient spatial separation and transfer of photogenerated carriers in the application of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 249-260) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.031
  27. Ma et al. (2018) Multiple carrier-transfer pathways in a flower-like In2S3/CdIn2S4/In2O3 ternary heterostructure for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production (pp. 7860-7870) https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR00170G
  28. Iwase et al. (2011) Reduced graphene oxide as a solid-state electron mediator in Z-scheme photocatalytic water splitting under visible light (pp. 11054-11057) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja203296z
  29. Shi et al. (2015) A g-C3N4/nanocarbon/ZnIn2S4 nanocomposite: an artificial Z-scheme visible-light photocatalytic system using nanocarbon as the electron mediator (pp. 17144-17147) https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC05323D
  30. Zhang et al. (2017) Novel 3DOM-SrTiO3/Ag/Ag3PO4 ternary Z-scheme photocatalysts with remarkably improved activity and durability for contaminant degradation (pp. 77-87) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.058
  31. Yang et al. (2018) Construction of urchin-like ZnIn2S4–Au–TiO2 heterostructure with enhanced activity for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (pp. 260-267) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.038
  32. Wang et al. (2019) A review of graphene-based nanomaterials for removal of antibiotics from aqueous environments (pp. 100-110) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.067
  33. Manchala et al. (2021) High potential and robust ternary LaFeO3/CdS/carbon quantum dots nanocomposite for photocatalytic H2 evolution under sunlight illumination (pp. 255-266) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.125
  34. Xie et al. (2019) The importance of the interfacial contact: is reduced graphene oxide always an enhancer in photo(electro)catalytic water oxidation? (pp. 23125-23134) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b03624
  35. Zhao et al. (2019) Polypyrrole/cadmium sulfide hollow fiber with high performance contaminant removal and photocatalytic activity fabricated by layer-by-layer deposition and fiber-sacrifice template approach (pp. 94-102) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.095
  36. Li et al. (2016) Hollow carbon spheres, synthesis and applications—a review (pp. 12686-12713) https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA03802F
  37. Yang et al. (2013) Hollow spheres of nanocarbon and their manganese dioxide hybrids derived from soft template for supercapacitor application (pp. 713-720) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.034
  38. Li et al. (2017) Hollow carbon spheres with abundant micropores for enhanced CO2 adsorption (pp. 1248-1255) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04131
  39. Tonda et al. (2014) Synthesis of Cr and La-codoped SrTiO3 nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic performance under sunlight irradiation (pp. 23819-23828) https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP02963A
  40. Wang et al. (2008) Preparation and characterization of carbon nanospheres as anode materials in lithium-ion secondary batteries (pp. 2294-2300) https://doi.org/10.1021/ie071337d
  41. Adewumi et al. (2018) Synthesis of carbon nanotubes and nanospheres from coconut fibre and the role of synthesis temperature on their growth (pp. 3788-3794) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-018-6248-z
  42. Saravanan et al. (2006) Investigations on the electrical and structural properties of polyaniline doped with camphor sulphonic acid (pp. 1496-1501) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.01.100
  43. Cordeiro et al. (2015) Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on polypyrrole: an electrical overview (pp. 1075-1079)
  44. Zhang et al. (2017) Facile synthesis of hierarchical nanocomposites of aligned polyaniline nanorods on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for microwave absorbing materials (pp. 54031-54038) https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA08794B
  45. Xing et al. (2016) Hydrothermal derived nitrogen doped SrTiO3 for efficient visible light driven photocatalytic reduction of chromium(VI) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2804-2
  46. She et al. (2018) Photocatalytic activation of saturated C–H bond over the CdS mixed-phase under visible light irradiation https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00466
  47. Thangadurai et al. (2008) Surface modification of CdS quantum dots using thiols—structural and photophysical studies https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/43/435708
  48. Cheng et al. (2017) Interconnected hierarchical NiCo2O4 microspheres as high-performance electrode materials for supercapacitors (pp. 9201-9209) https://doi.org/10.1039/C7DT01289F
  49. Tonda et al. (2017) g-C3N4(2D)/CdS(1D)/rGO(2D) dual-interface nano-composite for excellent and stable visible light photocatalytic hydrogen generation (pp. 5971-5984) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.065
  50. Zhang et al. (2016) Fluorescent probes for “off–on” highly sensitive detection of Hg2+ and L-cysteine based on nitrogen-doped carbon dots (pp. 288-300) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.02.018
  51. Jiang et al. (2017) Carbon nitride coupled with CdS–TiO2 nanodots as 2D/0D ternary composite with enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution: a novel efficient three-level electron transfer process (pp. 194-204) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.069
  52. Yang et al. (2016) A novel p-LaFeO3/n-Ag3PO4 heterojunction photocatalyst for phenol degradation under visible light irradiation (pp. 2620-2623) https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC09222A
  53. Tan et al. (2014) Oxygen vacancy enhanced photocatalytic activity of pervoskite SrTiO3 (pp. 19184-19190) https://doi.org/10.1021/am5051907
  54. Gu et al. (2017) Defects enhanced photocatalytic performances in SrTiO3 using laser-melting treatment (pp. 748-756) https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.461
  55. Jafari et al. (2016) Photocatalytic water splitting—the untamed dream: a review of recent advance https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21070900
  56. Wang et al. (2014) Band gap engineering of SrTiO3 for water splitting under visible light irradiation (pp. 12507-12514) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.059
  57. Shi et al. (2018) Bi2O3/BiFeO3 heterostructure: preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic activity (pp. 1327-1337) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-018-0384-z
  58. Li et al. (2015) State-of-the-art progress in diverse heterostructured photocatalysts toward promoting photocatalytic performance (pp. 998-1013) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201401636
  59. Prabhakar Vattikuti et al. (2016) ZrO2/MoS2 heterojunction photocatalysts for efficient photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (pp. 812-823) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-016-6267-y
  60. Hu et al. (2010) Coating colloidal carbon spheres with CdS nanoparticles: microwave-assisted synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic activity (pp. 18570-18575) https://doi.org/10.1021/la103191y
  61. Cao et al. (2011) Carbon nanoparticles as visible-light photocatalysts for efficient CO2 conversion and beyond (pp. 4754-4757) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja200804h